WITHDRAW

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 22, 2009 01:22 PM

It’s time for the GOP to cut bait on radical leftist Dede Scozzafava.

Dump Dede and quick.

I repeat: Can the Republican establishment hear conservatives now?

NRO’s Campaign Spot

RedState

Washington Times

Washington Examiner

The Conservatives

Big Govenrment

Red County

Ace of Spades

More voices piling on. Stay tuned. Get involved. Rescue conservatism from capitulation.

What good is an opposition party that keeps promoting its own worst opponents?

Posted in: GOP, NY-23

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Snooper Report
  2. The Other McCain: National Desk, Syracuse, N.Y., 3:45 p.m.
  3. Moralia
  4. Front Page
  5. PianoDraft
  6. Daily scoreboard « Don Surber

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #1
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:25 pm, libertybelle said:
  2. #2
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:25 pm, theloneranger said:

    I have a question: WHERE ARE THE REPUBLICANS?? Have they disappeared off the face of the earth?

  3. #3
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:30 pm, Jeddite said:

    I cant wait for the RNC and RNCCCCCCC to be promoting Lindsey Graham for President in 2012.

    You know it’s coming: “ONLY GRAHAM/HUCKABEE CAN STOP OBAMA/BIDEN IN ‘12! DONATE NOW!”

  4. #4
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:31 pm, Regulus said:

    What good is an opposition party that keeps promoting its own worst opponents?

    Indeed, what good is any party — in power or in opposition — that not only can’t distinguish itself from the other guys, but seems to think that the path to victory lies in becoming more like them?

    “I don’t know which species is worse — you don’t see them f***ing each other over for a percentage!”

    - Ripley in the movie “Aliens,” commenting about the problems with Republicans humans

  5. #5
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:33 pm, netherman79 said:

    Newt has published transcripts from his interviews on this subject at his blog.

  6. #6
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:34 pm, tre said:

    What good is an opposition party that keeps promoting its own worst opponents?

    That could be the point.
    Do you suppose the Republican “leadership” could really be democrat operatives who’ve infiltrated the party?

    *Twilight Zone music*

  7. #7
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:36 pm, Valiant said:

    Let her know directly how she is hurting the party,

    info@dedeforcongress.com

  8. #8
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:37 pm, Brian Roastbeef said:

    You know, I almost hope Sarah Palin doesn’t endorse Hoffman in this. Hoffman is doing best when the media is forced to focus on the many embarassments of the Scozzafava campaign. I fear the (hostile) media circus that Palin always attracts will divert the public attention from the complete joke that is Dede.

  9. #9
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:39 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:31 pm, Regulus said:

    “I don’t know which species is worse — you don’t see them f***ing each other over for a percentage!”

    - Ripley in the movie “Aliens,” commenting about the problems with Republicans humans.

    Professor Terguson: Good answer. Good answer. I like the way you think. I’m gonna be watching you.
    Thornton Melon: [chuckling to his classmates] Good teacher. He really seems to care. About what I have no idea.

  10. #10
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:42 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    I can see these Dems and Repubs sitting in some lounge drinking and smoking cigars together saying, “Who cares what Americans think—man, this is the life!”

  11. #11
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:43 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Jeddite said:
    You know it’s coming: “ONLY GRAHAM/HUCKABEE CAN STOP OBAMA/BIDEN IN ‘12! DONATE NOW!”

    I KNOW I shouldn’t have had anchovies on that pineapple pizza-please let this be but a bad dream-please?

  12. #12
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:44 pm, RedDog said:

    Will someone please explain to me how and why she got the endorsement in the first place? Was she the only secular socialist willing to run as a Republican?

  13. #13
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:44 pm, Brian Roastbeef said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:42 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    I can see these Dems and Repubs sitting in some lounge drinking and smoking cigars together saying, “Who cares what Americans think—man, this is the life!”

    Of course, the Dems then break the Republicans’ cigars, tax their brandy, and lock them out of the lounge… but such is the life of a useful idiot.

  14. #14
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:44 pm, txvet2 said:

    Palin won’t endorse Hoffman. It’d finish her with the Republican “establishment”.

  15. #15
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:46 pm, txvet2 said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:44 pm, RedDog said:

    Will someone please explain to me how and why she got the endorsement in the first place? Was she the only secular socialist willing to run as a Republican?

    One of her fellow liberals was in a position of authority with the Repub conference and handpicked her over the objections of the rest of the committee. I forget the names and dates.

  16. #16
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:48 pm, chapoutier said:

    Wow. Just doing some reading on Dede. You can forget about Hoffman, guys. Dede has been endorsed by the Oswego County ATV Club. They are like the Illuminati of North County politics. Vote against Dede and expect to wake up with Honda FourTrax skid marks across your face.

    Oh. She was also endorsed by Kos.

  17. #17
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:49 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Palin won’t endorse Hoffman. It’d finish her with the Republican “establishment”.

    She’s got nothing to lose. THe GOP “Establishment” already don’t like her. Maybe when the Conservatives she endorses start winning elections, they’ll get a clue.

  18. #18
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:50 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
  19. #19
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:50 pm, et said:

    Withdraw resign and apologize; then crawl back under whatever rock you emerged from.

  20. #20
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:50 pm, RedDog said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:42 pm, FirstSkirt said:
    I can see these Dems and Repubs sitting in some lounge drinking and smoking cigars together saying, “Who cares what Americans think—man, this is the life!”

    I suspect they all would sell out America at the first opportunity if it benefited them personally. Many in the AMA, Big Pharma, Big Insurance, and Big Industry have already tipped their gutless hands when they thought they might be spared the Marxists noose. They are immoral jackals, more than willing to sell out their country.

  21. #21
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:51 pm, Mulligan said:

    chapoutier lol.

  22. #22
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:51 pm, Veretax said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:44 pm, txvet2 said:
    Palin won’t endorse Hoffman. It’d finish her with the Republican “establishment”.

    Why does palin care about the establishment? They haven’t done much to defend her when things went south after the McCain campaign.

    If she is principled I think she will endorse Hoffman

  23. #23
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:53 pm, RedDog said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:49 pm, Dexter Alarius said:
    Palin won’t endorse Hoffman. It’d finish her with the Republican “establishment”.
    She’s got nothing to lose. THe GOP “Establishment” already don’t like her. Maybe when the Conservatives she endorses start winning elections, they’ll get a clue.

    I agree. People like Palin and Jindal are templates for the future. But we have to build on more than a few heroes. Still, they are a good start.

  24. #24
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:58 pm, rambler said:

    Ya think? What took them so long? She was sinking faster than a stone and they waited till she almost hit bottom. Good going RNC!

  25. #25
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:58 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Why does palin care about the establishment?

    Also, Sarah took on the GOP “Establishment” in Alaska… and won. They were crooked and she cleaned them up. If the guy steering the boat is headed toward a waterfall, if yelling and smacking him upside his head doesn’t work, toss him overboard and grab the wheel.

  26. #26
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:59 pm, cheapseat said:

    chap; as said in other tracks, i disagree with policy, but admire your sense of humor.

  27. #27
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:00 pm, cicerokid said:

    Vote against Dede and expect to wake up with Honda FourTrax skid marks across your face.

    Better that than the skid marks in her underware. Boxers or briefs?

    RNC fax line still down.

  28. #28
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:00 pm, RedDog said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:48 pm, chapoutier said:
    Wow. Just doing some reading on Dede. You can forget about Hoffman, guys. Dede has been endorsed by the Oswego County ATV Club. They are like the Illuminati of North County politics. Vote against Dede and expect to wake up with Honda FourTrax skid marks across your face.

    Oh. She was also endorsed by Kos.

    You know chap, you have an annoying way of ruining even the briefest glimmer of hope. The Oswego County ATV Club? Please, say it ain’t so. The bastcherds… is it a lesbian club?

  29. #29
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:02 pm, FilmLadd said:

    Hey Michelle, can’t you get Hannity or someone to slap Newt around a little bit over this?

    From his explanation over endorsing Sofatsa:

    My number one interest is to build a Republican majority.

    No, sorry Newt, your number one interest should be the founding principles of our country. Not your stupid party.

    Somebody PLEASE slap this baby-boomer blowhard until he can see clearly again.

  30. #30
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:05 pm, dan708 said:

    I wouldn’t mind seeing a conservative reporter write an article about how we got to this state of affairs? Exactly, who, how, and when was the decision made to turn the Republican Party into the We’re-Democrats-In-Everything-But-Name Party. I know part of the story as recited by MM, but I would like to see a complete summary.

  31. #31
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:06 pm, Mark Harvey said:

    Add me to the list!

    http://littleurl.net/42ebeb

  32. #33
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:08 pm, tre said:

    My endorsement of Dede Scozzafava in the special election for New York’s 23rd Congressional District is a means of regaining a conservative majority in America.

    But Dede is considered to be even more liberal than the democratic candidate.

    So, Newt, try again. Why did you endores her?

  33. #34
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:10 pm, ctmom said:

    Hey you guys, didn’t you hear? Obama says Republicans just do what they are told to do. Get with the program!

  34. #35
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:10 pm, Texhoma said:

    The RNC and NRCC will never remove their support of her since it will be the perfect opportunity to teach conservatives a lesson about going against the established Republican Party.

    The RNC is willing to accept a Democrat winner who is more conservative than Dede Scozzafava so they can say ’see, we told you so!!’

  35. #36
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:16 pm, et said:

    Hey Newt, how are you any different than the ACORN employees caught on tape?

  36. #37
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:24 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 1:34 pm, tre said:

    That could be the point.
    Do you suppose the Republican “leadership” could really be democrat operatives who’ve infiltrated the party?

    *Twilight Zone music*

    Ya think? I have to warn you though, once you figure that out and start looking at the pieces of the puzzle, it won’t be long before you’ll be accused of hating America.

  37. #38
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:25 pm, Hangfire said:

    Hey Newt, why work for a Republican majority if you already have a Conservative majority.

    And no……..it’s not the same!

  38. #39
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:26 pm, AmericaFirst said:

    NEWT’s number one priority is to go on Hannity and O’Reilly to sell books about books that have already been written. He writes 12 books a year to keep up with the RINO book-of-the-month club.

  39. #40
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:27 pm, txvet2 said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:16 pm, et said:

    Hey Newt, how are you any different than the ACORN employees caught on tape?

    That’s easy. They were only counselling a whore.

  40. #41
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:32 pm, Thomas said:
  41. #42
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:33 pm, WMB said:

    Newt has totally caved in. Is it RINO’s or nothing then? I think not!

  42. #43
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:46 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Dede has been endorsed by the Oswego County ATV Club.

    The most shocking thing about this? They have 1200 members.

  43. #44
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:54 pm, chapoutier said:

    The most shocking thing about this? They have 1200 members.

    One would think. But kids from my area grow up on 4 wheelers.

    Actually, I grew up on 3 wheelers until they were banned. I guess too many kids were trying to ride up the side of massive snow piles, only to have them tip over, land on the rider, with the hot engine inches from his face.

  44. #45
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:58 pm, Jeddite said:

    I, too, had a 3-wheeler as a young boy until it was mysteriously gone one day. As I recall, it was a present from my father after recovering from chicken-pox. :|

  45. #46
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:04 pm, BadIdeaGuy said:

    The Newt book reminds me- I get really nervous when I hear about Newt stomping around in Iowa. I used to really like him but the more I learn about him the more he sounds like an opportunist.

    It’s not like she’s a “Dem lite” or anything, she has the qualifications of a full-on hard lefty.

  46. #47
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:04 pm, Lindsay said:

    This is so important on many levels.

    Here in Florida, conservatives need to support Marco Rubio against Crist (who loves him some Obama), and endorsed the stimulus. ‘Nuff said. Crist is the DIABLO–Mark Steyn’s definition of “Democrat in all but label only” of the RINO’s.

  47. #48
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:23 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Actually, I grew up on 3 wheelers until they were banned. I guess too many kids were trying to ride up the side of massive snow piles, only to have them tip over, land on the rider, with the hot engine inches from his face.

    Well Yeeaaahh! Those 4 wheelers are for sissies!

  48. #49
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:36 pm, chapoutier said:

    Well Yeeaaahh! Those 4 wheelers are for sissies!

    Careful with comments like that or you will have Derek “Two Stroke” Moody (an OCATVC “trail boss” if you take my drift) knocking at your door asking “if maybez you’d like to clarifificate to my friend here, Lead Pipe, your recent conjectures on de subject of four wheelerz.”

  49. #50
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:43 pm, JustAThought said:

    Dede Scozzafava – One of the Democrat’s more open partyline talkers. You folks in NY, PAY ATTENTION for Pete’s sake!

  50. #51
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:46 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    It has been clinically determined that men who voted for McCain suffered drops in testosterone levels. Swear to God. It’s true.

  51. #52
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:48 pm, Papa Louie said:

    My number one interest is to build a Republican majority.

    So, Newt thinks that the way to build a Republican majority is to endorse the same candidates as the Daily Kos. If someone offered you a choice between an original painting and an obvious fake, would you choose the cheap imitation? Then why would you choose a Republican who is a cheap imitation of a Democrat? If Newt believes the American voter is stupid, how is he any different than Bill Maher or any other liberal?

  52. #53
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:53 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    In Newt’s world, the only thing between the Oakland Raiders and a Super Bowl win is the uniform. They need to switch to NY Giants uniforms. Works for the NY Giants.

  53. #55
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 4:10 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:36 pm, chapoutier said:

    ROFLMAO!!!! You have a great sense of humor. Don’t know how you come up with this sutff. “clarifificate”

  54. #56
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 4:27 pm, love2rumba said:

    It has been clinically determined that men who voted for McCain suffered drops in testosterone levels. Swear to God. It’s true.

    PsadenaPhil, this is why I voted for Sarah Palin..Testosterone levels are important to maintain!

  55. #57
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 4:28 pm, Pauldow said:

    The RNC has supported liberal Joe Lieberman back in 2006 over Republican Alan Schlesinger. The only issue Lieberman has a conservative leaning is on the war.

  56. #58
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 4:57 pm, beachmom said:

    The RNC still thinks conservatives are to blame for their losses in the past 8 yrs.
    Are they purposely being ignorant of history and of what the people are telling them?
    Talk about having a problem admitting mistakes.
    C’mon Steele, Pawlenty, Romney and the rest of you…RINOism is the problem.
    The Republican party got far from it’s basic beliefs of smaller govt. and lower taxes and free markets.
    They are too concerned with being liked.
    “Oh, they like me. They really like me!”
    Sheesh

  57. #59
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 5:01 pm, right_on said:

    Dump Dede and quick.

    But, but…we made a “commitment” to her and her campaign!

    Uh huh…how about your commitment to the people? To protect and defend the Constitution from ALL enemies, both foreign and domestic?

    Anyone supporting the anti-constitutional policies of this administration ARE enemies of the state, and need to be removed from office.

    If the justice department is not willing to take action that would protect and defend the constitution, it is left to patriots to remove the destroyers of freedom and liberty, via the ballot box.

  58. #60
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 5:03 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Newt:

    My number one interest is to build a Republican majority.

    He believes that a win for Scozzafava is a win for a 2010 Republican majority.

    WRONG!

    A win for Scozzafava is a loss for the Republican party. Why? Because:

    1) She would vote like Walter Jones, who is a “Republican” (RINO) from NC and almost always votes with the Democrats. What good would it do to build a “Republican majority” that has so many RINOs in it that the Democratic Socialists are the ones still in power?

    2) Voters will only reward the Republican party when the Republican Party and its candidates support Conservative values. RINOs do not win, as clearly shown by John McCain. The only reason McCain did not do even worse is because he had Palin as his VP.

    Newt just doesn’t get it. He thinks a win for a RINO is a win for the Republican party. The reality is that a win for RINO is a win for Kos and a loss for the Repubican party.

    The only way for a true win in this race is a win for Hoffman.

  59. #61
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 6:39 pm, granite said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 4:10 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    ROFLMAO!!!!

    “clarifificate”

    Sounds not unlike a word Bo Dietl might use:

    http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-132088074/meet-me-lunchatation-bo.html

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/nyregion/04towns.html

  60. #62
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 7:23 pm, Little Ma said:

    The Republican Party is embarrassed by our passion. We aren’t considered politically sophisticated enough to be given a voice. The GOP doesn’t want us now and never will.

    I don’t need the Republican Party.

  61. #63
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 8:41 pm, WarTip said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 2:05 pm, dan708 said:

    I wouldn’t mind seeing a conservative reporter write an article about how we got to this state of affairs? Exactly, who, how, and when was the decision made to turn the Republican Party into the We’re-Democrats-In-Everything-But-Name Party. I know part of the story as recited by MM, but I would like to see a complete summary.

    It would take more than an article. Legally go back to the efforts by Lincoln to “preserve the union” through the centralization of federal powers. Look at the influx of socialist programs between 1913 and the cackle of congress critters in the 1933 congress. Look at the subsequent promise of the proverbial forty acres and a mule to everyone who would quit their job and become a strain on the working man. Look at the influx of communist and socialist ideologies as it began to take over academia, hollywood, the press and other industries during the late 50s until it became relatively mainstream in the seventies to the accepted norm in the nineties. Follow through with the failed policies of Bush, a Republican house that refused to act like the winners they were and the resulting introduction of a democrat congress in 2006 who did act like winners and push their own legislation all the while blaming Bush who signed this asinine legislation under some misguided attempt at bipartisan support. Look at an uneducated general populace who staunchly believed their indoctrination from academia, believed that they had legal and constitutional rights to welfare and other methods of wealth redistribution and also believed (in their hearts) that Bush really was responsible for their ills and Dems would give them the rich man’s wealth in exchange for their compliance. Follow through to the election of a radical community organizer who could stabilize the divided groups and through the use of class and socio-political warfare turn them against any effort by anyone to enlighten them with facts, help them to see that they were just as capable of succeeding as the next guy if only they would work for it and show them that they could do better if they had to be responsible … and then watched as they chose instead to remain ignorant and apathetic in the name of getting something for free and you pretty much have a wrap of American society today. Still, to put it down in detail would take a small book at best.

    If you are serious, let me know. Not that I have ever looked at it in-depth or anything.

  62. #64
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 8:46 pm, AF Sarge (Ret) said:

    Just saw on Face Book that Sarah is backing Hoffman. Looking to see poll numbers go up for him.

    Sarge

  63. #65
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 8:48 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Now that we know where Sarah stands, why aren’t people asking about where Romney, Huckleberry and Pawlenty stand? What are they getting a pass? After all, they ARE declared candidates for prez. Sarah is not.

  64. #66
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 8:50 pm, AF Sarge (Ret) said:
  65. #67
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:04 pm, rightisright said:

    If she is principled I think she will endorse Hoffman

    She is principled, that’s what scares the dems, their afraid it may catch on to some of their own, oh, by the way, she did endorse Hoffman.

  66. #68
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:05 pm, txvet2 said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 8:46 pm, AF Sarge (Ret) said:

    Great. Never been so happy to be proven wrong. Go Sarah!!

  67. #69
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:06 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    When will the truly conservative among the Republicans become ashamed enough to leave the party (or courageous enough to take it back)?

  68. #70
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:24 pm, AF Sarge (Ret) said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:06 pm, Jet Jaguar said:
    (or courageous enough to take it back)?

    I think the best way is to un-elect them at election time. None are gonna leave on their own.

    Sarge

  69. #71
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:27 pm, AF Sarge (Ret) said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 3:46 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    It has been clinically determined that men who voted for McCain suffered drops in testosterone levels. Swear to God. It’s true.

    Whew! had me worried, I know my testosterone level stayed up….. I voted for Sarah. LOL

    Sarge

  70. #72
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:33 pm, tarpon said:

    It’s pretty clear what’s wrong with the GOP — No first principles.

  71. #73
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:34 pm, Rekd said:

    When will the truly conservative among the Republicans become ashamed enough to leave the party (or courageous enough to take it back)?

    Um, last election. Taking it back? That’s gonna mean more like me have to leave first.

  72. #74
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:40 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:06 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    When will the truly conservative among the Republicans become ashamed enough to leave the party (or courageous enough to take it back)?

    WE are doing it. At a time when the GOP is increasingly hamstrung in its efforts to raise money, we are forcing them to spend big gobs of it on this race. NY-23 used to be a slam dunk for the GOP and so, inexpensive.

    If either Hoffman or the Dem win, they will have lost an important and pivotal battle. The next confrontation between them and us conservatives will be even more costly for them but cheaper and this trend will grow as we gain momentum. The GOP cannot last long if we start stringing up victories.

    It’s like I keep saying, it is very expensive to sell cancer. No one in their right mind wants it. The cure may also be expensive but it is easier to raise money for. They are the cancer, we are the cure and the issues are gelling in the minds of the American voter because of NY-23. This could be where the dam of resistance to the will of the voters is finally burst.

    If it weren’t so important, why would the RNC be wasting so much money for one insignificant race? Why is it important for them to win it with a radical left-wing liberal?

  73. #75
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:41 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    correction:

    The next confrontation between them and us conservatives will be even more costly for them but cheaper FOR US….

  74. #76
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 9:48 pm, swede said:

    I’m thinking it might be worth having Scozzafava around just to hear KO the Bathtub Boy try to pronounce her name.

  75. #77
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 10:30 pm, powerpro said:

    Palin won’t endorse Hoffman. It’d finish her with the Republican “establishment”.

    I don’t think she cares about the establishment. I certainly don’t if all they can give us are Libs Lite.

    BTW….Palin endorsed Hoffman tonight.

    Support Doug Hoffman

    The people of the 23rd Congressional District of New York are ready to shake things up, and Doug Hoffman is coming on strong as Election Day approaches! He needs our help now.

    The votes of every member of Congress affect every American, so it’s important for all of us to pay attention to this important Congressional campaign in upstate New York. I am very pleased to announce my support for Doug Hoffman in his fight to be the next Representative from New York’s 23rd Congressional district. It’s my honor to endorse Doug and to do what I can to help him win, including having my political action committee, SarahPAC, donate to his campaign the maximum contribution allowed by law.

    Our nation is at a crossroads, and this is once again a “time for choosing.”

    The federal government borrows, spends, and prints too much money, while our national debt hits a record high. Government is growing while the private sector is shrinking, and unemployment is on the rise. Doug Hoffman is committed to ending the reckless spending in Washington, D.C. and the massive increase in the size and scope of the federal government. He is also fully committed to supporting our men and women in uniform as they seek to honorably complete their missions overseas.

    And best of all, Doug Hoffman has not been anointed by any political machine.

    Doug Hoffman stands for the principles that all Republicans should share: smaller government, lower taxes, strong national defense, and a commitment to individual liberty.

    Political parties must stand for something. When Republicans were in the wilderness in the late 1970s, Ronald Reagan knew that the doctrine of “blurring the lines” between parties was not an appropriate way to win elections. Unfortunately, the Republican Party today has decided to choose a candidate who more than blurs the lines, and there is no real difference between the Democrat and the Republican in this race. This is why Doug Hoffman is running on the Conservative Party’s ticket.

    Republicans and conservatives around the country are sending an important message to the Republican establishment in their outstanding grassroots support for Doug Hoffman: no more politics as usual.

    You can help Doug by visiting his official website below and joining me in supporting his campaign:

    http://www.doughoffmanforcongress.com/donate3.html.

    - Sarah Palin

    Political party means nothing if it’s not founded in anything…and if the establishment keep putting forward liberals for candidates, then I’ll follow Palin’s lead and support independent conservatives…that way, as Doug Hoffman puts it, at least conservatives have someone to vote for.

  76. #78
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:18 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Palin’s endorsement is very likely to be the headline tomorrow. I’m surprised that Drudge hasn’t put up his police flasher alert yet.

  77. #79
    On October 22nd, 2009 at 11:39 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Has anybody been to the RNC web site as of late? Pathetic. People post blog spots and there are hardly any responses. The most I think I have seen is 9.

    Epic failure. That is all the RNC is about and more proof is their support of liberals with “R’s” behind their names.

  78. #81
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 1:02 am, WarEagle82 said:

    Is there anything about the RNC that ISN’T PATHETIC? Seems unfair to single out their new web site.

    Good to know that the country is falling apart and Michael Steele is hard at work updating his web site…

    We are officially a one-party state. The good news is that there are three wings of the party: Maoists, Marxists and confused old men with annoying daughters…

  79. #82
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 1:47 am, pdigaudio said:

    Might as well cast my voice in here as well:

    The Underground Conservative

  80. #83
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 7:54 am, RobM1981 said:

    Gingrich will always think, understandably, as the Speaker of the House. In his mind, Scozzafava is one more link in the chain, with the goal of getting a majority… and all of the parliamentary benefits that go with it.

    It’s no different than him sitting on a couch with Pelosi. To him, this is just part of the “strange bedfellows” that politics require.

    What’s unfortunate isn’t that he’s horribly wrong, but that he’s horribly blind to his own mistake. Scozzafava’s negatives so grotesquely outweigh her one positive (her nominally being a Republican), it’s hard to defend Gingrich’s deep lack of judgement.

    He was already on very thin ice. At this point it’s hard to ever trust his wisdom as a leader again.

  81. #84
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 8:56 am, pressto said:

    I do not blame Dede or think she should withdraw, but the GOP sure needs to change if they have any hope of getting more members back. I finally changed my voter registration to decline to state last week.

  82. #86
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 10:24 am, Solo said:

    My endorsement of Dede Scozzafava in the special election for New York’s 23rd Congressional District is a means of regaining a conservative majority in America

    WOW.

    They just don’t get it.

    Supporting liberal republicans, growing government, and moving the party left was a way of maintaining a conservative majority… How’d that work, Newt?

    Conservatism within your party is all but dead and you want to resuscitate it by electing more left of center republicans. Real freaking smart. If Gingrich and his ilk is the best the rnc has to offer the party is finished.

  83. #87
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 10:30 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Can the Republican establishment hear conservatives now?

    No.

    They never could, and never will.

    Does anyone believe the EVER even tried?

    Reagan was the EXCEPTION.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  84. #88
    On October 23rd, 2009 at 10:47 pm, olbroad said:

    You can add my voice to that list!

    Bad Move, Newt!

  85. #89
    On October 24th, 2009 at 7:01 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    The GOP has no intention of letting conservatives get control of their party. They have no intention of representing your values. Conservatives need to be brave and move on.

    Or continue to hold your nose forever.

    GOP=WHIG

    GOP-RIP

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Mudville Gazette

» Protests in DC
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook