Did You Know...

   

Calling out Obama’s faulty health care anecdotes

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  September 14, 2009 03:32 PM

Scott Harrington in the WSJ spotlights two misleading health care anecdotes President Obama used in his joint address to Congress last week.

Will the health care czar be posting one of her reality check videos on this?

No, not bloody likely, I know:

To highlight abusive practices, Mr. Obama referred to an Illinois man who “lost his coverage in the middle of chemotherapy because his insurer found he hadn’t reported gallstones that he didn’t even know about.” The president continued: “They delayed his treatment, and he died because of it.”

Although the president has used this example previously, his conclusion is contradicted by the transcript of a June 16 hearing on industry practices before the Subcommittee of Oversight and Investigation of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The deceased’s sister testified that the insurer reinstated her brother’s coverage following intervention by the Illinois Attorney General’s Office. She testified that her brother received a prescribed stem-cell transplant within the desired three- to four-week “window of opportunity” from “one of the most renowned doctors in the whole world on the specific routine,” that the procedure “was extremely successful,” and that “it extended his life nearly three and a half years.”

The president’s second example was a Texas woman “about to get a double mastectomy when her insurance company canceled her policy because she forgot to declare a case of acne.” He said that “By the time she had her insurance reinstated, her breast cancer more than doubled in size.”

The woman’s testimony at the June 16 hearing confirms that her surgery was delayed several months. It also suggests that the dermatologist’s chart may have described her skin condition as precancerous, that the insurer also took issue with an apparent failure to disclose an earlier problem with an irregular heartbeat, and that she knowingly underreported her weight on the application.

These two cases are presumably among the most egregious identified by Congressional staffers’ analysis of 116,000 pages of documents from three large health insurers, which identified a total of about 20,000 rescissions from millions of policies issued by the insurers over a five-year period. Company representatives testified that less than one half of one percent of policies were rescinded (less than 0.1% for one of the companies).

If existing laws and litigation governing rescission are inadequate, there clearly are a variety of ways that the states or federal government could target abuses without adopting the president’s agenda for federal control of health insurance, or the creation of a government health insurer.

More on the Raddatz case here.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Posted in: Health care

Obama cronyism + your personal data = trouble

July 29, 2015 06:13 AM by Michelle Malkin

Hey AP, you spelled ‘Democrats’ wrong in this story about foundering O-care state exchanges

July 27, 2015 07:56 PM by Doug Powers

trainwreck

Blaming “taxpayers” for the epic fail

Feel the Bern: Prog conference-goer clues in Sanders about Obamacare irony

July 19, 2015 10:38 AM by Doug Powers

sanders

He helped build that

Obama admin: Honor the spirit of Independence Day by convincing your family this gov’t mandate is awesome; Updated

July 3, 2015 06:55 AM by Doug Powers

founders

“We hold these mandates to be self-evident”

Open thread: Obamacare renamed ‘SCOTUScare’ for good reason

June 25, 2015 08:33 PM by Doug Powers

johnroberts

The Interpreter


Categories: Barack Obama, Health care, John Roberts, Politics, Supreme Court

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook