<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marshall C. Sanford, will you PLEASE GO NOW!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarEagle82</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-791613</link>
		<dc:creator>WarEagle82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-791613</guid>
		<description>I suspect that the charges of misuse of government assets and funds will turn out to be overstated if not completely fabricated.  It is a convenient lever to use against someone who is now wildly unpopular.  

The problem is the guy is now completely ineffective.  If the Lt. Governor is also a slime-ball then I guess trading one slime-ball for another may teach the good people of South Carolina to stop voting for slime-balls!  

Frankly, it is time all of us learned that lesson.  We have a chance to demonstrate our ability to learn in 2010 and again in 2012.  Time will tell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that the charges of misuse of government assets and funds will turn out to be overstated if not completely fabricated.  It is a convenient lever to use against someone who is now wildly unpopular.  </p>
<p>The problem is the guy is now completely ineffective.  If the Lt. Governor is also a slime-ball then I guess trading one slime-ball for another may teach the good people of South Carolina to stop voting for slime-balls!  </p>
<p>Frankly, it is time all of us learned that lesson.  We have a chance to demonstrate our ability to learn in 2010 and again in 2012.  Time will tell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GraniteMan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-791168</link>
		<dc:creator>GraniteMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-791168</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt; His wife and children don&#039;t deserve what he is doing to them with this public humiliation. What an ego this dirt bag has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> His wife and children don&#8217;t deserve what he is doing to them with this public humiliation. What an ego this dirt bag has.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: love2rumba</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-791135</link>
		<dc:creator>love2rumba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-791135</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s not that I’m wrapping myself around him. I’m just not obsessing over him.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not obsessing either...nature takes care of its own.

&lt;blockquote&gt;He’s a man who made mistakes in his PERSONAL LIFE.

The more you talk about his ‘misuse of government funds’ the bigger the issue becomes. That’s not really important to you because he paid back the questionable amounts. The more you talk about it, the more legs this story will have. And the Dems will say it’s the republicans who think republicans are criminals.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How do you know what is important to me?

It was Sanford&#039;s actions that brought this imbroglio upon him...not me.. and not the next critic. Get it?

&lt;blockquote&gt;You have an issue with his ‘misuse of government funds’ because you are mad that he cheated on his wife.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I could honestly care less about his wife.  She made her life with him and she will have to deal with his adultery in whatever way she chooses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s not that I’m wrapping myself around him. I’m just not obsessing over him.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not obsessing either&#8230;nature takes care of its own.</p>
<blockquote><p>He’s a man who made mistakes in his PERSONAL LIFE.</p>
<p>The more you talk about his ‘misuse of government funds’ the bigger the issue becomes. That’s not really important to you because he paid back the questionable amounts. The more you talk about it, the more legs this story will have. And the Dems will say it’s the republicans who think republicans are criminals.</p></blockquote>
<p>How do you know what is important to me?</p>
<p>It was Sanford&#8217;s actions that brought this imbroglio upon him&#8230;not me.. and not the next critic. Get it?</p>
<blockquote><p>You have an issue with his ‘misuse of government funds’ because you are mad that he cheated on his wife.</p></blockquote>
<p>I could honestly care less about his wife.  She made her life with him and she will have to deal with his adultery in whatever way she chooses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtsEdge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-791111</link>
		<dc:creator>MtsEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-791111</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On August 26th, 2009 at 4:01 pm, WarEagle82 said: 
I cannot imagine why Sanford is so determined to cling to any last vestige of power. He is toast for at least the next decade and probably for life. Why won’t he just clear the decks and let South Carolina get on with business without the soap opera? 

Is it really necessary to put everyone through this mess until the end of his term? 

I mean even Spitzer had the decency to resign!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agreed.  Every time I see this guy on TV, I cringe.  If he would resign, at least he could retain a semblance of dignity.  But to continue to whine and babble about how much the state &quot;needs him&quot; after he abdicated his responsibility to fly to Argentina to satisfy his lust, is just too much to bear.  He abandoned his responsibility, deceived and defrauded the people of South Carolina, and has brought shame to himself and to his family, as well as to his state.  TIME.TO.GO.

I remember all too well the sordid details of our fine president Clinton who shamed our country with his inability to control himself, and his penchant for lying.  For months on end, the nation was treated to a nightly parade of trash talk.  As a direct result of Clinton&#039;s actions, our public standards of decency were permanently lowered.  Now we have Sanford who can&#039;t even see why he should no longer hold the public trust, after he threw it away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On August 26th, 2009 at 4:01 pm, WarEagle82 said:<br />
I cannot imagine why Sanford is so determined to cling to any last vestige of power. He is toast for at least the next decade and probably for life. Why won’t he just clear the decks and let South Carolina get on with business without the soap opera? </p>
<p>Is it really necessary to put everyone through this mess until the end of his term? </p>
<p>I mean even Spitzer had the decency to resign!</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed.  Every time I see this guy on TV, I cringe.  If he would resign, at least he could retain a semblance of dignity.  But to continue to whine and babble about how much the state &#8220;needs him&#8221; after he abdicated his responsibility to fly to Argentina to satisfy his lust, is just too much to bear.  He abandoned his responsibility, deceived and defrauded the people of South Carolina, and has brought shame to himself and to his family, as well as to his state.  TIME.TO.GO.</p>
<p>I remember all too well the sordid details of our fine president Clinton who shamed our country with his inability to control himself, and his penchant for lying.  For months on end, the nation was treated to a nightly parade of trash talk.  As a direct result of Clinton&#8217;s actions, our public standards of decency were permanently lowered.  Now we have Sanford who can&#8217;t even see why he should no longer hold the public trust, after he threw it away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-791104</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-791104</guid>
		<description>Our former gov&#039;s wife was given a cushy job at a state college.  They made the job up for her (200,000/year).  When outrage forced them to get rid of her, they didn&#039;t refill the position.

I could continue about WHY our D speaker is now in JAIL (not impeached, in JAIL). . . but I&#039;ve seen gov corruption.  Sanford&#039;s is tame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our former gov&#8217;s wife was given a cushy job at a state college.  They made the job up for her (200,000/year).  When outrage forced them to get rid of her, they didn&#8217;t refill the position.</p>
<p>I could continue about WHY our D speaker is now in JAIL (not impeached, in JAIL). . . but I&#8217;ve seen gov corruption.  Sanford&#8217;s is tame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-791101</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-791101</guid>
		<description>You have an issue with his &#039;misuse of government funds&#039; because you are mad that he cheated on his wife.  He&#039;s come clean on the funds he&#039;s used.

In NC, we are STILL investigating our former gov for misuse of funds.  His travel records for using highway patrol funds for the entire year of 2005 are missing.  The feds are looking for them.  He was a D, his Lt. Gov is now the Gov and she&#039;s a D.  Lots of our D legislators are now in jail for violating federal law.

Again, I&#039;d trade our corruption for this &#039;corruption&#039; in a second.  But I&#039;m not wrapping myself around Sanford specifically.  I just don&#039;t think this issue is as important as people here seem to think it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have an issue with his &#8216;misuse of government funds&#8217; because you are mad that he cheated on his wife.  He&#8217;s come clean on the funds he&#8217;s used.</p>
<p>In NC, we are STILL investigating our former gov for misuse of funds.  His travel records for using highway patrol funds for the entire year of 2005 are missing.  The feds are looking for them.  He was a D, his Lt. Gov is now the Gov and she&#8217;s a D.  Lots of our D legislators are now in jail for violating federal law.</p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;d trade our corruption for this &#8216;corruption&#8217; in a second.  But I&#8217;m not wrapping myself around Sanford specifically.  I just don&#8217;t think this issue is as important as people here seem to think it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-791087</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-791087</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that I&#039;m wrapping myself around him.  I&#039;m just not obsessing over him.

To your bold points.  He doesn&#039;t represent &#039;conservatism&#039; unless you say he does.  If he&#039;s conservative, that&#039;s great. . . but he&#039;s not the sole arbiter of conservatism.

He&#039;s not wrapping himself in Republicanism.  His Lt. Gov is a R too who doesn&#039;t think he represents R&#039;s well.  You don&#039;t think he represents R&#039;s well.  He&#039;s a man who made mistakes in his PERSONAL LIFE.

The more you talk about his &#039;misuse of government funds&#039; the bigger the issue becomes.  That&#039;s not really important to you because he paid back the questionable amounts.  The more you talk about it, the more legs this story will have.  And the Dems will say it&#039;s the republicans who think republicans are criminals.

It&#039;s like the US investigating the CIA.  Why do your enemy&#039;s job for them?  Especially if it doesn&#039;t affect you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m wrapping myself around him.  I&#8217;m just not obsessing over him.</p>
<p>To your bold points.  He doesn&#8217;t represent &#8216;conservatism&#8217; unless you say he does.  If he&#8217;s conservative, that&#8217;s great. . . but he&#8217;s not the sole arbiter of conservatism.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not wrapping himself in Republicanism.  His Lt. Gov is a R too who doesn&#8217;t think he represents R&#8217;s well.  You don&#8217;t think he represents R&#8217;s well.  He&#8217;s a man who made mistakes in his PERSONAL LIFE.</p>
<p>The more you talk about his &#8216;misuse of government funds&#8217; the bigger the issue becomes.  That&#8217;s not really important to you because he paid back the questionable amounts.  The more you talk about it, the more legs this story will have.  And the Dems will say it&#8217;s the republicans who think republicans are criminals.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the US investigating the CIA.  Why do your enemy&#8217;s job for them?  Especially if it doesn&#8217;t affect you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonus Quote of the Day &#124; linkthe.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-791032</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonus Quote of the Day &#124; linkthe.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-791032</guid>
		<description>[...] Marshall C. Sanford, will you PLEASE GO NOW! (michellemalkin.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marshall C. Sanford, will you PLEASE GO NOW! (michellemalkin.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: love2rumba</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-791004</link>
		<dc:creator>love2rumba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-791004</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;thacker Agency said&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You still didn&#039;t answer my question that I highlighted in bold:  &lt;strong&gt;  For himself, his state, Conservatism, and yes the Republican Party, what political capital has Sanford created by being obstinate in his refusal to resign in the wake of his affair and his possible misuse of state funds and authority?
&lt;/strong&gt;

That is &lt;strong&gt;how will it benefit (re: gain political capital) for the above named parties to stay the course?&lt;/strong&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;The more importance you give to this issue, the worse it will be. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What?  You mean that if I just stop discussing it some dem isn&#039;t going to harp on this????? They&#039;d love him to stay on, just to weaken real conservatives in that state elsewhere longer term...and the longer term is what is important.



The bottom line is that he lied about the affair,and unless it can be proven that his affair &lt;strong&gt;solely came out of his salary as governor&lt;/strong&gt;, he still has legal problems which are in fact impeachable, which if he does not resign, is a probability for he has become a liability to himself, his wife, his party. Moreover, his continual babbling about his Christian faith-which he tore to shreds like a dimwit-has destroyed his credibility.

Governor Sanford needs a shrink, not be kept in office.

He&#039;s an embarrassment. Right now he is deluded beyond belief.  

If you want to wrap yourself around this guy, you can go ahead and do so. Again, I do not know what you are going to gain by it.

Other than for the above, thank you for chirping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>thacker Agency said</p></blockquote>
<p>You still didn&#8217;t answer my question that I highlighted in bold:  <strong>  For himself, his state, Conservatism, and yes the Republican Party, what political capital has Sanford created by being obstinate in his refusal to resign in the wake of his affair and his possible misuse of state funds and authority?<br />
</strong></p>
<p>That is <strong>how will it benefit (re: gain political capital) for the above named parties to stay the course?</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>The more importance you give to this issue, the worse it will be.
</p></blockquote>
<p>What?  You mean that if I just stop discussing it some dem isn&#8217;t going to harp on this????? They&#8217;d love him to stay on, just to weaken real conservatives in that state elsewhere longer term&#8230;and the longer term is what is important.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that he lied about the affair,and unless it can be proven that his affair <strong>solely came out of his salary as governor</strong>, he still has legal problems which are in fact impeachable, which if he does not resign, is a probability for he has become a liability to himself, his wife, his party. Moreover, his continual babbling about his Christian faith-which he tore to shreds like a dimwit-has destroyed his credibility.</p>
<p>Governor Sanford needs a shrink, not be kept in office.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s an embarrassment. Right now he is deluded beyond belief.  </p>
<p>If you want to wrap yourself around this guy, you can go ahead and do so. Again, I do not know what you are going to gain by it.</p>
<p>Other than for the above, thank you for chirping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8 My Foot</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-790962</link>
		<dc:creator>8 My Foot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-790962</guid>
		<description>I think he should stay right where he is. Democrats have done worse. You know, like murdering innocent women by drowning them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he should stay right where he is. Democrats have done worse. You know, like murdering innocent women by drowning them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-790841</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-790841</guid>
		<description>love2rumba said: 

I&#039;m a little cricket and I&#039;m going to chirp for you.

He&#039;s not that important.  He only stands for those things if YOU say he stands for those things.

He didn&#039;t do anything illegal.  I didn&#039;t think Clinton did anything illegal by having an affair either.  Silly me, when I said Clinton&#039;s impeachment didn&#039;t have anything to do with sex, I meant it.  You must not have.

Apparently an individual&#039;s sex life is important to you.  It shouldn&#039;t be.

Does he do his job?  If so, drop it.  If not, impeach him.  He&#039;s not going to resign.  The main guy leading his impeachment has the most to gain, and they have never gotten along.  It is local politics that gained national prominence because of the liberal media. 

The liberal media want to smear &#039;the right&#039;.  The more importance you give to this issue, the worse it will be.  

He&#039;s the governor.  You are not.  Get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love2rumba said: </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little cricket and I&#8217;m going to chirp for you.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not that important.  He only stands for those things if YOU say he stands for those things.</p>
<p>He didn&#8217;t do anything illegal.  I didn&#8217;t think Clinton did anything illegal by having an affair either.  Silly me, when I said Clinton&#8217;s impeachment didn&#8217;t have anything to do with sex, I meant it.  You must not have.</p>
<p>Apparently an individual&#8217;s sex life is important to you.  It shouldn&#8217;t be.</p>
<p>Does he do his job?  If so, drop it.  If not, impeach him.  He&#8217;s not going to resign.  The main guy leading his impeachment has the most to gain, and they have never gotten along.  It is local politics that gained national prominence because of the liberal media. </p>
<p>The liberal media want to smear &#8216;the right&#8217;.  The more importance you give to this issue, the worse it will be.  </p>
<p>He&#8217;s the governor.  You are not.  Get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: love2rumba</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-790830</link>
		<dc:creator>love2rumba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-790830</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The fact that Dems get caught up in more and worse scandals doesn’t make Sanford less wrong. He needs to go. 

If South Carolinians were a were stupid enough to elect another slime-ball as Lt. Governor they will have a chance to rectify that mistake shortly. 

BTW, I am a South Carolinian by birth but I have not lived there in a very long time.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well said.  Another way to put it is to ask: &lt;strong&gt;For himself, his state, Conservatism, and yes the Republican Party, what political capital has Sanford created by being obstinate in his refusal to resign in the wake of his affair and his possible misuse of state funds and authority?&lt;/strong&gt;

If those that still support Sanford, as well as Sanford himself can give a reasonable answer to address the above question, then perhaps we too should continue to back him.

I think I&#039;m hearing crickets chirping, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The fact that Dems get caught up in more and worse scandals doesn’t make Sanford less wrong. He needs to go. </p>
<p>If South Carolinians were a were stupid enough to elect another slime-ball as Lt. Governor they will have a chance to rectify that mistake shortly. </p>
<p>BTW, I am a South Carolinian by birth but I have not lived there in a very long time.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Well said.  Another way to put it is to ask: <strong>For himself, his state, Conservatism, and yes the Republican Party, what political capital has Sanford created by being obstinate in his refusal to resign in the wake of his affair and his possible misuse of state funds and authority?</strong></p>
<p>If those that still support Sanford, as well as Sanford himself can give a reasonable answer to address the above question, then perhaps we too should continue to back him.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m hearing crickets chirping, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-790692</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-790692</guid>
		<description>Without googling, tell me who the NC governor is.

I&#039;d trade our governor for him any day of the week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without googling, tell me who the NC governor is.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d trade our governor for him any day of the week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-790688</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-790688</guid>
		<description>Why do you keep giving him press?  He&#039;s not going anywhere until the end of his term.  What difference does it make to you?

Hey, did you know it was Ramadan?  No?  Why not?  Maybe because you haven&#039;t had a post on it?  Maybe because it&#039;s not anywhere in any news?

Why do you know about this?  Because you keep beating a dead horse.  If you didn&#039;t give it attention it wouldn&#039;t matter.  You wouldn&#039;t know the SC governor just like you wouldn&#039;t know who most of the governors are.

I&#039;ll do my Dr. Seuss.

LET-IT-GO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you keep giving him press?  He&#8217;s not going anywhere until the end of his term.  What difference does it make to you?</p>
<p>Hey, did you know it was Ramadan?  No?  Why not?  Maybe because you haven&#8217;t had a post on it?  Maybe because it&#8217;s not anywhere in any news?</p>
<p>Why do you know about this?  Because you keep beating a dead horse.  If you didn&#8217;t give it attention it wouldn&#8217;t matter.  You wouldn&#8217;t know the SC governor just like you wouldn&#8217;t know who most of the governors are.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll do my Dr. Seuss.</p>
<p>LET-IT-GO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Ma</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/26/marshall-c-sanford-will-you-please-go-now/comment-page-1/#comment-790663</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Ma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33223#comment-790663</guid>
		<description>At 2:37 pm, &lt;strong&gt;granite&lt;/strong&gt; said:

Gotta love Cromwell&#039;s speech.  How about this: We march on Washington, take back our government, and give that speech to a joint session of Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 2:37 pm, <strong>granite</strong> said:</p>
<p>Gotta love Cromwell&#8217;s speech.  How about this: We march on Washington, take back our government, and give that speech to a joint session of Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

