The bootlicker media

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 22, 2009 11:04 AM

What could possibly have been discussed in President Obama’s meeting with left-wing opinion journalists that required secrecy?

What is being kept from the American public about the two-and-a-half hour confab?

Goodbye, watchdogs. Hello, bootlickers.

How about a full list of those who attended the off-the-record meeting?

Where’s the openness and sunlight and disclosure?

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

***

Ann Coulter tears into “The Grating Communicator,” one of President Obama’s reported attendees.

***

Update: Here’s your list of president-approved pundits!

Posted in: Media

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. PianoMan

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #1
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:08 am, pressto said:

    Maybe you missed this fact:
    “Sources tell us other attendees at the two-and-a-half hour chat”

    2 1/2 hours? This is 2 hours more time them President Obama gave Gen. McChrystal. I guess we can see where the President Obama’s priorities lie.

  2. #2
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:10 am, stillontheroad said:

    The Bootlicking Toadie Media I like to call it.

  3. #3
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:11 am, malkin_fan said:

    Your on a roll today Michelle.

  4. #4
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:13 am, tre said:

    “Who watches the watchers?”

    Judging from the fact that All Barack Channel, Nothing but Barack Channel, Channel for Barack Soundbites, Channel for Nothing but Nonsense are all losing viewers and Fox News is gaining, I suppose WE watch the watchers.

  5. #5
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:26 am, TooMuchTime said:

    How about a full list of those who attended the off-the-record meeting?

    Where are all of the liberal conspiracy sites on this? If President Bush had done this, the libtards would be hyperventelating about similarities to the Council on Foreign Relations, the Freemasons, the Bohemian Grove meetings, etc., etc.

    But when a socialist meets behind closed doors with members of the media, I guess it’s for The Greater Good(tm).

  6. #6
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:29 am, BadIdeaGuy said:

    So Olbermann and Maddow were there, but the Organizer-in-chief calls Foxnews “talk radio”?

  7. #7
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:29 am, TooMuchTime said:

    The Bootlicking Toadie Media I like to call it.

    I read that someone called it the Downstream Media. A perfect description. They are downstream of the real news stories covered by the blogs and talk radio. What’s left over is fluff pieces on Mrs. Bitterman’s fashions or how wonderful Dear Leader is.

  8. #8
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am, zyzzyg said:

    What is being kept from the American public about the two-and-a-half hour confab?

    I am torn by this. And, it comes down to parsing, and splitting hairs. Does the promise of transparency apply to private meetings, or to legislation, as stated during the campaign.

    There is the tradition and history of such meetings in the past. No big deal, correct?

    How about a full list of those who attended the off-the-record meeting?

    Less torn about this one. Wasn’t there a issue about who was visiting the White House? And, it was resolved to reveal the visitors log publicly. Has revealing the visitors log policy changed? If not, get the logs and publish them.

  9. #9
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:33 am, Jvette said:

    I read that someone called it the Downstream Media.

    “Dead bodies float downstream, it takes live bodies to resist the current.”

    Archbishop Fulton Sheen

  10. #10
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:43 am, cicerokid said:

    bootlickers

    ?

    Oh, that’s right. This is a family forum.

  11. #11
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:54 am, Flyoverman said:

    Someone needs to inform the rats that the ship they are on is sinking.

    If they want to survive they need to get off the ship or go down with it.

    Whatever……

  12. #12
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:55 am, beenthere said:

    The fourth estate is more accurately thought of as a fifth column. I recall one MSM commentator some years ago explaining that the MSM effectively gave the democrats a 20 percentage point advantage. I have no doubt that he was correct and more to the point everyone in the MSM believes it, and given that the democrats can only think in political terms, the hate&fear directed against Fox News, Glenn Beck in particular, follows at once.

  13. #13
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:55 am, jsr said:

    What is being kept from the American public about the two-and-a-half hour confab?

    Probably better that it was secret. What sane person could listen to listen to Obama, Maddow, Olberman, Dowd… for 2 1/2 hours without breaking down? I’d rather be water boarded than sit through a meeting like that.

  14. #14
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:58 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Now now cicerokid -but with Olbermann and Maddow there I fully understand. Have they had Chris Matthews fixed? If he were to lose control on camera–well this is a family forum ;)

  15. #15
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:00 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    And I had to listen to Newt touting his new book this morning when my alarm went off. Included in his speil was lying on behalf of Scozzafava. According to Newt, she is anti-tax, pro-small government, against Cap and Tax (like Newt himself ho-ho), pro-family, against Obamacare, and more. I also had to listen to Andy Willians gushingly urge Newt to run for Prez.

