Buy alprazolam without prescription. Buy alprazolam uk. Buy alprazolam 2mg bars….

Ephedrine. Ephedrine plus. Ephedrine hcl. Mini thins ephedrine. Turning ephedrine into amphetamines….

Hello I bookmarked this blog. Thanks heaps for this!… if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Pianoforte Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!…

Side effects of levothyroxine. Purchase levothyroxine. Can levothyroxine cause bone problems. Discount levothyroxine .8. Carbimazole and levothyroxine ingredients. Oral to intravenous levothyroxine 1.33. Petechial rash and levothyroxine. Soloxine vs le…

 
I don’t think that President Obama ever acknowledged that the surge in Iraq actually worked.
Because of that successful strategy, the world in general now considers the war in Iraq (one theater of the Global War on Terror) a victory.
But …

On October 5th, 2009 at 2:10 pm, corkie said:

Then she shouldn’t have a problem changing it.

Quit sniveling about the headline! It was what the Telegraph originally headlined their story with…which has since been changed by the Telegraph to “angry”.

I have a screen shot of the earlier headline.

An adviser to the administration said: “People aren’t sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn’t seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly.”

That stupid comment has been nagging at me since I read it earlier today.

So McChrystal has to fight a war in Af’stan on the one hand, and play “hard ball” politics in Washington on the other hand so he can fight that war?

McChrystal naive? The naive one is the inexperienced community agitator occupying the WH refusing to face reality.

On October 5th, 2009 at 12:09 pm, FireBlogger said:

The One will slip in a dove from a Pentagon anteroom and ship the entire war effort to (gulp) Biden.

How friggin sad!

So true. The media is already talking about “Biden’s strategy”.

Who knew Biden was a closet military tactician?

Which brings the questions….

I thought Urkel offered a strategy in March? I thought Urkel fired the previous Af’stan commander and installed McChrystal, then refused to take his calls.

Now Urkel keeps talking about some new strategy. Why? Did the last one you offered not work?

You are so right. Sad.

On October 5th, 2009 at 10:53 am, zyzzyg said:

Went to the link and read the article, and there is no mention that Pres Obama is furious with anyone for any reason.

Quoting the excerpt from the article, “Gen McChrystal shocked and angered presidential advisers with the bluntness of a speech given in London last week.”

Ummmm, it is the advisors that have issues with the General. An advisor was asked to characterized what Pres Obama thought of General McChrystal, and declined to do so.

Pres Obama very well might be furious with General McChrystal, but in no way does this story say so. Not every comment by every advisor should somehow be attributalble to the Pres.

Extrapolation and projection does not advance the arguement.

Did you miss the headline?

How many examples do you need where the media is aware of more facts than what makes it into their stories? Could that be a cause for the headline?

How many of these “advisers” were speaking for Urkel? If they were not speaking for him, why were they speaking for themselves?

Rather than whining about being upset over the Commander he appointed, why doesn’t Urkel just address his request for resources rather than taking weeks to do so?