Comments on: The “M” in MSNBC stands for misogyny http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:59:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ed Driscoll » ‘Why does MSNBC Tolerate Chris Matthews’ Misogyny?’ http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-1103578 Ed Driscoll » ‘Why does MSNBC Tolerate Chris Matthews’ Misogyny?’ Tue, 03 May 2011 22:06:24 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-1103578 [...] how ubiquitious it’s been amongst the network’s anchors, perhaps MSNBC should work it into their next ad [...] [...] how ubiquitious it’s been amongst the network’s anchors, perhaps MSNBC should work it into their next ad [...]

]]> By: Michelle Malkin » Hanna Rosin, Supreme Arbiter of Feminist Role Models http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-932107 Michelle Malkin » Hanna Rosin, Supreme Arbiter of Feminist Role Models Thu, 13 May 2010 16:17:41 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-932107 [...] the view of the MSNBC misogynists who believe that right-leaning pundits are nothing more than “mashed up bags of meat with lipstick?” Or maybe Rosin subscribes to the view, embraced by so many of her cohorts on the Left, that [...] [...] the view of the MSNBC misogynists who believe that right-leaning pundits are nothing more than “mashed up bags of meat with lipstick?” Or maybe Rosin subscribes to the view, embraced by so many of her cohorts on the Left, that [...]

]]> By: Michelle Malkin » The sun rises. Birds sing. Olbermann lies. http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-890711 Michelle Malkin » The sun rises. Birds sing. Olbermann lies. Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:46:31 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-890711 [...] deranged talking head who called me a “big mashed up bag of meat with lipstick” is suddenly concerned with public [...] [...] deranged talking head who called me a “big mashed up bag of meat with lipstick” is suddenly concerned with public [...]

]]> By: Michelle Malkin » Clown who called me “big mashed up bag of meat with lipstick” says Scott Brown hates women http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-873642 Michelle Malkin » Clown who called me “big mashed up bag of meat with lipstick” says Scott Brown hates women Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:20:25 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-873642 [...] You already know that the “M” in “MSNBC” stands for misogyny. [...] [...] You already know that the “M” in “MSNBC” stands for misogyny. [...]

]]> By: Jaded http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-824709 Jaded Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:35:52 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-824709 Let's be clear about the women that the left would be afraid of....beautiful, intelligent and Conservative....they fear them so they belittle them to make themselves feel more important. They will NEVER be important and they will always be impotent! Let’s be clear about the women that the left would be afraid of….beautiful, intelligent and Conservative….they fear them so they belittle them to make themselves feel more important. They will NEVER be important and they will always be impotent!

]]> By: Laree http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-824250 Laree Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:54:46 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-824250 Imus and Chris Wallace discuss the White House giving Fox News Channel the cold shoulder. Is MSNBC getting nervous about Mourning Joe? <a href="http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/10/imus-i-can-see-msnbc-from-my-window.html" rel="nofollow">Imus, I can see MSNBC from my window </a>:) Imus and Chris Wallace discuss the White House giving Fox News Channel the cold shoulder.

Is MSNBC getting nervous about Mourning Joe?

Imus, I can see MSNBC from my window :)

]]> By: Paul Revere http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-824146 Paul Revere Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:19:11 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-824146 All of the shouting and posturing means Olbermann is over-compensating for something. I'm sure we all know what it is. :-) All of the shouting and posturing means Olbermann is over-compensating for something. I’m sure we all know what it is. :-)

]]> By: JohnnyNJ http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-824129 JohnnyNJ Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:01:47 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-824129 I recently "downsized" my cable package to just "Basic" to save $50.00/Mo. and guess what? I still get CNBC, CNN, and FOX Cable but not MSNBC. It's great because I can't even accidentally tune into MSNBC while I'm "flipping" channels. I guess even Cablevision finds MSNBC irrelevent. I recently “downsized” my cable package to just “Basic” to save $50.00/Mo. and guess what? I still get CNBC, CNN, and FOX Cable but not MSNBC.

It’s great because I can’t even accidentally tune into MSNBC while I’m “flipping” channels. I guess even Cablevision finds MSNBC irrelevent.

]]> By: spaceycakes http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-824110 spaceycakes Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:48:21 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-824110 why hasn't OMU answered? I was waiting for the Rush Limbaugh facts he was going to thrash us with... doooiee. why hasn’t OMU answered? I was waiting for the Rush Limbaugh facts he was going to thrash us with…

doooiee.

]]> By: Flyoverman http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-824094 Flyoverman Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:33:00 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-824094 My view of people like Letterman and Olberman is simple. <em>No quarter asked and none given.</em> Let's party. My view of people like Letterman and Olberman is simple.

No quarter asked and none given.

Let’s party.

]]> By: McCloud9 http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-824086 McCloud9 Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:36 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-824086 <strong>How to Piss Off a Conservative...Lie to them! How to Piss Off a Liberal... Tell them The Truth! Michelle, pay No Attention to Olberman. You know how those Columbia University Grads. are... Its like they know more about Corn Futures than any other News Broadcaster on the air... How to Piss Off a Conservative…Lie to them!
How to Piss Off a Liberal… Tell them The Truth!
Michelle, pay No Attention to Olberman. You know how those Columbia University Grads. are… Its like they know more about Corn Futures than any other News Broadcaster on the air…

]]> By: GraniteMan http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-824078 GraniteMan Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:00:45 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-824078 Olbermann better take his cue from Rush and stop being so divisive! NFL won't let him in the locker room to sniff the jocks. Olbermann better take his cue from Rush and stop being so divisive! NFL won’t let him in the locker room to sniff the jocks.

]]> By: jangar http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-824071 jangar Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:53:22 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-824071 I really love how the left shows the world just how profane they really are. They used to be in the closet, but now parade themselves about like gay days in San Fran. I really love how the left shows the world just how profane they really are. They used to be in the closet, but now parade themselves about like gay days in San Fran.

]]> By: Dimsdale http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-824008 Dimsdale Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:20:25 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-824008 <blockquote> On October 14th, 2009 at 8:32 pm, OneMonkeysUncle said: Wait, let me get this straight… You’re all riled up about something Keith Olbermann said on TV and think he should be exiled to, like, the dark side of the moon…</blockquote> Allow me to help: Limbaugh is being falsely accused, and being defamed, as a racist, by demonstrable racists, because he is a conservative. Malkin is being racially attacked amd defamed by liberal racists for being a very successful conservative. In both cases, Limbaugh and Malkin use facts and their opponents own words against them, and their attackers are simply being typically ignorant, fact challenged liberals. <blockquote> …and yet you can’t wrap your teeny tiny little minds around even the CONCEPT that people might object to Rush Limbaugh owning a professional sporting team, 60% of whose players are BLACK?! RUSH LIMBAUGH?!</blockquote> Case in point. Are you afraid he will become a "plantation owner" due to all those black players? Are other white team owners running plantations? If Rush did what they say, prove it. It should be simple, right? <blockquote>With all due respect to La Malkin – and I am NOT defending Olbermann here, he was utterly and inexcusably over the line – but you people are such hypocrites it’s sickening.</blockquote> Try being "sickened" with facts rather than unfounded feelings, rumors and lies repeated to Goebbles standards. You will see a lot less of the inside of a toilet bowl if you do. <em>Ad hominem</em> attacks are the last refuge of a fact challenged liberal scoundrel.

On October 14th, 2009 at 8:32 pm, OneMonkeysUncle said:

Wait, let me get this straight…

You’re all riled up about something Keith Olbermann said on TV and think he should be exiled to, like, the dark side of the moon…

Allow me to help: Limbaugh is being falsely accused, and being defamed, as a racist, by demonstrable racists, because he is a conservative. Malkin is being racially attacked amd defamed by liberal racists for being a very successful conservative.

In both cases, Limbaugh and Malkin use facts and their opponents own words against them, and their attackers are simply being typically ignorant, fact challenged liberals.

…and yet you can’t wrap your teeny tiny little minds around even the CONCEPT that people might object to Rush Limbaugh owning a professional sporting team, 60% of whose players are BLACK?! RUSH LIMBAUGH?!

Case in point. Are you afraid he will become a “plantation owner” due to all those black players? Are other white team owners running plantations? If Rush did what they say, prove it. It should be simple, right?

With all due respect to La Malkin – and I am NOT defending Olbermann here, he was utterly and inexcusably over the line – but you people are such hypocrites it’s sickening.

Try being “sickened” with facts rather than unfounded feelings, rumors and lies repeated to Goebbles standards. You will see a lot less of the inside of a toilet bowl if you do.

Ad hominem attacks are the last refuge of a fact challenged liberal scoundrel.

]]> By: bjc http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/the-m-in-msnbc-stands-for-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-823984 bjc Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:02:17 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36434#comment-823984 *Michelle, you are the best; The "Paul Revere" type this country needs so desperately now more than ever; Keep on informing the masses leading up to 2010 and 2012. *As for Olberdork, maybe he misspoke; Perhaps he was thinking of when he frenetically "mashes his meat" while thinking of his mother; Or could it be she does it for him??? ;) *Michelle, you are the best; The “Paul Revere” type this country needs so desperately now more than ever; Keep on informing the masses leading up to 2010 and 2012.
*As for Olberdork, maybe he misspoke; Perhaps he was thinking of when he frenetically “mashes his meat” while thinking of his mother; Or could it be she does it for him??? ;)

]]>