    I’m going to feel sick all day.

  16. #16
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:00 pm, Ralph Gizzip said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am, zyzzyg said:

    What is being kept from the American public about the two-and-a-half hour confab?

    I am torn by this. And, it comes down to parsing, and splitting hairs. Does the promise of transparency apply to private meetings, or to legislation, as stated during the campaign.

    There is the tradition and history of such meetings in the past. No big deal, correct?

    If it was a group of people to give input to the Administration on some issue pertinent to them I don’t have a problem. But when that meeting is with the very group of people that are supposed to be reporting on what that Administration is doing I have a huge problem with that.

    “Who’s watching the Watchers?” Indeed!

  17. #17
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:02 pm, California Red said:

    If Fox News is not a news organization then I am quite sure this blog doesn’t even exist. It’s not news unless the White House approves.

  18. #18
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:04 pm, Hangfire said:

    I have no doubt that the President, weary of setbacks in implementing his Marxist programs, will call his faithful to himself periodically for a Love-Fest; a recharging of the Great One’s mercurial batteries.

  19. #19
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:08 pm, OldSailor said:

    The way the current administration and the media work together would make Joseph Goebbels proud.

  20. #20
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:12 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:02 pm, California Red said:

    If Fox News is not a news organization then I am quite sure this blog doesn’t even exist. It’s not news unless the White House approves.

    Perhaps an unbiased bi partisan Ministry of Truth needs to be established?

  21. #21
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:28 pm, Hangfire said:

    Amen, AzNean.

    And, of course, a Truth Czar.

  22. #22
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:31 pm, John Deaux said:

    How about a full list of those who attended the off-the-record meeting?

    FOIA request?

  23. #23
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:50 pm, reshas1 said:

    That would make a great commercial… 25 minutes with McChrystal, 2.5 hours with the lame media.

  24. #24
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:54 pm, Southpaw said:

    I can imagine what was said to those left wing “journalists” about getting out of line.

    “I have built my organization upon fear.”
    Al Capone
    “You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone.”
    Al Capone

    Xerxes Emanual: There will be no glory in your sacrifice. I will erase even the memory of Sparta Fox News from the histories! Every piece of Greek Conservative parchment shall be burned. Every Greek Conservative historian, and every scribe shall have their eyes pulled out, and their tongues cut from their mouths. Why, uttering the very name of Sparta Fox News, or Leonidas Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, will be punishable by death! The world will never know you existed at all!

  25. #25
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:05 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    Maybe they were there to deal with THIS

  26. #26
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:05 pm, Regulus said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:11 am, malkin_fan said:

    Your on a roll today Michelle.

    – And you were on fire last night on Hannity’s show. Loved the passion, especially the last comment about the NYT covering up the ACORN story back in October of 2008: “Who’s the REAL news organization?!?

    Perfect!

    As for what has become our Voluntary State Media, I can only imagine the jealousy that Hugo Chavez and Vladmir Putin must be feeling right now: to get their own media to submit to the yoke, they had to murder reporters and editors, and physically close down print and broadcast offices through violence or the threat of it.

    In comparison, our own Fourth Estate needed no “persuasion” at all — they are only too eager to fall to their knees in supplication.

    “First they came for FOX News…”

  27. #27
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:07 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    I’ll bet Maddow and Dowd had their nails and hair done they were so enthralled at meeting personally with Obeyme and being in the White House. They actually believe they’re relevant since they have been Blessed by His Highness.

  28. #28
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:12 pm, Cogs said:

    FOX News Channel; America’s Watchdog!

  29. #29
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:13 pm, beenthere said:

    So what was the meeting about? My guess — a proposed massive media bailout and how to spin it. If anyone has a better suggestion, let’s hear it.

  30. #30
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:32 pm, sbw999 said:

    I heard about this meeting on O’Reilly last night, and I cannot believe this isn’t front page news in all conservative blogs, and in the WSJ. Since when do the people that are supposed to comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable, meet with the President of the US???? This meeting is by itself a smoking gun to show that the media and the democrat party are synonymous at this point, and conspire together to pass the lib/socialist agenda of the left.

  31. #31
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:38 pm, granite said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:05 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    Maybe they were there to deal with THIS

    Wow!
    I didn’t know that much of one’s saddlebags could be photoshopped away!

  32. #32
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:59 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    I’ll bet Maddow and Dowd had their nails and hair done they were so enthralled at meeting personally with Obeyme

    Keith Olbermann must have been all atwitter to be included-nails, hair-the whole nine yards.

  33. #33
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:05 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    Where was the conservative uproar here and here?

  34. #34
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:08 pm, cheapseat said:

    the other day it was front page news when chavez STOLE the hilton hotel in venezuela, and lesser news when he sent his thugs to steal some man’s farm. but hugo has nothing on obama, he stole gm. now our dear leader has stolen the salaries of wall streeters, and seeks to steal fox news, talk radio, and the internet. between seeking to pack the courts and sledgehammer the opposition, can presidente for life be far behind.

  35. #35
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:14 pm, stillontheroad said:

    cheapseat said:

    What makes it worse, are the lap dogs in congress that are leting him get away with it and the Presitutes that bury anything not praising Fearless Leader.

  36. #36
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:21 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    But, but…. Where’s Chrissy? What have they done with Chrissy?! Was his leg tingling so badly that he couldn’t get out of the car or something? I suspect foul play.

  37. #37
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:24 pm, sonofdy said:

    TheOtherSide

    Are you going to join up to support your dear leaders military plans???

    http://www.goarmy.com

  38. #38
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:54 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:21 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    But, but…. Where’s Chrissy?

    Trying to control the “thrill” as he calls it. Even the Obamanites can’t have a Talking Heading in rut around the President-“Mount Me Please Mr. President” and all.

    Very tacky.

  39. #39
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:30 pm, stillontheroad said:

    ArizonaNeanderthal:

    I think one of the major problems with Chrissy is his use of liberal amounts of Boar Mate.

  40. #40
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:31 pm, Ron said:

    Well, judging from the list of attendees at the WH meeting, that’s one group no self-respecting journalist would want to join. But then, none of the attendees are self-respecting journalists, or even opinion leaders. I mean, who would believe Maureen Dowd or Eugene Robinson. But say, wait a minute! Don’t they have a “point of view”, or a “perspective”? Gosh, I think they do! Does Axelrod know about this, or Rahm “dead fish” Emanuel?

  41. #41
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:41 pm, JustAThought said:

    I’ll bet Maddow and Dowd had their nails and hair done

    Now THAT is putting perfume on a pig.

    This is exactly the kind of thing one would expect from Obama and his team. To exert control over those you need to voluntarily surrender to you, what better way than to bring them into some kind of inner circle, giving them some feeling of exclusivity. Then exclude and demonize one of their group, similar to the way chickens will attack and kill any one of their own when the group perceives it to be injured and vulnerable.

  42. #42
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:47 pm, Savage24 said:

    The sun does not shine in this White House or anywhere near it. In fact I don’t believe it shines in Washington DC, if it did we wouldn’t have all this corruption.

  43. #43
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 4:53 pm, docflash said:

    They can bootlick all they want.I will not get my news or happenings from any of them.I have had enough lies and distortions in my life.We all know they are shamelessly in the bag for the Dems and that makes them worthless.The only thing they can’t distort is the sports scores.I come to MM’s sites and her links and Fox for the truth.If you listen to and believe the MSM then you get what you deserve.

  44. #44
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 6:21 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    Chris Matthews couldn’t be there because the Secret Service refused to pull him off Da One’s leg if necessary.

    My brother had a dog like that once.

    ECS

  45. #45
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 8:31 pm, T-Bone said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:05 pm, TheOtherSide said:
    Where was the conservative uproar here and here?

    Uh…President Bush never tried to shut down liberal media groups while at the same time meeting with conservative reporters.

    Obama meets with liberal reporters and uses the power of his office to shut down conservative voices.

    But of course, you already know that.

  46. #46
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 8:51 pm, WarTip said:

    Oversimplification and to paraphrase;

    All your reporters are belong to us!

    Did I miss anything?

  47. #47
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 8:56 pm, rightisright said:

    And, of course, a Truth Czar.

    the spot is still open, they couldn’t find anyone truthful.

  48. #48
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:05 pm, corona said:

    Well, they weren’t bootlicking in this case – the Obama regime was forced to cave – this time.

  49. #49
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:19 pm, zyzzyg said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 12:00 pm, Ralph Gizzip said: #828573

    If it was a group of people to give input to the Administration on some issue pertinent to them I don’t have a problem. But when that meeting is with the very group of people that are supposed to be reporting on what that Administration is doing I have a huge problem with that.

    “Who’s watching the Watchers?” Indeed!

    Like I said, this is nothing new. Pres Bush had the same kinds of meetings.

    Why is this a problem now?

  50. #50
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:28 pm, Cal City Conservative said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:19 pm, zyzzyg said:
    Like I said, this is nothing new. Pres Bush had the same kinds of meetings.

    Why is this a problem now?

    Yeh right troll. We all know how much the media LOVED GWB. Good try fool, unless you can provide a link it only happened in your drug addled memories.

  51. #51
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:32 pm, Cal City Conservative said:

    Kind of OT but it still relates. You want to see how the left thinks click the link.

    http://www.slate.com/id/2232563/?GT1=38001

    What a buffoon. Go for it libs!!!

  52. #52
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:17 pm, zyzzyg said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:28 pm, Cal City Conservative said: #828860

    Yeh right troll. We all know how much the media LOVED GWB. Good try fool, unless you can provide a link it only happened in your drug addled memories.

    Name calling is less than helpful.

    And, I did not mention Pres Bush. I said meetings (with regard to media) have taken place at the White House, by Presidents, in the past.

    Try the link I have provided and welcome to my ‘dreams,’ and your nightmares.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/17/us/politics/17radio.html?_r=2&ref=washington&oref=slogin

    Like it, or not, facts are facts, and they do matter.

  53. #53
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:26 pm, zyzzyg said:

    Cal City Con _

    Meant to say I did not reference Pres Bush in my initial post.

  54. #54
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:39 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Why is this a problem now?

    Is “it gives us a chance to irritate Chris Matthews and zyzzyg” good enough?

  55. #55
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:39 pm, zyzzyg said:

    Cal City Con

    Here’s another private meeting, but with bloggers, bloggers from another country mind you -

    http://victorycaucus.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=30029&Itemid=1

  56. #56
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:43 pm, Cal City Conservative said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:19 pm, zyzzyg said:

    Like I said, this is nothing new. Pres Bush had the same kinds of meetings.

    Sure you didn’t!!! I’m not clicking on a LIBERAL NYT article. What do you expect? They are straight up dem hacks.

    You lose! Do you even know what you post? Oh I know it doesn’t matter in your world.

  57. #57
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:46 pm, zyzzyg said:

    Cal City Con

    OK, one last time, but with Pres Obama

    http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/14/obama-meets-with-liberal-columnists/

    This is nothing new other than how it is characterized and misrepresented.

  58. #58
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:51 pm, zyzzyg said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:43 pm, Cal City Conservative said:

    Sure you didn’t!!! I’m not clicking on a LIBERAL NYT article. What do you expect? They are straight up dem hacks.

    You lose! Do you even know what you post? Oh I know it doesn’t matter in your world.

    LOL.

    You asked for a link and then you won’t check it out. You want proof, and yet you want to remain ignorant.

    Then check out the other two links.

  59. #59
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:44 pm, Cal City Conservative said:

    To loosely quote the hostess, there is only one ignorant person here and it’s not me. I’ll say it one more time.

    NYT is nothing but a LIBERAL RAG! If you can’t do better than that I’m NOT interested. I can get the same bilge from any LIBERAL NEWS report (and they are many) anywhere else.

    Oh and I owned you about the Bush quote also so quit while you are behind. Here is an anchor go down with the ship.

  60. #60
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 8:10 am, Ralph Gizzip said:

    zyzzyg

    I read your NYT link about President Bush meeting privately with conservative radio hosts (not news reporters or their bosses) and one thing was glaringly obvious (at least according to the NYT story). Bush was meeting with people who disagreed with many of his policies in an attempt to reach a common understanding. I’ll bet you dollars to doughnuts there was not a single representative from FoxNews or any other Murdoch news organization (can you say the Wall Street Journal?) present in Obama’s private meeting. If there had been, you know damned well they would have reported it.

    So tell us again how this was just like what President Bush was doing.

  61. #61
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 9:09 am, zyzzyg said:

    On October 23rd, 2009 at 8:10 am, Ralph Gizzip said: #828985

    I read your NYT link about President Bush meeting privately with conservative radio hosts (not news reporters or their bosses) and one thing was glaringly obvious (at least according to the NYT story). Bush was meeting with people who disagreed with many of his policies in an attempt to reach a common understanding. I’ll bet you dollars to doughnuts there was not a single representative from FoxNews or any other Murdoch news organization (can you say the Wall Street Journal?) present in Obama’s private meeting. If there had been, you know damned well they would have reported it.

    Are radio hosts not part of the media? DO they not report the news as well as offer opinion? Did you see the picture? No, doubt each individual in the picture does not agree with everything Pres Bush says 100%.

    Splitting hairs on this is intellectually dishonest.

    Who a President wishes to have in private meetings is their choice. Has been and always will be. Yep, for any and every President, including but not limited to Obama and Bush.

    So tell us again how this was just like what President Bush was doing.

    Each held a private off the record private meeting. Yes, or no?

    Did you follow the other link, where Pres Elect Obama met with conservative journalists?

    Did you follow the other link, where Pres Bush met with bloggers?

  62. #62
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 3:44 pm, Dimsdale said:

    I believe that “Obamalickers” would suffice…

  63. #63
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 5:18 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Oh, please (zzzwhatever your tag is). Bush did it, so it’s okay for Obeyme to do it? That is BS. The situation today is different in that Obeyme is having his spokespeople get on every political talk show on TV and say Fox News has an agenda and a perspective that the administration doesn’t like. MoveOn.Org has been pretty verbal about ordering Dems NOT TO APPEAR on any Fox channel. Give me the link that shows ANY former President or any organization that supported him telling anyone in that administration NOT TO APPEAR on Fox or any other media show. You’re full of it!

  64. #65
    On October 26th, 2009 at 10:10 am, TK-421 said:

    Why do people who don’t agree with conservitive view points even bother posting on here? Reguardless this issue of media dominace by the Obama Administration cannot be dissmissed as “right wing paranoia” attempts to do so and foster the current system, will only result in civil war, one in which neither faction will win as for the sake of “international peace” UN peace keepers, or other national Militaries will come on to our soil. A broken one might I add.

    Did it ever once enter anyones mind thats why other nations help fund various parties and peoples to weaken and bring down the state via civil insurection for the ability and reasson to take our lands? My god even as weakend as we are we STILL make up 50% of global trade. And make no doubts weare devided.

    Red States, Blue States, Northerners, Southerns, Liberals, Conservitives, and worse yet a large immigrant population with no loyality to the US, but only in the country thanks to cash or border hopping. And worse of all the so called “moderates” who do nothing till its too late, or at all in either case. For further proof look at our current military, we are demoralized, the Taliban is on the rise we need more troops yet we twiddle thumbs.

    As to the media matter, I depend on largely national news services from Japan, China, and ironically Russia, as I can find more “truth” there than I can at home! And of course lovely blogs like this. Obama has made more screw ups in ONE year than Bush has in 8, never mind his “travels” as a “world citizen” his dissrespect to the people he claimed to care for in the wake of Katrina. And yet crickets chirp, last week they said under his leadership, stocks have stoped sliding, the reasission is over, thank god I am smart enough to look for myself and see they still are falling.

    More of our boys die in Iraqi and Afghanistan, while the Mr Populae Homecoming King twiddle’s his thumbs, which is far worse than retreat, indifferance is worse than being a coward in terms of war. Yet I see nothng bashing that, no one broadcasting US dead in BIG BOLD NUMBERS like when Bush was in office, Irony. The job of the media is to REPORT THE NEWS, not be a political force, or the backing and shield of one who is clearly a failure.

    I’m a bit of a nationalist, so I’m sick of this multi party split that weakens us more, I’m sick of this “we won and had to put up with Bush so now we got our boy!” mindset, I’m sick of our policy being affected by weaker nations, our resources guarding them while they grow fat and rich, I’m sick more so of the lies, dishonesty and corruption thats in out parties, thats in our school’s thats in our work places. And more so the idiots who think we should hold hands with the world, they’ll never hurt us if we are nice.

    Look at the nation today and see the truth of that lie, the rest of the world says its our problem the economy has fallen, they plot to replace the dollar, or force us to the table, when is enough enough? And the good of the nation is on the minds of our people, not money or ideology. But lets keep the game going and dance to the tune of others like puppets in a sad show.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Video flashbacks: Eric Massa attacks Rush Limbaugh, embraces Eliot Spitzer

March 8, 2010 11:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

64 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

He is not a useful idiot. He’s just an idiot.

WaPo sheds tears over Desiree Rogers

March 4, 2010 04:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 1 Trackback

“Anger in America,” MSNBC-style

March 2, 2010 05:17 PM by Michelle Malkin

84 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

“You’re wasting valuable oxygen.”

NYT: Brooklyn accent = RAAAAACIST!

February 19, 2010 07:59 AM by Michelle Malkin

59 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar: Captured

February 16, 2010 07:48 AM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

The sun rises. Birds sing. Olbermann lies.

February 15, 2010 09:46 AM by Michelle Malkin

69 Comments | 4 Trackbacks


Categories: Media



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook