See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On October 19th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   The video starts with an add for mashed potatoes. How white and racist is that? In fact, it’s all that runs for me…

2. #2
   On October 19th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   Ad, add what’s the difference?

3. #3
   On October 19th, 2009 at 1:54 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   I’m waiting for the MichelleO Antoinette T-shirts.

4. #4
   On October 19th, 2009 at 1:57 pm, mchristian said:

   Started with an ad for Vaseline when I watched it. That was much more apt. Barry would look better in a Che beret. Maybe when he meets with Fidel or Hugo.

5. #5
   On October 19th, 2009 at 1:57 pm, verogolfer said:

   Well, the gifts on my Christmas list are now set. Who wouldn’t want one of these?

6. #6
   On October 19th, 2009 at 1:57 pm, Truesoldier said:

   What a dilemma for the Obama administration. They cant complain about the cat being let out of the bag due to the need for China to keep buying US debt….

7. #7
   On October 19th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, vickisoup said:

   NOW can we call him a Communist?

8. #8
   On October 19th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, redbug70 said:

   If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain’t gonna make it with anyone anyhow!

9. #9
   On October 19th, 2009 at 2:03 pm, chapoutier said:

   NOW can we call him a Communist?

   Wait. You weren’t before?

10. #10
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, spaceycakes said:

    LOL–he wanted him to look more ‘American’ by having the hat cocked sideways…my guess is the news reporter got the translation wrong…the designer really used the term ‘wanted him to look more street‘.

11. #11
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:06 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Commerce officials say the shift will not cause controls to be loosened in regards to the export of missile and space technology…

    No need to loosen control as the Clinton administration already gave the Chinese everything they need.

12. #12
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:08 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, spaceycakes said:
    LOL–he wanted him to look more ‘American’ by having the hat cocked sideways…my guess is the news reporter got the translation wrong…the designer really used the term ‘wanted him to look more street‘.

    You walked into the party
    Like you were walking onto a yacht
    Your hat strategically dipped below one eye
    Your scarf it was apricot
    You had one eye in the mirror
    As you watched yourself gavotte
    And all the girls dreamed that they’d be your partner
    They’d be your partner, and

    You’re so vain
    You probably think this song is about you
    You’re so vain
    I’ll bet you think this song is about you
    Don’t you? Don’t you?

13. #13
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “It’s as though Commerce’s mishandling of missile-tech transfers to China in the 1990s never happened,” said Mr. Sokolski, a former Pentagon proliferation specialist. “But it did. As a result, we are now facing much more accurate, reliable missiles from China.”

    More reason to have supported Duncan Hunter. And why he was cool to Romney.

14. #14
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, letget said:

    Does this shirt come in dunn’s size? She seems to love this mao guy.
    L

15. #15
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Does this shirt come in dunn’s size? She seems to love this mao guy.
    L

    Hers comes without a neckhole, since her head is up her a$$ anyway.

16. #16
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Yes, AlohaGuy–Hunter was my man.

17. #17
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:15 pm, pianoman said:

    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, letget said:

    Does this shirt come in dunn’s size? She seems to love this mao guy.
    L

    Sizes are S, M, L, XL, 2XL, and “Oh My God it’s moving toward us”

    She’s covered.

18. #18
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:15 pm, California Red said:

    Only paraonid right wing radicals think Obama has any Marxist or Maoist leanings.

    The sad thing is that if Lennon was alive today he would have to re-write the lyric: If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you can work with the President anyhow!

19. #19
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:19 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    I watched Huckabee last night and the Oak Ridge boys were on. They did “Elvira” and seeing this has lyrics running through my head:
    “Oh-bama, oh-bama, oh-bama mao mao”

20. #20
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:21 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Rogue Cheddar said:
    Yep, C Michael Armstrong (Hughes) and
    Bernie Schwartz (Loral)hardly even a wrist slap for this stunt.

21. #21
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:22 pm, conservative in europe said:

    Qu’elle Surprise!?!

    I am stunned Blue Lips didn’t think of this earlier.

    He looks more honest in his full on Commie garb. The sheep’s clothing is off. The five year plan may now begin!

    How many people did Mao murder?

22. #22
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:30 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Started with an ad for Vaseline when I watched it

    haha!
    Should have been Crisco–it comes in a much larger size. You know–the ones sitting on the seats inside the men’s bathhouses.

    Ready, steady–GO!

23. #23
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, letget said:

    With most of the curd coming from china, this shirt will probably make you itch and get a horrible rash. This might not be a bad idea for the people who would buy this crud.
    L

24. #24
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Kwill said:

    Doesn’t matter too much, they’d have just stolen the tech via espionage anyway.

25. #25
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:42 pm, JammieWearingFool said:

    What would Che wear?

26. #26
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:47 pm, Hangfire said:

    Sticking with my “Vote for Pedro” shirt.

27. #27
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:55 pm, Flyoverman said:

    The shoe definately fits.

28. #28
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:55 pm, rightisright said:

    Mr. Sokolski said he expects the U.S. government under the new policy to again boost Chinese military modernization through “whatever renewed ‘benign’ missile technology” is approved.

    “It was foolish for us to do this in the 1990s and is even more dangerous for us to do now,” he said.

    I’m a little more concerned about the missile technology being passed on to China than I am about the Chinese admiring Oba-mao as a communist…that’s not new.

29. #29
    On October 19th, 2009 at 2:58 pm, Hangfire said:

    The only difference between tactical missile technology and benign missile technology is the payload.

30. #30
    On October 19th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Benign missile technology is an Obamatron design for the Fondle me Rocket designed to subdue the Taliban.

31. #31
    On October 19th, 2009 at 3:08 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Benign missile technology is an Obamatron design for the Fondle me Rocket designed to subdue the Taliban.

    stillontheroad, are you still talking about the Crisco situation?

32. #32
    On October 19th, 2009 at 3:14 pm, stillontheroad said:

    spaceycakes said:
    Indeed: this is the only response from the current President addressing the rough negotiations encountered with the terrorists and his hopes of greasing the valley of discontent between the Taliban and his administration.

33. #33
    On October 19th, 2009 at 3:20 pm, tre said:

    The only difference is Duh One hasn’t offed the thousands of citizens who refuse to bow down to him.

    !YET!

34. #34
    On October 19th, 2009 at 3:31 pm, SirKnob said:

    Gee Deja Vu President Carter all over again.

    During the cold war Carter administration, Russian missle technology was well behind ours too. Ballistic missle accuracy was within a mile of the target.

    At the time it had to do with bearings. The Russian did not possess equipment to produce machine bearings of the quality necessary.

    Step in President Carter. In order to provide the Russians better machinery for ‘farming tool purposes’ he relaxed the restrictions and the Russian were able to purchase our best machining tools.

    Not only did their missle accuracy increase, but their submarines became quieter.

    As for farming, it pretty much stayed the same, go figure.

    During the Carter years we gave the Russians technolgies that we spent billions to create. They go them for almost nothing. Bascially, because Mr. Big Tooth Smily in the White House didn’t see anyone as threat.

    Deja Vu and communist too.

35. #35
    On October 19th, 2009 at 3:48 pm, prendad said:

    Let’s see, we’re making it easier for the Chinese to get any military tech secrets that they didn’t already get form Clinton, and we are inviting the Russians to view our nuclear facilities. Well, hell, we’re just a bunch of world neighbors, friends-all. Right?
    Peace and goodwill is just breaking out all over the planet.
    Right?
    Well, unfortunately. . .
    Wrong!
    And we will, once again, pay dearly for these foulups. Consistently stealing money from military budgets from year to year is one thing. Compounding that transgression with deliberate give-aways of military technology is yet another stupid mistake.
    Now we have an underfunded military trying to defend us against world powers that are using the same technology as we are, compliments of our presidents, past and present.

36. #36
    On October 19th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, conservative in europe said:

    Sir Knob,

    Deja Vu and communist too.

    That one is a keeper!

    Fantastic.

37. #37
    On October 19th, 2009 at 4:51 pm, martin.musculus said:

    #826643
    On October 19th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, stillontheroad said:
    Benign missile technology is an Obamatron design for the Fondle Fonda me Rocket designed to subdue the Taliban.

    Fixed it.
    I for one, will never forget…

    But, I have to ask:
    Do you think they pay King Cockroach royalties for the use of his sickly-snoot?

38. #38
    On October 19th, 2009 at 5:03 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    How many people did Mao murder?

    We don’t know for sure. He let tens of millions of starve in the early 60s and then “re-educated” about 40-50 million throughout the 60s and 70s.

    Don’t forget that the Chinese gov’t is persecuting and murdering Chinese Christians to this day.

    Wonderful form of government, socialism! That’s why every murdering, tyrannical, bastard flocks to socialism like moths to a light. It gives them the power they crave.

39. #39
    On October 19th, 2009 at 7:48 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Team Obama – Delivering Chinese missiles to the American Heartland with perfect precision and low, low prices!

    You have to admire the determination of Clinton and Obama to reward their Chinese Communist contributors!

    Democrats – The best politicians money can buy!

40. #40
    On October 19th, 2009 at 8:27 pm, CW4_KGP said:

    Obama’s Chinese name is Obie Tse DUNG. I think it squarely states his position on most everything. Whenever he speaks he is full of crap.

41. #41
    On October 19th, 2009 at 10:22 pm, shimauma2 said:

    LOL! do the folks making and selling this shirt know they are engaging in capitialism? And does barry hussein get a cut because they are using his image?

42. #42
    On October 19th, 2009 at 10:24 pm, shimauma2 said:

    aww Martin, my bad; I missed your post on the way down….

    Teeej, thinking she should read these more thoroughly before posting

43. #43
    On October 20th, 2009 at 7:23 am, WarTip said:

    “It’s as though Commerce’s mishandling of missile-tech transfers to China in the 1990s never happened,” said Mr. Sokolski, a former Pentagon proliferation specialist. “But it did. As a result, we are now facing much more accurate, reliable missiles from China.”

    On a bright note, if they do have to actually use those missiles to get our natural resources (though we seem to be doing very well at giving them away already since both Russia and China are drilling closer to our shores than we can) they will very likely only use tactical nukes on the major population centers.

    Unfortunately, this will vastly decrease the number of people voting democrat so it may cause some issues between the communist Chinese and dear leader. No report yet from Comrade Gibbs on what compromises are being discussed.

    On October 19th, 2009 at 10:22 pm, shimauma2 said:

    LOL! do the folks making and selling this shirt know they are engaging in capitialism? And does barry hussein get a cut because they are using his image?

    Despite Communist China declaring itself as a communist nation, it has been moving into a more socialist form of government since the 90s. Two things to remember though, never call them Socialists as they do prefer the Communist Label and never order Peking Duck; it is now known as Beijing Duck … also never eat with your hands around them as it is considered rude.

    Duh One “Hopes” you will not need to be made aware of these “Changes” but with him in office and a complicit congress behind him … well … better safe than sorry.

    The t-shirts? Who cares? We knew this a long time ago … let’s just hope it takes the Chinese this long to figure everything out … maybe we will have a better chance of surviving this administration.

44. #44
    On October 20th, 2009 at 9:49 am, thetoysurgeon said:

    Yeah lets help the Chinese dvelop missles like ours so they can kill us all dead ! Geez what a bunch of morons.

45. #45
    On October 20th, 2009 at 9:52 am, thetoysurgeon said:

    I hope the US doesn’t default on our chinese loans….