<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stanford U. doesn&#8217;t want you to see this video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:27:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levothyroxine.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-834438</link>
		<dc:creator>Levothyroxine.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-834438</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Levothyroxine too much....&lt;/strong&gt;

Levoxyl vs levothyroxine. Levothyroxine 575 mg. Levothyroxine....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Levothyroxine too much&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Levoxyl vs levothyroxine. Levothyroxine 575 mg. Levothyroxine&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PianoDraft</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-825794</link>
		<dc:creator>PianoDraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-825794</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PianoDraft...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hello :) I bookmarked this blog. Thanks heaps for this!... if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Pianoforte Links http://www.de.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PianoDraft&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hello <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I bookmarked this blog. Thanks heaps for this!&#8230; if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Pianoforte Links <a href="http://www.de.Grand-Pianos.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.de.Grand-Pianos.org</a> Enjoy!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urbin Report</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-821947</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbin Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-821947</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BBC asks: What happened to global warming?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Paul Hudson, the BBC News &#8220;Climate correspondent&#8221; asks an inconvenient question:
What happened to global warming?
For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.
And our climate models did not forecast it, ev...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BBC asks: What happened to global warming?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Paul Hudson, the BBC News &#8220;Climate correspondent&#8221; asks an inconvenient question:<br />
What happened to global warming?<br />
For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.<br />
And our climate models did not forecast it, ev&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie's Farm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-820217</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie's Farm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-820217</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Friday morning links...&lt;/strong&gt;

Advice about marriage. Villainous
A Conservative Bible? Include me out. 
Is anti-trust used for consumer protection anymore?
Charlie Rangel: Poster Boy
The O: Taliban should be part of Afghan govt.
How reform is destroying medical care in Massachu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Friday morning links&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Advice about marriage. Villainous<br />
A Conservative Bible? Include me out.<br />
Is anti-trust used for consumer protection anymore?<br />
Charlie Rangel: Poster Boy<br />
The O: Taliban should be part of Afghan govt.<br />
How reform is destroying medical care in Massachu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819647</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819647</guid>
		<description>The theory it self is not evil, the professor may be or not be evil. Stanford repression of knowledge IS evil. Of course it is only protecting revenue streams, but choosing money over knowledge is evil for an institution of learning.  But that “little” evil is nothing compared to the evil  of those eagerly use this theory to rob people of FREEDOM…these people know that it is just an unproven theory, but grab it eagerly.  Of course they have no problem renaming it from Global Warming to Climate Change….what ever…..as long as they can use it to KILL FREEDOM.  Far to many people in our government believe that they and only they know how the masses must live, that they will not do so willingly so they must be  forced,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theory it self is not evil, the professor may be or not be evil. Stanford repression of knowledge IS evil. Of course it is only protecting revenue streams, but choosing money over knowledge is evil for an institution of learning.  But that “little” evil is nothing compared to the evil  of those eagerly use this theory to rob people of FREEDOM…these people know that it is just an unproven theory, but grab it eagerly.  Of course they have no problem renaming it from Global Warming to Climate Change….what ever…..as long as they can use it to KILL FREEDOM.  Far to many people in our government believe that they and only they know how the masses must live, that they will not do so willingly so they must be  forced,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightisright</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819590</link>
		<dc:creator>rightisright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819590</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Right after DDT.
The Left cares more about junk science than they do 1 million African children per year.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

yep, another wacko environmentalist, Rachael Carson is still killing people with her junk science which has been proven DDT does not harm humans or Rachael&#039;s  precious eggs shells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Right after DDT.<br />
The Left cares more about junk science than they do 1 million African children per year.</p></blockquote>
<p>yep, another wacko environmentalist, Rachael Carson is still killing people with her junk science which has been proven DDT does not harm humans or Rachael&#8217;s  precious eggs shells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fineous Reese</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819569</link>
		<dc:creator>Fineous Reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819569</guid>
		<description>the documentary could&#039;ve been called, &quot;Cloudy with a chance of fruitcakes&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the documentary could&#8217;ve been called, &#8220;Cloudy with a chance of fruitcakes&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred5676</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819498</link>
		<dc:creator>fred5676</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819498</guid>
		<description>I graduated in 1965, just before they started burning the ROTC building, etc.

I did get to vote for Goldwater in &#039;64 though!! And Ronald Reagan FOUR times!

Irony of this story: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.stanford.edu/pr/92/921005Arc2095.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Stanford motto&lt;/a&gt; seems to have been dumped on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reagansheritage.org/reagan/html/reagan_panel_pipes.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ash heap of history.&lt;/a&gt;

Valerie - I got that issue of the alumni/ae magazine the day the Van Jones story really broke - irony, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I graduated in 1965, just before they started burning the ROTC building, etc.</p>
<p>I did get to vote for Goldwater in &#8217;64 though!! And Ronald Reagan FOUR times!</p>
<p>Irony of this story: <a href="http://news.stanford.edu/pr/92/921005Arc2095.html" rel="nofollow">the Stanford motto</a> seems to have been dumped on the <a href="http://www.reagansheritage.org/reagan/html/reagan_panel_pipes.shtml" rel="nofollow">ash heap of history.</a></p>
<p>Valerie &#8211; I got that issue of the alumni/ae magazine the day the Van Jones story really broke &#8211; irony, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fairyfoose</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819497</link>
		<dc:creator>fairyfoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819497</guid>
		<description>Okay, I will grant that I have heard evidence of lighter roof colors deflecting heat, keeping temps cooler. He&#039;s (Chu) still a goof if he was the one that wanted to also paint streets white. Talk about a waste of precious resources...the $ in man hours to do that! I&#039;ve heard no Progressives saying the money would be better spent in a thousand other ways. It all comes back to a boondoggle waste of money and redistribution of wealth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I will grant that I have heard evidence of lighter roof colors deflecting heat, keeping temps cooler. He&#8217;s (Chu) still a goof if he was the one that wanted to also paint streets white. Talk about a waste of precious resources&#8230;the $ in man hours to do that! I&#8217;ve heard no Progressives saying the money would be better spent in a thousand other ways. It all comes back to a boondoggle waste of money and redistribution of wealth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlohaGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819480</link>
		<dc:creator>AlohaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819480</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I doubt it would amount to much savings. As far as climate, consider how small a number the total roof space is vs. area of planet (3/4 is H2O). Seems pretty stupid just by using simple reasoning. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to detect stupidity.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The savings on my roof are mine.  I&#039;m not talking about lowering global temps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I doubt it would amount to much savings. As far as climate, consider how small a number the total roof space is vs. area of planet (3/4 is H2O). Seems pretty stupid just by using simple reasoning. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to detect stupidity.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The savings on my roof are mine.  I&#8217;m not talking about lowering global temps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeakEasy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819426</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeakEasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819426</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 7th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, AlohaGuy said: reflecting sunlight off the roof rather than absorbing it can keep your building cooler in summer, and reduce your air-conditioning bill a bit.&lt;/blockquote&gt; I doubt it would amount to much savings. As far as climate, consider how small a number the total roof space is vs. area of planet (3/4 is H2O). Seems pretty stupid just by using simple reasoning. You don&#039;t have to be a rocket scientist to detect stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On October 7th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, AlohaGuy said: reflecting sunlight off the roof rather than absorbing it can keep your building cooler in summer, and reduce your air-conditioning bill a bit.</p></blockquote>
<p> I doubt it would amount to much savings. As far as climate, consider how small a number the total roof space is vs. area of planet (3/4 is H2O). Seems pretty stupid just by using simple reasoning. You don&#8217;t have to be a rocket scientist to detect stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlohaGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819425</link>
		<dc:creator>AlohaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819425</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;GISS compiles its reports by collecting the USHCN temperature readings and then subjecting them to secret adjustments, allegedly to correct for artificial influences such as land-use changes.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I love &quot;secret adjustments&quot; as a scientific tool...

I like trees too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>GISS compiles its reports by collecting the USHCN temperature readings and then subjecting them to secret adjustments, allegedly to correct for artificial influences such as land-use changes.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I love &#8220;secret adjustments&#8221; as a scientific tool&#8230;</p>
<p>I like trees too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danceswithdachshunds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819387</link>
		<dc:creator>Danceswithdachshunds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819387</guid>
		<description>Really.. we have to &lt;a href=&quot;http://&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;push Lindsey Graham OFF the pickle boat&lt;/a&gt; altogether.  He doesn&#039;t have a brain and therefore doesn&#039;t deserve to call himself a republican.

&lt;blockquote&gt;“To get a bipartisan bill on climate change, you&#039;re going to have to make it attractive for Republicans to vote for a cap-and-trade system,” Graham said&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Lindsey, if there is not ONE iota of empirical data to indicate that ALL GHG cause global warming let alone the TINY amount that we add to them then WHY CREATE AN &quot;ATTRACTION&quot; TO SUPPORT A LIE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really.. we have to <a href="http://" rel="nofollow">push Lindsey Graham OFF the pickle boat</a> altogether.  He doesn&#8217;t have a brain and therefore doesn&#8217;t deserve to call himself a republican.</p>
<blockquote><p>“To get a bipartisan bill on climate change, you&#8217;re going to have to make it attractive for Republicans to vote for a cap-and-trade system,” Graham said</p></blockquote>
<p>Lindsey, if there is not ONE iota of empirical data to indicate that ALL GHG cause global warming let alone the TINY amount that we add to them then WHY CREATE AN &#8220;ATTRACTION&#8221; TO SUPPORT A LIE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danceswithdachshunds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819369</link>
		<dc:creator>Danceswithdachshunds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819369</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; AlohaGuy said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;    Just like we have a nut job who wants to paint rooftops white&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually this is not a bad idea.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Especially in the sense that, if all the rooftops and streets in cities are painted white, it will prove &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heartland.org/publications/environment%20climate/article/24556/GISS_Hansen_Caught_Doctoring_More_Data.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;how WRONG the GISS applied their UHI (urban heat island effect) corrections&lt;/a&gt; to the surface temperature record &lt;a href=&quot;http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/santa_rosa-nm-data-comparison.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;as they did for example for Santa Rosa&lt;/a&gt;, (blue is the original un-doctored USHCN data, red is the doctored GISS data). &lt;a href=&quot;http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/12/08/how-not-to-measure-temperature-part-79-would-you-could-you-with-a-boat/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;

If urban temperature data is taken OUT of the temperature record, &lt;a href=&quot;http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=425725910040&amp;data_set=1&amp;num_neighbors=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &#039;global warming&#039; looks more like this.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://surfacestations.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anthony Watts&lt;/a&gt; has done an outstanding job figuring out just how badly our surface temperature record is tainted by UHI and he deserves an award for proving that there is .. NO CRISIS.

The better idea is to plant trees all over the place because, instead of reflecting heat or absorbing heat to emit later, they just grow and keep things cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> AlohaGuy said:</p>
<blockquote><p>    Just like we have a nut job who wants to paint rooftops white</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually this is not a bad idea.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Especially in the sense that, if all the rooftops and streets in cities are painted white, it will prove <a href="http://www.heartland.org/publications/environment%20climate/article/24556/GISS_Hansen_Caught_Doctoring_More_Data.html" rel="nofollow">how WRONG the GISS applied their UHI (urban heat island effect) corrections</a> to the surface temperature record <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/santa_rosa-nm-data-comparison.png" rel="nofollow">as they did for example for Santa Rosa</a>, (blue is the original un-doctored USHCN data, red is the doctored GISS data). <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/12/08/how-not-to-measure-temperature-part-79-would-you-could-you-with-a-boat/" rel="nofollow">More&#8230;</a></p>
<p>If urban temperature data is taken OUT of the temperature record, <a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=425725910040&amp;data_set=1&amp;num_neighbors=1" rel="nofollow"> &#8216;global warming&#8217; looks more like this.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://surfacestations.org/" rel="nofollow">Anthony Watts</a> has done an outstanding job figuring out just how badly our surface temperature record is tainted by UHI and he deserves an award for proving that there is .. NO CRISIS.</p>
<p>The better idea is to plant trees all over the place because, instead of reflecting heat or absorbing heat to emit later, they just grow and keep things cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlohaGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/07/stanford-u-doesnt-want-you-to-see-this-video/comment-page-1/#comment-819357</link>
		<dc:creator>AlohaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=35967#comment-819357</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Aloha Guy, The guy who wants to paint the roofs (?Steven Chu?) worked at Lawrence-Livermore Lab (greater Bay Area). Where there are actual Rocket Scientists. He’s turning out to be another nut job.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agree on Chu, but reflecting sunlight off the roof rather than absorbing it  can keep your building cooler in summer, and reduce your air-conditioning bill a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Aloha Guy, The guy who wants to paint the roofs (?Steven Chu?) worked at Lawrence-Livermore Lab (greater Bay Area). Where there are actual Rocket Scientists. He’s turning out to be another nut job.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Agree on Chu, but reflecting sunlight off the roof rather than absorbing it  can keep your building cooler in summer, and reduce your air-conditioning bill a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

