Cell phone bans for thee, but not for wife of Arnie

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 13, 2009 07:00 PM

Talking on a hand-held cell phone while driving in California is illegal:

Californians are going to have to put down their cell phone and use a hands-free device starting in 2008 if they want to talk and drive at the same time under a bill Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger plans to sign into law today.”Public safety is the governor’s No. 1 priority, and this bill make the streets and highways of California safer by making sure drivers have both hands available for driving,” said Margita Thompson, a spokeswoman for Schwarzenegger.

The Terminator needs to have a hands-free talk with wife Maria, who has been caught on tape numerous times violating his law.

TMZ has the latest video.

Looks like someone needs to be made an example of, eh, Governor?

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #823037
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:06 pm, California Red said:

    For a first time offender , the $23 fine turns out to be a $150 ticket after the counties and municipalities add on fees to the nominal fine.

    I know from experince because I, like Arnold, have an outlaw wife.

  2. #823040
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:12 pm, Rob said:

    Did any of you watch the HBO series, “Deadwood”?

    Remeber Wu, and how he parroted Swearengen’s favorite curse word?

    I read about these kind of liberals and I hear it said in Wo’s accent.

    “C—ksucker!”

  3. #823042
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:12 pm, Thomas said:

    Congratulations on contributing to Perez Hilton’s website traffic. I’m sure he appreciates it.

  4. #823043
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:13 pm, letget said:

    Well arnalds wife is a ‘kennedy’ and that makes everything oaky doky. Move on people.
    L

  5. #823045
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:13 pm, The Ugly American said:

    Haha!!……BUSTED!

    Meanwhile, Ah-nald’s eats his very special happy meal while Sacto’s approval ratings continue to tank.

    It’s no wonder our state is so screwed up.

  6. #823051
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:15 pm, letget said:

    Opps, last post s/b arnolds not arnalds.
    L

  7. #823052
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:16 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    Well arnalds wife is a ‘kennedy’ and that makes everything oaky doky. Move on people.

    Exactly! The Kennedy’s have diplomatic immunity in MA, why not in CA?

  8. #823054
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:16 pm, The Ugly American said:

    Congratulations on contributing to Perez Hilton’s website traffic. I’m sure he appreciates it.

    TMZ is owned by Time Warner-AOL and run by Harvey Levin…not Perez Hilton.

  9. #823057
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:19 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:06 pm, California Red said:

    For a first time offender , the $23 fine turns out to be a $150 ticket after the counties and municipalities add on fees to the nominal fine.

    I know from experince because I, like Arnold, have an outlaw wife.

    Yes, but unless your wife is a member of the sainted Kennedy clan like Maria – or her cousin Patrick ‘Patches’ Kennedy, who’s a repeat offender for driving under the influence/impaired (however the law reads) – your wife (and by extension, you) actually have to pay up. No nice police officer to escort you (or your wife) home with a polite reminder to obey the rules the next time. /sarc.

  10. #823058
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:20 pm, graysonret said:

    I’ve been using hands-free for a couple of years now…Onstar and through my navigator. I never did like to fumble for my cell-phone, especially driving home late nights on the highway, when I worked 45 miles away. I usually just let it ring, or pulled over. I always wondered when it will happen that some idiot, yakking nonsense on their cell-phone, would slam into me. It happened to a daughter of mine (rear-ended), last year. I have mixed feelings about making it a law. Too many controlling laws on the books now. Common sense, lacking now in this society, would say to use hands-free.

  11. #823059
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:23 pm, Southpaw said:

    Move along peasants, this is the new Obamamerica.

  12. #823063
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:29 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Could have been much worse. She could have had a lit cigarette with kids in the car.

  13. #823066
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:31 pm, Wayfaring Stranger said:

    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:20 pm, graysonret said:

    …I have mixed feelings about making it a law. Too many controlling laws on the books now. Common sense, lacking now in this society, would say to use hands-free.

    There are already laws on the books that cover distracted drivers – anything that takes your attention away from driving.

    The key is for law enforcement officers to actually enforce the law(s) with some measure of consistency.

    There’s no law mandating hands-free where I live, but with as much time as I spend on the road I opted to purchase (and use) a Bluetooth device – something my boss really should have subsidized, but won’t unless it’s mandated by law. And more often than not, he’s the one who’s calling me while I’m driving (and no conversation with him is brief) :roll:

  14. #823070
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:46 pm, Hangfire said:

    Not once did I ever have to take my eye off the road swapping 8-tracks.

  15. #823073
    On October 13th, 2009 at 7:57 pm, coffee said:

    I’m with Maria, let’s all use our cell phones. Stuff it nannies.

  16. #823084
    On October 13th, 2009 at 8:29 pm, lonecanoeist said:

    The photo could be worse, like a pic of her being sworn into some darn office the Kennedy name opened the door to.

  17. #823087
    On October 13th, 2009 at 8:38 pm, WarTip said:

    There are already plenty of laws on the books that do need to be enforced consistently and not arbitrarily as they are now. That is a great call and something that needs to be looked at closely if we are to remain as a nation.

    That being said, in the new world … we have to make exceptions for the ruling class so that they can make decisions about what is best for us.

    Praises be to Dear Leader … may he walk in his own light that he may avoid the shadows …

    /Sarc?

  18. #823089
    On October 13th, 2009 at 8:49 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Oh, but didn’t anyone read the fine print? It says…

    Liberals are exempt.

  19. #823092
    On October 13th, 2009 at 8:57 pm, mattm said:

    In a SUV no less. Violating the law and not being green, sheesh.

  20. #823094
    On October 13th, 2009 at 9:02 pm, in_awe said:

    Hello! Can you spell “Revenue”?

    The CHP and local PDs write thousands of these tickets every year and they yield big bucks.

    Seems the original bill was crafted so carefully that using a cell phone was illegal but texting while driving was still permitted. It took a year for that oversight to be remedied. LOL!

  21. #823100
    On October 13th, 2009 at 9:11 pm, infidel4life said:

    Typical Kennedy snobbery.

  22. #823102
    On October 13th, 2009 at 9:16 pm, purplepeep said:

    The 6 year old kid whom the leftist government school system wants to send to reform school for bringing his Cubscout fork-knife-spoon to a school lunchroom will get a harsher punishment than Mrs.Governator.

    Off topic, but funny, video from the Onion Newz:

    Obama To Enter Diplomatic Talks With Raging Wildfire

  23. #823106
    On October 13th, 2009 at 9:50 pm, eCurmudgeon said:

    I have a better solution to the “problem” of using cellphones while driving: Require all cars, trucks and SUVs sold in the United States have manual transmissions only. That ought to keep drivers busy enough to not even bother with using a phone at the same time.

    While we’re at it, can we also get rid of cup holders and cruise control, also for the same reason? And finally, I’d also like to see car stereos removed so that drivers can actually hear the outside world (i.e. emergency sirens and the like) and once again pay attention to traffic!

  24. #823125
    On October 13th, 2009 at 10:37 pm, Micheleeroo said:

    Maria, oops!

  25. #823140
    On October 13th, 2009 at 11:02 pm, Right By-The-Sea said:

    Good grief! Get a Bluetooth, libtard Maria! I bought one when the law took effect here, and I’m not a Kennedy OR a multi-millionaire, married to the RINO Governator.

  26. #823164
    On October 13th, 2009 at 11:54 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I remember last year when this became law. That same weekend I was a the shopping center parking lot, and some idiot, talking on his phone, ran a stop sign in front of me. Good thing I WAS paying attention to his irresponsible behavior.

    I can’t stand distracted drivers on their cell phones. If someone’s driving around in a parking lot (for cryin’ out loud), than PARK THE CAR and talk on the phone.

  27. #823173
    On October 14th, 2009 at 12:09 am, Thomas said:

    My mistake, I could have sworn that TMZ was Hilton’s. I got my vapid societal trash rumor / degenerate lefty hero celebrity worship mongers confused.

  28. #823316
    On October 14th, 2009 at 8:33 am, tre said:

    I wish I had a dollar for each of the times some idiot with a cell phone screwed into their ear nearly ran over me when I was on my motorcycle!

    I’ll give her the worstest, mostest, horriblestest punishment I can think of.

    Tie her up in a chair and force her to watch The Last Action Hero. TWICE!

  29. #823393
    On October 14th, 2009 at 9:35 am, gridlock said:

    Our “Public Servants” should ask themselves is they are willing to abide by the laws they pass. If the answer is “No”, they should reconsider their actions.

  30. #823465
    On October 14th, 2009 at 10:41 am, cheapseat said:

    but but but she’s a KENNEDY! nothing is illegal for america’s royal family. gridlock is exactly right.

  31. #823503
    On October 14th, 2009 at 11:08 am, spaceycakes said:

    Escalade, huh? Do they make it in a hybrid?

  32. #823569
    On October 14th, 2009 at 12:09 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, I was on the phone with her!

  33. #823578
    On October 14th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, combat18 said:

    I am surprised she drives herself anywhere.

  34. #823711
    On October 14th, 2009 at 2:34 pm, rightisright said:

    while Sacto’s approval ratings continue to tank.

    and they keep getting re-elected, now ain’t that something.

  35. #823861
    On October 14th, 2009 at 6:09 pm, Cosmo said:

    Relax, people. It’s not like she got behind the wheel intoxicated, drove her “companion” off a bridge, and didn’t report it for hours.

  36. #824832
    On October 15th, 2009 at 10:53 pm, revolution said:

    Hypocrisy reigns.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



JustOneMinute

» An Inconvenient Hack
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook