I have just sent this to my friends who also share the same views on this….

What made you want to write on Michelle Malkin ” Radical leftist GOP candidate Dede …? I was wondering, because I have been thinking about this since last Friday!…

Thanks heaps for this!… if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website HOT Pianoforte Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!…

Former House speaker Newt Gingrich, who was one of Scozzafava’s most prominent supporters, said…

“…oh crikey, there went my book sales – hey really, I really meant Hoffman, no really…”

I am and have always been a proud Republican.

(holding hands over ears) Mommy! Make it stop!

I wonder if Michael Steele, Newt Gingrich and their buddies in Washington, DC will get the message? What am I thinking. It will take more than this to make them nominate and support conservatives…

I wonder what broom closet Hoffman will call his office when he gets to DC? Like I said, the GOP is probably already preparing another left-wing idiot to run against Hoffman in 2010. Hoffman is likely to be a very lonely man in DC. Maybe I he will meet some of the nice folks at 214 Mass Avenue, NE.

Actually sounds like there were 2 Democrats in the race.

Then why do you behave as such an officious intermeddler offering stupid and inaccurate comments?

Which comment do you feel was inaccurate? Use your words like a big boy.

the term “rhetorical question” eludes you.

So does any semblance of a point you may have.

claim that tort reform would cut “only” one or two percent off medical costs (off a 2.5 trillion total).

I never said that. I said it would cut far less. In Texas, where tort reform was comprehensive and has been highly successful in lowering malpractice claims, health care costs are still going up as much as the rest of the country. Shocker, I know. Feel free to actually provide evidence that I am wrong I don’t know why you would start now, but I always welcome the opportunity to see what you can provide. But not here. Go on one of the other threads if you want to continue this discussion.

I think Gingrich knows that the RINOs are no longer running the Republican Party and he also knows that there can easily be a third Party movement if substantive change is not made – realignment is underway and it isn’t a pretty sight to the Republican leaders because they can’t predict the outcome. To me, Gingrich was trying to find an negotiated way to maintain Party discipline, but that is no longer acceptable to a Republican base who has seen the debacle created by compassionate conservatism and the constant claims of fiscal conservatism that are a sham to get elected.

On November 1st, 2009 at 5:14 pm, chapoutier said:
fulldrool,

Why would I feel foolish? This is your civil war, not mine.

Then why do you behave as such an officious intermeddler offering stupid and inaccurate comments?

And where did I say voters should submit to party duscipline?

the term “rhetorical question” eludes you. Besides, I said “Republicans”, not “voters”.

You are posting even less coherently than usual.

Yeah, next thing you know I might be challenging you to back your ridiculous
claim that tort reform would cut “only” one or two percent off medical costs (off a 2.5 trillion total).

On November 1st, 2009 at 5:14 pm, John Deaux said:

Yes, it does.

Touche!!

Why would I feel foolish? This is your civil war, not mine. And where did I say voters should submit to party duscipline? You are posting even less coherently than usual.

On November 1st, 2009 at 12:49 pm, granite said:

This confrontational, contradictory troll at the same time reminds me of:

Monty Python’s argument clinic sketch; in which Michael Palin expects a (reasoned, debate-like) argument from John Cleese; but gets only silly, simple, juvenile contradiction instead;

No, it doesn’t.