See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On October 12th, 2009 at 9:28 am, malkin_fan said:

   So I can now add Ogre to the list.

   1 Racist
   2 Hatemonger
   3 Ogre

2. #2
   On October 12th, 2009 at 9:29 am, b-cat said:

   I was just reading a piece of commentary this am on Big Hollywood that kinda fits.

   http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lscott/2009/10/12/debating-leftists-is-like-debating-charles-manson/

   Never worry Michelle. You are my favorite Ogress.

3. #3
   On October 12th, 2009 at 9:32 am, Cogs said:

   What did you expect? They are Liberals.

4. #4
   On October 12th, 2009 at 9:35 am, MarcoPolo said:

   The piece is an exploration of civility in the public political discourse, or lack thereof — some historical context, some examples, the role of the Internet, the right to free speech and right to engage as a citizen, fairly wide-ranging.

   Wow. Is that really how she saw her article? Fairly wide-ranging?

5. #5
   On October 12th, 2009 at 9:39 am, JHSII said:

   Sorry b-cat, I was following Leigh Scott in that article until he said:

   It’s like arguing the best way to take a cross-country trip with a delusional Dungeons and Dragons geek.

   At that point any credibility he had was instantly lost. He shouldn’t be lumping us in with the leftists.

6. #6
   On October 12th, 2009 at 9:40 am, Stewed Hamm said:

   Let’s see here. Michelle is asking a few basic questions to someone who was recently in the news. 25 years ago this was called “journalism.” Now it’s sour and dangerous?
   Attention Fossil Media: this is why you’re circling the drain.

   Also, note Mrs. Carney-Nunes’s hateful code words:

   “How can I talk to those people?” she said.

   A-hem. RAAAAAACIST!!
   Oh wait, she’s a liberal. False alarm everyone; nothing to see here.

7. #7
   On October 12th, 2009 at 9:41 am, xler8bmw said:

   No liberals aren’t racists right?

   HHHMMM I am a bit confused then…..
   #1 “I wish somebody could call CPS on your Asian ass before your children develop the same hatred running through your Filipino veins.”

   #2 “I reviewed your image this am and I noticed your thick lips. Please tell me you’re not BLACK. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE.”

   Nope no racism there are these people serious!?

   Why is it their the first with the race identity politics?

   Ok another day of UNBELIEVABLE!

8. #8
   On October 12th, 2009 at 9:44 am, Boomer said:

   The left really does a great job of projection. At this stage I do believe they fall into the realm of abnormal psychology. The upside is I have upgraded from a racist, xenophobe, hate speaking (due to using facts I have obtained from the new media), knuckle dragging Neanderthal, and am now an Ogre. For the drama queens on the left you have not even begun to see how uncivil I and other conservative can become when pushed too far, when I reach that point all I can think of is this famous line from a British Baird, “Cry Havoc! And let slip the dogs of war!”

9. #9
   On October 12th, 2009 at 9:46 am, cabrerski said:

   Note to WaPo staffers:

   Remember…

   Being a screeching banshee against a duly-elected right-of-center politician reflects the noble position of important historical dissent. Bonus points are added if theatrics or artistic talents are displayed (Nazi symbols, effigies, etc.)

   Asking a question of left-of-center politicians about policies and laws they wish to pass without debate is criminal and hate-filled.

   Glad to have cleared that up…

10. #10
    On October 12th, 2009 at 9:50 am, jsr said:

    The nation’s political discourse seems sour, angry, even dangerous

    By which they mean there are people that openly disagree with liberal dogma and will not back down by the usual charges of racism, hating children and wanting to kill poor people that used to work in the past.

11. #11
    On October 12th, 2009 at 9:50 am, zyzzyg said:

    “The Post dutifully extrapolated from the incident . . . “

    Yep, it is an unfortunate reality that extrapolation . . . projection and conjecture are tools that are used to mis-characterize and mis-represent facts. Not to mention avoiding telling the entire story.

    Both sides do it, so maybe it is OK. Nope. It is not OK. Because the other kids are jumping off the bridge does not mean you (global) should jump off the bridge, too.

    When Sen Burris says something less than accurate, does not mean that all Democrats believe it. And, when Rep Fox (R) NC says something less than brilliant, does not mean all Republicans believe it.

    Each is an extrapolation, and is an unfortunate mis-characterization and mis-representation of the facts.

12. #12
    On October 12th, 2009 at 9:55 am, Ron said:

    Yes, we know that African Americans have been beaten up at tea parties. Oh, wait, that was a conservative black man who was attacked by SEIU thugs. Never mind, no incivility here.

13. #13
    On October 12th, 2009 at 9:59 am, cheapseat said:

    the most amazing thing is that a t shirt of mccain doggy stylin sarah palin was never even commented upon by these protectors of free speech. anything goes from homo’s and huff po’s and daily kos, but don’t let beck, limbaugh, coulter or malkin ask a question regarding policy, and it’s hate speech. and people wonder why the populace rejects extra rights (hate crimes) for certain groups. if you criticize, prosecutors with an agenda can come after you, costing you a fortune. brown shirts, the media don’t need no stinking brown shirts, they got yellow rags.

14. #14
    On October 12th, 2009 at 9:59 am, b-cat said:

    On October 12th, 2009 at 9:39 am, JHSII said:

    At that point any credibility he had was instantly lost. He shouldn’t be lumping us in with the leftists.

    The operative word there being delusional.

15. #15
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:03 am, sonofdy said:

    I love hate mail in the morning, it smells like victory!!!

16. #16
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:09 am, JHSII said:

    On October 12th, 2009 at 9:59 am, b-cat said:

    The operative word there being delusional.

    So people who play (or have played) D&D are delusional?

    Me thinks you are saying that in the wrong forum.

17. #17
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:09 am, Savage24 said:

    I find it amazing that there are that many idiots that read and believe what is printed in the WaPo. I find it a honor to be called racist and hatemonger by these fools.

18. #18
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:11 am, sonofdy said:

    So people who play (or have played) D&D are delusional?

    HEY we are NOT delusional. I mean they, yeah THEY are not delusional.

    I never dressed up in carboard armor.. not once…

    LOL

19. #19
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:11 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    More people read this blog than read WaPo on a daily basis so I simply cannot understand what they think this will accomplish. Maybe their marketing department has detected some of their flock making the switch to enlightenment?

20. #20
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:21 am, spaceycakes said:

    Barbara Norwood
    to writemalkin@gmail.com
    date Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:22 AM
    subject your lineage

    who is this ‘Barbara Norwood’ character, and why is she so interested in someone’s lineage?
    One can only surmise she is questioning her own…

21. #21
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:21 am, swede said:

    Questions are dangerous, as they require answers. Instead of answering…attack the questioner! Fundamental Ad Hominem logic, and more evidence that MM is dead on target and scaring them silly. Keep up the pressure Michelle.

    I am reminded again of Teddy Roosevelt;

    To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, right or wrong – is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.

22. #22
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:22 am, Rob said:

    “Look, I don’t go for that pretend crap you all go for in this country. Every one of you hates every one of us, and we hate you right back. I don’t drink with nobody I hate, I don’t shake hands with nobody I hate.”

    –Bernardo, “West Side Story”

    I am with Bernardo… Screw them.

23. #23
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:22 am, jdsbc98 said:

    why did u stop putting their e-mail address up?

24. #24
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:23 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    “sour, angry, even dangerous,”

    That sounds like a decent description of the leftist in this country. Not just now, but for decades.

    Gerhart’s little propaganda piece is completely deceptive and the socialist who is the subject of her article is completely (to use a favorite lib term) disingenuous. She’s so full of it that I think even lefty’s might see through it.

    So Carney-Nunes just closed Michelle Malkin’s email like it was virus laden spam. How weak. She could have easily responded to the questions. But like a cockroach, she scurried into a crack in the wall when some revealing light was directed her way.

    If Carney-Nunes wrote an email to Michelle Malkin, I’d be willing to bet a whole lot of money that Ms. Malkin would have responded.

    Liberals are such cowards.

    Michelle, I hope you write a syndicated piece on this incident.

25. #25
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:25 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Next you send e-mails, make sure to include pictures of fluffy bunnies and baby duckies. Lots and lots of smiley faces too. A backdrop of clouds with bright streaks of sunlight breaking through is very uplifting too. These people need this stuff when they are off the meds.

26. #26
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:27 am, b-cat said:

    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:09 am, JHSII said:

    I am not saying you are delusional, I am saying the illustration used in the linked article was a delusional D&D player.

    I was introduced to D&D while serving in the Army. I played it for years. Didn’t suffer from delusions, and I’m sure you don’t either.

    If the writer had used a metaphor that included a delusional cocktail waitress, he also would not be implying that all cocktail waitresses are delusional.

27. #27
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:29 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    I just love the amateurish ham-handed excuses for getting caught too. Michelle lied, my assistant goofed. “They are so mean to me.”

    Yeah, we adults are not as pliant and impressionable as children are we Ms Nunes? Maybe you’re too sensitive for life in the real world.

28. #28
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:34 am, beenthere said:

    The liberal line is that conservatives are only to be tolerated to the extent they bow and/or curtsy before their betters and never, ever get uppity. Proper, old-fashioned conservatives know their place and while they might be permitted to make an objection or ask a question when called upon to do so, as long as they kept their voices and their heads low (“Massa, I do believe your shoes could use some extra polish. May I do so now?”), that was most assuredly the extent of it. We were and are viewed as the servants to the liberal Democrats, a role the McCains and Grahams are only too happy to assume.

    I really would like to think those days are now forever behind us, but old habits die hard.

29. #29
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:35 am, regularguy said:

    Dear Ms. Carney-Nunes and Ms. Gerhart,

    There is a sea of us “Malkins” out here and, guess what, we’re not going anywhere, we’re not intimidated by cries of raaaaaacism, and we’re coming for your jobs. You’re days of mediocre education and journalism are numbered.

30. #30
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:37 am, Paul Revere said:

    And WaPo wonders why all their shilling for their boy, Creigh Deeds, in northern Virginia isn’t helping.

31. #31
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:41 am, cabrerski said:

    Liberalism means never having to say you’re sorry…

    …or practical…
    …or intellectually honest…
    …or reasonable…
    …or blessed with testicular fortitude…
    …or…

32. #32
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:43 am, no2pcbs1 said:

    what pathetic pukes liberals truly are. call them out and they go into victim mode, and then lie. they can never accept responsibility for a thing and since lying is second nature to them they resort to it rather than tell the truth. carney-nunes would go to the wp, after all, fake hysterical drama evidently drives the actions of one and the comments of the other.

33. #33
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:46 am, Truesoldier said:

    The Post erroneously asserted that the video was “erroneously linked” to Carney-Nunes:

    There was nothing “erroneous” about the link. The video was uploaded on the YouTube channel of Carney-Nunes. She now blames it on an “associate” in the Post article:

    This is what they think everyone is upset over (the posting of the video)? I could care less if the video was posted on purpose or as the WaPo tries to claim “erroneously”. My problem is that the indoctrination was done in the first place. The WaPo is just upset that the cat got let out of the bag.

34. #34
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:46 am, ThatSamIAm said:

    Wapo, like the rest of the fringe media, have no stomach for truth. They are idealogue zealots out to smear anyone that doesn’t go along with their left wing progressive socialist agenda.

    They are like sports fans that can tell you all the great things about their team and only the bad about their opponent. Like children that form a click and make fun of the “outsideders”. But they don’t see that they are the outsiders. They are anti-American, anti-morals, anti-values, pro-homosexual, pro-illegal immigrants and pro-social justice. They are the fungus of society.

35. #35
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:49 am, graysonret said:

    People, like Barbara Norwood, are a waste of time. Their IQ and their education are suspect. When they are losing a discussion, they have to resort to name-calling and insults in order to feel, delusionally, that they are winning. I have no time for people like that, around me. If I had to deal with issues that way, my intelligence would tell me that I was wrong and that I needed to reassess my positions. To scream and yell that someone is insulting you, and then, in the next breath, do the same yourself, shows a complete lack of education, common sense, maturity and values.

36. #36
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:51 am, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Ms. Carney-Nunes reminds me of Tawana Brawley. If you recall that incident, Tawana said she had been raped by 7 white men. After an investigation revealed that no such thing had taken place, she admitted that she had made it up.

    It appears that Carney-Nunes is doing much the same thing, claiming to have received hateful e-mails and then conveniently destroying any trace to them.

    Cries of racism float through the air, and Carney-Nunes claims to fear for her life. This is a great way to change the subject and turn her from perpetrator to victim. Happens all the time in the criminal courts so why not here.

    Gerhart is a willing dupe, and possibly much worse.

37. #37
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:51 am, J S Ragman said:

    I am reminded of a scene from the movie Arthur, where Dudley Moore is visiting his father’s office, and his manservant Hobson waits outside, with a rather surly business associate of the elder Mr. Bach.

    The other man is remarking to the waiting area in general, “I can’t believe he gets all that money, and he pays his family back by, by being a stinking drunk.” To which Hobson comments, “I wouldn’t know, sir. I’m just a servant.”

    The other man continues, “Yeah, right. . .” To which Hobson then replies, “On the other hand, go screw yourself.”

