See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On October 28th, 2009 at 7:25 am, ajmontana said:

   Time to let the grown ups run the Country again. What and the H E double hockey sticks happened Nov. 4th 08?
   

2. #2
   On October 28th, 2009 at 7:30 am, Jeff2161 said:

   Apologies to Monty Python…

   Sir Bedevere: What makes you think she’s a witch?
   Peasant 3: Well, she turned me into a newt!
   Sir Bedevere: A newt?
   Peasant 3: [meekly after a long pause] … I got better.

3. #3
   On October 28th, 2009 at 7:31 am, bansharia said:

   aj,
   I liked that post as well:
   http://www.cbrookskurtz.com/articles/2009/10/27/die-on-your-feet-or-live-on-your-knees.html

4. #4
   On October 28th, 2009 at 7:35 am, iamsaved said:

   They are indeed correct. It’s time to stop Democrats posing as Republicans in order to get elected. They are the proverbial wolves in sheep’s clothing.

   Maybe, if enough conservatives are voted in, this sort of arrogance by John Murtha in Congress can be stopped.

5. #5
   On October 28th, 2009 at 7:36 am, Jeff2161 said:

   King Arthur: I am your king.
   Woman: Well I didn’t vote for you.
   King Arthur: You don’t vote for kings.
   Woman: Well how’d you become king then?
   [Angelic music plays... ]
   King Arthur: The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. THAT is why I am your king.
   Dennis: [interrupting] Listen, strange women lyin’ in ponds distributin’ swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.

   ——————————————————————————–
   Dennis: Oh, but you can’t expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you.

   ——————————————————————————–
   Dennis: Oh but if I went ’round sayin’ I was Emperor, just because some moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at me, they’d put me away.

   ——————————————————————————–
   Dennis: Come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help! Help! I’m being repressed!
   King Arthur: Bloody peasant!
   Dennis: Oh, what a giveaway! Did you hear that? Did you hear that, eh? That’s what I’m on about! Did you see him repressing me?

6. #6
   On October 28th, 2009 at 7:42 am, DagneyT said:

   I just sent my GOP membership request back with the message, “I am a conservative first. When the Republicans return to conservative values, I’ll rejoin.”

   This is a good sign that some are returning….!

7. #7
   On October 28th, 2009 at 7:58 am, bansharia said:

   Dag,
   I also have been having fun sending them back and was Blessed to open mailbox and have TWO “surveys” in box
   on same day.
   So much to say so little space
   keepem coming I have lots of ink RNC
   and you have plenty of prepaid postage.

8. #8
   On October 28th, 2009 at 8:35 am, jangar said:

   Good. It’s catching on like wildfire. Let it spread across the Nation.

   Who they gonna blame…FOX News? I’d wear that badge with honor!

9. #9
   On October 28th, 2009 at 8:45 am, carole said:

   Contact the NRCC

   Address:

   320 First Street, SE
   Washington, DC 20003

   Departments:

   The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC)’s departments can be reached below:

   General Email
   website@nrcc.org

   Executive
   Phone: 202-479-7000

   Administration
   Phone: 202-479-7000

   Political
   Phone: 202-479-7000

   Finance
   Phone: 202-479-7000
   Communications
   Phone: 202-479-7070

   eCampaign
   Phone: 202-479-7000 ASK FOR A REFUND…NO DE DE…..NO RINOS……

10. #10
    On October 28th, 2009 at 8:51 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Got my RNC fund raiser and I WAS going to tell them I will send the money to the Hoffmann campaign–but I think I will use the Jeff2161

    Sir Bedevere: What makes you think she’s a witch?
    Peasant 3: Well, she turned me into a newt!
    Sir Bedevere: A newt?
    Peasant 3: [meekly after a long pause] … I got better.

    So a tip of the hat to Colorado Republicans and Jeff2161

11. #11
    On October 28th, 2009 at 8:59 am, Truesoldier said:

    It is great to see that Conservatives are stepping up to the plate for Hoffman.

    On another note, Obama has been up to something else:

    High-dollar fundraisers have been promised access to senior officials and use of White House facilities in exchange for thousands of dollars in donations, documents reveal.

12. #12
    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:00 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    More GOP support for Doug Hoffman from GOP Rep. Todd Akin in Missouri; GOP Rep. Dana Rohrbacher; and former NRCC chair Tom Cole.

    According to Newt, they are not entitled to an opinion as this is a local election. I guess that leaves us all out as well. You too Michelle!

    P.S. You do not get better after turning into a Newt. You become a liberal.

13. #13
    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:00 am, JusDreamin said:

    Excellent. Not only the support, but the clear statement. Hat’s off to them

14. #14
    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:02 am, Omu said:

    If Scozzafava was as extremely liberal as this blog is saying, then why wouldn’t she just run as a Democrat? It would make her life much easier, especially in New York state which is as blue as it gets.

15. #15
    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:02 am, cheapseat said:

    perhaps a better use of (R) money and time would be to work toward changing republican state primary laws to assure that democrats can’t vote in our primaries (eh gov christ). after all, it was florida dems which so screwed their election proceedure that they then decided to give us john mccain as our candidate. until republicans pick their candidates, we will continue to get mccains and snowes.

16. #16
    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:05 am, nwsseeker said:

    Here’s some food for thought for us “Conservatives”. This race in NY,since Governor Palin endorsed Mr. Hoffman and Gingrichs’ doubling down has brought out endorsements and the lack thereof by individuals in the Republican Party. It would be good if there was a way to remind all the voters in the upcoming 2010 elections which candidates supported Hoffman and which ones didn’t. If we could get them “on record” prior to next years’ election their stance on this race would be telling and we could vote accordingly for principled conservatives.

17. #17
    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:17 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    I suppose most people are like me and didn’t miss emu?

    It is called INFILTRATION.

    We do not expect a third-grader like you to understand.

18. #18
    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:42 am, txvet2 said:

    To tell the truth, Gingrich has been irrelevant for over 10 years. I don’t know why people even bother to quote him anymore. It’s like quoting Wendell Wilkie.

19. #19
    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:50 am, John Deaux said:

    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:17 am, On-my-soap-box said:
    I suppose most people are like me and didn’t miss emu?

    OMU = One Monkey’s Uncle

    OMU is a foul mouthed troll. And not a bright one at that.

20. #20
    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:53 am, valleygreaser said:

    Everyone in the USA should see that clip of Murtha so they can understand what is happening to democracy under the democrats.

21. #21
    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:58 am, bansharia said:

    Carole,
    I’ll do one step better if I see one of the paid hacks face to face we are going to have some words.
    Have worked countless hours over my adult life as a VOL for GOP candidates facing huge odds while dem counterparts have been paid….
    AND THEY ARE PAYING PEOPLE TO CAMPAIGN FOR THIS COW?
    THIS Bitter/Clinger is going to NY to help Hoffman, topsiders on the ground
    ( aint wearing my boots in this weather )
    Note to DC GOPers you make me barf.

22. #22
    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:05 am, corkie said:

    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:02 am, Omu said:

    If Scozzafava was as extremely liberal as this blog is saying, then why wouldn’t she just run as a Democrat? It would make her life much easier, especially in New York state which is as blue as it gets.

    Research the issue yourself, and maybe you’ll figure it out.

    Here’s a head start: It’s a congressional race – not a senate race.

23. #23
    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:07 am, corkie said:

    Continued support for Hoffman seems to be developing.

    Say what you want about Palin, but the woman certainly demonstrated leadership on this issue.

24. #24
    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:08 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    What this signifies is the beginning of the conservative uprising from the lower ranks of the GOP. If this catches fire, it will be interesting to hear the verbal contortions from the party elites as they try to rationalize why everyone is wrong but them. The Gang of McCain that holds the reins will never leave willingly.

    This uprising will either result in new leadership before next year’s elections or form a very visible and broad base for a new major party.

25. #25
    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:17 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Kind of a corollary issue but I really didn’t expect Pawlenty to endorse Hoffman (which he did). This bears watching closely. This is the early favorite to win the GOP nomination in 2012 and has attracted the big hitters that supported Bush and McCain. Somehow, I don’t buy it. More tactical than conviction methinks.

26. #26
    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:30 am, bansharia said:

    Phil,
    I take offense at your use of the description “uprising of the lower ranks of the GOP”.
    While not in a personal sense but from a full frontal Constitutional understanding:
    They work for ME, WE and US.
    If that does not apply so be it.

27. #27
    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:34 am, bansharia said:

    Phil,
    I am not aware that there is any “early” fav for 2012 and with all due respect anyone thinking that far out is missing the much more critical issues of TODAY.
    There is no luxary of cocktail and weenie type conversations about the next POTUS election, America is under attack from enemies from within.
    FOCUS

28. #28
    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:34 am, chapoutier said:

    Say what you want about Palin, but the woman certainly demonstrated leadership on this issue.

    How? She was hardly the first big name to back Hoffman. At least Bachmann and Armey were before her. And what has she done besides issue a press release? Has she gone to the district to campaign for him? I know I read about a few other names doing so. Has she tried to raise money for him?

29. #29
    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:59 am, AmericaFirst said:

    I just emailed the NRA and expressed my furious displeasure with their endorsement of liberal Dede Scozzafava. My 5 year membership will be canceled and my card will be sent back to their offices if they do not renounce their endorsement of her. I’m waiting for their response. Will post it here.

30. #30
    On October 28th, 2009 at 11:10 am, AmericaFirst said:

    chapoutier: “Has she tried to raise money for him?”

    Hey chap, if you actually take the time to read Sarah Palin’s facebook page, you would have read the following…

    “…and to do what I can to help him win, including having my political action committee, SarahPAC, donate to his campaign the maximum contribution allowed by law.”
    Source: Sarah Palin

    You are a typical anti-Palin basher who would rather trash a Conservative without facts then actually do some research. corkie never said she was the first to endorse. Why don’t you read Palin’s facebook messages before you attack? I donated to Hoffman after reading her SARAHPAC MONETARY endorsement. Sarah Palin Led and I Followed. She’s a Conservative leader like corkie stated.

31. #31
    On October 28th, 2009 at 11:12 am, AmericanPatriot said:

    Has she tried to raise money for him?

    Chap, I believe she was sending a contribution.
    Seems like it was something like the max allowable.
    For many, Palin has clout. I don’t think she had to put feet on the ground, only make the endorsement.
    Could she have done more?
    Probably

32. #32
    On October 28th, 2009 at 11:21 am, corkie said:

    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:34 am, chapoutier said:

    She was hardly the first big name to back Hoffman. At least Bachmann and Armey were before her.

    Yes, Bachmann and Armey demonstrated leadership, also.

    On October 28th, 2009 at 11:10 am, AmericaFirst said:

    corkie never said she was the first to endorse.

    Exactly. Thanks, AmericaFirst.

    Our own Michelle Malkin endorsed prior to Palin. I never stated that Palin was first. I stated that she demonstrated leadership. She did it BEFORE it was safe for someone that wants future Republican nominations.

    Maybe you really don’t understand leadership, chap.

33. #33
    On October 28th, 2009 at 11:24 am, chapoutier said:

    AmericaFirst

    I meant attend fundraisers for him. I do not consider having her PAC donate a whopping $2,400 “leadership.”

    And I never said corkie said she was the first to endorse. But I would consider that a pretty strong indicator of leadership, sticking your neck out when no one else has. She certainly has not been the most vocal endorser either. Dick Armey is actually going to the district to campaign. If Palin has done or said more, I haven’t been able to find it.

    donated to Hoffman after reading her SARAHPAC MONETARY endorsement.

    Seriously, if you consider one facebook blurb and a $2,400 donation “leadership” it is no wonder the Republican party has been able to walk all over the conservatives in its party for so many years.

34. #34
    On October 28th, 2009 at 11:38 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:30 am, bansharia said:

    Phil,
    I take offense at your use of the description “uprising of the lower ranks of the GOP”.
    While not in a personal sense but from a full frontal Constitutional understanding:
    They work for ME, WE and US.
    If that does not apply so be it.

    Very odd rant. Complete misapplication of rhetorical logic.

    On October 28th, 2009 at 10:34 am, bansharia said:

    Phil,
    I am not aware that there is any “early” fav for 2012 and with all due respect anyone thinking that far out is missing the much more critical issues of TODAY.
    There is no luxary of cocktail and weenie type conversations about the next POTUS election, America is under attack from enemies from within.

    In my book, the Pawlenty endorsement is highly suspect and so he belongs in this discussion. He is the RNC darling yet he endorsed Hoffman. Had Palin not beat him to it and were Hoffman not the projected winner, he would have remained on the sidelines.

    Most of the heavy hitters from Team Bush and Team McCain are already on Team Pawlenty. That makes him the RNC darling, unless you believe that only becomes known by an RNC press conference. Pawlenty may be the latest RINO camel poking its nose into the conservative tent. We need to beware.

    If that offends you, I don’t know what to say. Wear a helmet?

    Mark my word, if Pawlenty gains favor among conservatives, he will have gotten a pass from the RNC to say whatever he needs to say to win the nomination but a deal will have been cut with the same old interests.

    I suspect you are thinking with your emotions rather than your intellect.

35. #35
    On October 28th, 2009 at 11:52 am, corkie said:

    On October 28th, 2009 at 11:24 am, chapoutier said:

    Seriously, if you consider one facebook blurb and a $2,400 donation “leadership”

    You’re darned right I do.

    Leadership isn’t mutually exclusive. I never stated that she was THE leader. I stated that she demonstrated leadership. Again, I don’t think you have a clear understanding of leadership.

36. #36
    On October 28th, 2009 at 12:08 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Never mind you have proven Chappy wrong in his original statements. He is still right in his own mind. Because Palin didn’t do what Chappy thought she should do, even though he doesn’t know what she has done, is all that matters. Facts don’t matter. Only Chappy’s opinion matters…

37. #37
    On October 28th, 2009 at 12:22 pm, dan708 said:

    If I had anything left after taxes and the recent root-canal, I’d throw a few bucks Mr. Hoffman’s way. I can only support you in spirit, Doug – give ‘em hell!

38. #38
    On October 28th, 2009 at 12:41 pm, chapoutier said:

    You’re darned right I do.

    Okay then. Good luck with leaders like that. Personally, I’ll take someone who does a little bit more.

    Because Palin didn’t do what Chappy thought she should do,

    To be a leader? Yes you are right she didn’t do what I thought she should do to meet my definition of leadership, which is why I questioned her leadership on the issue. That is very astute of you WE82.

    even though he doesn’t know what she has done

    Yes I do. A facebook post that came out after a number of other prominent Republicans had already endorsed her and, more importantly, after her base had already revolted on the issue. How long have the conservative blogs been covering this? MM, Red State, Glenn Beck…were all out ahead of this, ginning up support for Hoffman among the conservatives. She followed her troops into battle. Not the other way around. Oh. And she gave $2,400. Am I missing anything?

    List of things she didn’t do: any public fundraisers, any active campaigning (like Armey), any public speeches, any TV or radio ads (like Fred Thompson), any appearances with Hoffman…

39. #39
    On October 28th, 2009 at 12:54 pm, chapoutier said:

    Let’s kiss and make up everyone and let me share this bit of awesomeness with you.

    Schwarzenegger’s hidden message.

    This is a real letter, and for reference it was in reference to a bill sponsored by an assemblyman that said Ahnold could “kiss his gay a**.”

40. #40
    On October 28th, 2009 at 1:11 pm, corkie said:

    MM, Red State, Glenn Beck…were all out ahead of this, ginning up support for Hoffman among the conservatives . . . she followed her troops into battle.

    Your battle analogy is bad.

    MM, Red State, and Glenn Back cheered until would be Republican candidates entered into the ring.

    Palin demonstrated leadership by entering the ring early. Other would be Republican candidates followed (for obvious reasons I think).

    Don’t get me wrong. I applaud the work done by MM, Red State, and Glenn Beck, but they’re not in battle – they’re not the ones in the ring.

41. #41
    On October 28th, 2009 at 1:32 pm, b-cat said:

    Don’t get me wrong. I applaud the work done by MM, Red State, and Glenn Beck, but they’re not in battle – they’re not the ones in the ring.

    No one is more in the battle than MM and Glenn Beck. They are putting their lives on the lines. I don’t know about Red State, they probably enjoy some anonymity.

    I won’t even put political stickers on my car for fear for my property. Can you imagine being MM or Beck walking down a NY street?

42. #42
    On October 28th, 2009 at 1:37 pm, Truesoldier said:

    On October 28th, 2009 at 9:02 am, Omu said:
    If Scozzafava was as extremely liberal as this blog is saying, then why wouldn’t she just run as a Democrat?

    it si kinda like a case of gender identity crisis….call it ideology identity crisis.

43. #43
    On October 28th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, frontierguy said:

    Liberal Democrat issues are not in the best interest of the citizens of the United States, and therefore should be rejected by the Republican Party if we want this nation to survive and thrive as a beacon of light to the world.

    Exactly…
    California = Fail
    New York = Fail
    Chicago = Fail
    Detroit = Fail

    Wake up people, liberals destroy everything they touch. The only people who benefit are the people in charge, not the general population. Encouraging, local Republican outfits changing, next national.

44. #44
    On October 28th, 2009 at 2:22 pm, corkie said:

    On October 28th, 2009 at 1:32 pm, b-cat said:

    They are putting their lives on the lines.

    I don’t think the Hoffmon issue is incrementally increasing the dangers they already face.

45. #45
    On October 28th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, bansharia said:

    Phil,
    I sit corrected and was indeed typing with my emotions.
    Pleas accept my apologies.
    Thank you for being gentle

46. #46
    On October 28th, 2009 at 2:44 pm, vatodio said:

    Newt has practically been de-fanged and NEUTERED.

    He would be wise to keep his money earned from PHONY Conservative books paddling, in stead of attempting to run for higher office.

    If he is not DONE yet, he will be soon.

    Just keep moving to the CENTER (a la McCain) AND partner with Sharptons and Pelosis on unproven and bogus issue advertisements.

    That will expedite his cooking process well before 2012 elections.

47. #47
    On October 28th, 2009 at 2:49 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I am waiting for the announcement that Chappy has been appointed Senior Advisor to Sarah Palin.

    It is good to know that Chappy is so concerned about the future of the conservative movement in America. I think I just threw up a little bit in my mouth…

48. #48
    On October 28th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Republicans throughout America should insist that their Party back candidates worthy of their support, not liberals supported by Democratic leaders and Barack Obama.

    THat makes me proud to be a Coloradan! And Dave Schultheis is my State Senator! Way to go Dave!

49. #49
    On October 28th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, chapoutier said:

    It is good to know that Chappy is so concerned about the future of the conservative movement in America.

    Of course I am concerned about the conservative movement! Where would the Harlem Globetrotters be without the Washington Generals? Or Bugs Bunny without Elmer Fudd?

    You complete me, WarEagle.

50. #50
    On October 28th, 2009 at 3:22 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Well, we know where we would be without your kind, Chappy. We would be enjoying unprecedented prosperity in the freest and most vibrant democracy the world had ever seen.

    Instead, we get Obama & minions and his remarkable combination of fascism and narcissism…

51. #51
    On October 28th, 2009 at 3:27 pm, chapoutier said:

    Well, we know where we would be without your kind, Chappy. We would be enjoying unprecedented prosperity in the freest and most vibrant democracy the world had ever seen.

    You would be in Finland?

    All you need is a passport and a one way ticket. According to Travelocity, you can snag one that leaves tomorrow for under $1,000.

52. #52
    On October 28th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Figures a left-wing dweeb, ambulance-chasing lawyer would recommend a $1,000 fare to Finland…

    Oh, and the real index of freedom can be found here: http://www.heritage.org/index/Default.aspx

53. #53
    On October 28th, 2009 at 3:43 pm, chapoutier said:

    Figures a left-wing dweeb, ambulance-chasing lawyer would recommend a $1,000 fare to Finland…

    I WAS going to recommend you just swim it. But I hear the waters in the North Atlantic get a bit cold this time of year.

    Oh, and the real index of freedom can be found here: http://www.heritage.org/index/Default.aspx

    I have no problem if you want to move to Hong Kong instead.

54. #54
    On October 28th, 2009 at 3:53 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    There is nothing like an invigorating swim in the North Atlantic! I recommend you take a 10 minute swim and let me know how that works out for you. Then I’ll consider it.

55. #55
    On October 28th, 2009 at 4:30 pm, love2rumba said:

    Facts don’t matter. Only Chappy’s opinion matters

    That seems to be a modus operandi for libs

56. #56
    On October 28th, 2009 at 4:33 pm, Mr Wolf said:

    We have the same thing happening in CO as in NY- the GOP put up a squish, Norton, as ‘their’ candidate; even tho she voted for the largest tax increase in state history.

    The ONLY true Conservative candidate in CO is Tidwell- he’s pushing hard for the same ‘reforms’ and ideals as Conservatives should. This battle here will end up similar- GO TIDWELL!

    Wolf

57. #57
    On October 28th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    The GOP seems to think they can “win” by become Democrats. When you start defining “winning” as fighting to implement your opponent’s platform I am pretty sure you have lost…

    Oddly enough, the GOP “leadership” doesn’t seem to get it.

58. #58
    On October 28th, 2009 at 4:48 pm, dan708 said:

    I wonder what it would take to pull off a “coup de tat” of the Repub Party’s leadership? I’m not connected enough to know exactly what’s necessary. Your thoughts, MM?

59. #59
    On October 28th, 2009 at 4:54 pm, chapoutier said:

    I wonder what it would take to pull off a “coup de tat” of the Repub Party’s leadership?

    I am pretty sure that the first step is for everyone to synchronize their watches. At least that is what the A-Team would always do.

60. #60
    On October 28th, 2009 at 5:03 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    And then we could learn how to spell “coup d’etat.” Mr. T is very big on spelling…

    I wonder what it would take to pull off a “coup de tat” of the Repub Party’s leadership?

61. #61
    On October 28th, 2009 at 5:12 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Why do we say “coup d’etat” instead of “Putsch” or “Staatsstreich?” The Russian phrase, “Государственный переворот,” just doesn’t cut it though…

62. #62
    On October 28th, 2009 at 5:24 pm, chapoutier said:

    WarEagle, the only one you need to know is “vallankaapaus.”

    Hyvää matkaa, my friend!

63. #63
    On October 28th, 2009 at 5:40 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Entschuldigen Sie mich, aber kann Ich nicht Finnisches sprechen.

    But it makes sense that Alcibiades would rank on your rank list…

64. #64
    On October 28th, 2009 at 5:50 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Or if you prefer, Извините меня, но я не могу поговорить финское.

    Of course, that phrase led to complications back in the Winter of 1939 when Joe Stalin said it to Field Marshal Mannerheim. Evidently, due to Stalin’s poor pronunciation it was translated as “Excuse me but I would like to feed you to an enraged Møøse.”

65. #65
    On October 28th, 2009 at 6:15 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Phil,
    I take offense at your use of the description “uprising of the lower ranks of the GOP”.
    While not in a personal sense but from a full frontal Constitutional understanding:
    They work for ME, WE and US.
    If that does not apply so be it.

    Your argument would stand if the GOP agreed with your sentiment of them working for you and us.

    They do not, and you are a fool to follow them, as they are headed into the abyss.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

66. #66
    On October 28th, 2009 at 8:07 pm, starlightwoman said:

    Personally, I want to run for the Chair position of the Republican party. I realize it is primarily fund raising, but I think I could send a message.

67. #67
    On October 29th, 2009 at 12:40 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On October 28th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, chapoutier said:
    You complete me, WarEagle.

    Hey WarEagle, breaktime’s over! Half-assed or not, finish the job!

68. #68
    On October 30th, 2009 at 11:57 am, mlnicosia said:

    Pataki backs Hoffman!
    http://wcbstv.com/local/pataki.conservative.candidate.2.1281176.html

69. #69
    On October 31st, 2009 at 9:20 pm, Pixel_Dust_1776 said:

    Newt?………you can try, but your faced is being rubbed all over Dede’s leftovers.
    I love that quote:
    I love the smell of a RINO being Napalmed early in the morning!
    The Aroma of resurging Conservatism.
    Off with their heads and toss them at the feet of Graham and McCain!
    OOOOOOORRRRAAGH!
    Rio
    Semper Fi!
    Do or Die!!