Comments on: Obama “efficiency” in action

By: Obama’s economic policiy in one word: Mistake | Political Integrity Now

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:04:07 +0000

[...] Obama “efficiency” in action? [...]

By: Barack “Mr Flash My RA Eyes” Obama, Called Out as the Liar he is by Joe the Congressman with an example of an Obama Lie « VotingFemale Speaks!

Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:28:25 +0000

[...] Malkin: Obama “efficiency” in action and Unruly moment, manufactured outrage Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: Shocking Lack of Respect Hot [...]

By: URGENT! Private Security Risk of Obama’s Health Care Plan | Political Integrity Now

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:39:41 +0000

[...] Obama “efficiency” in action? [...]

By: Does Obama even understand the fundamentals of economics? | Political Integrity Now

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:34:37 +0000

[...] Obama “efficiency” in action? [...]

By: Obama tells media they should stop covering opposition | Political Integrity Now

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:50:38 +0000

[...] Obama “efficiency” in action? [...]

By: chapoutier

chapoutier — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:23:34 +0000

When did Rush condemn illegal drug use?

Uhhh... Many times.

And why would banning the word Vico.din protect Rush?

That was mostly a joke. It probably has to do with spam ad filters.

By: corkie

corkie — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:51:32 +0000

On September 10th, 2009 at 6:09 pm, chapoutier said:

I think it is a funny joke to many libs because of the hypocrisy he exhibited when vocally condemning illegal drug use on his show.

When did Rush condemn illegal drug use?

And why would banning the word Vico.din protect Rush?

By: Micheleeroo

Micheleeroo — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:00:40 +0000

Oh. My. Goodness.

Can I scream now???? These jokers want to control my medical care???

By: jangar

jangar — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:34:07 +0000

What he did with Cash for Clunkers, he’ll do for health care.

Duh!

It’s a Democrat thing…buy votes, spend others’ money, repeat cycle.

By: WarEagle82

WarEagle82 — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:20:26 +0000

Frankly, there was nothing RIGHT about Cash for Clunkers. It was the classic government program.

Everybody loses and we all pay for it! ObamaCare is likely to make Cash for Clunkers look like a good deal though!

On September 10th, 2009 at 5:40 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

The issue with this plan wasn’t the administrative overhead, rather it was the fact the Obama used $2.88 billion of our money to buy people cars and in the process, he saw to it that the traded-in vehicles were trashed, rather than used for a worthwhile cause, such as giving them to people who could afford a new car or even a crappy used car.

What a waste.

And if you want to add the lost value of the trade-ins to the overhead of this program, the irony is, the original blogger’s assertion is about right…

By: chapoutier

chapoutier — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:09:27 +0000

I think it is a funny joke to many libs because of the hypocrisy he exhibited when vocally condemning illegal drug use on his show. It is the same reason Haggard or Foley or Craig are funny. It’s not the gay, its the hypocrisy.

By: Reliq6

Reliq6 — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:05:15 +0000

curious* too!

By: Reliq6

Reliq6 — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:04:52 +0000

Chaps – why is this

I think it is trying to protect Rush.

some kind of funny joke with libs? I am just curiou. See because Bush was a drunk, Rush is an addict but Clinton didn’t inhale and Obama was only experimenting…right?

Guess I am missing the big “haha”.

By: stillontheroad

stillontheroad — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:40:26 +0000

A tad off topic but just a few thoughts:

The bottom line to this is: I do not care how many people this Sock Puppet says have no Health insurance. The bottom line is, why is this Puppet not creating an atmosphere where business can grow once more and hire people. The bottom line is, why is the Puppet not helping small business by creating an atmosphere where small business can grow and hire people. The bottom line is, why is the Puppet not getting rid of ridiculous laws and restrictions on companies so they can compete thereby creating jobs thereby allowing working people to have health insurance and a job and money to spend on products and services. This is a question to the Libtard Trolls especially.

By: NJ-Aviator

NJ-Aviator — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:40:25 +0000

The issue with this plan wasn’t the administrative overhead, rather it was the fact the Obama used $2.88 billion of our money to buy people cars and in the process, he saw to it that the traded-in vehicles were trashed, rather than used for a worthwhile cause, such as giving them to people who could afford a new car or even a crappy used car.

What a waste.

And if you want to add the lost value of the trade-ins to the overhead of this program, the irony is, the original blogger’s assertion is about right…