[...] Good piano performance. Thanks heaps for this!… if anyone else has anything it would be much appreciated. Great website http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!…

To be clear -

1. I voted for President Reagan and agreed w/ his reasons for bringing in a new slew of US Attorneys to exact cases from the approach of the then new administration. I had no problems when Clinton did it either; after all, they serve at the president’s pleasure. Likewise w/ President Bush’s removal of the seven/eight US Attorneys: they did not measure up to his standards in the application of justice so he had every right to remove them.

2. However, IG’s do not equate to US Attorneys. While attorneys learn their trade in the clinical settings of colleges and court rooms, IG’s possess a skill set and level of experience in keeping the American public safeguarded that can neither be replicated nor duplicated in the classroom or training field. It places the public at risk to remove these highly skilled IG’s from their posts and replace them w/ less experienced allies who will tow the party line.

Since the SEIU has the name Service in their title, let their hundreds of thousand members volunteer in Obama’s purple shirt army (as opposed to the brown shirts of bygone days).

I tol’ ya!! They’re PURPLEBELLIES!!! DON’T BREATH THE PAX!!! Check barry hussein and michelle mabelle for blue hands!

ECS-House honky. That’s funny!

True Soldier-I totally agree with the whole cartoons thing. I got mine hooked on Loony Tunes, the Jetsons, the Flintstones, etc. Oh, and let’s not forget the Coyote and Roadrunner episodes where you actually see the splat on the canyon floor. That’s some good watchin’!!

(Sorry for the thread drift. )

Grayson punked, Safe School Art!, another failed liberal idea, the totally-awesome Obama Scandal-o-Matic Machine, John Edwards Foundation for Unwed Mothers and more: Morning Intell October 22 2009.
……

On October 21st, 2009 at 11:06 am, Red State Skeptic said:

(snip)

W replaced 88 USA’s in his first two years. The scandal was his 2007 dismissal of 7 USA’s because they weren’t doing his bidding — highly irregular if not unprecedented. Historically, the DOJ has had more independence from the White House than other organizations, as it should.

And as inspector generals should. Firing Walpin was analogous to rubbing out a witness to a crime. The 88 USA’s were fired for NOT doing their job. Walpin was fired FOR doing his job.

…

On October 21st, 2009 at 5:08 pm, stillontheroad said: #828206

As I suspected, you did not answer direct questions.

Here is something right back at you. What ever you think cannot happen is a delusion.

What is it called when you think something is happening, that isn’t happening? Is that having an imagination?

When Companies are taken over by the Government with no Return on that investment,

I am against no return on investment. If the path you have chosen, not unlike that for Chrysler or the S&L Industry some years ago, then you had better structure it much better.

CEO pay is being controlled by Government,

Get the facts straight. Pay for CEOs who took bailout money is being controlled. Pay for CEOs who did not take bailout money is not subject to government controll. Correct?

Service Men and Women are in combat and this clown asks them to join in on how to make America Greener, etc etc.

Scooby Doo . . . Hurh?

I am unfamiliar with this policy. Please provide a link.

The Sock Puppet said what he said and I believe him.

But, you won’t believe Pres Obama when he says the alternative to not saving these companies was more catastrophic?

Draft: transitive verb to select somebody for compulsory service in the armed forces

Ummmm, OK. Definitions are fine. But, who is advancing a military draft?

Fact: Obama stated he wants a Civilian Service as well or better equiped than the military.
Draw your own conclusions

My conclusion is that Pres Obama would like to expand the Peace Corp and AmeriCorps. Two programs that he did not individually create. You may not realize this, but Pres Obama has yet to create, fund, or propose legislation for a ‘Civilian Service’. I will suggest ‘imagination’ instead of ‘dellusional.’

How about addressing the issue of subsidies? From your post #827975, and my response to it in post #828141.

Don’t worry, I will not hold my breath.

Reminds me of her similar effort in January, 2001.

Oh, wait …

Never mind. I guess they were all busy making movies the past eight years, and not much time for this vounteerin’ stuff.

The massive, leftward tilt in Hollywood donations to Democrat campaign coffers speaks for itself. As do the celebrity vows of volunteer-mongers like Demi Moore, who pledged in a recent national service PSA not to be a servant to her fellow citizens or her country, but “a servant to Barack Obama.”

Would that make her a “house honky?”

ECS

On October 21st, 2009 at 3:12 pm, stillontheroad said: #828145

Furthermore, Little Caesars citizen Army – other than the fact this statement from the Ones Holy hole has opened a lot of eyes with people that see. Now how does he manage to get his citizen troops to join – other than his worshipping thugs? Well lets see, how bout before anyonbe is allowed to go to college or join the work force, lets make it mandatory to join the Ones Citizen Army – right out of the Socialist/Communist playbook slick.

Is this currently happening, or are you specualting? Guessing? Hoping?

What you seem to be concerned about already exists. Here’s a fact for you. If you are of a certain age and have not registered with the selective service, you will find it difficult getting a Federal job and student loans. Did Pres Obama enact this law?

No worries, I have no expectation that you will respond to these direct questions with direct answers. I am fairly confident that you will take some sort of tangent.

On October 21st, 2009 at 3:02 pm, stillontheroad said: #828134

Put into context, Emanuel Obama was expressing what is done in Israel, where every citizen is required to perform some level of service. That is a Draft, they are required to sign up and when of age be part of the Armed services.

It could be considered a draft in Israel. Because, it is a requirement in, (where?) . . . Israel. Also, not every Israeli citizen is required to serve in the military. Conservative Jews are exempt and Arabs are discouraged, and often times rejected. So, those not in the militery, in Israel, are given another path to support their country.

What you failed to comprehend from my post -

“Emanuel also acknowledged that a ‘requirement’ would not fly culturally in America, but a program of some sort, like service to America, would be a good idea.”

‘Some sort’ of program and no ‘requirement’ does not equal a draft.

Existing programs, in the US and not created by Pres Obama, like the Peace Corps and AmeriCorp could fill the bill to what Emanuel was speaking about. OH, and no one is being drafted into these programs either.