<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where&#8217;s the transparency on Gitmo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoekstra: Dems said No Real Terrorism Threat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-842813</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoekstra: Dems said No Real Terrorism Threat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-842813</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Maggie&#039;s Notebook...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hoekstra spoke on the importance of recognizing the threat of terrorism, but Democrat leadership told him &quot;the threat is not real.&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Maggie&#8217;s Notebook&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hoekstra spoke on the importance of recognizing the threat of terrorism, but Democrat leadership told him &#8220;the threat is not real.&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Hoekstra: Obama Withholds Ft. Hood Info</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-842811</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Hoekstra: Obama Withholds Ft. Hood Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-842811</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Maggie&#039;s Notebook...&lt;/strong&gt;

Citing the possibility of turning the Fort Hood assassinations into &quot;political theatre&quot; and &quot;political stagecraft,&quot; he wants the results of his own investigation, before Congress steps-in....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Maggie&#8217;s Notebook&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Citing the possibility of turning the Fort Hood assassinations into &#8220;political theatre&#8221; and &#8220;political stagecraft,&#8221; he wants the results of his own investigation, before Congress steps-in&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Holder Thanks John McCain and Lindsay Graham:</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-842806</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Holder Thanks John McCain and Lindsay Graham:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-842806</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Maggie&#039;s Notebook...&lt;/strong&gt;

Eric Holder&#039;s speech announcing that he was bringing Khalid Sheik Mohammed, and five other terrorists to New York City, New York City, (he said it twice) for criminal trials, he thanked Senators John McCain and Lin ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Maggie&#8217;s Notebook&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Eric Holder&#8217;s speech announcing that he was bringing Khalid Sheik Mohammed, and five other terrorists to New York City, New York City, (he said it twice) for criminal trials, he thanked Senators John McCain and Lin &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-829009</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-829009</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:38 am, TooMuchTime said: #828599

No, not really. Unless he and the committee can be assured that the information remains secret. See the following:

U.S. Constitution – Article 1, Section 5, Clause 3:U.S. Constitution – Article 1, Section 5, Clause 3:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Then what is important is that Rep Hoekstra be reminded of this, since he is calling for the President to provide information to the States.

So, do you think the Administration is following the Constitution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:38 am, TooMuchTime said: #828599</p>
<p>No, not really. Unless he and the committee can be assured that the information remains secret. See the following:</p>
<p>U.S. Constitution – Article 1, Section 5, Clause 3:U.S. Constitution – Article 1, Section 5, Clause 3:</p></blockquote>
<p>Then what is important is that Rep Hoekstra be reminded of this, since he is calling for the President to provide information to the States.</p>
<p>So, do you think the Administration is following the Constitution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason L.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828931</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828931</guid>
		<description>If Mr. Obama and his White House are so transparent, why isn&#039;t he keeping his promise to close down Gitmo?  Could it be that &lt;strong&gt;NOBODY WANTS RABID TERRORISTS IN THEIR OWN BACK YARD?!?&lt;/strong&gt;  If he does ramrod some law through to get these terrorists brought to Mainland US Soil, the Dems will be finished next year and in `12....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Mr. Obama and his White House are so transparent, why isn&#8217;t he keeping his promise to close down Gitmo?  Could it be that <strong>NOBODY WANTS RABID TERRORISTS IN THEIR OWN BACK YARD?!?</strong>  If he does ramrod some law through to get these terrorists brought to Mainland US Soil, the Dems will be finished next year and in `12&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbear44</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828856</link>
		<dc:creator>tbear44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828856</guid>
		<description>Put &#039;em all on a big cargo plane back to the Middle East. I just hope we make sure there is enough fuel to get there! :wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put &#8216;em all on a big cargo plane back to the Middle East. I just hope we make sure there is enough fuel to get there! <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Bone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828811</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Bone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828811</guid>
		<description>Those poor innocent people.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2009/10/another_former_gitmo.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Another Gitmo detainee returns to die on battlefield&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those poor innocent people.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2009/10/another_former_gitmo.php" rel="nofollow">Another Gitmo detainee returns to die on battlefield</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ErikTheRed</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828758</link>
		<dc:creator>ErikTheRed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828758</guid>
		<description>@Southpaw - that&#039;s funny. I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Southpaw &#8211; that&#8217;s funny. I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheapseat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828712</link>
		<dc:creator>cheapseat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828712</guid>
		<description>send these s***birds home to the governments they belong to.  let them remove their trash, or our gubmint can cut their funding from our state department budget.  your with us, or against us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>send these s***birds home to the governments they belong to.  let them remove their trash, or our gubmint can cut their funding from our state department budget.  your with us, or against us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J S Ragman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828596</link>
		<dc:creator>J S Ragman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828596</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:58 am, Regulus said: &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, what &lt;em&gt;he&lt;/em&gt; said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:58 am, Regulus said: </p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, what <em>he</em> said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southpaw</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828579</link>
		<dc:creator>Southpaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828579</guid>
		<description>I had an epiphany last night. The answer is so obvious it&#039;s a slap your forehead type of thing.
Where is the best place to relocate the Gitmo detainees?

A. South Chicago

Now that the Olympic bid has failed, the Obamacronies would love to have a mega-prison project where they could siphon off hundreds of millions of dollars. Hundreds of Chicago thugs could be hired as guards (rather than beating innocent students to death).

Come on Obama, Jarret, Emanuel, put your money wher your mouth is. The choice is obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had an epiphany last night. The answer is so obvious it&#8217;s a slap your forehead type of thing.<br />
Where is the best place to relocate the Gitmo detainees?</p>
<p>A. South Chicago</p>
<p>Now that the Olympic bid has failed, the Obamacronies would love to have a mega-prison project where they could siphon off hundreds of millions of dollars. Hundreds of Chicago thugs could be hired as guards (rather than beating innocent students to death).</p>
<p>Come on Obama, Jarret, Emanuel, put your money wher your mouth is. The choice is obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NBF</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828575</link>
		<dc:creator>NBF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828575</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s filed away neatly with his original birth certificate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s filed away neatly with his original birth certificate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regulus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828571</link>
		<dc:creator>Regulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828571</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s the &quot;transparency&quot; at Gitmo, you ask?  Where&#039;s the transparency in &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; with these people?

Dishonesty in its various forms -- lies, prevarications, propaganda and playing hide-the-ball with important facts -- is how Hope-a-Dope got into the White House.  He successfully deceived two groups of voters for his margin of victory: 

- Cynical leftists who convinced themselves that he didn&#039;t mean it when he preached his &quot;I&#039;m-a-centrist&quot; pap; and 

- Naive centrists who convinced themselves that his associations with radical bad actors for all of his adult life aren&#039;t reflective of the kind of man he is today.

The leftists are discovering to their dismay that although he&#039;s certainly sympathetic to their views, Hope-a-Dope&#039;s loyalty will always be to himself first.  If that means stiff-arming them and foot-dragging on things like the homosexual and anti-war agendas, then tough for them.

And the centrists are discovering to their horror that Michelle and Shawn Hannity were right about him, after all: he really is a wolf in sheep&#039;s clothing.

To assuage their present disappointment in him, the lefties are counting on a Hope-a-Dope second term -- when he can finally drop the &quot;centrist&quot; crap and let it all hang out.  Chances are that if he &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; get a second term, they will not be disappointed.

The naive centrists are in a much more shaky position -- they&#039;ll never salvage any of their false hopes from 2008 -- but are nonetheless the key to taking Hope-a-Dope and his Corruptocratic Party down: having relied upon his dishonesty only to find out that he played them for fools, only the most idiotic among them will believe him again in 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s the &#8220;transparency&#8221; at Gitmo, you ask?  Where&#8217;s the transparency in <em>anything</em> with these people?</p>
<p>Dishonesty in its various forms &#8212; lies, prevarications, propaganda and playing hide-the-ball with important facts &#8212; is how Hope-a-Dope got into the White House.  He successfully deceived two groups of voters for his margin of victory: </p>
<p>- Cynical leftists who convinced themselves that he didn&#8217;t mean it when he preached his &#8220;I&#8217;m-a-centrist&#8221; pap; and </p>
<p>- Naive centrists who convinced themselves that his associations with radical bad actors for all of his adult life aren&#8217;t reflective of the kind of man he is today.</p>
<p>The leftists are discovering to their dismay that although he&#8217;s certainly sympathetic to their views, Hope-a-Dope&#8217;s loyalty will always be to himself first.  If that means stiff-arming them and foot-dragging on things like the homosexual and anti-war agendas, then tough for them.</p>
<p>And the centrists are discovering to their horror that Michelle and Shawn Hannity were right about him, after all: he really is a wolf in sheep&#8217;s clothing.</p>
<p>To assuage their present disappointment in him, the lefties are counting on a Hope-a-Dope second term &#8212; when he can finally drop the &#8220;centrist&#8221; crap and let it all hang out.  Chances are that if he <em>does</em> get a second term, they will not be disappointed.</p>
<p>The naive centrists are in a much more shaky position &#8212; they&#8217;ll never salvage any of their false hopes from 2008 &#8212; but are nonetheless the key to taking Hope-a-Dope and his Corruptocratic Party down: having relied upon his dishonesty only to find out that he played them for fools, only the most idiotic among them will believe him again in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TooMuchTime</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828559</link>
		<dc:creator>TooMuchTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828559</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Should he answer any and all questions on this matter, that might be of concern to the States?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, not really. Unless he and the committee can be assured that the information remains secret. See the following:

U.S. Constitution - Article 1, Section 5, Clause 3:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, &lt;em&gt;excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Should he answer any and all questions on this matter, that might be of concern to the States?</p></blockquote>
<p>No, not really. Unless he and the committee can be assured that the information remains secret. See the following:</p>
<p>U.S. Constitution &#8211; Article 1, Section 5, Clause 3:</p>
<blockquote><p>Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, <em>excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/22/wheres-the-transparency-on-gitmo/comment-page-1/#comment-828546</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=36962#comment-828546</guid>
		<description>Yep, the Administration should answer any and all questions with regard to Guantanamo, to the satisfaction of the Intellegence Committee, whether they like the answers, or not.

And, about these threat assessments that Rep Hoekstra knows about.  Should he answer any and all questions on this matter, that might be of concern to the States?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the Administration should answer any and all questions with regard to Guantanamo, to the satisfaction of the Intellegence Committee, whether they like the answers, or not.</p>
<p>And, about these threat assessments that Rep Hoekstra knows about.  Should he answer any and all questions on this matter, that might be of concern to the States?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

