Comments on: Obama’s FCC, liberal churches, and the “media justice” mob

By: Michelle Malkin » Change.org vs. Christianity

Michelle Malkin » Change.org vs. Christianity — Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:01:43 +0000

[...] taxpayer-funded initiatives (Obamacare, illegal alien amnesty, increased education spending, and FCC regulatory expansion, for [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » Stop the hate campaign against law-abiding American businesses

Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:05:52 +0000

[...] taxpayer-funded initiatives (Obamacare, illegal alien amnesty, increased education spending, and FCC regulatory expansion, for [...]

By: The Hate Speech Inquisition « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian

The Hate Speech Inquisition « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian — Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:28:32 +0000

[...] group is part of a larger “media justice” coalition dedicated to curtailing and redistributing conservatives’ political speech under the guise of [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » The Hate Speech Inquisition

Michelle Malkin » The Hate Speech Inquisition — Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:37:14 +0000

[...] group is part of a larger “media justice” coalition dedicated to curtailing and redistributing conservatives’ political speech under the guise of [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » Arizona: Doing the job the feds won’t do

Michelle Malkin » Arizona: Doing the job the feds won’t do — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:14:38 +0000

[...] shamnesty response. We need trustworthy conservative stalwarts who can withstand the relentless smear campaign against supporters of strict, consistent, effective immigration and entrance enforcement. Posted [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » When “social justice” is a code phrase

Michelle Malkin » When “social justice” is a code phrase — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:36:30 +0000

[...] Obama’s FCC, liberal churches, and the “media justice” mob [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » It’s April Fools’ Day all year long at the RNC

Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:32:00 +0000

[...] and Refugee Rights (ICIRR) and other outfits that oppose workplace enforcement and make a living demonizing the men and women who work at ICE and the Border [...]

By: GrandPiano

GrandPiano — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:59:49 +0000

GrandPiano…

Megacool Blog indeed!… if anyone else has anything it would be much appreciated. Great website Enjoy!…

By: Hyscience

Hyscience — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:02:42 +0000

Lou Dobbs, CNN, and the message for the rest of us…

Jeffrey Lord, in his informative discussion on Lou Dobbs leaving CNN, leaves us with an ominous take-home message: If they can silence Lou Dobbs – they will eventually try to silence the rest of us (take the time to read it all). As for the “they,” L…

By: Michelle Malkin » All aboard the Obama Amnesty Bandwagon

Michelle Malkin » All aboard the Obama Amnesty Bandwagon — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:59:01 +0000

[...] remember: They’re watching. Posted in: Amnesty Printer Friendly comments (0) trackbacks [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » Connecting the “media justice” dots

Michelle Malkin » Connecting the “media justice” dots — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:50:52 +0000

[...] various members of the speech-stifling “media justice” mob over the past few weeks (here and [...]

By: ITookTheRedPill

ITookTheRedPill — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:18:08 +0000

“America must fall,” Abdullah said, according to the complaint... In chilling detail, the 43-page indictment portrays a mosque where hateful rhetoric was repeatedly used by Abdullah, including during Friday sermons, traditionally the most popular gathering time in mosques. Abdullah also used violence to enforce control, the indictment said, often beating children. “We got to take out the U.S. government,” Abdullah said at another point. “The U.S. government is nothing but Kuffars.”

Is this "hate speech"? Will those who promote "hate speech" laws say that this is "hate speech"? Of course not. I don't promote calling this "hate speech", but I do promote calling it TREASON. And it needs to be dealt with as such. We used to hang people for treason. Try him, and if found guilty, put him to death. We either take out those who are guilty of treason, or they will take down this country.

By: ITookTheRedPill

ITookTheRedPill — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:41:49 +0000

RobM1981,
I actually agree with you 100%

By: ITookTheRedPill

ITookTheRedPill — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:39:41 +0000

On October 29th, 2009 at 9:59 am, RobM1981 said:

I hate the term “hate speech.”

Hater.

By: RobM1981

RobM1981 — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:59:39 +0000

I hate the term “hate speech.” I think it is one of the most insidious attacks on the First Amendment we have ever witnessed.

And, of course, President Chauncey thinks it’s just swell.

There is no such thing as hate speech. There is slander and there is libel, but “hate speech?” Sorry. You’ll find a real leprechaun before you’ll find hate speech.

Consider:

What if I said that a whole group of people are bad because they tolerate and even endorse suicide bombings, premeditated attacks on civilians, etc.? I paint the whole group as being evil, on average, because of this. I mock their god, and I mock their claims of being “peaceful.”

Based on my claims, I call for their expulsion from the United Nations. I call for a boycott on them, and even for rounding them up here in the United States and forcing them to watch Madonna video’s until they confess their evil ways.

The only question that anyone has to ask is: can I back up my claims with facts?

If I can, then it’s not hate speech. It’s political discussion, and it it 100% protected by the First Amendment. It is, in fact, WHY the First Amendment was written. I have the RIGHT to call the king a fink, or bad people bad, with no fear of repercussion…

…unless, of course, I’m lying.

If you can prove that what I am saying or writing is FALSE, and that I knew or reasonably SHOULD know, then it’s not protected. It’s slander or libel, and you have all sorts of ways to make me (a) stop, and (b) pay for it.

People who needs more than these rights and protections are worthless and weak – unable to fight fairly in a free society, and looking for an unfair protection to enable their own weaknesses.