Iran gets taken to the woodshed…but there’s no paddle

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 1, 2009 08:31 AM

World “leaders” will meet with Iran to “talk” about its rogue nuclear activities.

The “leaders” say this will not be talk for talk’s sake.

But the Obama administration says sanctions are not on the table.

Just really, really tough talk.

Iran gets taken to the woodshed. But there’s no paddle. Just chit-chat.

Michael Ledeen is right: “We’ve Been Talking to Iran for 30 Years.”

And yes, it’s comfy chair time again!

C.E.H. Weidel tweets: “This administration needs Super Nanny.”

Posted in: Iran

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Ztower
  2. PapaTodd.com
  3. GoKlavierKlavierFan
  4. Grand-Pianos.org
  5. PianoFan
  6. Grand-Pianos.org
  7. PianoTrade
  8. GoKlavierKlavierFan
  9. Iran Launches Worms Into Space « Sharp Right Turn

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #1
    On October 1st, 2009 at 8:37 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    That’s it! Bring out the “Comfy Chair”!

  2. #2
    On October 1st, 2009 at 8:39 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    [JARRING CHORD]

    [The door flies open and Cardinal Ximinez of Spain [Palin] enters, flanked by two junior cardinals. Cardinal Biggles [Jones] has goggles pushed over his forehead. Cardinal Fang [Gilliam] is just Cardinal Fang]

    Ximinez: NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise…surprise and fear…fear and surprise…. Our two weapons are fear and surprise…and ruthless efficiency…. Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency…and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope…. Our *four*…no… *Amongst* our weapons…. Amongst our weaponry…are such elements as fear, surprise…. I’ll come in again.

    [The Inquisition exits]

  3. #3
    On October 1st, 2009 at 8:42 am, desertdweller said:

    Time to walk away from the talks.

  4. #4
    On October 1st, 2009 at 8:43 am, TigerLady said:

    I’m sure the Iranians are shaking in their sandals.

  5. #5
    On October 1st, 2009 at 8:44 am, Roland said:

    The purpose of talking to Iran is not to get Iran to do anything. The purpose is to soothe the mentally challenged American voter into believing Obama is ‘doing something’ about the rising danger. That’s all.

    Iran will get nukes. The Arab world will arm up in response. With nukes all over the place, terrorists will be getting their hands on some. Cities will be lost. Government cameras will be everywhere.

    Nuclear terror is a problem well down the road, perhaps a decade or so. That is clearly not Obama’s problem. Some lucky guy in the future gets to use that crisis.

  6. #6
    On October 1st, 2009 at 8:44 am, Michelle Malkin said:

    That’s it! Bring out the “Comfy Chair”!

    Yep, just added.

  7. #7
    On October 1st, 2009 at 8:44 am, md1964 said:

    Anyone surprised??

    We are dealing with an Administration formed by a beta-male who voted “Present” on many of the bills, instead of being a man & standing FOR somethingby at least voting Aye or Ney on issues.

  8. #8
    On October 1st, 2009 at 8:50 am, Truesoldier said:

    I was thinking more along the lines of Team America:

    Kim Jong Il: Hans Brix? Oh no! Oh, herro. Great to see you again, Hans!

    Hans Blix: Mr. Il, I was supposed to be allowed to inspect your palace today, but your guards won’t let me enter certain areas.

    Kim Jong Il: Hans, Hans, Hans! We’ve been frew this a dozen times. I don’t have any weapons of mass destwuction, OK Hans?

    Hans Blix: Then let me look around, so I can ease the UN’s collective mind. I’m sorry, but the UN must be firm with you. Let me in, or else.

    Kim Jong Il: Or else what?

    Hans Blix: Or else we will be very angry with you… and we will write you a letter, telling you how angry we are.

  9. #9
    On October 1st, 2009 at 8:57 am, MarcoPolo said:

    Let Israel handle it.

  10. #10
    On October 1st, 2009 at 8:58 am, Truesoldier said:

    Now it seems that the Obama administration is divided on what to do in Afghanistan:

    With top military commanders and congressional Republicans pushing for a troop increase, Obama pressed key members of his national security team Wednesday for their views during an intense, three-hour session in a packed White House Situation Room.

    I can just imagine how this went.

    Obama: Come on guys help me out. This is really tough. I mean it took me months to pick a dog and I still haven’t picked a new church. Please help me decide this one.

  11. #11
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:12 am, happyscrapper said:

    O.T…I notice that Obama decided to finally address the issue of Afghanistan after The People got on his case. Maybe he is listening to us after all! Or, he checked his poll numbers. It certainly isn’t because he really cares about the troops. I question the timing of the meeting yesterday…sandwiched in between his TV appearances and his trip to Denmark. I previously questioned his patriotism…but that question has been answered.

    As for Iran…nothing will happen until it is too late. They will have nukes and Israel will be in dire peril. This country has sold Israel out, thanks to our muslum POTUS. I just hope the Jews in this country are finally waking up, and will stop voting for the liberals who want their homeland destroyed.

  12. #12
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:16 am, sonofdy said:

    The only advantage Israel will have is that Iran will have to test one first. Israel will then HAVE to act. And quickly.

  13. #13
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:17 am, Roland said:

    The Jews in this country do not give a damn about the Jews in Israel. If they did, they would never have voted for Obama.

    Believe actions, not words.

  14. #15
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:20 am, TigerLady said:

    Roland said:
    The Jews in this country do not give a damn about the Jews in Israel. If they did, they would never have voted for Obama.
    Believe actions, not words.

    Exactly.

  15. #16
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:25 am, jjmurphy said:

    I just hope the Jews in this country are finally waking up, and will stop voting for the liberals who want their homeland destroyed.

    Liberal ideology trumps theology

  16. #17
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:25 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Roland, that is in fact hard to comprehend. But yeah. That seems to be the case.

    and one more thing…

    OBAMA = WEAK

  17. #18
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:27 am, Savage24 said:

    You have entered the world of “medical wonders” no brains, no guts and no backbone.

  18. #19
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:29 am, jangar said:

    Obama needs to quickly get back to Letterman, and maybe bring A-jad with him, and get this mess hashed out.

    Yep, that would work :)

    /sarc

  19. #20
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:30 am, zyzzyg said:

    The unfortunate reality is that Iran is a sovereign nation, and like all sovereign nations, will do what is in their best interest.

    And ‘paddle’ is a euphemism for what exactly?

  20. #21
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:30 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Obama, is actually making the French look like tough guys.

    Our enemies know they can’t beat us in a battle with planes, tanks and soldiers. So they resorted to a covert op of rotting us from the inside out. Remember how these people operate. A 100 year plan.

  21. #22
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:31 am, John Deaux said:

    Now go away or we shall taunt you a second time.

  22. #23
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:32 am, jangar said:

    OBAMA = WEAK

    Begging to differ.

    Obama = New World Order, One World Government. He’s selling us all out at lightening speed. Watch for him to move to dissolve the dollar before the end of his term.

    Everyone MUST get their ‘houses’ in order NOW.

  23. #24
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:33 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    zyzzyg said:

    The unfortunate reality is that Iran is a sovereign nation, and like all sovereign nations, will do what is in their best interest.

    How is wiping out Israel in their best interest?

    And assuming America’s president actually had any guts, how would Iran brandishing nukes be in it’s best interest? More likely, it would mean their demise. But then you have Obama. So that threat is zero.

    And ‘paddle’ is a euphemism for what exactly?

    JDAMs, F/A18D’s, 25 kiloton nukes… take your pick…

  24. #25
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:36 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Further… going to a negotiation table in a case like this without a military threat looming in the background, makes the negotiations pointless for the side looking to win concessions.

    And Obama’s cabinet has all but said that the US has zero intention of using a military option. In fact, it has given signals that it would try to prevent Israel from using a military strike.

  25. #26
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:38 am, jangar said:

    zyzzyg said:

    And don’t forget that Iran has been a cancer to the US for more than 30 years. This stuff does not go away over night

  26. #27
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:40 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    jangar said:

    OBAMA = WEAK

    Begging to differ.

    I don’t disagree. I was referring to his stance towards aggressors.

    Domestically, he is a socialist juggernaut.

  27. #28
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:42 am, dan708 said:

    Perhaps all of this chit-chat is just a diversion to get them to let down their guard while Israel takes care of business. They’ve done it before.

  28. #29
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:45 am, jangar said:

    Domestically, he is a socialist juggernaut.

    And is bent on the destruction of our sovereignty. Don’t look for him to move toward doing anything that might upset any provocative nation of the world, except Israel.

  29. #30
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:46 am, granite said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:20 am, TigerLady said:

    Roland said:

    The Jews in this country do not give a damn about the Jews in Israel. If they did, they would never have voted for Obama.
    Believe actions, not words.

    Exactly.

    Ditto.

  30. #31
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:47 am, cicerokid said:

    Stealth bomber kinda’ looks like a paddle.

  31. #32
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:50 am, spaceycakes said:

    Tomorrow night (Oct. 2) begins Sukkot. Sounds like a good time for the tribe of Judah to thrash some Aryan backside.

  32. #33
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:50 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    jangar said:

    Begging to differ.

    Obama = New World Order, One World Government. He’s selling us all out at lightening speed. Watch for him to move to dissolve the dollar before the end of his term.

    Yup. The number of fronts he is advancing on is disturbing. Most people probably don’t realize how many moves he and his gang are making.

    Take Puerto Rico statehood. While it’s been a liberal issue for some time, they have now crafted a bill that attempts to bamboozle voters in Puerto Rico into voting for statehood, when repeatedly they have rejected it.

    Essentially, they are putting forth a “When did you stop beating your wife” question to voters.

    I’ll go into if anyone wants to know more, but you can google it as well.

    The motive of course is two more Dem Senators and bunch of Dem congressman and a lot of Dem voters.

    It’s all about power and control. It has nothing to do with the well being of citizens.

  33. #34
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:51 am, jangar said:

    granite said:
    Ditto.

    I can see the balerina behind this as well.

  34. #35
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:56 am, graysonret said:

    World “leaders” will meet with Iran to “talk”

    I think, like England and Chanberlain, everyone is scared of another world war. The next one will be much worse, of course, than the last one. But, there comes a time to know when you’re being “led on” and fooled, and put true pressure on these rogues. That’s the mark of a true statesman. Too many so-called “leaders” are more interested in themselves than solving world problems. So, nothing new on the world stage. A lot of people are going to die, needlessly, including some of these “leaders”, because of the “touchy-feely” mentality in the West today. History will, once again, repeat itself, as it has done countless times, due to ignorance. I fear for my children and grandchildren.

  35. #36
    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:58 am, granite said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:30 am, zyzzyg said:

    The unfortunate reality is that Iran is a sovereign nation, and like all sovereign nations, will do what is in their best interest.

    Just as predators, parasites, rapists, murderers, thieves, etc. do what is in their best interest.
    What is your point?

    And ‘paddle’ is a euphemism for what exactly?

    I don’t know whether to ignore, or laugh out loud at, that question.

    Do you even have a point, aside from contentiousness?

  36. #37
    On October 1st, 2009 at 10:10 am, no2pcbs1 said:

    even the comfy chair would be too harsh for liberals to consider, so taking on iran, is a joke. this administration does not have the intestinal fortitude to do anthing against iran, courage escapes zero and his lackey’s.

  37. #38
    On October 1st, 2009 at 10:30 am, granite said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 10:10 am, no2pcbs1 said:

    even the comfy chair would be too harsh for liberals to consider,….

    I take it they would go no further than using the soft pillow, then.

    …so taking on iran, is a joke. this administration does not have the intestinal fortitude to do anthing against iran, courage escapes zero and his lackey’s.

    It goes beyond their cowardice.
    They actually favor Iran over us.
    They think we are at fault, and are a bad nation.

  38. #39
    On October 1st, 2009 at 10:42 am, zyzzyg said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:33 am, NJ-Aviator said: #815642

    How is wiping out Israel in their best interest?

    I don’t know. That is Iran’s question to answer.

    And assuming America’s president actually had any guts, how would Iran brandishing nukes be in it’s best interest? More likely, it would mean their demise. But then you have Obama. So that threat is zero.

    Again, I do not know. Iran has to be asked why they think having nukes is in their best interest. Iran has to be told that the response to their having nukes is their annihilation. Then the question becomes, who will annihilate Iran for having nukes? We did not, and have not, annihilate North Korea for having nukes.

    JDAMs, F/A18D’s, 25 kiloton nukes… take your pick…

    OK.

    And, I repeat, we did not take action against North Korea. And what about Pakistani nukes? India nukes? What were our concerns when those countries were developing nukes? What did we say then, and what did we do after the got them?

  39. #40
    On October 1st, 2009 at 10:44 am, zyzzyg said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:38 am, jangar said: #815650

    And don’t forget that Iran has been a cancer to the US for more than 30 years. This stuff does not go away over night

    Agreed.

  40. #41
    On October 1st, 2009 at 10:51 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    After Iran nukes Israel, controls the Gulf oil states and brings Europe to Her knees all will be well and we can all get along. Patience good people, patience.

    May your flocks, herds and harems all prosper. Comrade Ayatollah B. Hussein Obama is on top of it.

  41. #42
    On October 1st, 2009 at 10:54 am, b-cat said:

    Iran has to be asked why they think having nukes is in their best interest.

    They will say (and have always maintained) they are not making nuclear weapons, they only want cheap power.

    Iran has to be told that the response to their having nukes is their annihilation.

    Which they know will not happen, especially when they have nukes too.

  42. #43
    On October 1st, 2009 at 10:57 am, b-cat said:

    Iran has to be told that the response to their having nukes is their annihilation.

    I might point out that this simply does not matter to Eichmanndidajob in particular. He belongs to the Mahdi sect, and actually desires a world wide blood bath to usher in the Mahdi, the Muslim end times leader depicted in their prophecies. This is not Christ.

  43. #44
    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:01 am, zyzzyg said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 9:58 am, granite said: #815686

    Just as predators, parasites, rapists, murderers, thieves, etc. do what is in their best interest.
    What is your point?

    The point is that the obvious must be stated.

    And, you obviously agree that any entity will do what is in their best interest, regardless of the consequences of their actions. Of course, we will do what is in our best interests, too.

    I don’t know whether to ignore, or laugh out loud at, that question.

    Do exactly what you want, but stand up, take a position and answer the question. Others have. Grow a pair and skip the diplo-speak dance around reality and go ‘all in.’ Say what you mean and mean what you say.

    Do you even have a point, aside from contentiousness?

    Since when does making a statement of fact become contentious? And, asking a question is only contentious when the reponder does not know whether to laugh, or ignore it, because they do not have an answer. A question is contentious because it shuts down the responder who does not have an answer other than blather, and responding with a question rather than an answer.

  44. #45
    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:13 am, granite said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:01 am, zyzzyg said:

    Your posts give the impression that you believe that you are smarter than others here; I guarantee you that you are not.

    The only question that you had posed in the post to which I had referred was:

    And ‘paddle’ is a euphemism for what exactly?

    The answer most likely is the credible threat of, preparation for, and the consequences of, military force.

    “Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments.”

    Frederick the Great
    king of Prussia 1740-1786 (1712 – 1786)

    http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/34507.html

    But, you knew that.
    All of us here know that you knew that.

  45. #46
    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:14 am, corkie said:

    And, you obviously agree that any entity will do what is in their best interest

    I’d like to make it perfectly clear to everyone that what is in a country’s best interest is very dependent upon who is sitting in the White House.

    Iran was doing what was in its best interest in the early part of Jan 1981. Then towards the end of Jan 1981 it decided that something different was in its best interest. Nobody should suggest that the American people can’t effect the “best interest” decision of any sovereign nation.

  46. #47
    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:18 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu will be providing the “paddle” as soon as their excellent intelligence agency decides that the Iranian NUKE is near completion.
    ***
    As far as Iran needing a test–intelligence agency guesses are that Israel has at least 100 nukes. They have never tested one. Hollow steel spheres (instead of the real plutonium or uranium pits) are crushed with explosive “lenses” to verify proper operation.
    ***
    The really hard part of getting nukes is getting the proper weapons grade fissile material. After that Mr. Kahn of Pakistan has provided all the other details needed.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  47. #48
    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:20 am, spaceycakes said:

    Grow a pair and skip the diplo-speak dance around reality and go ‘all in.’ Say what you mean and mean what you say.

    oh re-heh-heally?

    Been reading up on our Freud have we?
    Well, fine; I’m ‘all in’ the game too!
    Sounds like someone has a little pee-pee envy.

  48. #49
    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:48 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Great. Another chance for implementing the ‘Obama Doctrine’:

    Undermine our friends,
    Embolden our enemies,
    Diminish our country.

  49. #50
    On October 1st, 2009 at 12:06 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:13 am, granite said:
    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:01 am, zyzzyg said:
    Your posts give the impression that you believe that you are smarter than others here; I guarantee you that you are not.

    Granite…it is clear that zzy is a troll, somewhat in the same category as lgm, but more wordy. This particular troll gets very very nasty, and belittles every point you try to make. These threads have had some great debates, including those between people who don’t agree on the issues. But when the debate becomes snarly and the poster thinks he is some brainy intellectual who knows better than you, it is time to stop feeding the troll.

  50. #51
    On October 1st, 2009 at 12:08 pm, prendad said:

    Why don’t we skip all of this pretending and just lay it out:

    Iran will never stop enriching Uranium no matter how much “talking”, “meeting”, and arm twisting occurs.

    The minute that Obama or Hillary Clinton declares that we have blockaded refined gas shipments from Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard will immediately blockade the straits of Hormuz and bring all crude oil shipments out of the Gulf to a complete standstill. Now, who is blockading who and who is hurting who the most?

    Israel will end up attacking Iran and hopefully destroying the Iranian nuclear option. Nobody else will quit squabbling and “talking” long enough to do this. Israel is the only nation in the Middle East fearing it’s own existence on this planet and that is quite a motivator.

    The only way for Israel to survive is to attack Iran. Even Israel has a limit to it’s patience. That limit will be reached very soon, within a few months to be sure. The time for talking will run out and the cornered Israelites will strike. Whether we or anybody else backs them up with anything else than words remains to be seen. I doubt that our limp-wristed president will commit.

  51. #52
    On October 1st, 2009 at 12:14 pm, tre said:

    I remember a few years ago when Congressional morons were talking about negotiating with terrorist groups a soldier with the 82nd Airborne called Rush Limbaugh. He said they were negotiating with them.

    Lets send the 82nd Airborne to talk to Iran.

  52. #53
    On October 1st, 2009 at 12:18 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 12:08 pm, prendad said:

    The sad thing is, Israel probably won’t be successful in bombing the nuclear plant. They will either get pushed back, or will not be able to penetrate the underground facility. We definitely have a HUGE problem here, and Obama is totaly incapable of dealing with it. Too bad his organizing skills won’t help him here because he is really good at that.

  53. #55
    On October 1st, 2009 at 12:52 pm, zyzzyg said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:13 am, granite said: #815751

    Your posts give the impression that you believe that you are smarter than others here; I guarantee you that you are not.

    Your impression are your own. And, I will guarantee you that I am not smarter than others here. Never sais so and never suggested it.

    I state my opinions based on the issues raised by MM. I rarely initiate discussions with other posters, but will respond to others who initiate a discussion with me, as you did. I ask questions, hope I get answers, and respond to those who take me to task. I avoid casting perjoratives, assigning motives, suggesting what someone knows or does not know, and agree with others on ocaission.

    The only question that you had posed in the post to which I had referred was:

    And ‘paddle’ is a euphemism for what exactly?

    Yeah, but your response was not an answer. You told me how you felt, and your physical response.

    The answer most likely is the credible threat of, preparation for, and the consequences of, military force.

    Yep, that is an answer. ‘Paddle’ is a euphemism for ‘military force’. Why didn’t you say so sooner?

    “Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments.”

    Frederick the Great
    king of Prussia 1740-1786 (1712 – 1786)

    http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/34507.html

    But, you knew that.
    All of us here know that you knew that.

    [Snark: Do you mean a capella?]

    Excellant quote. And, no I did not know that. I am more familiar with Clauswitz, (paraphrasing) ‘War is an extension of diplomacy.’

    Ummm, so how do you know what everyone knows I know? Reading responses to MM’s various posts on Iran, ‘paddle’ has been characterized as severe sanctions to all out war to tactical military strikes. Therefore, my definition of ‘paddle’ could be among those same responses given by other posters.

    Try avoiding speculation and guessing, and just ask a question.

  54. #56
    On October 1st, 2009 at 12:55 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On October 1st, 2009 at 11:20 am, spaceycakes said:
    Grow a pair and skip the diplo-speak dance around reality and go ‘all in.’ Say what you mean and mean what you say.
    oh re-heh-heally?

    Been reading up on our Freud have we?
    Well, fine; I’m ‘all in’ the game too!
    Sounds like someone has a little pee-pee envy.

    Ooh, my money’s on Spacy!

    Aguado stomps on a cockroach to provoke Ventura]
    Aguado: Homicide, Ventura. Now how ya gonna solve that one?
    Ace Ventura: Good question, Aguado. First, I’d establish a motive. In this case the killer saw the size of the bug’s D!CK and became insanely jealous. Then I’d lose 30 pounds… PORKIN’ his wife.

  55. #57
    On October 1st, 2009 at 1:16 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    I’m sure the Iranians are picturing Obama in their minds as wearing a Jimmy Carter mask. He is the answer to all their prayers…..someone they will be able to play with and string along for as long as neccessary.

  56. #58
    On October 1st, 2009 at 2:27 pm, spaceycakes said:

    a shiny nickel for the guy in the yellow hat!

  57. #59
    On October 1st, 2009 at 2:59 pm, battleaxe said:

    “Stop! … or I’ll say ‘Stop’ again. Don’t make me write you another sternly worded letter!”

  58. #60
    On October 1st, 2009 at 4:47 pm, Salt said:

    Paddle does not necessarily have to mean military intervention, but it should mean something more than just more talking.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Mudville Gazette

» New Standards in Journalism
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook