[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……

Hello Thanks heaps for this indeed!… if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Piano Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!…

Hello Thanks heaps for this indeed!… if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Piano Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!…

Hello I bookmarked this blog. Thanks heaps for this!… if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Pianoforte Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!…

Hello I bookmarked this blog. Thanks heaps for this!… if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Pianoforte Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!…

Thanks heaps for this!… if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website HOT Pianoforte Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!…

Did Scotland get anything for releasing the terrorist?

The multi-billion dollar British Petroleum deal with Libya.

Given that The State owns everything in Libya and they are awash in oil, why does this charity need $400,000 from the U.S.

Do tell me what we get in return besides Muammar Gadhafi’s appreciation.

This is not passing the smell test.

This may have something to do with a quid pro quo Money to Libyan charity/Gadahfi Lockerbie prisoner released. How does Scotland fit into this? Did Scotland get anything for releasing the terrorist?

On September 24th, 2009 at 9:56 pm, steveegg said:

But wait, it gets a whole lot better (and by “better”, I mean “worse”):

- Said also personally supervised negotiations with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which had officially joined with Al Qaeda.

- Aisha is also a real piece of work; not only did her group awarded Muntazer al-Zaidi, noted shoe-chucker, a “courage” award, she served on Saddam Hussein’s defense team.

I’d like to hear whatever nitwit made the decision to given them this money explain this.

On September 24th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, tre said:

Libyan charities! ACORN! National Endowment for Obama Propaganda Art! SEIU!

In the meantime, REAL charities like the Red Cross, Salvation Army, et.al. have to beg for money!

Or any number of charities helping wounded veterans.

On September 24th, 2009 at 1:07 pm, chapoutier said:

Yes, it should be withdrawn. But don’t you think it possible that Obama had no clue this relatively small amount was even in there?

Considering he claims to have no clue about quite a few things, including knowing Ayers, Rezko or how much money has been shoveled at ACORN, I wouldn’t be surprised if he claimed he didn’t know about this.

- Said also personally supervised negotiations with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which had officially joined with Al Qaeda.

- Aisha is also a real piece of work; not only did her group awarded Muntazer al-Zaidi, noted shoe-chucker, a “courage” award, she served on Saddam Hussein’s defense team.

On September 24th, 2009 at 1:07 pm, chapoutier said:

Here is a link to the documentation.

It looks like it was appropriated for FY 2009, which would have been signed by Bush, not Obama.

Yes, it should be withdrawn. But don’t you think it possible that Obama had no clue this relatively small amount was even in there?

Try again, bub. Those were funds reprogrammed to Libya under the authority of the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009, signed by Obama. The attachment to the letter from Mark Kirk, which was dated September 15, 2009, and which originated in the Obama State Department, was the required notification to Congress of the reprogramming.

Thanks for playing the “It’s BOOOOOOOSH’S Fault Game”, but you get no take-home prizes.

Yes, sure, of course if we are going to pile money into something that sounds good, then we should put all kinds of safeguards to prevent waste, fraud and abuse. Of course we should “make sure” the funds go where we originally intend they go. Of course we should strictly determine to not let the purpose of the funds get diverted or perverted with litmus tests or whatever.

It. Does. Not. Work. EVER. For anything but a short period of time. Once we agree we ‘should’ spend money on the ‘good thing,’ it quickly goes bad.

Discussing it in the fashion you keep insisting on doing is exactly what “big government thinking” is.

The government has no business taxing us for anything except the defense of our rights. When it does, most of the money is stolen and/or wasted. Always. We know this. Just look.

If you still do not see what I am saying, I will let the matter drop.