GOP Sen. Kit Bond voted to confirm crime-coddling Attorney General Eric Holder on February 2, 2009.
Sen. Bond cluelessly explained that Holder was “a good listener.” As I reported at the time, 19 Bend Over Republicans joined the majority to install Holder as head of the Obama Justice Department. Let me refresh your memories:
Now, Sen. Bond and several others on this list are whining that Holder didn’t pay attention to their entreaties against appointing a special prosecutor to investigate the CIA. Just received the following letter to Holder from Bond and Company. So much for those good listening skills, eh?
Kyl, Bond, Sessions Respond to AG Holder’s Decision to Appoint a Special Prosecutor to Investigate CIA
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Whip Jon Kyl (Ariz.), U.S. Senator Kit Bond (R-Mo.), Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and other senators today sent the following letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder in response to his decision to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate CIA officials who interrogated al Qaeda terrorists:
“We are deeply disappointed by today’s announcement that you have chosen to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate CIA officials who interrogated al Qaeda terrorists. As we explained to you in a letter dated August 19, 2009, reopening those cases—which career prosecutors have already determined do not warrant criminal prosecution—could, among other things, have a chilling effect on the work of the intelligence community.
“We believe that the concerns raised in our letter warranted, at a minimum, careful consideration and a reasoned response. Instead, you moved forward without responding to our concerns or discussing with a coordinate branch of government the potential national security consequences that may result if the intelligence community is operating against a backdrop of prosecutions. The handling of this important issue calls into question your confirmation hearing commitments that you would establish a ‘full partnership’ with Congress and that you ‘recognize that congressional oversight and judicial review are necessary, beneficial attributes of our system of government.’
“Wholly apart from whether this issue should have been reopened, the manner in which you have chosen to do so is itself troubling. In the ordinary course, criminal investigations and prosecutions are to be handled by career Justice Department officials working under the oversight of the Department’s senior management. The Department’s own regulations permit deviation from the “normal processes of the Department” and the appointment of a special prosecutor only where there is a ‘conflict of interest for the Department’ or other such extraordinary circumstances. 28 CFR § 600.1. Because there is no apparent conflict of interest here, the customary basis for a special prosecutor is lacking.
“Moreover, history has shown that special prosecutors, who lack the accountability of career prosecutors to Justice Department management, often take an expansive view of their investigative authority. Thus, despite your assurances that this investigation will be narrow and focused, there is a real risk that today’s announcement portends a long, arduous, and unpredictable process for the intelligence community. By delegating the prosecutorial function to a largely unchecked special prosecutor, you are responsible for having set a course that may diminish our intelligence efforts, which fundamentally rely on forward-leaning responses to national security concerns.
“We fear that the true cost of this endeavor will ultimately be borne by the American people, who rely on the intelligence community, operating without distraction, to protect them from the many threats, known and unknown, that our country faces in this post-9/11 world.”
U.S. Senators Richard Burr (R-N.C.), Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) also signed onto the letter.
On August 19, these same senators sent a letter to Attorney General Holder emphasizing the danger and consequences of taking such action as was announced today. As of today, no reply has been received.
Message to Holder-confirming GOP Senators. You should have known better then.
You have some nerve complaining now.blog comments powered by Disqus
Transparency: Eric Holder runs for White House cover; obtains executive privilege over Fast&Furious docs; Update: AG letter added; Video flashback – Obama on executive privilege; Update: House panel votes 23-17 to place Holder in contempt
June 20, 2012 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin
House moving forward with afternoon contempt vote against Holder; Update: Holder found in contempt; 17 Dems vote yes, rest walk out without voting
June 28, 2012 01:00 PM by Doug Powers
June 27, 2012 01:11 PM by Doug Powers
January 29, 2013 07:16 PM by Doug Powers
June 15, 2012 08:21 AM by Michelle Malkin
Green Room» Howard Dean: “Benghazi is a laughable joke”
Daily Caller» After cricket liberation prank, high schoolers barred from commencement
Green Room» Time for a team huddle: Lefty bloggers/journos head to the White House
Daily Caller» ‘Yes we can’ chant breaks out as Senate panel passes immigration bill
Gay Patriot» Let’s Help The Dogs of Oklahoma City!
Daily Caller» Italian shotgun company says reports that its president was mistaken as a terrorist ‘absolutely false’
Gay Patriot» Tom Coburn: My Hero
Gay Patriot» Clint Eastwood Vindicated!