Did You Know...

   

Calling out Obama’s faulty health care anecdotes

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  September 14, 2009 03:32 PM

Scott Harrington in the WSJ spotlights two misleading health care anecdotes President Obama used in his joint address to Congress last week.

Will the health care czar be posting one of her reality check videos on this?

No, not bloody likely, I know:

To highlight abusive practices, Mr. Obama referred to an Illinois man who “lost his coverage in the middle of chemotherapy because his insurer found he hadn’t reported gallstones that he didn’t even know about.” The president continued: “They delayed his treatment, and he died because of it.”

Although the president has used this example previously, his conclusion is contradicted by the transcript of a June 16 hearing on industry practices before the Subcommittee of Oversight and Investigation of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The deceased’s sister testified that the insurer reinstated her brother’s coverage following intervention by the Illinois Attorney General’s Office. She testified that her brother received a prescribed stem-cell transplant within the desired three- to four-week “window of opportunity” from “one of the most renowned doctors in the whole world on the specific routine,” that the procedure “was extremely successful,” and that “it extended his life nearly three and a half years.”

The president’s second example was a Texas woman “about to get a double mastectomy when her insurance company canceled her policy because she forgot to declare a case of acne.” He said that “By the time she had her insurance reinstated, her breast cancer more than doubled in size.”

The woman’s testimony at the June 16 hearing confirms that her surgery was delayed several months. It also suggests that the dermatologist’s chart may have described her skin condition as precancerous, that the insurer also took issue with an apparent failure to disclose an earlier problem with an irregular heartbeat, and that she knowingly underreported her weight on the application.

These two cases are presumably among the most egregious identified by Congressional staffers’ analysis of 116,000 pages of documents from three large health insurers, which identified a total of about 20,000 rescissions from millions of policies issued by the insurers over a five-year period. Company representatives testified that less than one half of one percent of policies were rescinded (less than 0.1% for one of the companies).

If existing laws and litigation governing rescission are inadequate, there clearly are a variety of ways that the states or federal government could target abuses without adopting the president’s agenda for federal control of health insurance, or the creation of a government health insurer.

More on the Raddatz case here.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Posted in: Health care

Obamacare’s 1095-A nightmare

March 11, 2015 06:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

Train wreck update: HHS sends 800,000 Obamacare enrollees bad tax info

February 20, 2015 12:56 PM by Doug Powers

trainwreck

Proofreading we can believe in

Obama meets his perfect match: A selfie stick that peddles insurance

February 12, 2015 05:14 PM by Doug Powers

selfiestick

29 dimensions of compatibility

‘If you like your tax return…': Millions could be in for a surprise

January 6, 2015 11:53 AM by Doug Powers

pelosipassit

It’s not like we weren’t warned

Oh how sad: Harvard profs upset because Obamacare was only supposed to affect the rubes

January 5, 2015 02:29 PM by Doug Powers

diehard

“Welcome to the party, pal!”


Categories: Barack Obama, Education, Health care

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook