See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On October 21st, 2009 at 12:15 pm, flmom said:

   This is the same Shabazz who called our lovely hostess a ‘political prostitute’ on national tv and no one on the left batted an eye.

2. #2
   On October 21st, 2009 at 12:15 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

   Michelle, in addition to exposing these hoax crimes, wouldn’t it also serve a purpose to expose actual white-on-black violence that flies under the radar.

3. #3
   On October 21st, 2009 at 12:20 pm, dan708 said:

   Shades of Tawana Brawley. Has Malik Shabazz been in touch with Al Sharpton?

4. #4
   On October 21st, 2009 at 12:21 pm, vickisoup said:

   I’m so glad you posted this, Michelle. I saw it this a.m. and wondered myself what horrible threats must have been made against these men for them to plead guilty, even of a hate crime! Disgusting thug tactics of the NBP, no doubt.
   God bless this girl. She’s going to need it, for being brave enough now to recant. And God bless those young men who have to try and rebuild reputations lost to the likes of Malik Shabazz.

5. #5
   On October 21st, 2009 at 12:25 pm, Pat said:

   Last year someone found a noose on our college campus. The administration wisely turned away federal authorities saying they could solve it themselves. Never heard another word.

   HOAX!

6. #6
   On October 21st, 2009 at 12:27 pm, JHSII said:

   “They did plead guilty, I don’t know why,” he said of the defendants. “This is what she’s telling me.”

   Easy to say why – they knew that they were going to be found guilty because they were white and a plea meant that the sentence was reduced.

   In the modern environment to be white means that you are guilty – and if you don’t have the money to fight it doubly so.

7. #7
   On October 21st, 2009 at 12:28 pm, docflash said:

   Recanting means nothing.This COULD have happened,right?

8. #8
   On October 21st, 2009 at 12:33 pm, stillontheroad said:

   Red State Skeptic said:

   Name one, find us some facts.

9. #9
   On October 21st, 2009 at 12:35 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

   Red State Skeptic said:

   Michelle, in addition to exposing these hoax crimes, wouldn’t it also serve a purpose to expose actual white-on-black violence that flies under the radar.

   Or the much more common black on white, black on hispanic, hispanic on black or black on black crime that seems to be ignored? The Bloods, Cripts, MS 13, 16th Street Gang and such have killed THOUSANDS more than the Hooded Klowns of the Keystone Klan. Indeed the era of post-racialism has not arrived and the race mongers-some of my family among them-are not interested in post racialism and thus fan the fires of hate and fear. And WHEN push DOES come to shove generally the wrong people will be hurt.

   And fools such as Red State Skeptic will wonder what happened. I might be old and slow but I am not helpless-I do not plan to go quietly. Center of mass as the BitterClingers might say, Center of Mass.

10. #10
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:37 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    It doesn’t matter if it’s fake, it’s the seriousness of the charges that is all important! A pox on their house and a thumb in their eye!

11. #11
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:38 pm, Kingfish said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:35 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Center of mass as the BitterClingers might say, Center of Mass.

    Don’t forget the double tap!

12. #12
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:39 pm, spaceycakes said:

    I posted a link to this earlier in another thread–sorry about that…

    I’m still waiting to hear about the noose on the perfessor’s door at Columbia.

    hellooooooo?

13. #13
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:15 pm, Red State Skeptic said

    I have nothing to say regarding this topic but do want to discuss the inverse of every topic ad nauseum, because I’m a contrarian, no matter what Michelle posts.

14. #14
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:41 pm, sonofdy said:

    Red State Skeptic: If you wish to expose that write your oh damn blog.

    Its a semi-free country.

15. #15
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:43 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:38 pm, Kingfish said:
    Don’t forget the double tap!

    Rules to live by in zombieland.

16. #16
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:43 pm, sonofdy said:

    Red State Skeptic seems to be cool with people faking crimes to get back at old boyfriends.

17. #17
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:44 pm, zyzzyg said:

    I can not get over the fact that people pled guilty to crimes, that they may not have commited. There has to be more to the story and questions abound. Where were the lawyers for these people? What really did happen? What did not happen? Yep, there was a stabbing. Was that all? What the heck happened?

    This hints of Susan Smith. I want to avoid attacking a victim, but their accusations must be more closely examined.

18. #18
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:45 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Red State Skeptic said:

    Now I bet that squirrel cage of a mind is thinking – I just sent all those conservatives a link to a Television News site that proves, without a doubt, that white on black crime flys under the radar and is not reported on.

19. #19
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:46 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Rogue Cheddar said:

    I like the Reach out and Touch someone.

20. #20
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:48 pm, sonofdy said:

    I can not get over the fact that people pled guilty to crimes, that they may not have commited

    Good point. A little batton action going on in the police station??

21. #21
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:50 pm, txvet2 said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:35 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Center of mass as the BitterClingers might say, Center of Mass.

    Vests are too easy to come by. My target of choice would be lower abdomen. Very low.

22. #22
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:54 pm, max said:

    Red State Skeptic said:

    Michelle, in addition to exposing these hoax crimes, wouldn’t it also serve a purpose to expose actual white-on-black violence that flies under the radar.

    do you actually believe that more black-on-white violence flies under the radar than black-on-white violence flies under the radar?… What is your point anyway? That becasue there are some vioent white racists out there it’s ok for idiots like Shabazz to continue their racists charade?

23. #23
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:55 pm, max said:

    fix..
    do you actually believe that more white on black violence

24. #24
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:58 pm, TigerLady said:

    Red State Simpleton is basking in the glow of the responses to his ridiculous post.

25. #25
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:00 pm, max said:

    It’s likely that somebody has “manipsnanated” Williams against her will…

26. #26
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:05 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Eh, I just find it utterly appalling how Michelle Malkin jumps at every chance she gets to expose those evil black “race hustlers” but ignores all the despicable white racists in this country, especially in the Republican party (see here and here and here and here and here and here and here — just from 2009).

    The best way to make real change is to challenge your own. Michelle Malkin has no interest in taking on the bigots of the Republican party, which can only mean she has no problem with them.

27. #27
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:07 pm, twofoot said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:38 pm, Kingfish said:
    Don’t forget the double tap!

    I recommend Hydra-Shok. In .45 ACP.

28. #28
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:10 pm, sonofdy said:

    Red State Skeptic, The topic is the new black pathers supporting a hoax that has 8 inoccent people in jail.

    Not that you care because the hoaxer is black.

    You Red State Skeptic are a racist.

29. #29
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:13 pm, Hangfire said:

    Most violence against Blacks in urban America is from other Blacks.

30. #30
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:14 pm, Truesoldier said:

    The big question here is what will happen to those who plead guilty? I am guessing, as others have said, that they plead guilty for reduced sentences probably on the advice of their lawyers.

    RSS you miss the point. Michelle does not post those as the MSM covers them endlessly; instead she posts the stuff that the MSM tries very hard to ignore.

31. #31
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:15 pm, nbarry said:

    Why do people plead guilty to crimes they never committed? Because clearing their names has become unaffordable. Legal Aid lawyers and public defenders are there to make deals and have no incentive to conduct a proper defense. Prosecutors like Mike Nifong and Eliot Spitzer are more interested in punching their tickets with special interest groups than in seeing that justice is done. So, it appears, is Eric Holder. The 14th Amendment is supposed to guarantee all citizens equal protection of the law, but the politically favored are more equal than the rest of us.

32. #32
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:18 pm, mattm said:

    Post-racial era my ass. The Latino Assocation for Empowerment at my school is holding their annual ball.

    They actually put in the flyer, security wil be present leave the drama at home. I dont’t remember seeign that before on other similar types of event flyers.

33. #33
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:18 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Rogue Cheddar
    Don’t forget the double tap!

    Thank you, but are you one of those “despicable Republican racist” of which RSS speaks? Was it we despicable Republican racist who made the “Asian” jokes about Michelle Malkin, called Condolezza Rice an Aunt Jemimah, General Powell (pre Obamaiaztion) a House (Negro), Walter Williams several unkind names? Was that us or was RSS speaking of another? Sadly Appalling Michelle Malkin disappoints RSS again, sad. Me thinks RSS is easily disappointed.

    And to repeat-yes I must remember the double tap.

    I am enjoying this

34. #34
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:22 pm, nbarry said:

    Oh, one thing more. The practice of pretrial forfeiture makes it impossible for some defendants to hire competent legal counsel. If this were a more perfect world, the ACLU would be standing up for ALL falsely accused instead of their politically correct favorites.

35. #35
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:26 pm, seamusmeboy said:

    Ok Red State, we wont go into all your links in the last post, but those are some of the weakest examples of prejudice that I have ever seen. A compliment to Jewish people is now evidence of racism, a Justice of the Peace who doesn’t believe in interracial marriages (sounds like he disrespected both races), you’ve got to do better than that. The judge doesn’t even mention a political party, and he espoused a view (I personally disagree with) but is shared by groups from all races (Don’t believe me, I’ll introduce you to my minority neighbor, or for that matter any one of the many TV Trash Talk shows that trot out that subject quite frequently). Hit the books, do the research, then learn to discern fact from opinion.

36. #36
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:30 pm, max said:

    Red State Septic:
    fyi….
    http://asianamericanmovement.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/americas-anti-asian-racism-in-black-and-white/

37. #37
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:30 pm, stillontheroad said:

    The RSS is has his Fredricks of Hollywood garb in a twist. I sometimes wonder what position he holds in the Sock Puppet Cabinet.

38. #38
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:34 pm, Regulus said:

    I dunno. I read the article on the FNC Website, and was puzzled by the statement that the defendants were convicted based on their own statements as well as other evidence.

    If I’m being falsely accused, there’s no way I’m going to damn myself with my own words, or plea bargain. That the defendants in this instance appeared to incriminate themselves independently of the “victim’s” accusations is a disturbing loose end that overshadows that “victim’s” apparent change of heart.

39. #39
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:45 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:14 pm, Truesoldier said:

    RSS you miss the point. Michelle does not post those as the MSM covers them endlessly

    Oh really? I’m a pretty big consumer of media, and I don’t recall seeing those examples covered anywhere but on lefty niche sites.

40. #40
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:46 pm, PhredE said:

    (upon recantation…) She is going to be charged with filing a false report or similar such crime I hope… Leveling false accusations in an official manner is a very serious thing and should be treated as such (eg. requiring some jail time).

41. #41
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:53 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Red State Skeptic said:

    Well then there it is!! As long as you wallow in those Lefty Niche sites I would call them suspect from the get go.
    And again, to pound this home, any time there is white on black, even remotely, crime – the MSM has a field day. Duke University’s lacrosse team Rape charges ring a bell?

42. #42
    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:59 pm, sonofdy said:

    Ignore Red State Bigot.

43. #43
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:00 pm, Truesoldier said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:45 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    Oh really? I’m a pretty big consumer of media, and I don’t recall seeing those examples covered anywhere but on lefty niche sites.

    This is pretty funny cosidering your original post:

    Michelle, in addition to exposing these hoax crimes, wouldn’t it also serve a purpose to expose actual white-on-black violence that flies under the radar.

    I just did a quick check of the liberal blogs sites and did not see them post this story Michelle has posted on their site. So between that and the fact that you are saying that the MSM does not cover the stories either you seem to really have no point at all.

44. #44
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:02 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Regulus said:

    I dunno. I read the article on the FNC Website, and was puzzled by the statement that the defendants were convicted based on their own statements as well as other evidence.

    Sadly there are policeman who can extract a confession from a turnip–just don’t ask to see the video tape. Are any of you familiar the Buddhist Temple massacre in Phoenix? The Sheriff’s office got confessions from three young men: “Yes, Yes I did, Please Stop, Oh God Please Stop”. Our family doctor did the intake on one of the young men at County Hospital–to this day she will not treat a policeman.

    As soon as the PROFESSIONAL Sheriff’s investigators saw the confessions they knew they had the wrong men. Sometimes crimes are, or seem to be, so horrible reason goes out the window. Would I crack? I hope not but I have means, family and friends I know I can count on, a lawyer relationship of many years. If that family and friends are $15.00 an hour blue collar workers you have a problem.

    That “pretrial forfeiture”-a terrible price to pay for the drug war now used by Homeland Security–Guard even the smucks rights–they are yours too.

45. #45
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:05 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 1:53 pm, stillontheroad said:

    And again, to pound this home, any time there is white on black, even remotely, crime – the MSM has a field day. Duke University’s lacrosse team Rape charges ring a bell?

    Oh yeah? Tell me how many times you heard of the Cracker Barrel beating in the MSM. The Duke incident was (fake) news because of who it was, and it would have been (fake) news if it was a (phony) rape of a white woman too.

    Still, does the fact that something’s getting covered by the MSM really mean that Michelle Malkin won’t cover it? Did she refrain from covering Jeremiah Wright when there was a media firestorm around him? Elliott Spitzer? Mark Sanford? Of course not. And she and the rest of the right wing media world need to actively shun the bigots of the right to let them know they are not wanted.

    Too bad.

46. #46
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:06 pm, cheapseat said:

    the RACE/HATE CRIME charges are a tool that was designed to be a sledgehammer, and is a much abused sledgehammer for black racists. RSS if you want data, the fbi has it and it shows white on black crime is insignificant compared to black on white/asian/latino/black crime. You can take the hutus out of the jungle, but…

47. #47
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:09 pm, sonofdy said:

    RSB is just a racist trying to invent racism that isn’t there. That makes him dishonest as well.

48. #48
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:11 pm, mchristian said:

    Red State Skeptic said:
    Eh, I just find it utterly appalling how Michelle Malkin jumps at every chance she gets to expose those evil black “race hustlers”

    Then stop frequenting her blog, where she chooses the stories and write your own. No one forces you to expose your delicate sensibilities to the “hypocrisy.”

49. #49
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:11 pm, sonofdy said:

    Red State Skeptic

    http://www.goarmy.com

    Obama needs you to support his military mission!!!

    Sign up now!!! But hurry, there are not many postions left in the field of shower maintanence and band positions left!!!!

50. #50
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:12 pm, Kingfish said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:06 pm, cheapseat said:

    …if you want data, the fbi has it and it shows white on black crime is insignificant compared to black on white/asian/latino/black crime.

    In ther words, black on whatever has become so prevalient that it no longer is considered newsworthy by the MSM. A dog bites man story…

    But a white on black crime story, because it is vastly insignificant comparatively is the man bites dog story, hence newsworthy (valid or not).

51. #51
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:15 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:05 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    blah blah

    Where have you hidden LGM?

52. #52
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:16 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:06 pm, cheapseat said:

    Oh my God.

53. #53
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:17 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    As obama and the democrats sink in the polls there will be more such fake racial hoaxes to suppress the American disgust with the radical socialism of the left. Unfortunately, there is very little response to gratuitous charges of racism other than to point out that the obama administration is the most racist in history – and that includes Thomas Jefferson who owned slaves. (A gratuitous charge of racism can be treated with an equally gratuitous charge of the perpetrator of racism.)

54. #54
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:18 pm, sonofdy said:

    Red State Skeptic get over it.

    http://www.goarmy.com

    Your leader needs you.

55. #55
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:29 pm, Kingfish said:

    sonofdy: Never going to happen. Camouflage clashes with its pumps…

56. #56
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:30 pm, max said:

    Red State Septic spouted:
    “the Cracker Barrel beating ”

    HA! Like this little puny incident where a (potentially) mouthy mother got beat up for reprimanding a nutjob for (what?) opening a door to fast? This is somehow akin to a Rosa Parks moment.
    I WOULDN”T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT THIS PUNY INCIDENT! IT MEANS NOTHING, WHITE OR BLACK…
    and the worst part is
    YOU KNOW IT!

57. #57
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:32 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Red State Skeptic suck it up. The Marines need binjo ditch cleaners asap.

58. #58
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:40 pm, dan708 said:

    Would it not be helpful if the media could report crime WITHOUT EVEN MENTIONING the race of the suspect and victim? Yes, I’m dreaming…

59. #59
    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:46 pm, Kingfish said:

    dan708 has a lovely dream that I support. I reckon it will happen the same day MSM reports accurately ALL political affiliations and not just (R).

60. #60
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:02 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Funny. Bardwell was a Democrat from 1975 until 2007 or 2008 when he switched parties. But RSS says he is a Republican…

    And RSS found 5 or 6 links over a whole year. 5 o 6 links would represent a slow DAY for Jackson, Sharpton, Shabazz or Wright!

    RSS doesn’t care that Sharpton, et al. are “race hustlers.”

61. #61
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:03 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Keep in mind that “Malik Shabazz” was also the name used by “Malcolm X”.

    Malcolm Little –> Malcolm X –>
    El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, or simply “Malik Shabazz”.

    Keep in mind that Malcolm X said:

    You will never get real freedom and recognition between black and white people in this country without destroying the country, without destroying the present political system, without destroying the present economic system, without rewriting the entire constitution. It will be a complete destruction of everything that America supposedly stands for.

    – Malcolm X

    Then keep in mind what Obama said in his book:

    Only Malcolm X’s autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words. His unadorned insistence on respect. He promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline.

    – Barack Hussein Obama

62. #62
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:03 pm, corkie said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:15 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Michelle, in addition to exposing these hoax crimes, wouldn’t it also serve a purpose to expose actual white-on-black violence that flies under the radar.

    Your suggestion might be appropriate if she was posting about black-on-white violence. She’s not.

    She’s reporting on hoax crimes. And she reports hoax crimes both ways. Don’t you remember the pre-election incident in Pittsburgh?

    Now, in this case, it seems as if actual crimes were committed, but that she embellished her stories over time. The prosecutor claims that he didn’t rely on the embellished versions and that her original version matched the statements of the perps. We’ll see what comes out of this.

63. #63
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:07 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 2:30 pm, max said:

    HA! Like this little puny incident where a (potentially) mouthy mother got beat up for reprimanding a nutjob for (what?) opening a door to fast? This is somehow akin to a Rosa Parks moment.
    I WOULDN”T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT THIS PUNY INCIDENT! IT MEANS NOTHING, WHITE OR BLACK…

    Check the context. stillonthepot said any time a white on black crime happens, it blows up in the media. I said not so.

    Would you want to hear about black kids beating up white kids on a bus? Because I know a guy named Rush who would love to tell you about it.

    Interesting how spin this story as just a tit-for-tat between a sassy sister and a nutjob.

    Police said an investigation revealed that the female victim, identified as Tasha Hill, was entering the Cracker Barrel with her 7-year-old daughter as West was leaving the restaurant. As West was leaving, the exit door came close to striking the 7-year-old daughter of the victim, police said. Hill, by all witness accounts, politely asked West to be careful, officials said.

    “The man slung open the door pretty hard and fast and I had to push my daughter out of the way. I turned to the man and I just said, ‘Excuse me sir, you need to watch yourself you almost hit my daughter in the face.’ And from there it just went downhill,” said Hill.

    At that point, West became enraged and began to beat the victim in front of her 7-year-old daughter, according to police. Hill said she told West she was an Army servicemember and she did not want any trouble.

    West threw her to the ground and hit her in the head with his fists and feet, police said. During the exchange, witnesses said West could be heard screaming racial slurs towards the victim.

    “He said, ‘You’re an f****** black (N-word) b****,’ is what he said,” said Hill. “Then he punched me in my face. And I fell to the ground and he proceeded to punch in my head and face.”

64. #64
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:11 pm, max said:

    Hill, by all witness accounts, politely asked West to be careful, officials said.

    hmmm. maybe madmommy was the only witness? or another of her sassy sistahs maybe…
    hey, just asking questions…

65. #65
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:11 pm, max said:

    Would you want to hear about black kids beating up white kids on a bus?

    yes, much more than this door-rage incident.

66. #66
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:12 pm, sonofdy said:

    Red State Skeptic, Sassy sister????

    LOL

    http://www.goarmy.com

    Obama needs you!!!

67. #67
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:14 pm, sonofdy said:

    Red State Skeptic

    People who get into fights insult each other while doing so????

    That NEVER happens…

    

68. #68
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:15 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Red State Skeptic said:
    And you still are saying this flew under the radar? Even though it was reported on the local stations news?

69. #69
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:20 pm, John Deaux said:

    RSS,

    You’re calling one lone nutjob who went off on another individual a hate crime? Yes, it was wrong and the guy deserves severe punishment, not just for beating someone, but for doing it in front of a child also. However, that hardly compares to a group of students beating another while taping it and laughing about it afterwards.

    A little perspective would be nice.

70. #70
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:21 pm, sonofdy said:

    http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/09/16/cracker.barrel.beating/

    I guess you could argue that cnn is a fringe left wing web site.

71. #71
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:25 pm, right_on said:

    Now this is the kind of PRESS that I like. All truth-loving people should embrace this exposure. It reveals at least two things I know to be true;

    Radical Muslims ARE liars. And,

    Radical Black Muslims are RACISTS!

    What do you get when you cross the violent “Religion of Perpetual Outrage” with the misguided idiocy and ideology of Black militancy, Black hatred, Black material envy, Black entitlement and perpetual claims of victimization?

    There you go!

72. #72
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:39 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:20 pm, John Deaux said:

    You’re calling one lone nutjob who went off on another individual a hate crime? Yes, it was wrong and the guy deserves severe punishment, not just for beating someone, but for doing it in front of a child also. However, that hardly compares to a group of students beating another while taping it and laughing about it afterwards.

    You’re talking about the St. Louis bus incident? There is no evidence that was racially motivated.

    On the other hand, when a white man in the South beats up a black woman and calls her the ‘n’ word without provocation (according to eyewitnesses and video), I think you have enough evidence to call that a hate crime.

73. #73
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:40 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:21 pm, sonofdy said:
    http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/09/16/cracker.barrel.beating/

    I guess you could argue that cnn is a fringe left wing web site.

    ahahahaa! Glad to know someone was covering it, even if no one saw it.

74. #74
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:43 pm, BelchSpeak said:

    I followed this story from the beginning. I called it from the start that this was all a hoax. As the story progressed and everyone went to jail, this story became for me, the “one that got away.” Turns out I was right all along.

    By the way, Al Sharpton may have quite a bit to do with this coming to light. Megan Williams’ lawyer called Sharpton to warn him that he was about to be embroiled in another fake hate crime scandal. Sharpton released a memo calling for the release of the WV Six.

75. #75
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:46 pm, sonofdy said:

    Red State Skeptic: It was the third one down on the google search.

    http://WWW.goarmy.com

    Join up and support obama!!!

76. #76
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:51 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:46 pm, sonofdy said:
    Red State Skeptic: It was the third one down on the google search.

    http://WWW.goarmy.com

    Join up and support obama!!!

    I tried, but they turned me away when they saw my rainbow trousers!!

77. #77
    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:53 pm, sonofdy said:

    I tried, but they turned me away when they saw my rainbow trousers!!

    aaayhhh the first liberal chickenhawk…

78. #78
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:09 pm, Major O said:

    You have to give RSS credit. His incredible case of white guilt drives him to feats even the average liberal black person doesn’t go to.

    It’s all about being “agin’ whatever Michelle says. As has been said endlessly (though the “true believer” can’t hear because he just doesn’t have ears to hear)…the post is about racial hoaxes as well as about the “cover” given to such types of folks by the new DOJ under Obama.

    I distinctly recall Michelle being one of the first on the case for another racial hoax that involved a white female, so spare us the deflection to avoid the unavoidable–your party has been (Robert “sheets” Byrd, Al Gore Sr etc., etc.,) and IS the party of racism. Deal with it.

79. #79
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:13 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 3:53 pm, sonofdy said:

    aaayhhh the first liberal chickenhawk…

    I think you have to be a hawk to be a chickenhawk. I don’t support these BS wars now any more than when Boosh was my dearest leader.

80. #80
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:17 pm, sonofdy said:

    LOL sure sure RSB

81. #81
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Just two names from Knoxville, TN

    Christian and Newsome

    (still mourning thier passing)
    GSP

82. #82
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:29 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Hey by the way! Check out a certain GOP senator who’s about to face a nasty primary battle in a certain state whose Republicans not too long ago nominated David Duke for Senate. Said distinguished senator won’t get caught on tape denouncing the racist justice of the peace.

83. #83
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:35 pm, Major O said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:29 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    Hey by the way! Check out a certain GOP senator who’s about to face a nasty primary battle in a certain state whose Republicans not too long ago nominated David Duke for Senate. Said distinguished senator won’t get caught on tape denouncing the racist justice of the peace.

    Methinks thou doth protest a tad too much…

84. #84
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:41 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Well I for one do wish the White Guilt Cultist go to Africa and make amends. There they might do some good with just a little medical training. One their off days they can count dung beetles. My Latino Pride cousins should show their pride by living at the level of the residents of Chihuahua or Sonora-no fair sneaking into the Yanqui funded dental clinics now. The Latino Priders are often shocked to find Mexicans consider them Brown Yanquis/marrónnorteamericanos.

    I do state and affirm Mexican food is best but I would much rather drive my Towncar than a 56,57,58,61 Chevy/Ford/Dodge missing two doors and a windshield. But that is just me.

    Ok RedState have you booked your ticket to Africa? Mexico? East LA?

85. #85
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:42 pm, KVal57 said:

    Here a few links for YOU, RSS:

86. #86
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:49 pm, spaceycakes said:

    RSS said

    wth has that got to do with this thread?

87. #87
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:58 pm, 55dodger said:

    RSS, please do not take previous posters suggestions to join the Army. My son is currently deployed and I do not want him to depend on you for support.

88. #88
    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:58 pm, Major O said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 4:49 pm, spaceycakes said:
    RSS said
    wth has that got to do with this thread?

    Oh, you know…NOTHING. But it sure beats having to face unpleasant facts about your heroes.
    I know how tough it can be. I grew up by default a young, black Democrat. It was a top-notch Harvard educated conservative political science professor, Dr. Muller, who politely “rocked my intellectual world” by having the audacity to ask me to back up my frequent, unproven assertions. It’s never comfortable having to say, “Hmm. Maybe…I need to rethink this. Perhaps it isn’t exactly as I thought” or horror-of-horrors, “Maybe the other side actually has a point here.”

    Try it! It’s healthy and it’s free!

89. #89
    On October 21st, 2009 at 5:10 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    Don’t feed the troll fellas. The opposite of what Michelle is doing here would be to accuse our racist society for programming Blacks to think that they are being victimized 24/7 by Whitey, to the point where they believe they’re being sexually assaulted by the them even when they aren’t.

    Only a deranged person could take what is going on with this issue, and point the racist finger back at it. Race drives the left, so naturally when you point it out (that race is its lifeblood and purpose), that in-and-of-itself will make you a “racist” in their eyes. You can’t point out the flaws of their ideas regarding “social and economic justice,” because that is “racist.” You can’t explain that “leveling the playing field” means spreading the misery around equally, because that is “racist.”

    So, when the same race-peddling charlatans like Shabazz (who preach “social and economic justice,” as well as race-hatred) propose that a particular injustice occurred, when it didn’t, that can’t be pointed out because of his skin color. Pointing ANYTHING out about someone’s views or wrong-doings is off-limits, so long as they’re “victims” of a racist society.

    That’s all there is to it. You aren’t going to change RSS’s mind because there isn’t one to change. He’s hopelessly indoctrinated and cannot understand what occurs in the real world, no more than any insane leftist.

90. #90
    On October 21st, 2009 at 5:17 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Race drives the left

    You’d have to wear earplugs and scream at the top of your lungs to deny that racism is a big – and growing – force on the right. (Not coincidentally, that’s exactly Michelle Malkin’s strategy.) The evidence is there.

91. #91
    On October 21st, 2009 at 5:29 pm, sonofdy said:

    You’d have to wear earplugs and scream at the top of your lungs to deny that racism is a big – and growing – force on the right.

    If you say so.

    

92. #92
    On October 21st, 2009 at 5:32 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    You’d have to wear earplugs and scream at the top of your lungs to deny that racism is a big – and growing – force on the right. (Not coincidentally, that’s exactly Michelle Malkin’s strategy.) The evidence is there.

    Bullsh$t.

93. #93
    On October 21st, 2009 at 5:34 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Red State Skeptic said:

    Always remember, the KKK was the enforcement wing of the Democrat Party.

94. #94
    On October 21st, 2009 at 5:40 pm, JHSII said:

    The left lives and thrives on racism.

    For someone on the left to accuse someone on the right of racism is projection in its purest form.

95. #95
    On October 21st, 2009 at 5:53 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    The best way to make real change is to challenge your own. Michelle Malkin has no interest in taking on the bigots of the Republican party, which can only mean she has no problem with them.

    The best way for real change, RSS, is to challenge your own. You know, like Robert Byrd. All he did was use the “N” word in a speech and was never taken to task for it by the liberals. And spare me his recanting his former ways. That speech was in 2001 or 2002.

    He’s a member of the KKK. You remember the KKK, don’t you? It was started by the democrats. It’s sole purpose was to intimidate, or kill, Republicans. At the time of the KKKs inception (and for 65 years), blacks were all in the Republican Party. Later, they ran as democrats and became socialsts because of the gov’t largesse of FDR, Truman, and Johnson.

    So, since Byrd is still in the Senate, I can only guess that means you have no problem with his racism.

96. #96
    On October 21st, 2009 at 6:15 pm, SpeakEasy said:

    Crimes are crimes and race should not play a part in the reporting, the prosecution, the conviction or the sentences. It is BECAUSE of the invention of hate crime legislation that people who know they are innocent feel compelled to plead down to reduce the sentence on a crime they never committed because they do not believe they will get a fair shake. End hate crime BS now and level the playing field.

97. #97
    On October 21st, 2009 at 6:30 pm, Major O said:

    The best way for real change, RSS, is to challenge your own. You know, like Robert Byrd. All he did was use the “N” word in a speech and was never taken to task for it by the liberals. And spare me his recanting his former ways. That speech was in 2001 or 2002.

    He is impervious to fact. If you try and enlighten him with indisputable facts about the racist history of the Democrat party, he just goes crazy and starts linking thither and yon to myriad “resources” showing that it is, in fact, the GOP that is racist. To hear him tell it, LBJ freed the slaves…

98. #98
    On October 21st, 2009 at 6:46 pm, tbear44 said:

    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:38 pm, Kingfish said:
    On October 21st, 2009 at 12:35 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Center of mass as the BitterClingers might say, Center of Mass.
    Don’t forget the double tap!

    Double tap is tough with a 12ga. and probably unneccesary, but I am willing to give it a shot.

99. #99
    On October 21st, 2009 at 6:53 pm, tbear44 said:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esV5HOG_xe8
    Language warning.

100. #100
     On October 21st, 2009 at 7:00 pm, SHoward said:

     On October 21st, 2009 at 5:17 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

     On October 21st, 2009 at 5:32 pm, AlohaGuy said:

     Yeeeeaaaahhhh, I’m gonna have to go with AlohaGuy here, RSS. Your statement is pretty broad and far reaching. A few comments and a crazy guy in GA aren’t quite enough to make your case.

     Now if you can provide some better evidence…?????