<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cone of Shame Award repeat: The intransigence of Mark Sanford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Cone of Shame Award winner: (Former) GOP Rep. Christopher Lee</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-1052670</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Cone of Shame Award winner: (Former) GOP Rep. Christopher Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-1052670</guid>
		<description>[...] Looks like another one for the growing list of GOP Cone of Shame Award [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Looks like another one for the growing list of GOP Cone of Shame Award [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE BOTTOM TEN: 2009 YEAR IN REVIEW &#124; REPUBLICAN REDEFINED</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-863872</link>
		<dc:creator>THE BOTTOM TEN: 2009 YEAR IN REVIEW &#124; REPUBLICAN REDEFINED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-863872</guid>
		<description>[...] you could dream of being, I would say that you had one of the worst years out there. To say your 2009 was rough would do a great disservice to rough years everywhere, but when will you ever learn to just go away [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you could dream of being, I would say that you had one of the worst years out there. To say your 2009 was rough would do a great disservice to rough years everywhere, but when will you ever learn to just go away [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; David Letterman blackmailed over alleged affairs</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-816064</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; David Letterman blackmailed over alleged affairs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-816064</guid>
		<description>[...] Flashback: Letterman mocking Mark Sanford&#8217;s infidelity (as yes, I still want Sanford to go!)&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flashback: Letterman mocking Mark Sanford&#8217;s infidelity (as yes, I still want Sanford to go!)&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerLady</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-794218</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-794218</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Michelle said He lied to his family. He lied to his staff. He lied to his constituents. He manipulated government officials and abused taxpayer funds.&lt;blockquote&gt;

This is not about a conservative who had sex outside of his marriage.  And personally, I have no plans to &quot;get over&quot; my feelings in this area. This is a moral, legal and ethical issue.

Do I care if Mark Sanford cheated on his wife. Not a whit.  I didn&#039;t care when Clinton had sex with Monica in the oval office. I do care that he lied about it. I do care that his actions degraded the presidency and reduced it to a joke on a late night show.  I care about how my country and its citizens are perceived in this country and around the world.
Call me naive but I believe that an elected official should be one who has high moral character and integrity.  Mark Sanford apparently has neither.

I am tired of hearing that my Christian values are tired and out of date.   Just because all conservatives are not happily married and monogamous Christians doesn&#039;t mean anything to me. I am not guided by herd mentality. 

The only thing I agreed with in your statement is to turn the camera off.  Let Mr. Sanford be his own punishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Michelle said He lied to his family. He lied to his staff. He lied to his constituents. He manipulated government officials and abused taxpayer funds.<br />
<blockquote>
<p>This is not about a conservative who had sex outside of his marriage.  And personally, I have no plans to &#8220;get over&#8221; my feelings in this area. This is a moral, legal and ethical issue.</p>
<p>Do I care if Mark Sanford cheated on his wife. Not a whit.  I didn&#8217;t care when Clinton had sex with Monica in the oval office. I do care that he lied about it. I do care that his actions degraded the presidency and reduced it to a joke on a late night show.  I care about how my country and its citizens are perceived in this country and around the world.<br />
Call me naive but I believe that an elected official should be one who has high moral character and integrity.  Mark Sanford apparently has neither.</p>
<p>I am tired of hearing that my Christian values are tired and out of date.   Just because all conservatives are not happily married and monogamous Christians doesn&#8217;t mean anything to me. I am not guided by herd mentality. </p>
<p>The only thing I agreed with in your statement is to turn the camera off.  Let Mr. Sanford be his own punishment.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldcollegeguy1980</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-794031</link>
		<dc:creator>oldcollegeguy1980</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-794031</guid>
		<description>Sex and the conservative.

This is a topic that should be addressed openly at some point though.

All conservatives are not happily, married monogamous christians.  

Nor should they be.

Sexually they are the same as any other group. A mixed bag, a very mixed bag.  

If I had been Gov Sanford, instead of crying and getting all torn up at the outing of the affair.  I would have winked at the camera, smiled and said &quot;yeah I slept with her and shes hot.&quot;  

His marriage is over anyways at that point.   Yeah he screwed up. Join the club.  

The sooner we as conservatives get over ourselves in this area the better. I do not care if this guy had sex with anyone above the age of majority, who is capable of making a consensual decision.  I don&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sex and the conservative.</p>
<p>This is a topic that should be addressed openly at some point though.</p>
<p>All conservatives are not happily, married monogamous christians.  </p>
<p>Nor should they be.</p>
<p>Sexually they are the same as any other group. A mixed bag, a very mixed bag.  </p>
<p>If I had been Gov Sanford, instead of crying and getting all torn up at the outing of the affair.  I would have winked at the camera, smiled and said &#8220;yeah I slept with her and shes hot.&#8221;  </p>
<p>His marriage is over anyways at that point.   Yeah he screwed up. Join the club.  </p>
<p>The sooner we as conservatives get over ourselves in this area the better. I do not care if this guy had sex with anyone above the age of majority, who is capable of making a consensual decision.  I don&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldcollegeguy1980</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-794025</link>
		<dc:creator>oldcollegeguy1980</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-794025</guid>
		<description>I could not care less about this guys or anyone elses sex life. 

I just wish he would shut the h@#! up about it. He sounds foolish and childish.

He is like a teenager who has little experience in this area and has lost a girlfriend and is now wandering around aimlessly talking about it to anyone who will listen.  Enough already.

And just like that teenager, he has talked so much, that he has now alienated anyone who actually cared for him, and now is talking to the &quot;cruel kids,&quot; who only want to seem sympathetic so they can ridicule him.

Enough already. Put the guy on suicide watch and turn the cameras off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not care less about this guys or anyone elses sex life. </p>
<p>I just wish he would shut the h@#! up about it. He sounds foolish and childish.</p>
<p>He is like a teenager who has little experience in this area and has lost a girlfriend and is now wandering around aimlessly talking about it to anyone who will listen.  Enough already.</p>
<p>And just like that teenager, he has talked so much, that he has now alienated anyone who actually cared for him, and now is talking to the &#8220;cruel kids,&#8221; who only want to seem sympathetic so they can ridicule him.</p>
<p>Enough already. Put the guy on suicide watch and turn the cameras off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightisright</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-793645</link>
		<dc:creator>rightisright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-793645</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Come on libtards! Do it NOW! You missed your chance with the “Liar of the Senate,” Teddy Kennedy. Don’t let this opportunity pass! Impeach them before they die!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s democrat party way of cleaning house, when the culprit dies, like Ted(the puke) Kennedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Come on libtards! Do it NOW! You missed your chance with the “Liar of the Senate,” Teddy Kennedy. Don’t let this opportunity pass! Impeach them before they die!</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s democrat party way of cleaning house, when the culprit dies, like Ted(the puke) Kennedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-793609</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-793609</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wow. Just wow.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah. Thacker misses the point and ignores the book (MM&#039;s major work) completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wow. Just wow.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah. Thacker misses the point and ignores the book (MM&#8217;s major work) completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerLady</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-793583</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-793583</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; ThackerAgency said:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow. Just wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> ThackerAgency said:</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow. Just wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-793554</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-793554</guid>
		<description>And let me add that this particular trait of MM is specifically what makes women &lt;strong&gt;weaker leaders&lt;/strong&gt; than men.  Yes, add sexist to the litany of things people call me.

I hope you win your Crusade here.  Of course I don&#039;t know what you will &#039;win&#039; specifically.  But you have lost a lot of respect from me.  I&#039;m not defending Sanford, but what he did does not rise to the level of condemnation that you give it.

I assume based on your posts that you too think that Clinton was impeached for sex as well.  What a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And let me add that this particular trait of MM is specifically what makes women <strong>weaker leaders</strong> than men.  Yes, add sexist to the litany of things people call me.</p>
<p>I hope you win your Crusade here.  Of course I don&#8217;t know what you will &#8216;win&#8217; specifically.  But you have lost a lot of respect from me.  I&#8217;m not defending Sanford, but what he did does not rise to the level of condemnation that you give it.</p>
<p>I assume based on your posts that you too think that Clinton was impeached for sex as well.  What a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-793548</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-793548</guid>
		<description>I am really surprised at the pettiness and vindictiveness of your quest for your own perceived &#039;justice&#039; here that won&#039;t make any difference in your life.

I know you are riding high with your book sales.  I know it is America&#039;s favorite past time to condemn.

But I am quite disappointed with the sheer vitriol you show this man.

This is a prime example of how America builds someone up just to tear them down.  The only reason you care was because you wanted to support him.

He did nothing to you personally.  His being removed from office means nothing to your life whatsoever.  It is a shame that of all the things to be outraged about concerning this government, this is what you choose.

Frankly, I don&#039;t understand it.  And frankly, it makes me reconsider your ability to distinguish between what is important and what is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really surprised at the pettiness and vindictiveness of your quest for your own perceived &#8216;justice&#8217; here that won&#8217;t make any difference in your life.</p>
<p>I know you are riding high with your book sales.  I know it is America&#8217;s favorite past time to condemn.</p>
<p>But I am quite disappointed with the sheer vitriol you show this man.</p>
<p>This is a prime example of how America builds someone up just to tear them down.  The only reason you care was because you wanted to support him.</p>
<p>He did nothing to you personally.  His being removed from office means nothing to your life whatsoever.  It is a shame that of all the things to be outraged about concerning this government, this is what you choose.</p>
<p>Frankly, I don&#8217;t understand it.  And frankly, it makes me reconsider your ability to distinguish between what is important and what is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaded</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-793516</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-793516</guid>
		<description>The sooner this embarrassment is sent home to his wife and lover the better off the state will be.  This guy is a true tool, it&#039;s all about him forget about the constituents.  I cannot believe he is a Republican with that type of thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sooner this embarrassment is sent home to his wife and lover the better off the state will be.  This guy is a true tool, it&#8217;s all about him forget about the constituents.  I cannot believe he is a Republican with that type of thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorro</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-793096</link>
		<dc:creator>zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-793096</guid>
		<description>Marshall C. Sanford has disgraced himself and his continued presence only soils the beautiful state house of his fine state.  Mr. Sanford; do the right thing, resign now.  Today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall C. Sanford has disgraced himself and his continued presence only soils the beautiful state house of his fine state.  Mr. Sanford; do the right thing, resign now.  Today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogue Cheddar</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-793076</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue Cheddar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-793076</guid>
		<description>Come on Mark! Teddy finally did the right thing, why can&#039;t you?  Ooh! Too soon? :shock:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Mark! Teddy finally did the right thing, why can&#8217;t you?  Ooh! Too soon? <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/28/the-intransigence-of-mark-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-793063</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=33333#comment-793063</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;TigerLady said: 
By george, enjem24, you may have cracked the nut that is RSS.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wish. Even I&#039;m not that good. I&#039;m just an amateur.

And RSS is a whole new kind of nut slightly lgmesque but with a rough-hewn finish. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>TigerLady said:<br />
By george, enjem24, you may have cracked the nut that is RSS.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wish. Even I&#8217;m not that good. I&#8217;m just an amateur.</p>
<p>And RSS is a whole new kind of nut slightly lgmesque but with a rough-hewn finish. <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

