<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The bootlicker media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK-421</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-829992</link>
		<dc:creator>TK-421</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-829992</guid>
		<description>Why do people who don&#039;t agree with conservitive view points even bother posting on here? Reguardless this issue of media dominace by the Obama Administration cannot be dissmissed as &quot;right wing paranoia&quot; attempts to do so and foster the current system, will only result in civil war, one in which neither faction will win as for the sake of &quot;international peace&quot; UN peace keepers, or other national Militaries will come on to our soil. A broken one might I add.

Did it ever once enter anyones mind thats why other nations help fund various parties and peoples to weaken and bring down the state via civil insurection for the ability and reasson to take our lands? My god even as weakend as we are we STILL make up 50% of global trade. And make no doubts we&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;are&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; devided.

Red States, Blue States, Northerners, Southerns, Liberals, Conservitives, and worse yet a large immigrant population with no loyality to the US, but only in the country thanks to cash or border hopping. And worse of all the so called &quot;moderates&quot; who do nothing till its too late, or at all in either case. For further proof look at our current military, we are demoralized, the Taliban is on the rise we need more troops yet we twiddle thumbs.

As to the media matter, I depend on largely national news services from Japan, China, and ironically Russia, as I can find more &quot;truth&quot; there than I can at home! And of course lovely blogs like this. Obama has made more screw ups in ONE year than Bush has in 8, never mind his &quot;travels&quot; as a &quot;world citizen&quot; his dissrespect to the people he claimed to care for in the wake of Katrina. And yet crickets chirp, last week they said under his leadership, stocks have stoped sliding, the reasission is over, thank god I am smart enough to look for myself and see they still are falling.

More of our boys die in Iraqi and Afghanistan, while the Mr Populae Homecoming King twiddle&#039;s his thumbs, which is far worse than retreat, indifferance is worse than being a coward in terms of war. Yet I see nothng bashing that, no one broadcasting US dead in BIG BOLD NUMBERS like when Bush was in office, Irony. The job of the media is to REPORT THE NEWS, not be a political force, or the backing and shield of one who is clearly a failure.

I&#039;m a bit of a nationalist, so I&#039;m sick of this multi party split that weakens us more, I&#039;m sick of this &quot;we won and had to put up with Bush so now we got our boy!&quot; mindset, I&#039;m sick of our policy being affected by weaker nations, our resources guarding them while they grow fat and rich, I&#039;m sick more so of the lies, dishonesty and corruption thats in out parties, thats in our school&#039;s thats in our work places. And more so the idiots who think we should hold hands with the world, they&#039;ll never hurt us if we are nice.

Look at the nation today and see the truth of that lie, the rest of the world says its our problem the economy has fallen, they plot to replace the dollar, or force us to the table, when is enough enough? And the good of the nation is on the minds of our people, not money or ideology. But lets keep the game going and dance to the tune of others like puppets in a sad show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people who don&#8217;t agree with conservitive view points even bother posting on here? Reguardless this issue of media dominace by the Obama Administration cannot be dissmissed as &#8220;right wing paranoia&#8221; attempts to do so and foster the current system, will only result in civil war, one in which neither faction will win as for the sake of &#8220;international peace&#8221; UN peace keepers, or other national Militaries will come on to our soil. A broken one might I add.</p>
<p>Did it ever once enter anyones mind thats why other nations help fund various parties and peoples to weaken and bring down the state via civil insurection for the ability and reasson to take our lands? My god even as weakend as we are we STILL make up 50% of global trade. And make no doubts we<em><strong>are</strong></em> devided.</p>
<p>Red States, Blue States, Northerners, Southerns, Liberals, Conservitives, and worse yet a large immigrant population with no loyality to the US, but only in the country thanks to cash or border hopping. And worse of all the so called &#8220;moderates&#8221; who do nothing till its too late, or at all in either case. For further proof look at our current military, we are demoralized, the Taliban is on the rise we need more troops yet we twiddle thumbs.</p>
<p>As to the media matter, I depend on largely national news services from Japan, China, and ironically Russia, as I can find more &#8220;truth&#8221; there than I can at home! And of course lovely blogs like this. Obama has made more screw ups in ONE year than Bush has in 8, never mind his &#8220;travels&#8221; as a &#8220;world citizen&#8221; his dissrespect to the people he claimed to care for in the wake of Katrina. And yet crickets chirp, last week they said under his leadership, stocks have stoped sliding, the reasission is over, thank god I am smart enough to look for myself and see they still are falling.</p>
<p>More of our boys die in Iraqi and Afghanistan, while the Mr Populae Homecoming King twiddle&#8217;s his thumbs, which is far worse than retreat, indifferance is worse than being a coward in terms of war. Yet I see nothng bashing that, no one broadcasting US dead in BIG BOLD NUMBERS like when Bush was in office, Irony. The job of the media is to REPORT THE NEWS, not be a political force, or the backing and shield of one who is clearly a failure.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit of a nationalist, so I&#8217;m sick of this multi party split that weakens us more, I&#8217;m sick of this &#8220;we won and had to put up with Bush so now we got our boy!&#8221; mindset, I&#8217;m sick of our policy being affected by weaker nations, our resources guarding them while they grow fat and rich, I&#8217;m sick more so of the lies, dishonesty and corruption thats in out parties, thats in our school&#8217;s thats in our work places. And more so the idiots who think we should hold hands with the world, they&#8217;ll never hurt us if we are nice.</p>
<p>Look at the nation today and see the truth of that lie, the rest of the world says its our problem the economy has fallen, they plot to replace the dollar, or force us to the table, when is enough enough? And the good of the nation is on the minds of our people, not money or ideology. But lets keep the game going and dance to the tune of others like puppets in a sad show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PianoMan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-829942</link>
		<dc:creator>PianoMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-829942</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PianoMan...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hello :) I bookmarked this site. Thanks heaps for this!... if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Pianoforte Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PianoMan&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hello <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I bookmarked this site. Thanks heaps for this!&#8230; if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Pianoforte Links <a href="http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org</a> Enjoy!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FirstSkirt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-829367</link>
		<dc:creator>FirstSkirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-829367</guid>
		<description>Oh, please (zzzwhatever your tag is).  Bush did it, so it&#039;s okay for Obeyme to do it?  That is BS.  The situation today is different in that Obeyme is having his spokespeople get on every political talk show on TV and say Fox News has an agenda and a perspective that the administration doesn&#039;t like. MoveOn.Org has been pretty verbal about ordering Dems NOT TO APPEAR on any Fox channel.  Give me the link that shows ANY former President or any organization that supported him telling anyone in that administration NOT TO APPEAR on Fox or any other media show.  You&#039;re full of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, please (zzzwhatever your tag is).  Bush did it, so it&#8217;s okay for Obeyme to do it?  That is BS.  The situation today is different in that Obeyme is having his spokespeople get on every political talk show on TV and say Fox News has an agenda and a perspective that the administration doesn&#8217;t like. MoveOn.Org has been pretty verbal about ordering Dems NOT TO APPEAR on any Fox channel.  Give me the link that shows ANY former President or any organization that supported him telling anyone in that administration NOT TO APPEAR on Fox or any other media show.  You&#8217;re full of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimsdale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-829319</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-829319</guid>
		<description>I believe that &quot;Obamalickers&quot; would suffice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that &#8220;Obamalickers&#8221; would suffice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-829001</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-829001</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 23rd, 2009 at 8:10 am, Ralph Gizzip said: #828985

I read your NYT link about President Bush meeting privately with conservative radio hosts (not news reporters or their bosses) and one thing was glaringly obvious (at least according to the NYT story). Bush was meeting with people who disagreed with many of his policies in an attempt to reach a common understanding. I’ll bet you dollars to doughnuts there was not a single representative from FoxNews or any other Murdoch news organization (can you say the Wall Street Journal?) present in Obama’s private meeting. If there had been, you know damned well they would have reported it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are radio hosts not part of the media? DO they not report the news as well as offer opinion? Did you see the picture?  No, doubt each individual in the picture does not agree with everything Pres Bush says 100%.  

Splitting hairs on this is intellectually dishonest.

Who a President wishes to have in private meetings is their choice.  Has been and always will be.  Yep, for any and every President, including but not limited to Obama and Bush.

&lt;blockquote&gt;So tell us again how this was just like what President Bush was doing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Each held a private off the record private meeting.  Yes, or no?

Did you follow the other link, where Pres Elect Obama met with conservative journalists?

Did you follow the other link, where Pres Bush met with bloggers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On October 23rd, 2009 at 8:10 am, Ralph Gizzip said: #828985</p>
<p>I read your NYT link about President Bush meeting privately with conservative radio hosts (not news reporters or their bosses) and one thing was glaringly obvious (at least according to the NYT story). Bush was meeting with people who disagreed with many of his policies in an attempt to reach a common understanding. I’ll bet you dollars to doughnuts there was not a single representative from FoxNews or any other Murdoch news organization (can you say the Wall Street Journal?) present in Obama’s private meeting. If there had been, you know damned well they would have reported it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Are radio hosts not part of the media? DO they not report the news as well as offer opinion? Did you see the picture?  No, doubt each individual in the picture does not agree with everything Pres Bush says 100%.  </p>
<p>Splitting hairs on this is intellectually dishonest.</p>
<p>Who a President wishes to have in private meetings is their choice.  Has been and always will be.  Yep, for any and every President, including but not limited to Obama and Bush.</p>
<blockquote><p>So tell us again how this was just like what President Bush was doing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Each held a private off the record private meeting.  Yes, or no?</p>
<p>Did you follow the other link, where Pres Elect Obama met with conservative journalists?</p>
<p>Did you follow the other link, where Pres Bush met with bloggers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Gizzip</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-828985</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Gizzip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-828985</guid>
		<description>zyzzyg 

I read your NYT link about President Bush meeting privately with conservative radio hosts (not news reporters or their bosses) and one thing was glaringly obvious (at least according to the NYT story).  Bush was meeting with people who &lt;em&gt;disagreed&lt;/em&gt; with many of his policies in an attempt to reach a common understanding.  I&#039;ll bet you dollars to doughnuts there was not a single representative from FoxNews or any other Murdoch news organization (can you say the Wall Street Journal?) present in Obama&#039;s private meeting.  If there had been, you know damned well they would have reported it.

So tell us again how this was just like what President Bush was doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zyzzyg </p>
<p>I read your NYT link about President Bush meeting privately with conservative radio hosts (not news reporters or their bosses) and one thing was glaringly obvious (at least according to the NYT story).  Bush was meeting with people who <em>disagreed</em> with many of his policies in an attempt to reach a common understanding.  I&#8217;ll bet you dollars to doughnuts there was not a single representative from FoxNews or any other Murdoch news organization (can you say the Wall Street Journal?) present in Obama&#8217;s private meeting.  If there had been, you know damned well they would have reported it.</p>
<p>So tell us again how this was just like what President Bush was doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal City Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-828924</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal City Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-828924</guid>
		<description>To loosely quote the hostess, there is only one ignorant person here and it&#039;s not me. I&#039;ll say it one more time. 

NYT is nothing but a LIBERAL RAG! If you can&#039;t do better than that I&#039;m NOT interested. I can get the same bilge from any LIBERAL NEWS report (and they are many) anywhere else.

Oh and I owned you about the Bush quote also so quit while you are behind. Here is an anchor go down with the ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To loosely quote the hostess, there is only one ignorant person here and it&#8217;s not me. I&#8217;ll say it one more time. </p>
<p>NYT is nothing but a LIBERAL RAG! If you can&#8217;t do better than that I&#8217;m NOT interested. I can get the same bilge from any LIBERAL NEWS report (and they are many) anywhere else.</p>
<p>Oh and I owned you about the Bush quote also so quit while you are behind. Here is an anchor go down with the ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-828902</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-828902</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:43 pm, Cal City Conservative said: 

Sure you didn’t!!! I’m not clicking on a LIBERAL NYT article. What do you expect? They are straight up dem hacks. 

You lose! Do you even know what you post? Oh I know it doesn’t matter in your world.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL.

You asked for a link and then you won&#039;t check it out.  You want proof, and yet you want to remain ignorant.

Then check out the other two links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:43 pm, Cal City Conservative said: </p>
<p>Sure you didn’t!!! I’m not clicking on a LIBERAL NYT article. What do you expect? They are straight up dem hacks. </p>
<p>You lose! Do you even know what you post? Oh I know it doesn’t matter in your world.</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL.</p>
<p>You asked for a link and then you won&#8217;t check it out.  You want proof, and yet you want to remain ignorant.</p>
<p>Then check out the other two links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-828900</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-828900</guid>
		<description>Cal City Con

OK, one last time, but with Pres Obama

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/14/obama-meets-with-liberal-columnists/

This is nothing new other than how it is characterized and misrepresented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cal City Con</p>
<p>OK, one last time, but with Pres Obama</p>
<p><a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/14/obama-meets-with-liberal-columnists/" rel="nofollow">http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/14/obama-meets-with-liberal-columnists/</a></p>
<p>This is nothing new other than how it is characterized and misrepresented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal City Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-828898</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal City Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-828898</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:19 pm, zyzzyg said:

Like I said, this is nothing new. Pres Bush had the same kinds of meetings.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sure you didn&#039;t!!! I&#039;m not clicking on a LIBERAL NYT article. What do you expect? They are straight up dem hacks. 

You lose! Do you even know what you post? Oh I know it doesn&#039;t matter in your world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:19 pm, zyzzyg said:</p>
<p>Like I said, this is nothing new. Pres Bush had the same kinds of meetings.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure you didn&#8217;t!!! I&#8217;m not clicking on a LIBERAL NYT article. What do you expect? They are straight up dem hacks. </p>
<p>You lose! Do you even know what you post? Oh I know it doesn&#8217;t matter in your world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-828896</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-828896</guid>
		<description>Cal City Con

Here&#039;s another private meeting, but with bloggers, bloggers from another country mind you -

http://victorycaucus.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=30029&amp;Itemid=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cal City Con</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another private meeting, but with bloggers, bloggers from another country mind you -</p>
<p><a href="http://victorycaucus.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=30029&#038;Itemid=1" rel="nofollow">http://victorycaucus.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=30029&#038;Itemid=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArizonaNeanderthal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-828895</link>
		<dc:creator>ArizonaNeanderthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-828895</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is this a problem now?&lt;/blockquote&gt; Is &quot;&lt;em&gt;it gives us a chance to irritate Chris Matthews and &lt;strong&gt;zyzzyg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; good enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why is this a problem now?</p></blockquote>
<p> Is &#8220;<em>it gives us a chance to irritate Chris Matthews and <strong>zyzzyg</strong></em>&#8221; good enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-828891</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-828891</guid>
		<description>Cal City Con _

Meant to say I did not reference Pres Bush in my initial post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cal City Con _</p>
<p>Meant to say I did not reference Pres Bush in my initial post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-828888</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-828888</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:28 pm, Cal City Conservative said: #828860

Yeh right troll. We all know how much the media LOVED GWB. Good try fool, unless you can provide a link it only happened in your drug addled memories.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Name calling is less than helpful.

And, I did not mention Pres Bush.  I said meetings (with regard to media) have taken place at the White House, by Presidents, in the past.

Try the link I have provided and welcome to my &#039;dreams,&#039; and your nightmares.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/17/us/politics/17radio.html?_r=2&amp;ref=washington&amp;oref=slogin

Like it, or not, facts are facts, and they do matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:28 pm, Cal City Conservative said: #828860</p>
<p>Yeh right troll. We all know how much the media LOVED GWB. Good try fool, unless you can provide a link it only happened in your drug addled memories.</p></blockquote>
<p>Name calling is less than helpful.</p>
<p>And, I did not mention Pres Bush.  I said meetings (with regard to media) have taken place at the White House, by Presidents, in the past.</p>
<p>Try the link I have provided and welcome to my &#8216;dreams,&#8217; and your nightmares.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/17/us/politics/17radio.html?_r=2&#038;ref=washington&#038;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/17/us/politics/17radio.html?_r=2&#038;ref=washington&#038;oref=slogin</a></p>
<p>Like it, or not, facts are facts, and they do matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal City Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/the-bootlicker-media/comment-page-1/#comment-828861</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal City Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36967#comment-828861</guid>
		<description>Kind of OT but it still relates. You want to see how the left thinks click the link.

&lt;/a&gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2232563/?GT1=38001

What a buffoon. Go for it libs!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of OT but it still relates. You want to see how the left thinks click the link.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2232563/?GT1=38001" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2232563/?GT1=38001</a></p>
<p>What a buffoon. Go for it libs!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

