MoveOn demands that Democrats stay off Fox News

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 20, 2009 02:36 PM

A reader just sent this fresh missive from the Fox News Deranged-foot soldiers at MoveOn:

From: Noah T. Winer, MoveOn.org Civic Action moveon-help@list.moveon.org
Subject: Stay off FOX
[Recipient name redacted]
Date: Tuesday, October 20, 2009, 2:05 PM

Dear MoveOn member,

All year, FOX has worked 24/7 to block President Obama’s agenda—repeating lies about “death panels,” promoting Tea Party protests, and whipping up fake political scandals.1

Now, President Obama is fighting back. The White House communications director said FOX is a “wing of the Republican Party…let’s not pretend they’re a news network.”2 To draw attention to its biased coverage, President Obama will not appear on FOX for the rest of this year.3

It’s about time Democrats stood up to FOX! Can you sign this petition asking Democrats to support President Obama’s stance by staying off FOX as long as he does? We’ll deliver it to Sen. Lautenberg and Sen. Menendez. Clicking here will add your name:

http://civic.moveon.org/foxobama/o.pl?id=17603-12662345-_CGt.ax&t=3

The petition says: “Democrats should support President Obama’s effort to call out FOX. Please stay off FOX for as long as he does.”

Democrats often appear on FOX in hopes of reaching out to conservative viewers. But FOX cuts off their mic, distorts what they say, or runs biased headlines at the bottom of the screen.4 In the end, Democrats always lose on FOX.

FOX insists there’s a difference between its news shows and its right-wing opinion shows with Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and others.

But in August, FOX’s so-called news shows “aired 22 clips of town hall meeting attendees opposed” to Obama’s health care plans and zero in support. CNN and MSNBC were more fair and balanced.5

In another “news” story, FOX passed off a GOP press release as its own research—typo and all.6

FOX executives now describe the channel as “the voice of opposition” to Obama’s agenda. FOX president Roger Ailes—a former adviser to Nixon, Reagan, and George H.W. Bush—said, “I see this as the Alamo.”7

But a Capitol Hill newspaper reports, “In the House and Senate, Democrats who pledged to follow the administration’s near-boycott of Fox were hard to find, although many expressed support for Obama’s stance.”8

Democrats will only find the courage to join Obama if they hear from enough concerned voters. Sign this petition to ask Sen. Lautenberg and Sen. Menendez to stay off FOX. Clicking here will add your name:

http://civic.moveon.org/foxobama/o.pl?id=17603-12662345-_CGt.ax&t=4

Thanks for all you do.
–Noah, Nita, Michael, Kat, and the rest of the team

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Rob said:

    Good riddance to bad rubbish.

  2. #2
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    Nobody would see them if they stay off Fox. Fox is the only station that anyone is watching, and their numbers are growing.

  3. #3
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:43 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    Who cares? Democrats and Republicans are wholly irrelevant…

    …ooops… is Alan Colmes an “independent”?

  4. #4
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:46 pm, Hangfire said:

    Hmmmm……..after requesting (ordering) Democrats to stay off of FOX, they can then make a better claim to FoxNews being biased: “See, they never have any Democrats on their shows!”

  5. #5
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:46 pm, WarTip said:

    Hahahahahahahahahahhaha

    Will I answer their question?

    YES!

    Can you sign this petition

    YES I CAN!

    BUT

    NO I WON’T!

    No matter how much you may cry and whine about someone actually FACT CHECKING YOUR PROPAGANDA AND UNADULTERATED GARBAGE!

    The audacity of audacity on display here is truly amazing!

    My last comment here had to be censored … but only because they deserved it!

  6. #6
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:46 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Who was that scratchy voiced woman who ran Dukakis’ campaign into the ground?

    I’ll bet she was a party animal back in the 70s.

  7. #7
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:47 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    MSNBC fair and balanced?

    OK, and Keith Olbermann is sane…

  8. #8
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:50 pm, Southpaw said:

    Boo hoo hoo. They said hurtful things about our Obama. We’re gonna take our widdle balls and go home.

    Good.Riddance.

  9. #9
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:50 pm, d1carter said:

    This will only play well with the deeply committed Dems. Most want to watch sources of news to find out what is really going on.

  10. #10
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:50 pm, jjmurphy said:

    We simply cannot co-exist with these liberals. There is no common ground. Divorce/Secession are the least violent options. Let them live in their utopia, which will soon enough turn into a living Hell. We can live in our wildly successful, free-market economy without these pathetic, whining, prepubescents.

  11. #11
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:51 pm, walterc said:

    I’m no political pundit, but I’m not sure calling protesters derogatory names when reporting on the Tea Party Protests is really being “Fair and Balanced”.

    And I’ve seen plenty of coverage of the President’s health care program on FNC.

    so I don’t think I’ll be clicking on the link to add my name.

  12. #12
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:56 pm, formerwm said:

    This is such childish behavior on the part of Obama. Just imagine if Bush had done this to network news for running with a false story about his National Guard Fit Reports. This whole administration is like babies run wild. It would be funny if not so serious in it’s consequiences to the American public. What did Baldwin say? There is a cold chill running through this nation. Hmmmmm, now I am agreeing with a far left nut? I’m starting to feel that chill. But it is coming from a whold new direction…Chicago er I mean The White House.

    Where are the true reporters??? They should all feel used and manipulated by Obama. I hope the backlash is tremendous if they ever come to their senses.

  13. #13
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:56 pm, Rob Roy said:

    Noah, Nita, Michael, Kat, and the rest of the team

    wooo hooo, let’s kill free speach.

  14. #14
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:57 pm, WarTip said:

    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:50 pm, Southpaw said:

    Boo hoo hoo. They said hurtful things about our Obama. We’re gonna take our widdle balls and go home.

    Good.Riddance.

    What balls? If they found a pair of balls on the playing field somewhere, they better look for the owner. I think he will want them back and may not favor it too kindly if he is forced to ask for them!

    Umm, those are balls you play with lest ye believe I am being … ummm … humorous. Just because someone has testicular fortitude and their opponent does not, does not mean you are always referring to those balls.

    Balls or dodge ball?

    Oops

    Nevermind

  15. #15
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Man, and I keep telling Democrats to take this network that started the rumor that the president was raised jihadi and sponsors opposition protests seriously.

  16. #16
    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm, MagnumOpus said:

    HA! The author’s name is “Noah Winer”. LMAO! Given the tenor of his missive, it sounds like he knows plenty of whiners…

  17. #17
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:00 pm, txvet2 said:

    No problem. The RINOs like Snowe, Collins, McCain, et al will be sure to get the Democrat message out for them.

  18. #18
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Roland said:

    All Democrats refusing to appear on the most watched TV news channel? Nobody gets to see them?

    Oh, darn.

    Is there something about a political party taking Washington D.C. that automatically turns them into brainless twits?

  19. #19
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Hangfire said:

    Can we now call the White House “Chicago’s Lower East Side?”

  20. #20
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, rplatt said:

    Well, then I’m sure the wormy little Democrat politicos will all fall into lock step and do exactly as momma MoveOn instructs them to do. MoveOn and George Soros own the Party of the Democrats so they have little choice but to comply or be punished.

  21. #21
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:04 pm, Hangfire said:

    Fox Channel has more minorities than the other networks, and they’re better looking, too.

    And Fox has Hernando Revolver AND Colmes, the High School A/V Club poster child.

  22. #22
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:07 pm, FruNobulux said:

    The more shrill and strident they get, the more it hurts them. Each of us should get dozens of accounts on the lefty websites and egg them on.

  23. #23
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:08 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    I wonder if bullets will get their attention? Nothing else seems to work. No transparency, no rational arguements, they flatly don’t want to hear from half of the people in this country. Go get em FOX we are behind you.

  24. #24
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:08 pm, John Deaux said:

    Fox News deserves to be ostracized. They ran fluff pieces like the Van Jones and ACORN stories and ignored hard news like how bad Fox News is or why the Obama Administration is just like Camelot.

  25. #25
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:09 pm, Truesoldier said:

    Don’t they realize this is a loosing strategy? The more they make this war against Fox public the more the general public will go check out Fox News like a rubber necker checks out an accident causing a traffic jam.

    The only winner in this will end up being Fox getting more publicity (which suits me fine).

  26. #26
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:10 pm, Flyoverman said:

    I love this. Wouldn’t you love to run against one of these idiots?

    “So you believe we should have open commincations with North Korea, Iran, Hamas and the Taliban. However, you will not have open communications with Fox News. Do you consider Fox News a greater threat to America than North Korea, Iran, Hamas and the Taliban?”

    Every Repuiblican who appears on CNN, ABC, CBS, or MSNBC, should ask their Democrat counterpart should use the occasion to ask their counterpart, “Can we have this discussion on Fox? If not, why not?”

    Go for it Democrats. Polarize yourselves.

  27. #27
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:11 pm, Savage24 said:

    Great, when is Shep Smith leaving?

  28. #28
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:12 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Its funny he doesn’t know how to number pargraph or indent..LOL look at the numbers following each paragraph in his email.

    what a winer!

  29. #29
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:13 pm, bamapachyderm said:

    Hugo Chavez called, he wants his domestic policy papers back.

    Our Left is no different from that of the Che Guevara/Fidel Castro-worshiping Latin American Left.
    http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1925129,00.html

  30. #30
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:14 pm, iamsaved said:

    These dimwits just keep pushing more moderate democrats and independents to the Foxnews channel to see what all the commotion is. When they hear something that sounds like the truth, they stick around.

    Outside of the extreme left wing portion of the Democrat party, most people can differentiate between out and out propaganda and news that presents facts to back their statements up.

    The passion may be dying down with the “Slobbering Love Affair” the MSM has regarding Obama.

  31. #31
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:15 pm, JammieWearingFool said:

    I wish they would stay off Fox. I have little use for mean, ugly people.

  32. #32
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:17 pm, JammieWearingFool said:

    Of course if Fox deliberately did not invite on Democrats they’d be whining even more that they can’t get any air time.

  33. #33
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:18 pm, bamapachyderm said:

    I just signed it…as Hugo Chavez. LOL
    (hugo.chavez@presedencia.gob.vz)

  34. #34
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:20 pm, T-Bone said:

    On Fox, Democrats always lose.

    Now thats a statement. They lose, of course, because they are challenged on Fox. Their moronic ideas do not withstand the scrutiny.

  35. #35
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:21 pm, Sparrow said:

    For all those of you thinking “Who cares? Fox will win the ratings war anyway”, that’s not the point. It’s in the current administration’s interest to see that Democrats speak on the less watched news channels – not because they care about the ratings wars, but because that’s how they can limit people’s exposure to the truth. We just had that report out stating that Obama’s campaign purposely limited the media’s exposure to their candidate during the election. This is more of the same. It doesn’t matter if Fox news wins the ratings game, the Democrats still succeed in keeping their people from getting asked the tough questions or speaking live where they could accidentally go off script.

    The more the Democrats can keep all of us peons from seeing and hearing their people speak, the better it is for them. They need an apathetic, uncaring public if they’re going to get their agenda through.

  36. #36
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:21 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    But in August, FOX’s so-called news shows “aired 22 clips of town hall meeting attendees opposed” to Obama’s health care plans and zero in support. CNN and MSNBC were more fair and balanced.

    We must be watching two different Fox News channels. All I saw during August was Obama on the tv. Fox carried several of his meetings live and in their entirety. Everytime Barry O has showed up somewhere to speak Fox has been there so I don’t want to hear that crap, as long as the venue was open to the public. Maybe they are talking about some of those meetings held behind closed doors or ones in which only select members of the media were invited.

  37. #37
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:22 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    MOve On is a circle jerk.

  38. #38
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:23 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    So it is a problem that Fox airs “right-wing” opinion shows.

    Then why isn’t it a problem that the other networks air left-wing editorials during the so-called newscasts?

    I don’t care if Katie Couric editorializes with her lunatic, left-wing views on a Sunday morning show. I do mind that she editorializes from behind the news desk nightly! But the lefties have no problem with THAT!

  39. #39
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:25 pm, Freddy said:

    Thanks for all you do.
    –Noah, Nita, Michael, Kat, and the rest of the team

    Does the rest of the team consist of – chavez, ortega, zelaya, castro, castro, obama?

  40. #40
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:26 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    The Obama admin is trying to discredit FOX NEWS as non-news thus Fox will lose their Press and Tax status. The IRS will be looking down Fox’s neck before too long. Better make sure your house is in order. They will do everything to shut Fox down. The will shut down any other view at any costs. Beware FOX.

  41. #41
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:26 pm, T-Bone said:

    If Move On spent as much money on helping the poor as they do on political propaganda, we could eradicate poverty.

    Instead of doing something about it, they just blame others. Typical Obama approach. Same ilk, same results.

  42. #42
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:27 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Hangfire said:

    Can we now call the White House “Chicago’s Lower East Side?”

    more like mao-central….

  43. #43
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:27 pm, seamusmeboy said:

    Couldn’t be a more appropriate last name for the missive’s author…

    Noah T. Winer

  44. #44
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:27 pm, love2rumba said:

    If the dems take this advice, they will only margnalize themselves such that people will think they are really some kind of secretive conspiracy to destroy the US…oh did I already give out the answer?

  45. #45
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:27 pm, Freddy said:

    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:21 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    Maybe they are talking about some of those meetings held behind closed doors or ones in which only select members of the media were invited.

    Like that Acorn awards ceremony they refused to let Fox into?

  46. #46
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:28 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    FoxNews is doing the job that professional journalists are supposed to do, and they are doing the job that is constitutionally protected. The propaganda from the other “SWEN” organizations is not what the founders had in mind but to protect free speech, they gave it free license.

    FoxNews is almost certainly going to gain further viewership — so we should all thank obama for his help here.

  47. #47
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:29 pm, pressto said:

    “August, FOX’s so-called news shows “aired 22 clips of town hall meeting attendees opposed” to Obama’s health care plans and zero in support.”

    I remember them broadcasting Obama town hall on August 11th, but I guess they don’t consider those who attended this stage event supporters. :-)

  48. #48
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, stillontheroad said:

    I smell the truely desperate. This is full tilt panic mode on the Liberal Vermin side and now it is strike out at anything game playing. Time for FOX to really start digging and broadcasting specials on all of the Sock Puppets activities and associations – hammer, hammer, hammer the Libs till they shriek.

  49. #49
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:31 pm, NeoFan said:

    Thank you MoveOn.org!!!! I hope the other hate filled racists like Geraldo Rivera will follow suit and quit fox. Hannity is way better with out the Space Alien Libtard. I can’t wait, no more Elis Pelican, no more Orin Hatch or John McCain, No more Grahamnesty. Oh please let it be true. No more democrats on fox woohoo. No more Colin Powell. Yeah!

  50. #50
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:32 pm, T-Bone said:

    “FOX’s so-called news shows “aired 22 clips of town hall meeting attendees opposed” to Obama’s health care plans and zero in support.”

    Maybe there weren’t any in support? ;)

  51. #51
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:32 pm, sonofdy said:

    Like they were watching fox news anyway.

  52. #52
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:34 pm, sonofdy said:

    “FOX’s so-called news shows “aired 22 clips of town hall meeting attendees opposed” to Obama’s health care plans and zero in support.”

    The source for that was mediamatters.

    :roll:

  53. #53
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:34 pm, Misscheryl said:

    bu..bu..bu..but I thought Obama and Michelle said they didn’t pay any attention to Fox.

  54. #54
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, ThatSamIAm said:

    Signed by so and so and “the rest of the team”

    Must be the RED team.

    This is so funny. Fox ratings are rising daily based off their cowardice.

  55. #55
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:36 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Jeeze – it’s just like re-living middle school.

  56. #56
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:44 pm, pueblo1032 said:

    GOOD GRIEF MM, I was waiting for this one!!! GEORGE SOROS (the current owner of the democratic party) AKA MOVEON.org demanding BLAH, BLAH, BLAH… Now the circle is definitely complete… Thank you GEORGE and company, this should drive the STAKE through the heart of the BEAST… Please, c’mon 2010, please, I am as GIDDY as a kid waiting for CHRISTMAS MORNING…

  57. #57
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:45 pm, right_on said:

    MoveOn demands that Democrats stay off Fox News

    The Commie and Nazi loving bosses of the Democrat Socialist Party (aka George Soros and Steve Bing) have spoken!

    Once they realize this “Isolation” policy is not working for them, violence will be perpetuated on FNC, and affiliates. One need only look at history, and that history shows that violence almost always follows failed propaganda attempts.

    ‘Nuff said….

  58. #58
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:47 pm, UrbanSpaceman said:

    Not that I watch much TV news, but I took the link and added this comment when I signed the petition:

    “Yes, since you are too weak to stand up to real questions and face the truth, you should stay away from real TV news like FOX.

    Just stay on the liberal rags that try to pass as news shows so we do not have to listen to your tripe.”

    I wonder what kind of response I will get?

  59. #59
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:49 pm, T-Bone said:

    Man, I hope they get this done. It would be nicer watching Hannity without that smug wipe Bob Beckel or Lanny Davis.

    I like hearing the opposing viewpoints to provide some clarity but Beckel is just a lying sack o woe. A lot of his answers are like Colmes or LGM.

    But… they did it… waaaahhhhh!

  60. #60
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:52 pm, et said:

    And who would have thought that Move On would send Michelle this birthday present.

  61. #61
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:53 pm, Regulus said:

    The biggest problem the left has is that almost everything they do, and don’t do, is an expression of avoidance.

    This is just another example of the phenomenon: if they were confident of their positions, the Hope-a-Dope folks would be eager to take on “the enemy” on their home turf.

    But they run away instead, while issuing an assortment of whiny rationalizations for their cowardice in the same way that an Octopus squirts a blob of ink at potential threats while it tries to skulk away in the confusion.

    Pathetic.

  62. #62
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:53 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Now there’s a thought – never having to see Bob Beckel or Lanny Davis? Oh Yeah!

  63. #63
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, orlandocajun said:

    Actually, I either fast-forward my recording, or mute the sound during the segment when O’Reilly or Hannity has a liberal on their show. I can’t stand to listen to them. Sometimes, O’Reilly has two at a time.

    Bottom line…I won’t miss them.

  64. #64
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, orlandocajun said:

    BTW, they can keep Juan Williams. He’s at least sane and a good guy.

  65. #65
    On October 20th, 2009 at 3:59 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Let’s agree as long as they promise to take O’Reilly with them.

  66. #66
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:01 pm, ctmom said:

    Well, Soro’s does own the democrats. I guess he can tell them what to do.

  67. #67
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:02 pm, carole said:

    I love love love this.

    I liken it to the few times the republicans have shown some guts and said to the dems…..You vote for it if you like it so much….It puts them on record of being for some horrible legislation.

    These dems. are now going to have to choose, the crazy base or the chance to be on tv and be important.

    I love this…can’t wait for a dem free Fox…Talk about heaven.

  68. #68
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Rabid anti-Foxites!

  69. #69
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, spaceycakes said:

    To draw attention to its biased coverage, President Obama will not appear on FOX for the rest of this year.

    Promise?

  70. #70
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:06 pm, swede said:

    This “strategy” by Barry’s Ivy League egg heads borders on bizarre. When they went after Rush his ratings went through the roof. FNC’s ratings have soared 20% since ObaMao et al began their assault.

    Did anyone catch Breitbart on Red Eye the other night? Hey, White House! I trashed ACORN! I exposed Holdren! Attack me! PLEASE!

  71. #71
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:06 pm, ronalddog said:

    You guys are missing an opportunity here. Click the link and add their favorite ACORN voter registration name (e.g. Mickey Mouse, Sinbad the Sailor, etc.)

    I think I’m going with Matt Damon….

  72. #72
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:09 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    To draw attention to its biased coverage, President Obama will not appear on FOX for the rest of this year.
    Promise?

    In fact, he won’t be on Fox until he has an Afghanistan policy…

  73. #73
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, jsr said:

    For once I agree with MoveOn. Dems should limit themselves to legitimate news organizations, say interviews with the New York Times or Chris “Tingle Leg” Mathews. That will definitely help them get their message out.

  74. #74
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:14 pm, Southpaw said:

    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, spaceycakes said:
    Rabid anti-Foxites!

    Flaming Bunnies

  75. #75
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:17 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    They really are stupid. I suppose that’s why they’re generally called ‘useful idiots’ but in this case I can’t say how useful it really is to tell pols on your side not to appear on the network with the highest ratings?

