See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On September 10th, 2009 at 8:49 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

   Wow, sex ,lies, and video tape! The remake! What a tool!

2. #2
   On September 10th, 2009 at 8:50 am, Jet Jaguar said:

   Character matters!!!

3. #3
   On September 10th, 2009 at 8:51 am, Jet Jaguar said:

   p.s. I think the cone should go around another part of these creapos’ bodies.

4. #4
   On September 10th, 2009 at 8:57 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

   Sleeping with lobbyists eh? I know drummers with more scruples than that!

5. #5
   On September 10th, 2009 at 9:04 am, ajmontana said:

   FOUND!!!!!!
   “Worlds Largest Cone of Shame”
   Capable of fitting all of Congress Crapweasels.

6. #6
   On September 10th, 2009 at 9:05 am, ajmontana said:

   here is link, sorry.

   “Worlds Largest Cone of Shame”

7. #7
   On September 10th, 2009 at 9:05 am, jangar said:

   Jet Jaguar said:
   p.s. I think the cone should go around another part of these creapos’ bodies.

   Bad dog – stop licking yourself!

8. #8
   On September 10th, 2009 at 9:06 am, ajmontana said:

   ok 1 more try….lol

   worlds largest cone of shame

9. #9
   On September 10th, 2009 at 9:10 am, Red State Skeptic said:

   Vitter called out! Love it.

10. #10
    On September 10th, 2009 at 9:24 am, DesertLover said:

    The key word here is “resigned” …

    a word that does not exist in the liberal dictionary …

11. #11
    On September 10th, 2009 at 9:47 am, Mainah said:

    that was just gross.

12. #12
    On September 10th, 2009 at 9:52 am, Dimsdale said:

    Republican is to resigned as Democrat is to promotion.

13. #13
    On September 10th, 2009 at 9:59 am, tre said:

    On September 10th, 2009 at 9:06 am, ajmontana said:

    They need to remember that we have our Golden Eye on them!

14. #14
    On September 10th, 2009 at 10:14 am, Thomas said:

    Yup. Another jerk republican. Cone of shame. Upside down dead elephant logo.

    And yet, 60 South Carolina House Republicans called for Gov. Mark Sanford to resign. Hmm. Didn’t heat about that. Oh well. Must not be newsworthy.

15. #15
    On September 10th, 2009 at 10:21 am, b-cat said:

    Sorry, I don’t think I’m gonna get worked up over sex scandals anymore, unless I see the standard applied to both sides equally.

    Until then its just a tactic to make it harder to keep R’s in their jobs, while the D’s are openly buggering to their tiny little hearts content.

16. #16
    On September 10th, 2009 at 10:22 am, pecze said:

    And, at least he honest in his apology…He apologized for the fact that his comments were a distraction. He did not apologize for having the affairs — which I’m sure he’s not very sorry for.

17. #17
    On September 10th, 2009 at 10:31 am, DBNinKY said:

    At least he, unlike many other Republican embarrassments, had a last shred of decency left in him to resign.

    What’s more, unlike Pelosi’s defiant, continued support of Rangel, Republicans nearly always take their members to task and step away from them. Democrats seldom do that.

18. #18
    On September 10th, 2009 at 11:07 am, no2pcbs1 said:

    mike duvall’s sexual bragging, guess in california, it’s the little things that count. hey mikey stop being a jerk and belittling yourself.

19. #19
    On September 10th, 2009 at 11:13 am, happy2behere said:

    Thomas just came here to swoop and poop. He missed the majority of us on this blog who called for Sanford’s resignation at the time, and still do. Serial adulterers get no pass here, dude.

20. #20
    On September 10th, 2009 at 11:15 am, Thomas said:

    He missed the majority of us on this blog who called for Sanford’s resignation at the time,

    had nothing to do with what I said.

21. #21
    On September 10th, 2009 at 11:41 am, mchristian said:

    Thomas, you said nothing of value. Your comment is irrelevant and uninformative. You contribute nothing to the discussion. You can’t even distract people as you are supposed to do. You are a very bad troll.

22. #22
    On September 10th, 2009 at 12:25 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    I am not a total prude, but reading the text was bad enough. I do not want to hear the audio of Mr. “Family Values.” I hope his wife is already gone and consulting with her divorce lawyer.

23. #23
    On September 10th, 2009 at 12:37 pm, greenfairie said:

    And that my friends is why the California GOP SUCKS.

24. #24
    On September 10th, 2009 at 12:47 pm, T-Bone said:

    It’s just about sex. Whats the problem?

25. #25
    On September 10th, 2009 at 12:53 pm, zorro said:

    The audio has been pulled.

    What a disgrace. He broke his marriage vows, his wife should get everything.

26. #26
    On September 10th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, rambler said:

    cheat on the wife – get the boot; fail to pay taxes – stay on.

27. #27
    On September 10th, 2009 at 1:08 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On September 10th, 2009 at 11:41 am, mchristian said:
    Thomas, you said nothing of value. Your comment is irrelevant and uninformative. You contribute nothing to the discussion. You can’t even distract people as you are supposed to do. You are a very bad troll.

    And, and, and he hates the Three Stooges, the bastage!

28. #28
    On September 10th, 2009 at 1:13 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    Where are those who claim that Michelle ignores Republican misdeeds now? You’d think they’d be falling all over themselves apologizing. /sarc

    ECS

29. #29
    On September 10th, 2009 at 1:27 pm, Khyris said:

    Actually, he’s now claiming that it was all fictional boasting. Hyperbole if you will. Not reversing his resignation, but for his sake I hope he’s telling the truth this time.

30. #30
    On September 10th, 2009 at 1:38 pm, Salt said:

    On September 10th, 2009 at 12:47 pm, T-Bone said:

    It’s just about sex. Whats the problem?

    That’s sarcasm, right?

31. #31
    On September 10th, 2009 at 1:43 pm, love2rumba said:

    And yet, 60 South Carolina House Republicans called for Gov. Mark Sanford to resign. Hmm. Didn’t heat about that. Oh well. Must not be newsworthy.

    Sanford has been pretty well covred here, unless you enjoy eyerolling to the point of injury .

    (I believe the term is ad nauseum )

32. #32
    On September 10th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I know drummers with more scruples than that!

    Liar!

33. #33
    On September 10th, 2009 at 2:10 pm, happy2behere said:

    During the Sanford controversy, the Repubs voting for Sanford to resign was covered here, discussed here, and celebrated here. Not newsworthy? Not here. You weren’t clear, dear.

34. #34
    On September 10th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, Thomas said:

    Wow. I would like to see republicans who do bad – and the republicans who do good being talked about. So I must be a very bad troll, says mchristian. Right. Sure thing, buddy.

    And sanford has been covered here. And has the 60 republicans who did the right thing also been covered here? To give equal time to the republicans who do the right thing as well as the republicans who embarrass us by their bad behavior? …. Yes? No?

    That’s my only question, love2rumba.

35. #35
    On September 10th, 2009 at 2:32 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On September 10th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    I know drummers with more scruples than that!
    Liar!

    Yeah, you’re right. My hyperbole pegged when I was trying to make a point. My bad. I shouldn’t have used one of the lowest forms of sexual deviates for a comparison.

36. #36
    On September 10th, 2009 at 2:49 pm, beenthere said:

    I was actually unsure there were any GOP California Assemblymen left. The funny thing is Duvall might very well have been lying. I think it was Mencken who said to never believe a man’s bragging when it comes to his sexual exploits. That goes double for politicians, of course.

37. #37
    On September 10th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Salt said:

    Michelle has mentioned GOP members who have called on Sanford to step down, including the Lt. Governor.

    She covered the censure vote as well as the letter that was sent.

    It’s all in the Sanford thread.

    All of this is a bit off topic. Michelle has rightly criticized Duvall.

38. #38
    On September 10th, 2009 at 3:22 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    And he’s not attractive at all. Some women can be idiots ……

39. #39
    On September 10th, 2009 at 3:29 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On September 10th, 2009 at 3:22 pm, GladzKravtz said:
    And he’s not attractive at all. Some women can be idiots ……

    Deep down, they all want the bad boy.

40. #40
    On September 10th, 2009 at 3:42 pm, drfredc said:

    What, he didn’t just switch to the Democrat party and market himself as resume enhanced?

41. #41
    On September 10th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    Deep down, they all want the bad boy.

    With so many bad boys these days, a gal can/should be Pri T choosy.

42. #42
    On September 10th, 2009 at 3:56 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On September 10th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, GladzKravtz said:
    Deep down, they all want the bad boy.
    With so many bad boys these days, a gal can/should be Pri T choosy.

    No choosing! Soon the government will mandate a public option on that, you know, single player!

43. #43
    On September 10th, 2009 at 4:50 pm, love2rumba said:

    …And sanford has been covered here. And has the 60 republicans who did the right thing also been covered here? To give equal time to the republicans who do the right thing as well as the republicans who embarrass us by their bad behavior? …. Yes? No?

    That’s my only question,love2rumba.

    Your point is a valid consideration, Thomas.

    MM has given positive space to Republicans like Coburn, Pence, and as of late Wilson etc. when they have gone out to challenge Obama since and during the election. The Repubs who are challenging Sanford has been covered-accurately-by other media, and since it already has been covered accurately and with the appropriate depth by others, should she also chime in with nothing different from what AOL, CNN etc. have already done? Would it not be smarter to cover things that CNN, Time etc. aren’t giving enough attention to?

    If there has been one gripe I’ve had with journalism regardless of venue is how deliberately over-simplified and often redundant it has been on key issues-that sense that an article has been written by a time-clock puncher instead of someone who really wants to get to the bottom of what is going on and be able to communicate this to a reader who may not have the background immediate to make sense of what is going on such as the Financial Crisis of 2008, and this is why I am a voracious reader of internet blogs and other alternative news sites.

    So far if the other media hasn’t covered a topic that might impact a conservative, MM ususally is on top of it.

    Come back in six months,follow her columns, and I think you will see she has been fairly even-handed. If Michelle Malkin were not even-handed and thorough about what is happening at the moment, I would have left this site already and her credibility would be in tatters in my mind…This is the best way I can answer your question, Thomas.

44. #44
    On September 10th, 2009 at 8:27 pm, mchristian said:

    Thomas, I did not get your point. I apologize for my rudeness.