(and so is every coal fired power plant in the world…)

If we can just get those millions of cows to stop f*rting, life would be all unicorns, butterfiles and rainbows.

Whether plants are eaten by cows, burned, or simply die and decay, they release carbon back into the environment. Plants absorb carbon while growing and release it when decaying. Cows speed up the process a bit but the net result is the same whether the plants are digested or decayed. It’s part of the cycle of life. You might be able to slow down the process but you can’t stop it.

That explains WHY plants in commerical greenhouses do so much better at 1000 or 1200 PPM than how they do in outside air at only ~400 PPM – THEY EXSITED FOR A LONG TIME AT MUCH HIGHER LEVELS.

Just doubling CO2 over what it is now produces amazing results in plant growth and health.

Liberals CANNOT escape this simple truth – plants in today’s climate are CO2 IMPOVERISHED.

Earth’s atmosphere today contains about 380 ppm CO2 (0.038%). Compared to former geologic times, our present atmosphere, like the Late Carboniferous atmosphere, is CO2- impoverished! In the last 600 million years of Earth’s history only the Carboniferous Period and our present age, the Quaternary Period, have witnessed CO2 levels less than 400 ppm.

So what the liberals call ‘green’ is an attack on plant life! To them ‘green’ means starving plants; denying them the CO2 their genetics want more of.

It cannot get any clearer than this – this liberal LIE about ‘green’ relating to CO2 has to be exposed for what it actually means to plant life- those green things.

If we can just get those millions of cows to stop f*rting liberal Democrats to stop speaking, life would be all unicorns, butterfiles and rainbows.

FIFY

Newsbusters did a great analysis of how ABC smeared her by editting the part of the interview concerning Russia but I can’t find anything on the climate part of the interview? (The link to Mark Levin’s show website is 404 and all references to it in his site search appear to be scrubbed???)

As I recall, her actual full response was very good, something like – there MAY be a human factor that affects the climate but we don’t know whether our affect is 90% or 10%. But now all I can find is edited garbage.

On September 1st, 2009 at 12:06 am, happy2behere said:

If we can just get those millions of cows to stop f*rting, life would be all unicorns, butterfiles and rainbows.

Beano?

On August 31st, 2009 at 6:13 pm, Bicyea said:
I wish those icecaps would hurry up and melt and raise the sea levels. Two miles and I will have a beach front property!

I wouldn’t hold my breath. The maximum sea level rise if this pseudoscience is correct would be about 30 inches.

This is full of “possibles,” “estimateds,” “suggesteds,” and other BS.

ECS
“Iron Hand is feet dry.”

League of Conservation Voters?

Now these ecoterrorist, chicken little watermelons have co-opted the word Conservationist?

No, no, no, NO Mr. Karpinski, a conservationist deals in REALITY, an econutcase deals with junk science, snake oil, and demonizing anything you can’t wring a buck out of by putting the word “Big” in front of it. Which is why I’m attacking global warming advocates… or in Mr. Karpinski’s terminology Big Ignorance

On August 31st, 2009 at 6:13 pm, Bicyea said:

I wish those icecaps would hurry up and melt and raise the sea levels. Two miles and I will have a beach front property!

Party!