    I would think that they would be absolutely delighted if all republicans refused to appear on ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS and CNN so why is it that they cannot seem to relate to how this is a ‘good thing’ from our perspective?

    I’m signing the petition! The more times FNC can report that democrats refused an invitation to appear – the better!

  76. #76
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:17 pm, Misscheryl said:

    In fact, he won’t be on Fox until he has an Afghanistan policy…

    But he cannot discuss Afghanistan! He said they don’t even have a government so what do you expect him to do? He is going to wait until they decide on that first and then he’ll wait some more..besides, he’s got some serious campaigning to do in New York and has invited some of his hollywood buds for a visit at the WH. It’s tough being him. Yep, he can’t be expected to make any decisions when they don’t seem too serious about their own future. We’ll just forget about those Americans who are “fighting” and loosing their lives over there until he can pull his head out of his ass.

  77. #77
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:24 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Thank you for this initiative, it will be a pleasant relief not having to listen to all the whining liberals invited onto FNC.

  78. #78
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:25 pm, bruins90210 said:

    Good, Obama’s a lying dirtbag anyway. It will be easier to avoid him.

  79. #79
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:28 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Southpaw said: Flaming Bunnies

    heh heh

  80. #80
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:31 pm, swede said:

    In fact, he won’t be on Fox until he has an Afghanistan policy…

    Let’s be fair. He has a clearly defined policy delineated in the War on Terror Overseas Contingency Operation play book.

    Find and engage “moderate” Taliban. Offer them a new energy efficient Chevy if they will be nice. Nobel earned.

  81. #81
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:31 pm, MagnumOpus said:

    I just signed it as “Mao Zedong, Anita Dunn’s favorite philosopher”

  82. #82
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:38 pm, JustAThought said:

    MoveOn.org made this ‘request’? Really? I’m sure the level of my surprise is no surprise.

    Democrats = Chimps/Chumps apeing behavior because they see it done, heedless of any negative consequences to themselves.

  83. #83
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:42 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    This “strategy” by Barry’s Ivy League egg heads borders on bizarre. When they went after Rush his ratings went through the roof. FNC’s ratings have soared 20% since ObaMao et al began their assault.

    Just because Rush has more listeners doesn’t mean Obama’s doing worse. Rush remains extremely unpopular with the general public, and the White House could do worse than to paint Republicans as mindless tools who won’t do anything to cross Limbaugh.

  84. #84
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, JT said:

    Proof that liberals aren’t necessary.

  85. #85
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:48 pm, rambler said:

    I have to use the mute button for the most outrageous spin misters anyway, so if they don’t appear on FOX there’s more time for the truth tellers. I think FOX puts them on to show how silly many of them are anyway.

  86. #86
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:49 pm, Hangfire said:

    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:42 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Rush remains extremely unpopular with the general public….

    And where did you obtain this data? Some street corner in Berkeley?

  87. #87
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:53 pm, JT said:

    If you are a critical thinker, you like Rush. If you are a kool-aid drinker, no so much.

  88. #88
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:53 pm, JT said:

    not

  89. #89
    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:54 pm, Dave Turson said:

    In 2006, Noah T. Winer was crying about CNN hiring Glenn Beck and becoming a “Fox News clone.” And here he is again, same year, telling us what MoveOn wants: “MoveOn members want a Democratic Party that’s fighting for universal health care, solutions to climate change, and a restoration of democracy.”

  90. #90
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:00 pm, swede said:

    Rush remains extremely unpopular with the general public, and the White House could do worse than to paint Republicans as mindless tools who won’t do anything to cross Limbaugh.

    I think you’re missing the point, not to mention the demographics. Rush appeals to the far right. That’s a given. While the independents don’t care for him, they are appalled at that a talk show host and private citizen is being demonized by the President. It demeans the office and is rather inane.

    Rush gets headlines – ObaMao gets nada. I don’t care for Rush all that much either. While I generally agree with his thinking, I find him arrogant and pretentious. But that’s just me.

  91. #91
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:09 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    The anchors on ABCNNBCBS = T-ball
    Chris Wallace = Nolan Ryan

  92. #92
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, purealchemy said:

    On October 20th, 2009 at 2:46 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
    Who was that scratchy voiced woman who ran Dukakis’ campaign into the ground?

    Susan Estrich?

  93. #93
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:49 pm, Hangfire said:

    Rush remains extremely unpopular with the general public….

    And where did you obtain this data? Some street corner in Berkeley?

    Not really.

  94. #94
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:21 pm, purealchemy said:

    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:06 pm, swede said:
    Did anyone catch Breitbart on Red Eye the other night? Hey, White House! I trashed ACORN! I exposed Holdren! Attack me! PLEASE!

    Oh, good. Someone watches Red Eye besides me. :grin:

  95. #95
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:21 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 20th, 2009 at 4:53 pm, JT said:
    If you are a critical thinker, you like Rush. If you are a kool-aid drinker, no so much.

    Or if you’re praying for a prolonged recession.

  96. #96
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:22 pm, Dimsdale said:

    Which is worse: being the alleged “media arm of the GOP” or being under the thumb of the ultraleft radical group Moveon.com?

    I watch Fox News Sunday, and I have found Chris Wallace to be quite deferential to any liberal pol that comes on. They definitely get their message out, and the claims of their “mikes being turned off” is patently untrue. Additionally, the panel is equally populated with conservatives and liberals, unlike, say, Matthews show.

    Lastly, I just saw an hour long show by Glenn Beck (Health care reform: Second Opinion), which had about 40 real doctors and med students expressing their actual opinions, which ranged from pro to con. No preplanted supporter groups. It is worth the search at YouTube.

    Ever see that on the liberal media?

    Just like Palin, the liberals seek to kill off that which they cannot control, which they fear, and which reveals the ugly truths about them. You know, all the stuff the liberal media refuses to do (for a Dem president and Congress, anyway).

  97. #97
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:26 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Let’s be fair. He has a clearly defined policy delineated in the War on Terror Overseas Contingency Operation play book.

    Find and engage “moderate” Taliban. Offer them a new energy efficient Chevy if they will be nice. Nobel earned.

    True. And a house in Sacramento.

  98. #98
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:33 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    and the White House could do worse than to paint Republicans as mindless tools who won’t do anything to cross Limbaugh.

    The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 28% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -12. The Approval Index rating has been lower only on two days since the current President took office (see trends).


    The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. …

    Overall, 47% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President’s performance. Fifty percent (52%) disapprove.

    How’s that strategy working out? A majority disapprove of his performance.

  99. #99
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:39 pm, sonofdy said:

    Red State Skeptic:

    Haven’t you signed up yet to support your glorious leaders military moves???

    http://www.goarmy.com

  100. #100
    On October 20th, 2009 at 5:58 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Then they can complain even more about how “biased” Fox News is…talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

    :roll:

    The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 28% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -12. The Approval Index rating has been lower only on two days since the current President took office (see trends).

    Yes. But see, to liberals like Red State Skeptic, majorities only mean something when they favor liberal policies or politicians. When the majority counter such liberal ideologies, we have to defer to the minority. Get how that works?

    Besides, the 40% who strongly disapprove? They’re all racist or something…

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Global Warmists Seek to Flush Out ‘Denier’ Meteorologists

January 30, 2012 04:09 PM by Doug Powers

104 Comments

Cloudy with a chance of fiery death

Editor’s Note of the Day

January 18, 2012 02:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments

Left Kind of Upset With Politifact’s ‘Lie of the Year’ Choice

December 20, 2011 01:41 PM by Doug Powers

73 Comments

“Throw grandma from the cliff” blowback

MTV Ditches ‘Choose or Lose’ Slogan

December 19, 2011 10:59 AM by Doug Powers

100 Comments

Chose and lost?

MSNBC Leans Forward to Apologize to Mitt Romney

December 15, 2011 04:33 PM by Doug Powers

41 Comments

Sorry we much

Al Sharpton: Parody We Much

December 11, 2011 03:33 PM by Doug Powers

38 Comments

Lib media journos punked by fake SEIU press release

December 7, 2011 09:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments


Categories: Media,Media Bias,MoveOn.org

Betsys Page

» Cruising the Web
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook