Video: Rep. Pete Stark tells interviewer, “Get the f**k out of here or I’ll throw you out the window”

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 3, 2009 10:07 AM

stark

Longtime readers of this blog are well aware of California Democrat Rep. Pete Stark (Raving Mad)’s unhingedness.

He has called a Republican opponent a “c**ksucker”, left a profanity-laced message on a constituent’s voicemail, and suggested on the floor of the House that Republicans are sending men and women to Iraq “to get their heads blown off for the president’s amusement.”

He’s an unrepentant basket case — and everything that’s wrong with Washington.

Here’s fresh proof from an independent TV documentarian Jan Helfeld, whose Socratic interviewing techniques cause Stark to engage in another trademark tirade. Helfeld asks Stark about the national debt and the economy. Stark tells him repeatedly to “shut up,” sneers at Helfeld’s lack of an advanced economic degree, and ends the interview by bolting from his chair and telling Helfeld to “Get the f**k out of here or I’ll throw you out the window:”

Hat tip: darknight3565.

Zero Hedge weighs in:

“A line that will now live forever, thanks to Congressman Stark: “The more debt we owe, the wealthier we are”.

That pretty much sums up political “thought[.]“

***

Update: Apparently, the vid has been around a while — but it’s a wonderful exclamation point on the long, hot Congressional recess and the Democrat reaction to town hall protesters, which has exposed the arrogance virus shared by Stark and his colleagues.

Here’s more info on Helfeld.

Posted in: Democrats, Unhinged

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Substratum
  2. Founding Bloggers
  3. The Clampdown
  4. Jeremiah Films
  5. Ace of Spades HQ
  6. Ed Driscoll
  7. Verum Serum

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #798213
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:20 am, xler8bmw said:

    What an obnoxious, self rightous, pompous, obstinate, (Too many words to add) A$$

  2. #798215
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:23 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    What a crass, filthy, excuse for a human being, let alone a Congressman. The fact that this kind of scum can keep getting re-elected to Congress speaks worse about the state of our nation than anything else I can imagine.

  3. #798217
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:25 am, HomeoftheBrave said:

    And this ladies and gentlemen, is the poster-child for our elected federal officials, the majority of which infest the highest offices in our country. All the clips I have seen are Socialist/Marxist/Democrats. I have not seen a Conservative go “off the reservation”. Anyone who knows of a recent clip, please let me know. Just trying to confirm that this is a left-wing sickness that we have to cure over the next few years….

  4. #798218
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:26 am, TooMuchTime said:

    In the mid-1990s, a group of moronic “economists” said that countries would be better off accumulating debt. A co-worker and I used to have pretty good discussions about conservative vs. liberal. I explained we needed to balance the gov’t budget. He countered with the “study” mentioned above.

    It’s interesting that even liberals balance their personal budget but somehow give the gov’t a pass. Intelligent people balance their own budget and demand the same from their gov’t.

    Now, Stark “Raving Mad” has given us proof of the complete stupidity of socialsts.

    Regime change begins at home! Come on 2010!

  5. #798221
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:28 am, granite said:

    “…or I’ll throw you out the window:”

    Isn’t that a threat?

    Is not threatening to lay hands upon someone considered to fall under the legal definition of assault?

  6. #798222
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:29 am, J S Ragman said:

    “The more debt we owe, the wealthier we are”.

    Yep, that’s a Cal Berkeley MBA talking.

  7. #798223
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:29 am, frontierguy said:

    sneers at Helfeld’s lack of an advanced economic degree

    True liberal democrat form. His district must be full of people who are so much better than anyone else, we should thank them for being alive, and gracing our country as our betters.

  8. #798224
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:30 am, Kingfish said:

    The more you owe, the wealthier you are.

    Just goes to prove that people who paint the sky green and the grass blue deserve to be sterilized.

    What an absolute disgrace

  9. #798225
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:32 am, flmom said:

    Thursday must be Congress-Critters-Who-Have-Been-in-Washington-Too-Long Day. Here we have exhibit #2 for the case of term limits, note the advanced case of arrogance, Stark needs to go.

  10. #798227
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:35 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Talk about reaction to Townhall protestors, here is our local media reporting on a 65 y.o. man getting his finger bit off by a Moveon.org zealot.

    A witness from the scene says a man was walking through the anti-reform group to get to the pro-reform side when he got into an altercation with the 65-year-old, who opposes health care reform.

    Anyone see a problem with this report? He just “happened” to walk through the anti-reform group for a short-cut? H-m-m-m. Nothing fishy about that! There is no chance at all that he did or said anything
    offensive/provocative?

    I’ll bet that this unnamed witness was also a MoveOn.org agitator. Not that these guys have any history of provoking violence.

  11. #798228
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:36 am, Weary Citizen said:

    Wow. I finally understand why we are in such debt. Thinking like that is unbelieveable. The gov’t can spend $ more wisely than private enterprise? The more debt we take on the more wealthier we become? National finance are totally differnt than an individual’s finances (only in that a gov’t can inflate away their debt)? Where do we find such morons, and what idiots vote for these morons. Unbelievable, the level of ignorance combined with arrogance (a lethal mix) running our country.

  12. #798229
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:37 am, happyscrapper said:

    Oh, yeah…real classy. A perfect example of what has happened to the radical left in this country. They have completely lost their moral compass and don’t see anything wrong with this kind of behavior. The foul language is one manifestation of the rot going on underneath. It is so much a part of their being, that the “f” word is just a regularly used adjective. No big deal. These people have no idea how sleazy they really are. We need to remind them on a regular basis!!

  13. #798232
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:38 am, Roland said:

    Egad. A True Believer. Nothing like an arrogant ignoramous elitist.

    Like all modern Democrats, Stark thinks the strategy for stimulating the economy out of a conventional slowdown must be a good long term strategy, too. And like all modern Democrats, he thinks the way to stimulate the economy is by increasing the size of government rather than cutting taxes.

    The last sane Democrat was JFK, and he was a sleeeeze.

  14. #798233
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:40 am, no2pcbs1 said:

    hey pete you pathetic gutless wonder there is an old saying in my neck of the woods, there ain’t nothing between us but air, so jump, boy.

  15. #798234
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:40 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Oh yes, the classy left. Always at a loss for real words.

  16. #798235
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:41 am, spaceycakes said:

    3 words:

    Cali.Forn.Ia

  17. #798239
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:44 am, RobM1981 said:

    I am so excited to have him making decisions about my Health Care.

    What do you think he’s going to tell an 89 year old Granny when she “wants” a knee replacement?

  18. #798242
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:45 am, DBNinKY said:

    Wasn’t Stark the guy caught on video threatening a fellow rep (a Midwest Republican, I think) with physical violence in a Capitol Hill dinning room?

  19. #798244
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:46 am, cicerokid said:

    He represents his constituency rather well, I’d say.

  20. #798250
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:52 am, RobM1981 said:

    Don’t threats of physical violence, if they can reasonably be construed as serious, qualify as “assault?”

  21. #798251
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:52 am, b-cat said:

    Stark tells him repeatedly to “shut up,” sneers at Helfeld’s lack of an advanced economic degree, and ends the interview by bolting from his chair and telling Helfeld to “Get the f**k out of here or I’ll throw you out the window:”

    The proper response: I sneer at your lack of an advanced martial arts degree; now go ahead and try, tough guy.

  22. #798256
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:55 am, swmntman said:

    Wow – what a condescending egotist! Reminds me of a humorless Ted Baxter. What is funny is the way he challenged the interviewer about his credentials, his school, and his intellect while spouting complete economic buffoonary. Haha – this was like an Saturday Night Live skit back when SNL was funny.

  23. #798260
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:55 am, xler8bmw said:
  24. #798263
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:57 am, moonsbreath said:

    Sooooo, that’s what happens to a man when he’s gone through a mid-life crisis.

  25. #798277
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:02 am, DaveC said:

    Pete Stark.. Not to be confused with Pete King.

    both are in the House.

  26. #798278
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:02 am, PhredE said:

    http://www.stark.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=613&Itemid=1

    The loon represents the East Bay area around SF (which isn’t saying much, of course, but I’m SOOOO glad I don’t live anywhere near his district…)

  27. #798280
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:03 am, happyscrapper said:

    Someone needs to call him on his threat, then let the baffoon hit him. He can then sue. Of course, the moron would have someone else do the actual physical dirty work. By the way, anger management is definitely warranted here and someone needs to do an intervention.

  28. #798281
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:03 am, Speakup said:

    The more you owe, the wealthier you are

    Only if you plan on default or if you consider the American taxpayer as your personal cash cow either way its theft.

  29. #798285
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:06 am, sonofdy said:

    The more you owe, the wealthier you are.

    Under that logic we should all be millionaires by now.

  30. #798286
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:06 am, BruceB said:

    The more u owe , the richer you are.

    How come I wasn’t in Forbe’s 500 richest people.

  31. #798287
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:07 am, spaceycakes said:

    The more you owe, the wealthier you are.

    This is all of us, next April 15th

  32. #798295
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:13 am, RedDog said:

    If little man had threatened to throw me out the window I would have invited him to try, and if he did – crushed him.
    This guy should be in a psych ward.

    “constitutional reforms please”

  33. #798304
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:18 am, FirstSkirt said:

    I hope Americans are finally realizing that any form or representative government died the day Bill Clinton took office. Stark is the rule, not the exception in our Congress today. Since they will not impose term limits on themselves, we will have to use the vote to do it for them. How despicable can dems get….first name calling, now physical threats. Republicans need to use this video in an ad for whoever runs against this elitist pig.

  34. #798307
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:20 am, infidel4life said:

    Stark is in need of the forced institutionalization a public option would provide. ;)

  35. #798315
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:24 am, ajmontana said:

    Fo shizzle yo, the dude has mad language skills. word. :roll:

  36. #798319
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:27 am, xler8bmw said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:06 am, sonofdy said:

    Actually he is semi correct. Some debt is good it helps strengthen your borrowing and spending power. But, the debt this country has now is unstastainable and out of control so his arguement is moot to try and get uppity that our current debt is good!

  37. #798327
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:31 am, Mark Harvey said:

    Good GOD ALMIGHTY! Pete Stark. When will people vote this FOOL out of office?

  38. #798328
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:31 am, McCloud9 said:

    I would PAY REAL U.S. CURRENCY, to see someone take Stark behind the woodshed.
    And one more thing… Stark needs to be reminded about that office he parks his butt in. IT BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE!
    You buddy are just renting it.

  39. #798329
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:31 am, jsr said:

    sneers at Helfeld’s lack of an advanced economic degree

    I know a few people with advanced economics degrees. They mostly work in restaurants, and it isn’t on the financial end of the business. The rest are always pursuing yet more advanced degrees and bounce from one job to another, always looking for the big break that will lead to some cushy government or university job. Most are saddled with huge loans from years of studying. I don’t think any of them feel wealthy from that debt either.

  40. #798339
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:35 am, Salt said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:27 am, xler8bmw said:

    Actually he is semi correct. Some debt is good it helps strengthen your borrowing and spending power. But, the debt this country has now is unstastainable and out of control so his arguement is moot to try and get uppity that our current debt is good!

    I agree on your latter point and would like to amend that it’s about one’s demonstrated ability to pay debts that strengthens your borrowing/spending power, not the amount of that debt.

    Trillion dollar deficits weaken that stance. Stark failed to adequately address that point. In fact, like most politicians, he readily endorsed borrowing even more money.

    One thing I did not hear him say: “Reduce spending”.

  41. #798349
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:45 am, xler8bmw said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:35 am, Salt said:

    I think we’re saying the same thing. Obviously if you have debt you have to demonstrate your ability to pay your debt. I worked for a company that had NO debt owned & operated in the black but, had limited spending power. So we put them into debt and borrowed to buy other radio stations. They now have a high borrowing and spending capability and are current with debt payoff.

    It’s the same thought how credit cards work. No credit even thought you’re in the black you have limited spending and borrowing power. You have credit cards with limited debt and current in paying debt you have better spending & borrowing power with a great credit rating. Too high of debt you lose your cedit rating from owing too much (where we are as a nation now)

  42. #798363
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:52 am, infidel4life said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:31 am, Mark Harvey said:

    Good GOD ALMIGHTY! Pete Stark. When will people vote this FOOL out of office?

    Don’t hold your breath. His district is in the S.F. Bay area, where the insanity of liberalism has rotted everyone’s brains.

  43. #798368
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:54 am, lgm said:

    We have both Cheney and McCain on tape using obscenity.

  44. #798374
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:57 am, Salt said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:54 am, lgm said:

    We have both Cheney and McCain on tape using obscenity.

    Tu Quoque, as usual.

    Is Rep. Stark a hero to you?

  45. #798378
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:59 am, xler8bmw said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:54 am, lgm said:

    Another stupid comment from the peanut gallery. This is a pattern w/this guy not just one heated moment. Also, his contempt and condescending towards someone he thought was below his intelligence level makes him the fool!

  46. #798384
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:02 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Here we go, LGM…your projection is that it’s okay for Dems to do it because the Repubs do it and worse. You are beyond help. This ISN’T about the obscenity, per se. It is about his total disregard for a constituent and lack of appreciation for the job he’s been GIVEN by the Americans in his district. Gee, it this has to be explained to you, you have OD’d and are beyond help
    Don’t have us quoting YOUR Highness Obama about using obscenity–there isn’t enough room on this blog. Just.Go.Away.

  47. #798386
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:03 pm, DBNinKY said:

    It really is delicious when the Left reveals its true inner self on video!

  48. #798387
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:04 pm, txvet2 said:

    Actually, I think Courtney probably meant the more in debt we are, the wealthier he gets, from his “campaign contributions” and other sources of “income” from grateful recipients of his largesse, as well as from the taxpayer money he steers into his own pocket.

  49. #798390
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:05 pm, Salt said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:04 pm, txvet2 said:

    A good thought, but I wouldn’t expect him to be even half as honest as to admit that.

  50. #798397
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:14 pm, granite said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:18 am, FirstSkirt said:

    …first name calling, now physical threats. Republicans need to use this video in an ad for whoever runs against this elitist pig.

    Yep.
    First thought I had, too.
    I just hope that RINOs won’t still be running things in campaigns; otherwise, this dangerous clown’s words will be buried – in fact, will be sent down the memory hole – never to see the light of day again.

  51. #798399
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:14 pm, sam.i.am said:

    I just called his DC office, spoke to someone named Analie (or something) and I told her about the video. She said “that video is 20-yrs old”. I had told her up-front that I was not a constituent of Rep. Stark. As the conversation went on she became more agitated. The last straw was when I asked if Rep. Stark still believes that the more debt we owe the wealthier we are.
    She said, “Since you are not a constituent, he has no comment.”
    I asked, “What if I were a reporter, would that change things?”
    She said, then I would direct you to his press office.” I said fine.
    Then she said, “Oh he’s out today, you’ll have to get the contact information off the internet. Good Day, Sir!” Then she hung up on me.

    It’s so easy (and FUN) to get under their skin!

  52. #798400
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:17 pm, rplatt said:

    Somebody is going to cal out that smart mouthed ass one of these day then we’ll see how tough he is.

  53. #798407
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:23 pm, cheapseat said:

    this is the same sort of thinking which convinces these morons on the left to turn their credit card purchases of pizza and underwear into a 30 year mortgage at only 5% per year.

  54. #798415
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:26 pm, Romeo13 said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:27 am, xler8bmw said:

    Actually he is semi correct. Some debt is good it helps strengthen your borrowing and spending power. But, the debt this country has now is unstastainable and out of control so his arguement is moot to try and get uppity that our current debt is good!

    The problem is that somthing like $4.2 Trillion of this debt is in bonds held by the Social Security Administration.

    Now, the Soc Sec will need to call in these debts as the Boomers retire… and the house of cards falls.

    Its also interesting to note, that the “current” ideas of the eggheads who are economists, have driven us to the point of this unsustainable economy, and economic collapse. While less educated people, with old style theories, built us into an Economic Super Power…

  55. #798419
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:28 pm, spaceycakes said:

    The more I see of that video, the more I’m convinced of two things:

    1)he was separated at birth from his brother, Jawn Kerry.

    and

    2)he jumps up from his chair because he has just filled his ‘Depends’ in a rage.

  56. #798438
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:38 pm, xler8bmw said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:26 pm, Romeo13 said:

    Well we can thank LBJ for that for allowing congress to use SS funds for gov spending…..then Carter allowing immigrants to grandfather benefits when they became citizens.

    And people really think they can run HC???!!!!!

    The sheep go BBBAAAHHHH

  57. #798446
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:44 pm, md1964 said:

    A homemaker who has to maintain a Grocery Budget, could supervise our national Budget 1 million times better than these corrupt, Elitists that are watchdogs now.

    The more debt you have the richer you are???? Good God Stark… then the interviewer is right.. why not run the debt up another trillion or so and be even richer?? And people wonder why few trust the Gub-mint.

  58. #798460
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 12:51 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Now I remember where I last focused on Pete Stark! He was Rangel’s co-sponsor of a House Resolution to re-institute the draft.

    As you recall, the republicans controlled congress back then. The existence of this bill in Congress was being used by liberal activists to scare college age voters into thinking Bush and republicans were trying to re-institute the draft hoping that most would not actually check the facts.

    But republicans foiled their plan and brought it up for a vote, (somehow the lame libs had managed to get the bill tabled indefinitely or something like that?). When it went to a vote even coward Charlie Rangel, the bill’s author, voted against it. Only two people voted for it in the entire House – Jack Murtha and … PETE STARK.

    I looked up the definition of ‘feces’ in the dictionary and there was a picture of Pete Stark.

  59. #798477
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 1:01 pm, rambler said:

    It’s one thing for the public to think a congressman is stupid; it’s another when he proves he is by his own words. I’m so glad these clowns are recorded on tape.

  60. #798483
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 1:07 pm, RetFireman said:

    So we all need to have Ph.D’s in oder for either this Congressman to explain his economic policies or to understand the concept that trillion dollar deficits are actually GOOD for this country and it’s economy and growth.

    Hell, based on that logic, what the hell am I stressing out about concerning my own bills and personal debt. I’m a freaking American success story. All those people telling us that debt is bad probably went to an inferior college and are obviously wrong. Who knew?

  61. #798494
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 1:11 pm, right_on said:

    But, the debt this country has now is unstastainable and out of control so his arguement is moot to try and get uppity that our current debt is good!

    Stark has no explaination for his party’s financial calamity, and citizen robbing policies. This is a clear case of “Anus Protectus.”

    In true Saul Alinsky style, he attacks and belittles his opponent:

    “Where did you go to college?”

    “Maybe if you’d gone to a good college…”

    “If you would just shut up and listen to me, maybe you would learn something…”

    “Listen to me. This time I will talk slowly…”

    “Do you have a doctorate? A masters? Uh, heh, yeah!”

    “Do you have a degree in economics?”

    For those among us who don’t recognize Stark’s mentality, it is pretty common to the elite within the Democrat Party“I’m smarter that you, I’m more clever than you, and I don’t have to explain myself to an idiot!”

    Isn’t it ironic that the all-knowing, superior intellects in the Democrat Party are leading this country into ruin? How many degrees in economics do members of congress have? If there are any, either their input is not heeded, or the colleges they attended taught faulty science.

  62. #798566
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 2:00 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Every single one of these S.O.B.s should be voted out -

  63. #798571
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 2:04 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Yep, that’s a Cal Berkeley MBA talking.

    Whooaaaa – a Cal Econ PhD maybe, but I think their MBAs are more realistic – well maybe…. :)

  64. #798575
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 2:06 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    this is the same sort of thinking which convinces these morons on the left to turn their credit card purchases of pizza and underwear into a 30 year mortgage at only 5% per year.

    …on a house worth half what they paid for it – then we have to pay for it for them while making sure those idiots at Fannie Mae, and Fannie Frank get rich.

  65. #798621
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 2:39 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Stark Raving Mad…

    This guy represents the Bay Area of CA. Wasn’t hard to guess that.

    I wonder when the House Ethics committee with censor him. Not…

  66. #798653
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 2:55 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Just watched some of Jan Helfeld’s other videos. Entertaining stuff.

  67. #798662
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Bruce said:

    Jet Jaguar said:
    speaks worse about the state of our nation than anything else I can imagine.

    More like the state of Kalifornia, don’t you think, Jet?

    RobM1981 said:
    Don’t threats of physical violence, if they can reasonably be construed as serious, qualify as “assault?”

    It depends on statute – which I was unable to find for DC. That said, Stark definitely made a threat which could be chargable. What the gentleman should have done is go directly the the DC police and filed a complaint. Hopefully he was taping the interview and has the threat on tape as well.

  68. #798680
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 3:22 pm, J S Ragman said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 2:04 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    Yep, that’s a Cal Berkeley MBA talking.
    Whooaaaa – a Cal Econ PhD maybe, but I think their MBAs are more realistic – well maybe….

    Sorry Aloha. I checked his bio. Berkeley MBA, 1960.

  69. #798689
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 3:37 pm, orlandocajun said:

    Add this guy to the idiot who praised Castro last week and throw in Pelosi, Boxer and Feinstien and you gotta figure that they’re passing out free grass in California. All of those morons are a reflection of the associate morons who keep electing them to office.

  70. #798690
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 3:38 pm, yukball said:

    My Congressman. Couldn’t be prouder, which is to say every time I hear this arrogant low-life speak I come closer to suffering from fatal embarrassment. Can’t wait to get the hell out of the Bay Area.

  71. #798694
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 3:42 pm, sbw999 said:

    My IQ just decreased 10 points listening to this pompous ass. Good God!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is what passes for a Congressman these days. We’re done. *bangs head against the wall*

  72. #798700
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 3:49 pm, yukball said:

    By the way, there’s no point in wasting the money to run against him. You’d have to place TV ads in the San Francisco media market, which is very expensive and covers probably eight or ten districts, so there’s huge waste in media spending. He has been routinely reelected in the past decade with 70+% of the vote. (Obama: 74.4%) Stark enjoys an overwhelmingly Democratic district in which Jesus himself could not win running as a Republican. Better to spend the money going after candidates in swing districts.

    If someone wanted to do the blogosphere a favor, they would aggregate the on-line donation portals of the GOP candidates in about 75-90 ‘winnable’ districts and concentrate on them. Maybe even set up a PAC or some other entity which evenly divvies up single donations across that set of 75-90 districts.

  73. #798708
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 3:56 pm, yukball said:

    Look up Cook Partisan Voting Index in Wikipedia. Stark, CA 13 = D+22.

    But, look at this quote:

    There are currently 10 Democratic-leaning districts represented by Republicans and 71 Republican-leaning districts represented by Democrats. Three districts represented by Republicans have Cook PVIs greater than D+5; 35 districts represented by Democrats have Cook PVIs greater than R+5.

    So my guess was pretty close. There are 71 districts we should concentrate on, not 75. I bet we could make a good race in another 50, and draw away Dem $$ which would otherwise go to defend those first 71. That’s how we win, and then let Pete Stark and his moron ilk waste away on the minority party back benches and stew in their own anger.

  74. #798715
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 4:08 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    When the all the dust settles from the Obama years. Americans who defended this country and Constitution, both civilian and military, need to hunt down these traitors and prosecute them. If its a witch hunt they want we will have the greatest one of all. They are all traitors and makes me ashamed of my country. I would like to know what “Americans” put this kind of trash into office. No wonder Cali is a cesspool. No wonder this country is being taken over by zealots and commies.

  75. #798716
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 4:10 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    I am sick of the games these politicians play.

  76. #798734
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 4:24 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Congressman Stark: “The more debt we owe, the wealthier we are”.

    “Good news Honey, we’re stinkin rich!”

  77. #798744
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 4:46 pm, GraniteMan said:

    The more debt we owe, the wealthier we are”.

    Holy Cow that means when the Dems were bragging about their surpluses in the Clinton years they were actually bragging about how POOR we were. I’m confused, but then I didn’t study economics either.

  78. #798761
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 5:05 pm, Salt said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 2:55 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Just watched some of Jan Helfeld’s other videos. Entertaining stuff.

    The one with Pelosi is entertaining and shows she hasn’t changed.

  79. #798763
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 5:07 pm, T-Bone said:

    Liberal logic

    Pete Stark is a liberal
    Pete Stark curses
    I like liberals
    I like Pete Stark
    I like cursing

    Cheney is a conservative
    Cheney curses
    I dislike conservatives
    I dislike Cheney
    I dislike cursing

    Huh?

  80. #798775
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 5:30 pm, ScottyDog said:

    Another politician that has been brainwashed by the Federal Reserve of Rockefeller.

    The moron can not even figure out that if the Government was the bank they would not be paying interest on our deficit.

    This guy is the poster boy for getting the Federal Reserve abolished.

  81. #798893
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:09 pm, William said:

    So Stark threatened to throw Jan Helfield out the window?

    Response:

    Hey, Pete, Go ahead! Try and throw me out the window, IF you’ve got the balls!

    Come on, Asswh#@le. What are you wating for.

    Let’s see you TRY it!

    No?

    Petey girl,

    Don’t write a check with your mouth that you’re body can’t cash, sissy girly man with the foul mouth.

  82. #798912
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:21 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:44 am, RobM1981 said:

    I am so excited to have him making decisions about my Health Care.

    What do you think he’s going to tell an 89 year old Granny when she “wants” a knee replacement?

    Uh, “Get the f**k out of here or I’ll throw you out the window:”?

    Do I win?

  83. #798914
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:26 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:54 am, lgm said:

    We have both Cheney and McCain on tape using obscenity.

    Oooooooh you really got us on that one!

    …any videos of them threatening violence?

  84. #798918
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:34 pm, William said:

    In post # 798912, on September 3rd, 2009 at 11:21 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On September 3rd, 2009 at 10:44 am, RobM1981 said:

    I am so excited to have him making decisions about my Health Care.

    What do you think he’s going to tell an 89 year old Granny when she “wants” a knee replacement?

    Uh, “Get the f**k out of here or I’ll throw you out the window:”?

    Do I win?

    Republicanvet,

    That was hilarious!

    Thanks for the laugh!

  85. #798922
    On September 3rd, 2009 at 11:39 pm, Republicanvet said:

    Jeez. Watching this video he just reminds me of a Leslie Nielsen using Grecian formula or something.

    I kept waiting for the stupid one-liner or background humor…or him to give a look of “oh oh, did anyone else see that”?

    Such a strong man, jumping up and walking himself to a corner. He should have just faced into the corner and stayed there.

  86. #798979
    On September 4th, 2009 at 1:46 am, Seabecker said:

    It’s interesting to note that Stark asks if Helfeld has a degree or taken classes in economics, and belittles him for not having at least a Masters in the subject. However, freshmen level ECON 101 classes clearly teach how many of the items that Stark and the Dems hold dearly are harmful, including minimum wage, rent controls, price controls, etc. etc.

  87. #799011
    On September 4th, 2009 at 7:01 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    :shock: Yep, that’s a Cal Berkeley MBA talking.

    I am a Odd Planet Berkeley MBA :oops: It was easy to spot an MBA candidate: We were those odd fellows who got haircuts, shaved and brushed our teeth and all that repressed stuff. But at least I know now where we got the term:
    Stark “Raving Mad”(TooMuchTime)

  88. #799163
    On September 4th, 2009 at 9:50 am, mytake said:

    This is what is leading our country? I can’t understand why we are in so much trouble?

  89. #799207
    On September 4th, 2009 at 10:09 am, locomotivebreath1901 said:

    “He’s an unrepentant basket case — and everything that’s wrong with Washington Kalifornia.”

    Fixed that for ya.

    Charlie Rangel is everything that’s wrong with Washington.

  90. #799407
    On September 4th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, krig said:

    Lets see? The government somehow operates in some type of altered state of reality and theory i.e. the more they borrow the more wealthier the government gets whereas, the individual gets poorer the more he borrows? What drugs are these people on?

  91. #800561
    On September 6th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, goodforlaughs said:

    Obviously, stark sees himself as an economic genuis; we can imagine how he and the other libtards draw the illogical conclusion that “little timmy taxturbo” is a financial guru.

  92. #801069
    On September 7th, 2009 at 8:31 pm, Illbay said:

    Who are these people (e.g. Pete Stark), and how did we get so many of them in our government?

    Do so many Americans truly hate and despise themselves and their fellow-countrymen that a scant generation or so after “The Greatest Generation” committed unbelievably heroic acts on the battlefields of Europe and the Pacific, we have so many well-fed, well-read and downright pampered folks who think it proper to display unmitigated hatred and vitriol toward the nation of their birth?

  93. #802083
    On September 9th, 2009 at 1:04 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Illbay – it is just BECAUSE they have been well-fed, pampered, and cared for by the sacrifices made by the Grestest Generation that ALL politicians have developed a sense of entitlement. They were NEVER patriots and they do not now or will ever truly love their country. They are incapable of putting their country above their own personal enrichment. We must find a way to get term limits imposed. Use your vote, people!!!

You must be logged in to post a comment.



JustOneMinute

» Free Nate Silver!

Riehl World View

» Glenn Beck Is An Ass
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook