WaPo’s Applebaum still defending failure to disclose Polanski conflict
Patterico reported over the weekend that lecherous child predator/director Roman Polanski’s Washington Post defender Anne Applebaum failed to mention in her latest pro-Polanski blog post that her husband is a Polish politician actively lobbying for Polanski’s freedom.
Applebaum now says she “had no idea that my husband, who is in Africa, would, or could do anything about it, as Polanski is not a Polish citizen.”
Er, except that, as Patterico points out, the very first sentence of her blog post links to a story mentioning that her husband was seeking clemency for Polanski.
How do you say “FAIL” in Polish?
***
Hollywood rides to convicted child-rapist fugitive Polanski’s aid.
Whoopi: It’s not “rape-rape.”
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
L.A. Board of Supervisors Impose $1,000 Fine for Having Fun on the Beach
February 9, 2012 04:42 PM by Doug Powers
77 CommentsWhy don’t White House visitor logs report Hollywood Halloween guests?
January 9, 2012 03:25 PM by Michelle Malkin
118 CommentsNoted Supporter of the 99% Occupies Floor of Hospital
January 9, 2012 01:12 PM by Doug Powers
77 CommentsOccupy Wall Street Shuts Down Production of Law & Order Episode About Occupy Wall Street
December 9, 2011 03:20 PM by Doug Powers
67 CommentsMiley Cyrus, Occupier Poster Girl
December 2, 2011 08:32 AM by Michelle Malkin
128 CommentsHollyweird Hate Tweet of the Day: Adam Levine doesn’t want your money
October 19, 2011 06:44 PM by Michelle Malkin
123 CommentsVideo: Capital One Bank shill turns up to cheer on anti-bank agitators
October 19, 2011 09:55 AM by Michelle Malkin
41 CommentsCelebs Supporting Wall Street Protesters Know a Little Bit About Wall Street
October 5, 2011 01:46 PM by Doug Powers
163 Comments
Categories: Hollyweird
Redstate
» Morning Briefing for February 14, 2012
Betsys Page
» Cruising the Web
Pundit & Pundette
» Bishop Jenky, Nicki Minaj, and the "98%"
Sister Toldjah
» Obama’s new budget is a bad joke

















Lying isn’t just something the left does, it’s what the left *is.* Once you adhere to an entire philosophy of lies, constant lying becomes quite easy.
Whoopi: I’m not smart-smart.
Pole: Success! (gratuitous Polish insult)
That is pretty much how these Hollyweird types think-as Polanski is a fellow “artist” he is exempt from the normal consequences of life.
I fear this case in one more link in the Man-Child Sex Liberation Movement as espoused by Justice Ginsberg.
This is what Situational Ethics and Moral Relativism lead to. When there are no moral absolutes then anything can, and will be, justified by someone.
Whoopi; I’m OK with child molesters X2
What a sicko.
Beautiful.
WAPO has to be proud of the transparent BS being continually spewed by their columnists.
Disingenuous, morally vapid, and stupid is no way to go through life.
So if I get convicted of a crime, all I need to do is make movies to get out of serving time for it???
Cool…
This could be why acorn was so eager to help set up underage brothels. Libs have to get thier play things from somewhere.
Let’s not blow this out of proportion. It’s not like Polanski drugged and raped a child.
Seriously, I cannot wrap my head around his defenders. He should get off because it was a long time ago? Because his victim is (or claims to be) well-adjusted? Because the victim’s mother was partially at fault? The man is still a child rapist!
As a father of a 2 year old daughter, Heather, I can say that I don’t care if it’s been 30 years or 30 minutes! I’d be coming after that pedophile with my Bowie Knife in my hand!
I’m not surprised by Whoopi or much of anything that comes out of the mouth of Hollywood celebrities. But I am disappointed in Applebaum. She has written some excellent columns. This is the same woman who wrote “Gulag”? But when dealing with celebrities, some people go brain dead.
whoopi et al, you really need to reorganize your definitions of bad behavior because your relativistic moral code is leading you into the sewer. marijuana isn’t really a drug, coke isn’t really bad for you, gambling isn’t really addictive or bad, prostitution isn’t really a crime cause it’s victimless. every vice crime that ever existed has been marginalized by the left and hollywood, and now they are marginalizing statutory rape as they have with the nambla group.
I imagine more that one suicide-accidental death fits that scenario.
Since the left can stomach misogynistic regimes and religious “practices” from clitorectomies to stoning, (as long as they’re not Christian religions), what’s a little “she-was-asking-for-it?” supportive chit-chat in the café des artistes?
Liberals sexist? Preposterous. Next somebody will accuse them of racism.
Well, if you can’t make movies to escape punishment, maybe you could write, say, children’s books and get out of jail that way.
AZ Caveman:
I’m with tre.
Although it would be difficult to explain just why a man cut off a certain part of his anatomy with that rusty, dull Bowie Knife, it would be more fitting than for him to be dead and would serve as a reminder to those who believe “Whoop-di-doo!” the brain-dead actress just gave them a pass because it was, after all “not rape-rape.”
Polaksi gave a 13 year-old qualludes and champagne then raped and sodomized her. The illustrious BBC broadcast a report yesterday that he “had sex with” the complainant. Even if he “had sex” with a drugged 13 year old, she was unable to give consent because of her age and her state of mind.
That is rape, Whoopi, CHLD RAPE, so turn in your feminist card, now.
And as for Applebaum, anyone who could could contort reason in such a way to excuse a child rapist, is not going to be forthcoming with salient details, now are they?
Maybe they should ask Oprah what rape-rape is.
This creep was 43 when he did this. I’m 42. I’d like all the people who think Polanski is being persecuted and who have 13-year-old daughters to send me their addresses so I may come over and drug and buttsecks their bat mitzvah girls, since it’s no big deal. Any takers?
If this was some trampy 16-year-old floozy, it’d be different, but it’s not, so it isn’t. They call it “Hollyweird” for a reason.
How can these liberals be so hypocritical and not realize it? Are they all stupid, or just realizing some sort of profit from it? These are the same people who scream max punishment for child molesters. All in all, they are just as corrupt in mind and spirit as our government.
If the Republicans had half a brain, they’d make ENORMOUS gains on this crap.
Melissa Gilbert saying “her mother was in the building” is worse than Whoopi’s drivel.
A 42 year old man gave barbiturates and alcohol to a 13 year old girl. That’s a felony, in and of itself. Barbs and booze had just killed Henrix and several other people, at the time, and this was a 13 year old girl. He plea-bargained out of that charge, but he clearly admitted it.
RIGHT THERE, Gilbert and Goldberg should be pilloried for their atrocity. But it continues…
Once this 13 year old girl was drugged – A 13 YEAR OLD GIRL, DRUGGED AND DRUNK – he undressed her.
THAT’S another felony, in and of itself.
THEN he “positioned her.” The only reason he DIDN’T bind her down is that the drugs and booze did it for him. Yet another felony.
THEN he raped her, anally. And he raped her a SECOND TIME.
He shouldn’t be in jail; he should be staked out in the Arizona desert, naked. So as not to make it cruel and unusual punishment, I recommend giving him qaaludes and champagne first, just to make him more “compliant.”
And right about now I’m OK with doing the same to Goldberg and Gilbert, if they really believe that this animal doesn’t need to be imprisoned. Those are the words of accessories to pedophilia and rape, IMHO.
This is Hollywood. It is a depraved barnyard society. It’s their lifestyle choice to be as perverted and morally corrupt as possible.
What should happen to Polansky? First he should have his genitals cut off and then he should be put in prison so he can also be raped and sodomized just like he did that child.
Whoopi Goldberg is about as pathetic an excuse for a human being as you will find and the fact she gets to be on TV to spew her ignorance is all you need to know about how sad our society is.
If the leftists didn’t have double standards they would have no standards at all.
Can you imagine Hollywood excusing and defending a conservative filmmaker involved in a much less heinous crime? No, I thought not.
These people are beyond despicable. There is literally no end to leftist hypocrisy.
If he hadn’t run away and he just faced his sentencing, Polanski would have served his time already. Now his life may very well end in a cold, lonely cell. I will now signify the violin I’m playing for him by rubbing my thumb and forefinger together.
How does Roman Polanski help Michelle Obama’s Kids?
On September 29th, 2009 at 12:00 pm, Some Guy said:
By staying Europe?
Paging the NOW……NOW……
She’s right. This is drugging and then sodomizing a 13 year old girl. This is worse than “rape-rape”.
Fail = Zawiesc (maybe, I’m way too rusty)…
Unless you are an active pedophile or president of NAMBLA, how in the world can you defend this idiot? Why do the libs always forgive someone of his “indiscretions” if he has an artistic soul?
Maybe we have some room in the cell for Applebaum’s tool of a husband…
I hope you’re not holding your breath!
Once again the “National Association of Gals” is completely silent on a leftist abusing a female in the most awful and egregious fashion.
I can’t believe the “she-was-asking-for-it” implications coming from some many of these leftist idiots! Can you imagine the outrage that would follow if a conservative had said anything remotely similar?
The latest libtard talking point is to compare Polanski to priests who molested children, thereby somehow exonerating Polanski with some twisted, half-baked form of tu quoque.
Funny how the leftists always want to “crucify” Priests who get caught abusing kids.
Even their double standards appear to have double standards.
Liberalism IS a mental disease!
And yes, I know the article I linked to is actually reasonable in its assessment, but the HuffPo left will take that argument and run with it in the opposite direction like a disoriented Forrest Gump.
To paraphrase Dean Wormer, “Fat, stupid and liberal is no way to go through life, Whoopie”.
How can this eyebrowless waste of protoplasm actually sit there and split hairs on the rape of a 13 year old girl? Is she mentally defective?