<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The anti-Rush revival revisited Updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:15:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoPiano</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-830463</link>
		<dc:creator>GoPiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-830463</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;GoPiano...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thanks heaps for this!... if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website HOT Pianoforte Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>GoPiano&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thanks heaps for this!&#8230; if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website HOT Pianoforte Links <a href="http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org</a> Enjoy!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riccola</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-825498</link>
		<dc:creator>riccola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-825498</guid>
		<description>Boycott the NFL!!! http://www.facebook.com/groups.php?ref=sb#/group.php?gid=172601391760</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boycott the NFL!!! <a href="http://www.facebook.com/groups.php?ref=sb#/group.php?gid=172601391760" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/groups.php?ref=sb#/group.php?gid=172601391760</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huggybear</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-825406</link>
		<dc:creator>huggybear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-825406</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;we finally have a “Kristallnacht” against conservatives in this country.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow, was it really necessary to got here?  Not being allowed to buy a football team = THE HOLOCAUST.  Way to undermine whatever point people are trying to make about this ridiculous story.

&lt;blockquote&gt; I think it’s entirely appropriate to sense a larger “movement” afoot than just an isolated case of “coincidence.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I half-agree with you here -- I don&#039;t think it&#039;s just a &quot;coincidence,&quot; but I am not willing to let Rush off the hook for any backlash he receives; he has rightfully earned it.  I refuse to accept that this is all a fabrication that has nothing to do with anything he has ever said or done, or the inflammatory persona he has spent 20 years creating and profiting from, that &lt;em&gt;it’s everyone else’s fault&lt;/em&gt; because they can&#039;t handle the truth.  Please.

I’m calling BS on this tired notion that some prominent figures on the right are being persecuted and victimized by some faceless, conspiring entity in a manner that is any different than they do to their own political opponents.  Rush is a character assassin and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-10-16/rush-the-race-baiter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;race-baiter&lt;/a&gt; as much as the likes of Sharpton and Olbermann, some of you just condone it (or are completely oblivious to it) because he speaks to your political interests.  Whether or not he is a racist is not a concern of mine – that’s not an accusation I toss around lightly -- but I know for a fact he does occasionally make racially provocative comments, and it appears he benefits from the attention far more than he suffers …well, except for this one time.

And really, what does this have to do with Keith Olbermann?  Does he own a sports team that I am unaware of?  But since you brought it up, I would like to go on record right now as fully disavowing and disapproving of &lt;strong&gt;Keith Olbermann as a sexist, self-serving pseudo-progressive&lt;/strong&gt; who sees nothing wrong with degrading women with violent, misogynistic commentary that I personally find both &lt;strong&gt;distasteful and disturbing&lt;/strong&gt;.  The &quot;bag of meat&quot; comment is vulgar and gross on so many levels I don&#039;t even know where to begin, but I refuse to accept that as being a reflection on me simply because it came from Olbermann&#039;s mouth.  He does not and never has represented me or my beliefs, and I am ashamed to have someone like him claiming he does.  If he tries to buy a football team I would be happy to see him shot down, although I doubt being a misogynist is a disqualifying trait in the NFL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>we finally have a “Kristallnacht” against conservatives in this country.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, was it really necessary to got here?  Not being allowed to buy a football team = THE HOLOCAUST.  Way to undermine whatever point people are trying to make about this ridiculous story.</p>
<blockquote><p> I think it’s entirely appropriate to sense a larger “movement” afoot than just an isolated case of “coincidence.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I half-agree with you here &#8212; I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s just a &#8220;coincidence,&#8221; but I am not willing to let Rush off the hook for any backlash he receives; he has rightfully earned it.  I refuse to accept that this is all a fabrication that has nothing to do with anything he has ever said or done, or the inflammatory persona he has spent 20 years creating and profiting from, that <em>it’s everyone else’s fault</em> because they can&#8217;t handle the truth.  Please.</p>
<p>I’m calling BS on this tired notion that some prominent figures on the right are being persecuted and victimized by some faceless, conspiring entity in a manner that is any different than they do to their own political opponents.  Rush is a character assassin and <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-10-16/rush-the-race-baiter/" rel="nofollow">race-baiter</a> as much as the likes of Sharpton and Olbermann, some of you just condone it (or are completely oblivious to it) because he speaks to your political interests.  Whether or not he is a racist is not a concern of mine – that’s not an accusation I toss around lightly &#8212; but I know for a fact he does occasionally make racially provocative comments, and it appears he benefits from the attention far more than he suffers …well, except for this one time.</p>
<p>And really, what does this have to do with Keith Olbermann?  Does he own a sports team that I am unaware of?  But since you brought it up, I would like to go on record right now as fully disavowing and disapproving of <strong>Keith Olbermann as a sexist, self-serving pseudo-progressive</strong> who sees nothing wrong with degrading women with violent, misogynistic commentary that I personally find both <strong>distasteful and disturbing</strong>.  The &#8220;bag of meat&#8221; comment is vulgar and gross on so many levels I don&#8217;t even know where to begin, but I refuse to accept that as being a reflection on me simply because it came from Olbermann&#8217;s mouth.  He does not and never has represented me or my beliefs, and I am ashamed to have someone like him claiming he does.  If he tries to buy a football team I would be happy to see him shot down, although I doubt being a misogynist is a disqualifying trait in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major O</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-825356</link>
		<dc:creator>Major O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-825356</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Are there double-standards at play here? Perhaps. But they’re not mine, and they’re not the property of “the left.” They would belong to the people — whoever they are — who decided to deny Rush the priveledge of purchasing a football team. If these people turn around and sell the team to Keith Olbermann or Al Sharpton, you’ve got yourself a pretty strong case that those specific individuals are acting in bad faith. But the idea that this is part of an ongoing vast left-wing conspiracy to keep conservatives down is absolutely ludicrous.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, yes! IT&#039;S COMPLETELY INSANE AND CRAZY!

So the fact that the entire Same Stream media, not just one news station somewhere in obscurity, but the ENTIRE NATIONAL MEDIA propagates a KNOWN SERIES OF OUTRIGHT LIES about the man for days and not one investigation of the veracity, and a congress woman (Sheila Jackson) makes comments about the appropriateness of Rush not being a part of the purchase because of his supposed views, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are on TV talking about why Rush shouldn&#039;t be a part of the NFL, and professors from black universities are consulted to pontificate on the rightness of denying Rush the &quot;privilege&quot;, but for you it&#039;s &quot;nothing to see here, folks. move along!&quot; Not like Rush, who is routinely propped up by the Left as THE leader of conservatism is actually thought by them to be the face of the conservative movement or anything. Nooo, couldn&#039;t possibly be that in trying to black him they are saying something to conservatives in general! Just some ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS AND ABSURD &quot;right wingers&quot; get all wee-weed up.

That mentality will be the same one that leads people to scratch their heads in ignorant bewilderment wondering &quot;Well, shoot! How did things come to this pass?&quot; when we finally have a &quot;Kristallnacht&quot; against conservatives in this country.
 
The frog in the pot is often boiled slowly and the first time someone sounds the alarm, he sure looks like an &quot;alarmist&quot; and &quot;ridiculous&quot;--until he&#039;s right. It&#039;s called being atop the slippery slope and seeing it for what it is.

And nobody is putting Rush forward as some kind of poor, abject sad, forlorn, &quot;hapless&quot; person. MM and others have plainly stated it looks like a case of blackballing someone for their ideology. Especially when you try to analyze the reason given by execs: Rush is &quot;polarizing&quot;. And as has been pointed out, &quot;So KEITH OLBERMANN is not??&quot; The stated reason doesn&#039;t add up, so that leads people naturally to find the &quot;real&quot; reason.

When you then see the entire lock-step national media work in concert to push a phony story about Rush, I think it&#039;s entirely appropriate to sense a larger &quot;movement&quot; afoot than just an isolated case of &quot;coincidence.&quot;

And for the record, I could care less about the NFL or any national sports. Don&#039;t watch or patronize them in any way and never have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Are there double-standards at play here? Perhaps. But they’re not mine, and they’re not the property of “the left.” They would belong to the people — whoever they are — who decided to deny Rush the priveledge of purchasing a football team. If these people turn around and sell the team to Keith Olbermann or Al Sharpton, you’ve got yourself a pretty strong case that those specific individuals are acting in bad faith. But the idea that this is part of an ongoing vast left-wing conspiracy to keep conservatives down is absolutely ludicrous.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, yes! IT&#8217;S COMPLETELY INSANE AND CRAZY!</p>
<p>So the fact that the entire Same Stream media, not just one news station somewhere in obscurity, but the ENTIRE NATIONAL MEDIA propagates a KNOWN SERIES OF OUTRIGHT LIES about the man for days and not one investigation of the veracity, and a congress woman (Sheila Jackson) makes comments about the appropriateness of Rush not being a part of the purchase because of his supposed views, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are on TV talking about why Rush shouldn&#8217;t be a part of the NFL, and professors from black universities are consulted to pontificate on the rightness of denying Rush the &#8220;privilege&#8221;, but for you it&#8217;s &#8220;nothing to see here, folks. move along!&#8221; Not like Rush, who is routinely propped up by the Left as THE leader of conservatism is actually thought by them to be the face of the conservative movement or anything. Nooo, couldn&#8217;t possibly be that in trying to black him they are saying something to conservatives in general! Just some ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS AND ABSURD &#8220;right wingers&#8221; get all wee-weed up.</p>
<p>That mentality will be the same one that leads people to scratch their heads in ignorant bewilderment wondering &#8220;Well, shoot! How did things come to this pass?&#8221; when we finally have a &#8220;Kristallnacht&#8221; against conservatives in this country.</p>
<p>The frog in the pot is often boiled slowly and the first time someone sounds the alarm, he sure looks like an &#8220;alarmist&#8221; and &#8220;ridiculous&#8221;&#8211;until he&#8217;s right. It&#8217;s called being atop the slippery slope and seeing it for what it is.</p>
<p>And nobody is putting Rush forward as some kind of poor, abject sad, forlorn, &#8220;hapless&#8221; person. MM and others have plainly stated it looks like a case of blackballing someone for their ideology. Especially when you try to analyze the reason given by execs: Rush is &#8220;polarizing&#8221;. And as has been pointed out, &#8220;So KEITH OLBERMANN is not??&#8221; The stated reason doesn&#8217;t add up, so that leads people naturally to find the &#8220;real&#8221; reason.</p>
<p>When you then see the entire lock-step national media work in concert to push a phony story about Rush, I think it&#8217;s entirely appropriate to sense a larger &#8220;movement&#8221; afoot than just an isolated case of &#8220;coincidence.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for the record, I could care less about the NFL or any national sports. Don&#8217;t watch or patronize them in any way and never have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huggybear</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-825179</link>
		<dc:creator>huggybear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-825179</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Please define which “people” you are referencing&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know, the ones who decided they don&#039;t want him buying the team?  The ones victimizing poor, poor Rush?  Who are they?  &lt;em&gt;I honestly don&#039;t know.&lt;/em&gt;

The reason I don&#039;t understand the specifics of the situation is because I don&#039;t care enough to understand them.  I have no idea what the owners of a football team even do, or why that would be something someone would want to do.  I &lt;strong&gt;hate&lt;/strong&gt; professional athletics for myriad reasons, not the least being the fact that wife-beating, drunk-driving, animal-abusing cretins are treated like saints and paid millions and lead lives of insane priveledge if they can &lt;em&gt;throw an f&#039;ing ball&lt;/em&gt;.  I am all too familiar with the presence of polarizing figures in athletics, which is why I don&#039;t pay attention to any of it.

What I &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; care about is that people are whining about Rush being some sort of poor, hapless victim when he is nothing of the sort.  The man has done very well for himself doing what he does, and if that comes at the occasional &quot;price&quot; so be it.  Nobody is threatening his life (at least in this particular instance) or causing him harm in any way, he is being denied the &lt;em&gt;priveledge&lt;/em&gt; of purchasing a football team.  Cry me a river.

Are there double-standards at play here?  Perhaps.  But they&#039;re not mine, and they&#039;re not the property of &quot;the left.&quot;  They would belong to the people -- whoever they are -- who decided to deny Rush the priveledge of purchasing a football team.  If these people turn around and sell the team to Keith Olbermann or Al Sharpton, you&#039;ve got yourself a pretty strong case that those specific individuals are acting in bad faith.  But the idea that this is part of an ongoing vast left-wing conspiracy to keep conservatives down is absolutely ludicrous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Please define which “people” you are referencing</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, the ones who decided they don&#8217;t want him buying the team?  The ones victimizing poor, poor Rush?  Who are they?  <em>I honestly don&#8217;t know.</em></p>
<p>The reason I don&#8217;t understand the specifics of the situation is because I don&#8217;t care enough to understand them.  I have no idea what the owners of a football team even do, or why that would be something someone would want to do.  I <strong>hate</strong> professional athletics for myriad reasons, not the least being the fact that wife-beating, drunk-driving, animal-abusing cretins are treated like saints and paid millions and lead lives of insane priveledge if they can <em>throw an f&#8217;ing ball</em>.  I am all too familiar with the presence of polarizing figures in athletics, which is why I don&#8217;t pay attention to any of it.</p>
<p>What I <em>do</em> care about is that people are whining about Rush being some sort of poor, hapless victim when he is nothing of the sort.  The man has done very well for himself doing what he does, and if that comes at the occasional &#8220;price&#8221; so be it.  Nobody is threatening his life (at least in this particular instance) or causing him harm in any way, he is being denied the <em>priveledge</em> of purchasing a football team.  Cry me a river.</p>
<p>Are there double-standards at play here?  Perhaps.  But they&#8217;re not mine, and they&#8217;re not the property of &#8220;the left.&#8221;  They would belong to the people &#8212; whoever they are &#8212; who decided to deny Rush the priveledge of purchasing a football team.  If these people turn around and sell the team to Keith Olbermann or Al Sharpton, you&#8217;ve got yourself a pretty strong case that those specific individuals are acting in bad faith.  But the idea that this is part of an ongoing vast left-wing conspiracy to keep conservatives down is absolutely ludicrous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major O</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-825173</link>
		<dc:creator>Major O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-825173</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 15th, 2009 at 10:31 pm, Bruce said: 
This type of smear campaign tactic continues to be repeatedly used by the Democrat / Left wing because these attacks CONSISTENTLY work.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And that&#039;s it exactly. I get tired of hearing, &quot;The American people are getting more and more irritated with tactics like this.&quot; NO THEY&#039;RE NOT! It&#039;s WORKING and that&#039;s why these guys use it. Say what you will about Glenn Beck, but he&#039;s on the right track as far as turning the tables right back against them only using the TRUTH instead of made-up quotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On October 15th, 2009 at 10:31 pm, Bruce said:<br />
This type of smear campaign tactic continues to be repeatedly used by the Democrat / Left wing because these attacks CONSISTENTLY work.
</p></blockquote>
<p>And that&#8217;s it exactly. I get tired of hearing, &#8220;The American people are getting more and more irritated with tactics like this.&#8221; NO THEY&#8217;RE NOT! It&#8217;s WORKING and that&#8217;s why these guys use it. Say what you will about Glenn Beck, but he&#8217;s on the right track as far as turning the tables right back against them only using the TRUTH instead of made-up quotes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-824823</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-824823</guid>
		<description>This type of smear campaign tactic continues to be repeatedly used by the Democrat / Left wing because these attacks &lt;em&gt;CONSISTENTLY&lt;/em&gt; work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This type of smear campaign tactic continues to be repeatedly used by the Democrat / Left wing because these attacks <em>CONSISTENTLY</em> work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmills55</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-824800</link>
		<dc:creator>cmills55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-824800</guid>
		<description>The NFL is now a disgrace. I rather watch college football and NASCAR than this crap. Thank goodness that Time Warner did not have NFL network cant wait for college basketball and NHL real action.

This from a black american conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NFL is now a disgrace. I rather watch college football and NASCAR than this crap. Thank goodness that Time Warner did not have NFL network cant wait for college basketball and NHL real action.</p>
<p>This from a black american conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal City Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-824758</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal City Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-824758</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On October 15th, 2009 at 2:10 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

I know I’m a day late here, but this is just one of many things where committed conservatives have no idea how they are so far outside what is accepted in mainstream America.

This sports columnist for the AJC says it all for me.

Highlight:


♦ Sang, “Barack, the Magic Negro,” on his show.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ok jackass class is in session. Paul Shanklin does the song not RUSH! Good try IDIOT. Once again count on a LEFTY troll to not know this.

Also for your stupid Alpha Sierra Sierra a BLACK columnist from the LA times was the FIRST to call him that!

So now you are informed and schooled once again. It is nothing but poking fun at the KBPBHO and you once again fail even moderate comprehension. 

Crawl back under your rock fool. This says it all if you care to get a D9 cat and pull you head out of where the sun doesn&#039;t shine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On October 15th, 2009 at 2:10 pm, Red State Skeptic said:</p>
<p>I know I’m a day late here, but this is just one of many things where committed conservatives have no idea how they are so far outside what is accepted in mainstream America.</p>
<p>This sports columnist for the AJC says it all for me.</p>
<p>Highlight:</p>
<p>♦ Sang, “Barack, the Magic Negro,” on his show.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ok jackass class is in session. Paul Shanklin does the song not RUSH! Good try IDIOT. Once again count on a LEFTY troll to not know this.</p>
<p>Also for your stupid Alpha Sierra Sierra a BLACK columnist from the LA times was the FIRST to call him that!</p>
<p>So now you are informed and schooled once again. It is nothing but poking fun at the KBPBHO and you once again fail even moderate comprehension. </p>
<p>Crawl back under your rock fool. This says it all if you care to get a D9 cat and pull you head out of where the sun doesn&#8217;t shine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarEagle82</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-824579</link>
		<dc:creator>WarEagle82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-824579</guid>
		<description>As you overlook the painfully obvious irony in my reply...

Like I said earlier...

&lt;blockquote&gt; On October 15th, 2009 at 5:37 pm, chapoutier said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;    Chappy must be a charter member of the International Godwin’s Law Association…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And you to the Fraternal Order of the Painfully Oblivious to Irony.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you overlook the painfully obvious irony in my reply&#8230;</p>
<p>Like I said earlier&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p> On October 15th, 2009 at 5:37 pm, chapoutier said:</p>
<blockquote><p>    Chappy must be a charter member of the International Godwin’s Law Association…</p></blockquote>
<p>And you to the Fraternal Order of the Painfully Oblivious to Irony.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-824576</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-824576</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Chappy must be a charter member of the International Godwin’s Law Association…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And you to the Fraternal Order of the Painfully Oblivious to Irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Chappy must be a charter member of the International Godwin’s Law Association…</p></blockquote>
<p>And you to the Fraternal Order of the Painfully Oblivious to Irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarEagle82</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-824575</link>
		<dc:creator>WarEagle82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-824575</guid>
		<description>Chappy must be a charter member of the &lt;em&gt;International Godwin&#039;s Law Association&lt;/em&gt;...

&lt;strong&gt;Oi, vey!  Such a putz he is!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chappy must be a charter member of the <em>International Godwin&#8217;s Law Association</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Oi, vey!  Such a putz he is!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-824570</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-824570</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Unterschätzen Sie nie die zerstörende Befugnis von 26,000 Idioten. — A. Einstein&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You know who else wrote in German?

HITLER!!!

Why are you like Hitler, WarEagle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Unterschätzen Sie nie die zerstörende Befugnis von 26,000 Idioten. — A. Einstein</p></blockquote>
<p>You know who else wrote in German?</p>
<p>HITLER!!!</p>
<p>Why are you like Hitler, WarEagle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarEagle82</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-824567</link>
		<dc:creator>WarEagle82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-824567</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Unterschätzen Sie nie die zerstörende Befugnis von 26,000 Idioten.  -- A. Einstein&lt;/em&gt;

Of course he could say it in Yiddish which is way kewl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Unterschätzen Sie nie die zerstörende Befugnis von 26,000 Idioten.  &#8212; A. Einstein</em></p>
<p>Of course he could say it in Yiddish which is way kewl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-anti-rush-revival-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-824527</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36423#comment-824527</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

Oh, there is that rapier-like, Upstate New York wit again! Now I see how Elliot Spitzer got elected in the first place…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

One L in &quot;Eliot.&quot;  But no doubt you are right that the whopping 26,000 people from my county tilted the election in his favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Oh, there is that rapier-like, Upstate New York wit again! Now I see how Elliot Spitzer got elected in the first place…</p></blockquote>
<p>One L in &#8220;Eliot.&#8221;  But no doubt you are right that the whopping 26,000 people from my county tilted the election in his favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

