“Judges want to f— young girls. Juries want to f— young girls. Everyone wants to f— young girls!”
Those are the words of Hollyweird hero and convicted child rapist Roman Polanski.
For a running tally of the crime-coddling apologists in the arts community joining the “Free Polanski” bandwagon, go here.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 |
L.A. Board of Supervisors Impose $1,000 Fine for Having Fun on the Beach
February 9, 2012 04:42 PM by Doug Powers
77 Comments
Why don’t White House visitor logs report Hollywood Halloween guests?
January 9, 2012 03:25 PM by Michelle Malkin
118 Comments
Noted Supporter of the 99% Occupies Floor of Hospital
January 9, 2012 01:12 PM by Doug Powers
77 Comments
Occupy Wall Street Shuts Down Production of Law & Order Episode About Occupy Wall Street
December 9, 2011 03:20 PM by Doug Powers
67 Comments
Miley Cyrus, Occupier Poster Girl
December 2, 2011 08:32 AM by Michelle Malkin
128 CommentsHollyweird Hate Tweet of the Day: Adam Levine doesn’t want your money
October 19, 2011 06:44 PM by Michelle Malkin
123 Comments
Video: Capital One Bank shill turns up to cheer on anti-bank agitators
October 19, 2011 09:55 AM by Michelle Malkin
41 Comments
Celebs Supporting Wall Street Protesters Know a Little Bit About Wall Street
October 5, 2011 01:46 PM by Doug Powers
163 Comments
Categories: Hollyweird
Pundit & Pundette
» Bishop Jenky, Nicki Minaj, and the "98%"Sister Toldjah
» Obama’s new budget is a bad jokeJustOneMinute
» We Hear From The Department Of Good Ideas And False Choices
This is why we need the death penalty in America. Sick does not begin to describe this.
They have no decency.
Isn’t he supposed to get a free pass since he is an Artiste?
I just read that Woody Allen has now signed the petition calling for an immediate release of Roman Polanski. I should have seen that coming. Why does it not surprise me that “pervs of a feather debauch together.”
I pledge to not see another movie made by any of the perverted, hypocritical, idiots who signed this petition.
Debra Winger weighs in with this bit of stupidity.
She has no comment on how the victim or Roman Polanski’s sexual attack was exploited by Polanski. Shall we all shred our copies of “Officer and Gentleman” now or have a bonfire later?
Can anybody name a decent movie Debra Winger appeared in over the last 5 years? And she is a judge at some event? I guess the couldn’t get Jeffrey Dahmer…
The pervs are calling for a boycott of Switzerland. Well, at least one place in the world will shortly be safe to visit with our children. Boycott American, why don’t you hypocrites!
Yes, they are preparing a free pass for this child-rapist. They will issue it as soon as the IRS extends a pardon and refund to Al Capone.
This is going to ruin a lot of Hollywood careers. This is NASTY just plain NASTY. Why would I patronize the flim of an enabler of a child rapist?
I Wouldn’t. NASTY that’s the word for it, they are NASTY PEOPLE. YUCK, they don’t understand they have just caused a major gag reflex in the majority of Americans? Nasty is as Nasty does.
In the interests of full disclosure, I am the father of several daughters. If Polanski had done this to my child I believe I would have followed him to France and resolved the issue myself a very long time ago.
Laree, I don’t think this will damage the career of a single Hollywood pervert.
In the end, one comes to expect this from the French. After all, they think Jerry Lewis is a genius too…
Some animals just need to be put down.
In the New Age just do whatever feeeeellss good. Christians, and Jews are not welcome due to their morality called hate speech.
Now, back to secular humanism.
I have no daughters, but if I did, I hear you.
WOMEN defending him should be ashamed. So should men, but how could any woman?
Debra Winger? Is this the has-been movie festival?
I saw Samantha Geimer on Nightline last night in a pre-recorded segment in which she said she was sure that Polanski had learned his lesson and would never do such a thing again.
What many people forget is that after fleeing American justice, his next major release was Tess, starring Nastassja Kinski, daughter of actor Klaus Kinski (Nosferatu). According to Polanski biographers, he began a sexual relationship with Kinski when she was 15 years old.
The lesson he apparently learned was “Don’t do minor girls in America.”
There are cures for this predilection. One involves intense prayer and repentance, and surrender to holy spirit to fight off your learned behavior (1 Cor 6:9, 10)
The other cures I won’t mention here, but I’m sure you have some idea.
This underscores the true desires of the “reverse progressive” Hollywood and its followers.
They do not believe in anything that gets in the way of what makes then “feel good” physically or emotionally (this includes our constitution and laws), unless it is a law to prevent you from speaking your point of view or in any way reminding them that they are intruding on your rights. In that particular circumstance, they want to crucify you (eventually, this will be literal if this movement continues to force its way on the rest).
Since they do not get emotional satisfaction from true self accomplishment or self sacrifice (such as helping others or taking a step back to provide room for others), they try to substitute it with anything to make them feel better, so how dare you tell them that this is intruding on someone else’s rights!
I guess the logic goes that since some other people are perverted too his behavior is acceptable. Even if this rant were even partially true, there’s a world of difference between “want to…” and doing. The difference is called civilization.
What’s with this uber ego in Hollywood that makes actors et al think people care what they think?
Damn, this whole thing is actually starting to make the “Free Mumia” crowd look almost sane.
OK, not really, but still…
I’m beginning to see the enormity of what has been done…putting the powerful media of motion picture and television in the hands of truly awful, rotten, sick, evil people. What has that done to our culture and to us?
Apparently all of these Hollyweirdos are ok with child rape. Why else would they sign a petition?
Roman Polanski: HE RAPED A CHILD!
Democrat Party Platform # 1: Rape of little girls is equivalent to abortion rights. The next feminist movement agenda. I tell you, sh*t is going to hit the fan in the next four years. I’m stocking up on ammo to defend against the onslaught of LIBERAL CHILD RAPISTS. This Democrat party wants to start a civil war. They continue to destroy the value of human life. They invade our schools and indoctrinate our children. I’m tired of “ignoring” Democrats and their childish rants of insanity. I do not tolerate one second of any friend or stranger who wants to go on endlessly about the evils of Conservativism. I fight back with knowledge of facts. Convicted sex offenders like Roman Polanski are allowed to live in our communities. Democrats promote it. We need to defend ourselves from their inevitable preying on our children. My voice will NOW be a hell of a lot louder than theirs! My guns will be audibly louder if sex offenders like DEMOCRAT Roman Polanski were to step on my property.
Nice touch with the scripture reference, Smithee.
I too have 13 year-old daughter. She is a beautiful child in a woman’s body who still sleeps with a teddy bear. If someone did that to my daughter, I would not rest until they were put in jail. (Not taking the law into my own hands or wishing someone else would take vengence in jail, either.) I believe God when he said vengence is his job.
I’m wondering if he had abused an animal like Vic did, would the people sympathetic to Polanski be as sympathetic?
*Once a pedophile, always a pedophile; The lady may have forgiven, but society expects justice to protect others from this depravity; We demand it, and Hollywood is anything but indicative of mainstream society, so they, being a large part of the problem, should be ignored.
Great question from Allahpundit at HA
If drugging and raping a child is not over the line, where the he[[ is your line?
Too bad this didn’t happen in Texas. He would have learned how it feels to be an abused little girl.
Not everyone wants to f— little girls. For example, there are some individuals in the penal system who would rather f— child rapists. Polanski might do well to stir some KY into his metamucil.
I still don’t quite get how it took 30 years to extradite him.
Hey, Roman, how about I anally rape you with a .40? It’s the latest rage.
Good luck on that. The stores are selling out as fast as they can stock it, even at twice normal prices.
txvet2 – He made sure he stayed away from any country with an extradition treaty with the USA. It took 30 years before he finally slipped up and crossed the wrong border.
From Ed Driscoll.com:
I’ve always liked Jewell’s music. Now I like her even more. I think I’m going to get another of her CDs tomorrow.
And inmates want to f- sissified foreign filmakers.
Polanski didn’t produce Deliverance, did he? No worries. He’ll be a shoe in for the Ned Beatty award….
Hearing the left supports this guy does not surprise me in any way.
…with a cheese grater.
I hope he gets prison time and I hope he gets raped by a 300 pounder named Jamal.
SECOND!
I wonder how many little girls he’s raped since he fled the US.
I seem to remember that the Oscars (or some other awards show?) was going to give Polanski an award a few years ago and he wanted to come to LA to accept it.
He contacted the DA’s office and asked if they would let him do that. They said, “We’d be glad to let you come back to America. Please give us the exact date and time so we can be waiting at the airport with handcuffs.”
And he was offended and even confused. He believed (and said clearly) that he was too important to be treated that way.
Maybe, extraditing him back here and throwing him in prison for a while will tell all of Hollywood that they’re not that important. And maybe being afraid of that is why they are supporting him now.
and so we say, fire up old sparky and let him ride the lightning! (Thank you, Pat Buchanan.)
This causes one to wonder if/when the names on the list may have done the same thing and so cannot condemn Polanski. Those are most reticent to cast the stone that practice the same lifestyle.
It’s turning out to be a roll call of the no-touch’ems and the who-needs’yas.
Given that ‘bama is not well liked in Europe either, especially now in France, one can imagine that this is more about striking a blow at him and his American than anything else.
One of the things which separates the civilized from the uncivilized is the civilized do the right thing despite what they ‘want’ to do. There have been times, more then once i will admit, that I ‘wanted’ to kill somebody. But because i am counted among the civilized, i refrained from doing so. Only a complete reprobate will use the idea that others may ‘want’ to be despicable as a defense.
Watch for rappers to produce a hit song using Roman’s rant.
James Greenidge
Queens NY
It is possible that Polanski did what he was accused of 32 years ago. But it also possible that he was the victim of a shyster lawyer who cooked up the whole thing to get a fat settlement out of Polanski. Remember that there are lots of groupies who work with shyster lawyers to do this kind of thing.
And on the same subject, the trial lawyers have done far more harm to the people of American than Mr. Polanski ever could. There used to be 15 companies making football helmets. Now, thanks to trial lawyers, there are only two companies that make the helmets. The trial lawyer put thousands of American workers out of jobs. And there used to be a morning sickness drug that worked called Benedectin. The trial lawyer smelled blood in the water and pounced putting the company and the drug (that actually worked) right out of business costing thousands of jobs. Yes,Polanski may have harmed one victim. But trial lawyers harm thousands of American workers every day. And the trial lawyers give themselves awards.
I believe it was Robin Williams who once did an impression of Jack Nicholson rambling about Roman Polanski’s sexual perversions.
This has been fodder for the left for a long time. Hollywood starts really don’t have a problem with rich people abusing women. They just play people who do on TV.
I think the reason so many want to give Polanski a pass is the brutal murder of his wife, Sharon Tate, and their unborn child by the Manson butchers. Having said that, it is no excuse for his crime, nor his fleeing to escape justice.
If the government were to give him a pass due to history or the length of time away, we would be telling criminals it is acceptable to run away, just don’t get caught.
Child rape is shocking and illegal unless you’re a famous liberal filmmaker.
Its easy to pin liberals, they position at the lowest denominator.
I already boycott certain actors- the list just got longer. If you think boycotting the movies can’t make a difference then brush up on the communist scare. Lots of careers ended during that time. Time to send a message to Hollywierd, your moral relativism is not wanted and will not be tolerated.
Marc, he pleaded guilty. No excuses.
He has admitted to it. Both in the plea agreement and in subsequent interviews. He drugged and repeatedly raped a 13 year old child. It’s not any more complicated than that.
Michael Vick and Plaxico Burris must be ticked.
Please folks. You must know that Polanski is a member of a protected class. Afterall, the Dems repeatedly and pointedly shot down amendments to pending hate crime legislation that would make this kind of perversion exempt from that idiotic and misguided legislation.
Not only will this issue NOT affect many, if any, Hollywood careers, in fact it is likely to have just the opposite effect and actually ENHANCE a few. Afterall, how long do you really think it will be until the movie is made?
There we go. Even though the victim is ready to move on with her life and has been for decades, even though the man has lived in exile from America his whole life (he won’t rape any little girls here any more because he won’t come back), even though he has paid the victim an undisclosed sum, it is up to the public to determine that the death penalty is appropriate for this man.
Ah yes, the righteous indignation of a person and a keyboard. We prove our morality at how viciously we condemn someone else.
Nobody is defending what he did. People are saying that nothing that is done to him now will make a difference. He was looking at 45 days in jail. Somehow I don’t believe that if he did that in addition to the punishments he’s already lived with that the people here would consider it justice.
EVERYBODY KNOWS that no models on magazines, TV, movies are under 50 years old. NOBODY thinks young girls are sexy. . . right? That’s the conventional wisdom here?
So that justifies the drugging and anal rape of a 13 year old girl? Because there are young models on TV and magazines? That’s conventional wisdom WHERE?
There’s a difference between being tempted and giving in to those temptations.
Seems Polanski sued vanity faire for reporting his inappropriate sexual advances toward a young model at the Funeral for Sharon Tate.
Imagine that.
pgtips – I’m going out on a limb here… but in my mind even THINKING about DRUGGING and SODOMIZING a 13 year-old girl is beyond SICK. If anyone is actually TEMPTED to do such things… sick, just sick. Get help. I just cannot believe anyone would suggest being ‘tempted’ by such depravity is okay as long as you don’t act on it.
How can anyone defend this? How?
Turn your heart to God and take the Apostle Paul’s advice and think on GOOD things. PURE things, LOVELY things. With His help you can train your mind away from such immoral thoughts. And I can guarantee that if you never think those things, you’ll never act on those things.
Think pure thoughts and you’ll not even be tempted by such evil.
Thacker Agency – I see… just so long as he doesn’t rape the young girls of OUR country………………..
The death penalty ensures he won’t do it to anyone else… ev-er.
So in your mind all he has to do is pay up and he’s free to do it again?
I applaud the woman for forgiving him and moving on. That’s the right thing to do. But to allow him to be free to commit this atrocity on more young girls is positively IMMORAL. We can forgive and still execute punishment to prevent any further crimes.
Your arguments make no sense at all. And you know what? There is such a thing as righteous indignation. And there is nothing wrong with it.
Remember Michael Jackson?
The “King” of pop.
Pedophile. Period. No further arguments.
Polanski?
A third rate film maker. At best.
Pedophile and rapist. No argument can be made otherwise. End of story.
“Hollywood’s” acceptance of these crimes because the perpetrators were and are “one of them” is sickening but expected.
“Conservative” Michael Medved did a whole radio show yesterday dedicated to just letting Polanski go in order to save money and manpower, because Polanski had pleaded it down to just “sex with a minor” so it wasn’t really rape.
ThackerAgency wrote:
You indeed do sound very righteously indignant.
If you keep getting on horses that high, you’re liable to fall off and break your overburdened neck.
You have GOT to be kidding!
I wonder if Michael would let Polanski babysit his own daughters? The money and manpower has been expended at this point. All we have left is to meet him at the airport.
I guess I just won’t go to the cinema any longer. I already stopped watching TV…
“Conservative” Michael Medved needs to avoid little girls-seems he has the Polanski condition.
Ploanski might say “juries want to f— young girls” but the punk sure did not want to appear in front of a jury. But the point is the man was charged with, admitted to and was convicted of a felony in California–he needs to be brought to California for sentencing.
Celebrities be damned.
I think that job should go to Rogue Cheddar!
I too, have a daughter. She is a married adult now, but were she to be harmed in any way by some piece of crap, I will mete out my own justice here on earth and let God deal with the spiritual side of vengeance.
F- Roman Polanski, the entire Hollywood crowd and the horses they rode in on!
These leftist, immoral libtards are recommending the government put citizens in jail if we don’t buy health insurance. But they demand we let child rapists go without jail.
How seriously screwed up are these people. Liberalism is a mental illness!
What was it leftards used to say about protecting the weakest among us? The next time they say that just laugh out loud in their face!
This event perfectly defines the unending hypocrisy of these brain-damaged morons!
txvet2 said:
It is so bad here all there is in .223 is Wolf Brand – Russian made, cheap but not even my third choise.
Perv Czar
Mr. Polanski, if I catch you anywhere within a mile of my daughter, then I’ll fire up my chainsaw and take away ANY desire for women you may have!
I’m also crious. Child rapists don’t just have a fling and repent. Someone needs to take a good hard look at what he has been up to since he fled.
You can bet he did not stop at 2.
Once Hollywood sufficiently suffers from declining box office sales, do you think they may then re-think their cultural positions? Doubtful. They’ll continue to press on towards filth.
If it goes BANG, it’ll do for now!
I know, right? They wouldn’t even allow him to pick up his Oscar in LA! How much crueler can prison actually be?
Actually, I’m not buying it. I’m as small government as you can get, and what this guy did was sick. It’s certainly not something that every guy dreams of doing.
Let’s not forget that he fled to avoid sentencing, and got away with it simply because he’s a rich and has charisma.
In the world of the elite left the “important” contributors to a Progressive society are afforded privilages. If those privilages injure or kill other people, those losses are considered acceptable for the “greater good.”
Polanski’s “Progressive works” puts him in that group. He’s “too important to fail.”
I boycotted Hollywood along time ago. Nothing but a collection of spoiled communists babies and wierdo sex offenders. I haven’t gone to a movie in years and TV is almost as bad. I don’t need their rich little opinionated conspiracies. I foresee Hollywood losing alot of clout over this one.
If he accidentally falls out of the plane taking him back to the USA, will anyone mind?
If hollyweirds can convince Obama that the victim was accidently born alive during a late term abortion they can probably get him to pardon Polanski on the grounds that she didn’t deserve to be alive anyway.
Self-serving, narcissistic, hypocritical morons with no moral values and no grasp of reality. These people marry multiple times to each other’s spouses…or they just switch up without bothering to marry at all. And they are actually allowed to breed. We need to boycott ANY endeavors they are involved in. Make a list and stick to it. There are a few good people left in Hollywood. Support them.
WarEagle, you got it right. The differences in Conservative and Liberal are a great deal more than political, they are in the very way that thoughts are processed and views are established. Totally different worlds.
Whoopi Goldberg said it wasn’t rape-rape. OK resident genius dingbat what kind of Rape was it?
Nope, Artiste are above the law: at least they tell each other that.
Mary Letourneau is waiting for her apology. She didn’t even rape or drug the underage kid she was involved with. Heck, she married the guy. Maybe we need to compensate her for the injustice?
Anone who argues that it is OK to drug and rape an underage child is telling me plenty about themselves. What I’m hearing isn’t the words they are saying.
Its hollywood. This probably wasn’t his only or even youngest victim. He is not the only one I am sure. Of course they support him because they see it all the time.
Insert push to reduce the age of consent here.
Using MSNBC as a guide, they’ll double down.
This guy, Polanski, and his sycophant supports in Hollywood probably do not even realize that their view of having sex with underage children fits right in with the views of radical Islam.
Lecherous b@$tard$, all of them.
Hollywood earns it’s reputation as a degenerate community, again.
This is just normal behavior for a PEDO… If you don’t believe this is true, go on the WEB and check out NAMBLA… Translated, NORTH AMERICAN MAN BOY LOVE ASSOCIATION… I sy put him in prison, with the GENERAL POPULATION… They will take care of him…
Not just radical Islam. Most of the ‘moderates,’ too. The Koran tells them it’s okay.
And the hollyweird crowd does realize their views on the matter fit in with Islam. It’s one of the many reasons they don’t resist Islam while they scream bloody murder against Christianity.
Hollywood is our enemy every bit as much as al qaeda. Their tactics are just different.
Do you think Hollywoods reaction might be due to this reality:
Sexual exploitation of starry-eyed girls and young women is rampant in Hollywood. Breitbard could mine more gold with an undercover expose of this atrocious behavior.
Birds of a feather flock together.
+1
Also agree w/those who say the supporters of this filthy behavior probably do it (or want to) themselves.
Seems to me that everyone on that list should at least be arrested for aiding a fugitive. Our justice system is a laughingstock, and will only be more of one if this guy slips away again.
I think anyone named “Woody” should really stay out of these arguments …
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
***
HI WAREAGLE82–I think your idea that the rapist should pay a price for his crime is a good one. However, I think that using the death penalty for this crime changes justice into vengeance. The death penalty should be reserved for cases where someone was murdered–or for serious treason against the U.S.A.–like the Rosenberg atomic spy cases.
***
How about castration to prevent repeat offenses followed by 20 years in prison?
***
John Bibb
***
In a related story, Whoopi Goldberg and Debra Winger called for the release of Phillip Garrido for keeping an underage girl for 18 years. Their supporters began a “Free Garrido Now” campaign.
Whoopi: “At least the girls weren’t young-young.”
Wonder how many of these fine folks are also on the “Free Mumia Abu-Jamal” list?
Why is it that no one has the testicles to contradict him? I know at least one adult male who doesn’t wish to f___ young girls…
Something tells me that if Polanski had been arrested while Bush was in office, these Hollywood lefties would be howling that this is a prime example of the facism of Bush’s America. Nevermind that it is the state of California that is persuing charges and extradition. A leftie never lets the facts stand in the way of misplaced moral indigation.
Actually no, that’s not possible. The facts of the case are not in dispute.
The rest of your rant is just one big non sequiter. How exactly does anything done by any trial attorney excuse Polanski for drugging, raping and sodomizing a child?
Fixed that part for you.
And your point is…. what, exactly? That we should stop punishing individual criminals until we pass some kind of tort reform? That our outrage about the trial bar should be so all-consuming that we can’t spare some condemnation for a rapist? Help us out here, because I’m sure several of us are waiting to refute your argument if only you’d make something that resembles one.
Y’know, SpeakEasy, just recently I was trying to explain to someone that the courts take someone’s word for it when the person pleads guilty. Then comes the sentencing for what the person has plead guilty to – unless the person becomes a fugitive from justice like Polanski and kicks the sentencing phase down the road a bit.
But some folks will have not of that reality, so ya might be beating your head against the wall there trying to explain.
There’s actually a difference between the two cases, and it’s what makes this Polanski thing truly sickening.
The “Free Mumia” crowd contends that he was wrongly convicted. Their premise is that an innocent man is in jail. They’re wrong, of course, but if you accepted their interpretation of the facts their cause would be a just one. They’re not saying “Yeah, he murdered a cop but let’s just let him walk”.
Polanski’s supporters, on the other hand don’t contend that he didn’t do it. Their position is basically “sure, he raped a little girl, but he made some great movies so we should just let it slide”. That’s utterly disgusting, it’s completely indefensible.
I really wish that the people signing that petiton could go through what the victim went through, then we could ask them if they still think it’s no big deal.
txvet, some of that Wolf brand .223 could have come in handy when WarEagle caught up with him.
I don’t have sympathy for Mr. Polanski but in the grand scheme of things, Polanski is small potatos. The real menace in our society is the beehive of trial lawyers that puts so many companies out of business, makes doctors practice defensive medicine and drives many OBGYN specialists right out of medical practice. Each year thousands of businesses are forced to close their doors because of frivolous lawsuits, doctors close their practices and important breakthroughs in disease treatment are not made because the potential liability to frivolous lawsuits is so high. So why are we so concerned with Polanski? Polanski may harmed one person 32 years ago, although she says she forgives him and seems healthy. Trial lawyers and their frivolous lawsuits cause greater harm than Polanski could do if he had 500 lifetimes. So why is everybody so worked up about Polanski? Just go to the local courthouse and see all the frivolous lawsuits and ambulance chasing going on daily. That makes Polanski’s shenanigans small potatos in comparison.
Here is a link with some of the details of Polanski’s rape of this child.
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/roman-polanski/Story?id=8705958&page=1
Read it and realize he had already gotten away with statutory rape and managed to get a reduced charge!
And notice how Hollywood was already defending him even back then!
Polanski may not be the lowest life form on the planet but he certainly sees very little when he looks down.