    I would imagine that is about as civil as my discourse would be.

38. #38
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:53 am, rplatt said:

    When threatened, leftist Democrats morph into screaming banshees, showing their fangs, dripping slobber from their open rancid mouths and crapping on themselves. Disgusting sight but very revealing . . . we need to keep them in that state.

39. #39
    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:58 am, pressto said:

    Hmm, the WoPo seems to be slipping because they forgot to do their normal, you are RAAAACIST.

40. #40
    On October 12th, 2009 at 11:10 am, Flyoverman said:

    All you learned was how effective you have become, Michelle.

    We have the initiative and they know it. Thus, they try to get us to voluntarily back off. Wishful thinking.

    Releated, yesterday on Yahoo I saw this snort worthy headline. “Tea Partiers turning on Republican leaders; endorsing conservative renegades.”

41. #41
    On October 12th, 2009 at 11:10 am, stillontheroad said:

    Hell, I would rather be an informed conservative ogre than a Liberal Boot Licking Toady.

42. #42
    On October 12th, 2009 at 11:14 am, cicerokid said:

    When you throw a rock into a pack of hounds, the one you hit yelps.

43. #43
    On October 12th, 2009 at 11:20 am, BadIdeaGuy said:

    Wow Michelle, that was some really harsh wording in that email!! (/sarc)

    Every time these guys get cornered I think of the Austin Powers movie with the -uhhh- “enlargement pump” after he’s reanimated. He denies that he owns it, and then they present a credit card receipt signed by him, warranty card filled out by him, and a book on how to use it, authored by him.

    So Car-nes denies being linked to the video, and says “ohhh, look at the hatemongers politely requesting information on this!”

    Then she admits that it was her youtube account?!

    Seriously, somewhere there is a book Carney-Nunes wrote called “How I Taught Kids to Sing Obamaganda Anthems, Videotaped it, and posted it to youtube: That’s my bag, baby!” by Charisse Carney-Nunes. And the back cover will have a review by Ann Gerhart that says “The Burlington ES indoctrination is some of the best statist indoctrination that’s ever been done”.

44. #44
    On October 12th, 2009 at 11:21 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    Just another example of projecting by hateful, irrational, foaming-at-the-mouth Libtards.

45. #45
    On October 12th, 2009 at 11:23 am, RogerCfromSD said:

    There is nothing “civil” about being called a racist, a hatemonger, a teabagger, or any of the numerous names the liberals have called us. Through their MSM outlets, no less!

    So, they can go screw themselves, as far as I’m concerned.

46. #46
    On October 12th, 2009 at 11:31 am, RobM1981 said:

    To be fair: Michelle didn’t start her eMail with “Dear _________.”

    I bet Michelle doesn’t offer scones with tea, either. Barbaric…

47. #47
    On October 12th, 2009 at 11:35 am, RetFireman said:

    It never fails to astound me how hypocritical these Liberals are, or how offensively racist they are in their attempts to claim how racist you, or for that matter, any and all Conservatives are.

    Hypocrisy, thy name is Liberalism.

48. #48
    On October 12th, 2009 at 11:51 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    from Ann Gerhart
    to writemalkin @gmail.com
    date Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM
    subject re: washpost reporter interview request
    mailed-by washpost.com

    Dear Ms. Malkin,

    For a piece that is running in tomorrow’s Washington Post, I am hoping to speak with you briefly this afternoon.

    Is she kidding? She emails you on Saturday at 11:50 am and expects that you’ll be available in the following few hours for an interview?

    I can imagine most newsroom editors accosting her for waiting until the last minute …on a weekend… to get commentary from someone mentioned in her article. What a joke. Maybe she should try to do her job with a little more responsibility.

    Unless of course, she really didn’t want to talk to you, but only say that you did not respond.

49. #49
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:00 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    “DemocRATS” / liberals / socialists / statists / marxists / communists always expect all to bow before their propaganda–and go into HIGH DUDGEON MODE if anyone tries to confuse them with the facts. Or when someone questions their motives, actions, and statements.
    ***
    I have never seen or read Michelle Malkin denigrating anyone because of their color, ethnic group, etc. However, she will SAVAGE THEM UNMERCIFULLY for bad thinking, un-American acts and statements, etc.
    ***
    Good work Mrs. Malkin–keep hitting them where it hurts–in your usual classy style. The truth hurts–and will set us free of these clowns in 2010 and 2012!
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

50. #50
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:03 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Typical liberals.

    They say and do things that are exponentially worse than anything we would think of, and portray our actual attempts at civil discourse as “evil” and ask “Where is the beginning of that coversation?”.

    The beginning of that conversation took place when Mr. Obama ran as a “post-racial president”, and promised us that his election would be the end of racism. Now, we ask a few simple questions and are called racist even more loudly simply because the subject wasn’t comfortable with the questions, which were completely legitimate.

    I wonder what Ms. Carney-Nunes found so uncomfortable about questions like:

    “Did you help write the song/rap and teach it to the children?”

    “Are you an educator/guest lecturer at the school?”

    “Did you teach about your book, “I am Barack Obama” at the school?”

    and

    “How well-acquainted are you with the president?”

    I don’t even see anything confrontational in any of this. In fact, I already know the answers, and I wasn’t even privy to the email exchange.

    Yes. Guest lecturer. Yes. We were schoolmates.

    See Charisse? That wasn’t all that hard, now was it?

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

51. #51
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:07 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On October 12th, 2009 at 10:35 am, regularguy said:
    Dear Ms. Carney-Nunes and Ms. Gerhart,

    There is a sea of us “Malkins” out here and, guess what, we’re not going anywhere, we’re not intimidated by cries of raaaaaacism, and we’re coming for your jobs. You’re days of mediocre education and journalism are numbered.

    Yes!!! I love this post!

52. #52
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:10 pm, dan708 said:

    Now seriously, does anyone with a living brain cell read WaPo? They are swirling down the same toilet as NYT.

53. #53
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:12 pm, dan708 said:

    BTW, this reaction by Carney-Nunes reminds of the MSM’s general reaction to McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin. The common thread is that both Palin and our Ms. Malkin are beltway “outsiders”.

54. #54
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:12 pm, Joshsmompam said:

    Dear Michelle,
    You are delightfully intelligent, compassionate, inspiring and a talented writer. I am forever grateful for your willingness to listen and then give your support to a suburban mom trying to fight the parasitic Democrat/SEIU relationship from engulfing her home and her family.
    Respectfully,
    Pam Harris

55. #55
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:20 pm, d1carter said:

    MM:
    What horribly hateful questions you put to this nice quiet housewife who had nothing to do with the song posted on her youtube account. How incivil!/sarc

    If you go to the article there are many comments posted in rebuttal to WaPo hatchet job. I am proud to be one of them.

    Keep up the great work, MM.

56. #56
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:22 pm, Jvette said:

    On October 12th, 2009 at 11:51 am, NJ-Aviator said

    :

    Exactly.

57. #57
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:26 pm, vickisoup said:

    What’s “dangerous” is calling non-dangerous speech “dangerous” just because it challenges the veracity of someone else’s comments, or questions the motivation behind them.
    Liberals know a thing or two about being “dangerous”, it’s true. Ask their buddies over at the New Black Panthers, ACORN or the SEIU.
    

58. #58
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, zorro said:

    Michelle, you must be hitting the mark to provoke such a response from the WaPo! Well done, I hope and pray that one day the Washington Post will find the money to hire a real journalist to write page one articles. Ann Gerhart is obviously too dim to relate the facts of story, maybe she should apply for a job with ACORN.

59. #59
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:38 pm, Lindsay said:

    Note to libs: unlike the Democratic Underground and the Daily Kos blogs and other liberal, Bush-hating sites, Michelle Malkin will ban you if you use profanity or other non-appropriate remarks—check her terms of use.

    I have been posting for years, and am proud to be part of the “inflammatory conservative” readers of hers…after all, last time I checked, there is freedom of speech. Remember, “dissent is the highest form of patriotism,” or maybe that only applies to Democrats and flaming liberals when a Republican is in office.

    Michelle, thanks for all you do!

60. #60
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:42 pm, guitarguy said:

    Michelle,
    Much thanks for clearing this up!

    And here’s some tasty red meat for the gang:

    http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/34873_Anatomy_of_an_Outrageous_Outrage/comments/#ctop

61. #61
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:42 pm, right_on said:

    This is getting old…

    It all comes down to interpretations. What do liberals regard as, dangerous? Sour? Angry? Incivil?

    Further, what do they think liberty means? Freedoms? Shall no be infringed?

    You see, with me, the meanings of these words never change. With liberals, they change with the season, with the cause, with the color of the man, or whenever it suits their agenda.

    We, as conservatives, use words to sway, convince, or change minds with logical thought. Liberals, for some reason, are incapable of logically forming an argument, and because of that, they MUST use common terms in negative ways to demean, villify, condemn, and demonize those in opposition of their views.

    It’s unnerving to think how many of these types of people are in positions of power in government, and in the schools. Thank God actual rational thinkers are still commanding our military. We must not relax and think they are not trying to compromise that leadership, as well!

62. #62
    On October 12th, 2009 at 12:54 pm, Mister P said:

    These women are out of their league in trying to tangle with MM. She will knock their curve balls out of the park.

63. #63
    On October 12th, 2009 at 1:07 pm, swede said:

    Liberals, for some reason, are incapable of logically forming an argument, and because of that, they MUST use common terms in negative ways to demean, villify, condemn, and demonize those in opposition of their views.

    The reason is obviously that there is no logical argument. The only option at that point is Ad Hominem attack. You can’t deal with the logic, so discredit the person rather than the argument. AKA politics.

    With Culture of Corruption, MM has become a force and voice that must be reckoned with. Much easier attack her than her well researched and reasoned logic. It will backfire.

64. #64
    On October 12th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, jeanie said:

    Go Michelle! Mmmm, mmm, mmm!

65. #65
    On October 12th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Libs just throw up nonsense that sounds somewhat plausible to the uninformed in the hope that it sticks in order to forward their agenda. Climate Change has NADA to do with climate change.

    You try and address the issues and wham!

    Look at the reporter who asked Al Gore a substative question his Global Warming movie. The response? The man’s microphone was cut off and he was escorted out.

    There was more discussion of issues at the Salem Witch Trials. That is why these people need to be met head on with candor and without backing off one inch no matter how hard they cry “foul.”

66. #66
    On October 12th, 2009 at 1:35 pm, zerodamage said:

    I am amused by Charles Johnson on this one. He accepted every single thing that the Post wrote without a single thought otherwise. A quick Google search discovers a lot of disdain for the Washington Post before – you know – the right-wing went Nazi and all of that.
    Sharp Left Turn only

67. #67
    On October 12th, 2009 at 1:39 pm, paulsur said:

    No one reads the Wapo anymore except for Washington liberals. Who really cares what they put on their front or back page? It is irrelevant.

68. #68
    On October 12th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, Leatherneck said:

    I’m not horrible!

69. #69
    On October 12th, 2009 at 1:45 pm, prendad said:

    These example emails that MM often receives denigrating her ethnic background and her sex are apalling.
    Sadly, they are crude examples of shallow-minded, poorly educated bigots who are hard-wired to react in this manner. Talk about incivility, these negative references to MM’s Filipino background are especially petulant and deserve my special lambasting criticism.

    “How can I talk to those people?” she said. “You tell me: Where is the beginning of that conversation?”

    Hey, why don’t you start by washing your collective mouths out with a huge bar of your favorite soap?

70. #70
    On October 12th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, prendad said:

    And furthermore, the Filipino people who fought beside us in WWII do not deserve to have their ethnic backgrounds slurred by spoiled bratty racist low-brows who are not worthy to even fetch them a glass of water.

71. #71
    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Dear Asian Assed, Filipino-veined woman with thick lips,

    I am writing to complain of your incivility…

72. #72
    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:24 pm, graysonret said:

    I wonder how long before Congress and Obama, flex their muscles, and, like all other power-hungry leaders, nationalize the newspapers…in the interest of national security, of course, bailouts, and/or “fairness”. They are already looking at “fairness doctrines” so don’t think it is absurb. I wonder then how the MSM will take having censors; probably think it’s grand being from the “messiah”.

73. #73
    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:25 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Wow! Pravda On The Potomac admits you exist on the FRONT PAGE!

    Does anybody, outside 1600 Penn Ave, still read these morons at the post?

    At this point the “National Enquirer” has got to be the newspaper of record in America…

74. #74
    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:37 pm, Regulus said:

    Modern-day liberals are past masters of the highest expression of hypocrisy: the blatant double-standard.

    Given their own consistently boorish behavior — which manifests itself in the attitude of, “You-can’t-possibly-have-an-honest-disagreement-with-me-so-therefore-it-must-be-an-expression-of-’hate’” — for anyone of the leftist persuasion to tut-tut anyone on the right about “civility” is so insulting to the intelligence as to induce a state of near-shock … except that I have become so accustomed with their oafishness and their flaming hypocrisy that nothing shocks me about them anymore.

    I expect the worst, the lowest, and the most vile from libs and lefties, and they never — never — fail to deliver.

75. #75
    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, lilbean said:

    the media is now nothing more than a PAC. it/they should be looked at and treated as such. can’t remember the show or date, but i remember nyt ed BK exclaiming proudly on the air that bush didn’t realize the “we are a political entity”.

76. #76
    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:42 pm, Tuesday said:

    There’s no reasoning with fools. Now I know why Pam Geller calls the Leftists PUTZES. They are unreasoning, illogical, and hate-filled.

    WaPo is fat becoming an NYT clone.

    Regulus, you got it in one: expect the worst, the lowest, and the most vile from libs and lefties, and they never — never — fail to deliver.

77. #77
    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:49 pm, California Red said:

    How did they describe the nation’s discourse when Bush was in office. I seem to rememebr lots of hateful and angry claims that “Bush lied and people died.” There were lots of Hitler comparisons and hanging or burning of politicians in effegy was considered patriotic dissent.

    For 8 years I had to listen to these people attack George Bush and conservatives. I don’t think now is time for the “folks who created this mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess.”

78. #78
    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:51 pm, happy2behere said:

    The WaPo writer impunes Malkin’s character and gives her a few minutes/hours notice via email, on the weekend no less, to respond. Totally unprofessional. Who’s her supervising editor?

79. #79
    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:56 pm, scrubjay said:

    You should demand that she print a correction about the email not being answered. She made it sound like you were ducking the issue. A few hours before press time is not reasonable. It is like letting the phone ring once and then hanging up and saying that no one answered the phone. It is a practically a lie.

80. #80
    On October 12th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, cabrerski said:

    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:25 pm, WarEagle82 said:
    At this point the “National Enquirer” has got to be the newspaper of record in America…

    Can’t be, they went after liberal John Edwards with a passion…

81. #81
    On October 12th, 2009 at 3:06 pm, WarTip said:

    “How can I talk to those people?” she said. “These are people who persist in believing that Barack Obama is a Muslim, that he isn’t a citizen of this country. You tell me: Where is the beginning of that conversation?”

    Dispense with the emotional rants, dispense with the biased and unfounded allegations, discuss facts, discuss actual situations and real-world results and consequences.

    Just a thought.

82. #82
    On October 12th, 2009 at 3:13 pm, reshas1 said:

    I saw on Fox today that there are parents there today protesting the school.
    I can tell you that if someone did that with my kids(especially posting it on Youtube without my consent), hell hath no fury of a mother taken advantage of.. As a mother, I’d go for the jugular.

83. #83
    On October 12th, 2009 at 3:19 pm, Mister P said:

    I see Michelle made Obama’s top 25 hit list. I want to be on that list Obama is as small minded as politicians come, so watch out.

84. #84
    On October 12th, 2009 at 3:21 pm, cabrerski said:

    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:51 pm, happy2behere said:
    The WaPo writer impunes Malkin’s character and gives her a few minutes/hours notice via email, on the weekend no less, to respond. Totally unprofessional.

    Gerhart: “But that would mean that Malkin’s comments would have shown that my story was without merit. I couldn’t have that since it would ruin my narrative and already-drawn conclusions.”

85. #85
    On October 12th, 2009 at 3:21 pm, wren said:

    For a fine example of how “civil” liberals are in the most liberal city of San Francisco you have to watch this video of the reaction local Democrats had to Gov. Schwarzenegger appearing at their fundraiser.

    Warning: The language they used is not appropriate for children!

86. #86
    On October 12th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, karenhasfreedom said:

    That “reporter” who tried to contact Michelle on Saturday morning can’t have school aged kids. Anyone with a brain knows that any parent with kids is ALWAYS busy on Saturday carting kids around to their activities. Why would she expect to find a busy, working mom hanging by her email/phone for a short 3 hour window mid-day on a Saturday to answer her inane questions?

    Also, how could ANYONE perceive those emails that Michelle sent asking questions as hate filled or impolite?

    What does Obama call it? Getting all wee wee’d up? Geesh, liberals have very thin skin.

    And speaking of skin, why are liberals so focused on the color of someone’s skin? Geesh, those idiots who sent “hate mail” are displying the very bad character that they are complaining to Michelle about.

    People who try to defend Obama and anything about Obama, just are not rational. Not anymore. There is nothing RATIONAL about what is going on with him and around him.

87. #87
    On October 12th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, prendad said:

    I expect the worst, the lowest, and the most vile from libs and lefties, and they never — never — fail to deliver.

    Sounds like the title of an upcoming best seller. Start writing.

88. #88
    On October 12th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, drfredc said:

    Blah blah blah. More left wing political bigotry on display. Expect it to continue far into the future so long as it’s not labeled for what it is by the targets of this bigotry.

    The left has basically replaced it’s racial bigotry with political bigotry, barely changing the subtitles.

89. #89
    On October 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm, swede said:

    prendad said:
    I expect the worst, the lowest, and the most vile from libs and lefties, and they never — never — fail to deliver.
    Sounds like the title of an upcoming best seller. Start writing.

    Already been written. “Unhinged:Exposing Liberals Gone Wild”

90. #90
    On October 12th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, Major O said:

    Also, how could ANYONE perceive those emails that Michelle sent asking questions as hate filled or impolite?

    I don’t think the reporter is attempting to register her OWN perception–she’s trying to SHAPE the perception for thoughtless drones on the Left (like the ones that hectored Michelle with mail after the article was posted) using a redefinition of “incivility” that essentially means asking tough questions of your side.

    Of course that definition did not obtain during White House Press meetings with President Bush…

91. #91
    On October 12th, 2009 at 4:45 pm, CrazyFool said:

    Funny how its her YouTube channel, with her name blazoned on the title – yet she blames an ‘associate’ for posting it. I wonder if she would have taken the credit if everyone had said ‘good job!’….

    As for the email message – funny how the left just can’t hold back on the sexual or racial references when whineing about someone who’s asian, female, or non-white.

    On October 12th, 2009 at 2:01 pm,
    

    AlohaGuy said:

    Dear Asian Assed, Filipino-veined woman with thick lips,

    I am writing to complain of your incivility…

    Exactly!

92. #92
    On October 12th, 2009 at 5:03 pm, OneMonkeysUncle said:

    …and in other news, the denizens of Vast Right Wingnuttistan remain unable to withstand the kind of attacks they routinely use on persons of Alternate Ideologies. (c.f., Beck, Glenn, rape, murder, 1990).

    Ah, poor, defenseless, wittle Wingnuts…

    But don’t worry, your Sky-God(tm) is on your side, and you’ll “Get Your Reward In a Better Place(tm)!”

93. #93
    On October 12th, 2009 at 5:12 pm, corona said:

    For the record: Caughlin was a socialist.

94. #94
    On October 12th, 2009 at 5:17 pm, Micheleeroo said:

    What problem could Miss Carney-Nunes possibly have with these questions from Michelle? Unless Miss Carney-Nunes recognized that she’d been caught brainwashing the kids…..that’s what her response says to me.

95. #95
    On October 12th, 2009 at 5:23 pm, BadIdeaGuy said:

    Her brain already was on morning drive time: breakfast for the kids, her day’s work at a government agency.

    Which .gov agency? Is that a state secret? Lemme guess… Department of Education?

96. #96
    On October 12th, 2009 at 5:25 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    The criminalization of conservatism continues.

    Michelle Malkin: Were you at this place at this time?
    Leftist Moron: You vile, evil person, how could you ask such questions!
    MM: Did you have anything to do with the event that tool place at that location at that time?
    LM: I can’t believe the hateful tenor in your questions!
    MM: Did you deliver a lesson at this place at this time?
    LM: I refuse to respond to your angry, hate-filled diatribes and I am going to report you to the police for hate speech! You dark-skinned, lick-lipped racist!

    “WaPo — leading the charge into left-wing, lunatic editorializing on the front page!”

97. #97
    On October 12th, 2009 at 5:47 pm, ExPfc said:

    Actually, I think Michelle’s lips are lovely…as is the rest of her.

98. #98
    On October 12th, 2009 at 5:49 pm, Republicanvet said:

    I just emailed some comments to the WaPo Ombudsman at:

    ombudsman@washpost.com

    I’m POSITIVE we will see some fast action on this in tomorrow’s paper.

    /sarc

    What a hack Gerhart is. Typical of the slugs infesting the drive-by media.

99. #99
    On October 12th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, Republicanvet said:

    Oooooh. That was quick.

    See the nice response I got from Mr. Ombudsman?

    Subject: The ombudsman is out of the office.

    I will be out of the office starting 10/09/2009 and will not return until
    10/20/2009.

    If you have a complaint, please send to the appropriate desk. I will see
    your messages when I come back on 10/20.

    I’m sure he is looking into my comments while he is out.

100. #100
     On October 12th, 2009 at 6:13 pm, corona said:

     Coughlin was a socialist.