The massacre at Fort Hood and Muslim soldiers with attitude

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 6, 2009 12:01 AM

Scroll for updates…7:39am Eastern press conference…Ft. Hood officials disclose that the murder victims included 12 soldiers and 1 civilian…first responder heroine who shot Hasan is in stable condition…witnesses still being interviewed “all through the night”…they confirm that Hasan was wearing his uniform…

I was traveling to Wichita for a speaking event/fundraiser (which I’ll tell you more about later) when news of the Fort Hood massacre broke. Please continue to pray for the 12 murder victims [update 11/6: now 13 dead] and their families, and the 30 wounded and their families.

Allahpundit at Hot Air has a massive, blow-by-blow post on all the latest developments. The Christian Science Monitor profiles Nidal Malik Hasan, the Muslim soldier identified by the military as the shooter:

Terry Lee, a retired Army colonel who knew Hasan, told Fox News about a story he heard secondhand. He said a fellow colleague had told him that Hasan had made “outlandish comments” about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and US involvement in them and that “Muslims had a right to rise up and attack Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

“[He] made comments about how we shouldn’t be over there – you need to lock it up, Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor,” Lee added.

But the suspect’s cousin, Nader Hasan, gave Fox News a different picture. He said his cousin had never deployed but was affected by the war and had been concerned about his impending deployment.

“He would tell us how he would hear things, horrific things, things from war probably affecting him psychologically,” Nader Hasan said.

From AP:

His name appears on radical Internet postings. A fellow officer says he fought his deployment to Iraq and argued with soldiers who supported U.S. wars. He required counseling as a medical student because of problems with patients.

There are many unknowns about Nidal Malik Hasan, the man authorities say is responsible for the worst mass killing on a U.S. military base. Most of all, his motive. But details of his life and mindset, emerging from official sources and personal acquaintances, are troubling.

“Troubling.” And familiar.

At least six months ago, Hasan came to the attention of law enforcement officials because of Internet postings about suicide bombings and other threats, including posts that equated suicide bombers to soldiers who throw themselves on a grenade to save the lives of their comrades.

Here’s the Scribd comment of Nidal Hasan:

There was a grenade thrown amongs a group of American soldiers. One of the soldiers, feeling that it was to late for everyone to flee jumped on the grave with the intention of saving his comrades. Indeed he saved them. He inentionally took his life (suicide) for a noble cause i.e. saving the lives of his soldier. To say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate. Its more appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble cause. Scholars have paralled this to suicide bombers whose intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by killing enemy soldiers. If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory. Their intention is not to die because of some despair. The same can be said for the Kamikazees in Japan. They died (via crashing their planes into ships) to kill the enemies for the homeland. You can call them crazy i you want but their act was not one of suicide that is despised by Islam. So the scholars main point is that “IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOUR INTENTION IS THE MAIN ISSUE” and Allah (SWT) knows best.

Those of you with long memories will remember all those who came before Hasan. Here is my column from March 2003 on Muslim soldiers with attitude:

Sgt. Asan Akbar, a Muslim American soldier with the 326th Engineer Battalion, had an “attitude problem.”

According to his superiors and acquaintances, Akbar’s attitude was bitterly anti-American and staunchly pro-Muslim. So how did this devout follower of the so-called Religion of Peace work out his attitudinal problems last weekend?

By lobbing hand grenades and aiming his M-4 automatic rifle into three tents filled with sleeping commanding officers at the 101st Airborne Division’s 1st Brigade operations center in Kuwait.

Akbar is the lone suspect being detained in the despicable attack, which left more than a dozen wounded and one dead. Surviving soldiers say Akbar, found cowering in a bunker with shrapnel injuries, was overheard ranting after the assault: “You guys are coming into our countries, and you’re going to rape our women and kill our children.”

“Our”? At least there’s no doubt about where this Religion of Peace practitioner’s true loyalties lie.

Naturally, apologists for Islam-gone-awry are hard at work dismissing this traitorous act of murder as an “isolated, individual act and not an expression of faith.” But such sentiments are willfully blind and recklessly p.c.

Sgt. Akbar is not the only MSWA — Muslim soldier with attitude — suspected of infiltrating our military, endangering our troops and undermining national security:

– Ali A. Mohamed. Mohamed, a major in the Egyptian army, immigrated to the U.S. in 1986 and joined the U.S. Army while a resident alien. This despite being on a State Department terrorist watch list before securing his visa. An avowed Islamist, he taught classes on Muslim culture to U.S. Special Forces at Fort Bragg, N.C., and obtained classified military documents. He was granted U.S. citizenship over the objections of the CIA.

A former classmate, Jason T. Fogg, recalled that Mohamed was openly critical of the American military. “To be in the U.S. military and have so much hate toward the U.S. was odd. He never referred to America as his country.”

Soon after he was honorably discharged from the Army in 1989, Mohamed hooked up with Osama bin Laden as an escort, trainer, bagman and messenger. Mohamed used his U.S. passport to conduct surveillance at the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi; he later pled guilty to conspiring with bin Laden to “attack any Western target in the Middle East” and admitted his role in the 1998 African embassy bombings that killed more than 200 people, including a dozen Americans.

Ain’t multiculturalism grand?

– Semi Osman. An ethnic Lebanese born in Sierra Leone and a Seattle-based Muslim cleric, Osman served in a naval reserve fueling unit based in Tacoma, Wash. He had access to fuel trucks similar to the type used by al Qaeda in the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers, which killed 19 U.S. airmen and wounded nearly 400 other Americans.

Osman was arrested last May as part of a federal investigation into the establishment of a terrorist training camp in Bly, Oregon. Osman recently pleaded guilty to a weapons violation, and the feds dropped immigration charges against him in exchange for his testimony.

Ain’t open borders grand?

– John Muhammad. The accused Beltway sniper and Muslim convert was a member of the Army’s 84th Engineering Company. In an eerie parallel to the Akbar case, Muhammad is suspected of throwing a thermite grenade into a tent housing 16 of his fellow soldiers as they slept before the ground-attack phase of Gulf War I in 1991. Muhammad’s superior, Sgt. Kip Berentson, told both Newsweek and The Seattle Times that he immediately suspected Muhammad, who was “trouble from day one.”

Curiously, Muhammad was admitted to the Army despite being earlier court-martialed for willfully disobeying orders, striking another noncommissioned officer, wrongfully taking property, and being absent without leave while serving in the Louisiana National Guard.

Although Muhammad was led away in handcuffs and transferred to another company pending charges for the grenade attack, an indictment never materialized. Muhammad was honorably discharged from the Army in 1994. Eight years later, he was arrested in the 21-day Beltway shooting spree that left 10 dead and three wounded.

Ain’t tolerance grand?

– Jeffrey Leon Battle. A former Army reservist, Battle was indicted in October 2002 for conspiring to levy war against the United States and “enlisting in the Reserves to receive military training to use against America.” According to the Justice Department, he planned to wage war against American soldiers in Afghanistan.

Ain’t diversity grand?

“It’s bad enough we have to worry about enemy forces, but now we have to worry about our own guys,” Spc. Autumn Simmer told the Los Angeles Times this week after the assault on the 101st Airborne. The Islamist infiltration of our troops is scandalous. Not one more American, soldier or civilian, must be sacrificed at the altar of multiculturalism, diversity, open borders, and tolerance of the murderous “attitude” of Jihad.

FYI: Convicted Beltway sniper John Muhammad is scheduled to be executed next week. No doubt the families of the Muslim sniper victims are re-living the horror tonight.

FYI: Muslim US soldier Hasan Abujihaad was convicted last year on espionage and material terrorism support charges
after serving aboard the USS Benfold and sharing classified info with al Qaeda financiers, including movements of US ships just six months after al Qaeda operatives had killed 17 Americans aboard the USS Cole in the port of Yemen.

On Twitter, follow #fthood for news updates.

More Twitter-related news here.

***

Clarice Feldman notes President Obama’s “odd” — to say the least — reaction to the attack on Fort Hood soldiers:

On Thursday, 11 soldiers and civilian police at Fort Hood were slaughtered execution-style at close range and over 30 others wounded, allegedly by a U.S. Army Major Malik Nadal Hasan. The President immediately addressed the nation concerning this horrific event.

However, his expression of grief was very odd. He spent the first two minutes of the four-and-a-half minute address in a light-hearted discussion of his earlier “Tribal Nations Conference” on Native American rights, including a “shout out” recognition of a conference attendee.

When he finally got around to the purpose for his public appearance, he gave an uninspired and rambling dissertation on the tragedy. Even then, he could not keep the topic focused on sympathy for the pain of others:

I want all of you to know that as Commander in Chief, that there’s no greater honor, but no greater responsibility for me (emphasis his) than to make sure that the extraordinary men and women in uniform are properly cared for…

Poor soul, it’s so saddening to know how this tragedy affects him. Listening to this address provides some insight into Obama’s character and how he ranks his priorities.

***

Business as usual: The whitewashing of jihad by the MSM. See here and here.

I’ve said it many times over the years and it bears repeating again as cable TV talking heads ask in bewilderment how all the red flags Hasan raised could have been ignored: Political correctness is the handmaiden of terror.

***

Crikey:

U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul, a Republican from Austin, was briefed by military officials and said Hasan had taken some unusual classes for someone studying about mental health.

“He took a lot of extra classes in weapons training, which seems a little odd for a psychiatrist,” McCaul said.

McCaul said Hasan had received poor grades for his work at Walter Reed and was not happy about his situation in Fort Hood, where Hasan apparently felt like “he didn’t fit in.”

“He’s disgruntled because he had a poor performance evaluation, he doesn’t believe in the mission, he’s looking at getting transferred to Afghanistan or Iraq,” McCaul said. “He’s not happy about all that.”

McCaul added that officials planned to interview Hasan to try to determine for sure that he was not working with foreign agents.

“From an intelligence standpoint, that’s key, finding out if he talked to anyone overseas,” McCaul said.

***

Bruce Bawer has a brilliant essay on the MSM whitewashing of jihad:

CNN (ditto the New York Times website) was considerably less useful than the tidbits I picked up online by following links on various blogs and in Facebook postings. They led me to (among other things) an AP story, a Daily Mail article, and a Fox News interview that provided telling details: Hasan had apparently been a devout Muslim; Arabic words, reportedly a Muslim prayer, had been posted on his apartment door in Maryland; in conversations with colleagues he had repeatedly expressed sympathy for suicide bombers; on Thursday morning, hours before the massacre, he had supposedly handed out copies of the Koran to neighbors. A couple of these facts eventually surfaced on CNN, but only briefly; they were rushed past, left untouched, unexamined; the network seemed to be making a masterly effort to avoid giving this data a cold, hard look. Meanwhile it spent time doing heavy-handed spin — devoting several minutes, for example, to an inane interview with a forensic psychiatrist who talked about the stress of treating soldiers bearing the emotional scars of war. The obvious purpose was to turn our eyes away from Islamism and toward psychiatric instability as a motive.

…after [the Anderson Cooper show] was over, we got a “special edition” of Larry King Live hosted by Wolf Blitzer. This one really took the cake. By way of “illuminating” Hasan’s actions, Blitzer interviewed a panel of — no, not experts on Islamic jihad, but psychiatrists. Blitzer endlessly repeated the mantra that Hasan had been “taunted” for being Muslim, had feared going to a war zone, and had ultimately gone “berserk,” and the docs echoed this line. “He did not reach for help when he should have,” lamented one panelist. Another opined: “It sounded like it got to be too much for him.” Yet another told us: “All kind of people need help who aren’t getting help. … He was feeling picked on by his colleagues. … He was strained. He was scared.”

Could there be a more bitter contrast? At Fort Hood, so many courageous GIs, all of them prepared to risk their lives fighting the Islamic jihadist enemy in defense of our freedom, several of them now dead. And, on our TV screens, so many apparently craven journalists, public officials, psychiatrists, and (alas) even military brass — all but a few of whom seemed unwilling to do anything more than hint obliquely at the truth that obviously lies at the root of this monstrous act.

And now: Reports that Hasan shouted “Allahu Akbar!” during the attack.

Nothing to see here. Move along…

Posted in: Islam, War

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Ed Driscoll
  2. Randy Thomas
  3. Live Blogging Ft. Hood Murders
  4. Tel-Chai Nation
  5. Hard Starboard
  6. Michigan Taxes Too Much
  7. UrbanGrounds
  8. UrbanGrounds
  9. UrbanGrounds
  10. protein wisdom
  11. The Clampdown
  12. Brutally Honest
  13. sisu
  14. Headlines Exposed 11.06.2009 — ExposeTheMedia.com
  15. Hasan Murders in the name of Allah: CAIR Defends
  16. PAXALLES
  17. DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP
  18. Malik Hasan's advisory position - Obama transition
  19. A Snapper is a Fish. A Jihadist is an Islamic Terrorist — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami
  20. Hyscience
  21. Nidal Hasan Al Qaeda: Nidal Hasan Anwar Al Alwaki:
  22. Piano
  23. NATIONAL SECURITY NEWS « FactReal

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #701
    On November 8th, 2009 at 10:08 am, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:12 am, zeroangel said:

    IMHO, much of our problems result from the disconnect between people like me (RINO’s, moderates, libertarians, neo-cons, whatever label you want to use) and the social conservatives / far-right religious fundamentalists.

    I personally have moved further and further from a “Colin Powell” fiscal Republican to a more hard line approach as the more I study social liberalism, the more damage I see that it causes. At one point I was a liberal and found that over time I saw what ‘The War on Poverty’ had done to the neighborhood and people I’d grown up with. I grew up poorer than dirt and most of it before the ‘War on Poverty’ had gone a single generation. In the beginning it engendered some good. Over time it has sapped the will to succeed through hard labor, savings and sacrifice. It and other programs of entitlement have helped to destroy the community I once knew. Where in the old days we’d share with our neighbors who had very little, the same ‘trash’ fish we couldn’t sell at market that we ate. That resource is being thrown out after all, why eat ‘opala’ (trash) when you can have McDonalds or a frozen steak dinner? Why save and scrimp to buy a home when you can get one through a special program. Why work a 100hrs a week to build a ‘nest egg’ when you don’t have to? It was an environment that didn’t have handouts and entitlements that drove me to succeed and to keep succeeding, that clawing and biting kind of ambition and drive that got me out of where I started and to where I am today.

    There are a lot of bigots I’ve noticed in both movements. The liberal bigots look down their noses at the ‘underclass’ people like those I come from and give us entitlements to assuage their conscience and make them feel oh,so much better. The conservative bigots (i.e., Newt Gingrich) label us the underclass and sneer at us for not having gotten to their oh so exalted status which in most cases isn’t much better than where I came from. But, like the cowboys and other ‘Cle-billys’ near my home they come by it honestly. They’ve been told by the Newt Gingriches and other leaders that if they hew to a Christian line and vote for them, they will somehow be more successful without the hard work and sacrifice needed to truly do so. They’re told by their leaders whom they trust and believe because it seems to make some kind of sense. They direct their anger not at those leaders but to the external enemies those leaders have demonized in their minds. Sound familiar?
    Yep, an extremist is an extremist no matter what color, creed or race.

    Which I guess brings me to your final comment;

    As for the poem and your explanation, so you were / are a sniper?

    I never went to sniper school although I went to Camp Perry as a competitor three times before I graduated high school. My PMOS has as its branch insignia crossed arrows and the motto inscribed on our crest is De Oppresso Liber, I was drawn to that phrase and enlisted as a medic and served in that capacity for seven years before ‘going over to the dark side’ and getting a commission. In warfare, I think my job is more one of service to oppressed people and through that defending my country than it is of ‘killing people and destroying their junk’. That’s not always the case though, During the Carter era we were enforced spectators to depredations by any force that wasn’t visibly backed by the Soviets. Later, I served in Nicaraugua and Honduras where there seemed little difference between the two sides in their brutality and disregard for human life or pain and suffering inflicted on the very people each side claimed it was serving. I served in Panama where the running joke was “Operation Just Cause we can” and was witness to Somalia where during Operation Gothic Serpent we were engaging Mohammed Aideed because he was getting the graft that Kofi Anan’s son (and thereby Kofi Anan) thought was rightfully his for UN humanitarian aid being distributed in Mogadishu. Iraq and Afghanistan have been the only two campaigns I’m proud to have served on, as they’re the most justifiable and beneficial of most of my career that started with pulling former CIA assets out of Laos and elsewhere when things fell apart there. So, as a Snark I try to do no manner of harm. But somewhere along the line became a Boojum causing some to ’softly and suddenly vanish away’.

  2. #702
    On November 8th, 2009 at 10:32 am, purealchemy said:

    ssnark, my apologies for not giving your poem full attention last night.
    Will revisit it later today.

  3. #703
    On November 8th, 2009 at 10:34 am, purealchemy said:

    Good Grief!!!
    No wonder the conservative cause has so many problems. Between failing to understand the Constitution and failing to be able to read and interpret a simple poem.

    Are you saying I don’t seem to understand the Constitution or conservatives in general?

  4. #704
    On November 8th, 2009 at 10:55 am, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 10:34 am, purealchemy said:

    Are you saying I don’t seem to understand the Constitution or conservatives in general?

    Not necessarily you personally. But rather that a large group of so called conservatives, many in the town and nearby ranches where I live have that problem. There were more when I got involved with the Tea Party movement.

    Being a good citizen of the USA is hard work. It involves reading, knowing history, geography, economics and most importantly, critical thinking skills. I run into too many people wearing both liberal and conservative labels who do very little to none of these. Learn not to depend upon pundits and political leaders to provide you with pre-digested information. They’ll lead you where they want you to go. Making you none the better than the very people who we’re fighting against.
    I have nothing against anyone here personally, I probably would like most here personally. What I’m inveighing against,are some of the attitudes, ignorance and those things that don’t vary enough to indicate to someone who did intelligence analysis that this is their own thinking but rather regurgitating someone else’s thoughts.

    Please don’t take things I say personally, they’re not meant that way.

  5. #705
    On November 8th, 2009 at 11:30 am, zeroangel said:

    Ssnark:

    Glad to see your reply. I’ll be brief becaise I have to run errands to do. I think you and are talking about different meansing of “social conservatives” I am right on boadr with you ref. entitlements. I was talking about legislating morality (for example the objection to gay marraige and such)

    OK TTYL.

  6. #706
    On November 8th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, purealchemy said:

    Please don’t take things I say personally, they’re not meant that way.

    ssnark, unfortunately, I often take things too personally and literally, as Chappy well knows.
    Frankly, I am not adept at interpreting poetry or poetic literature but I am trying hard to grasp your snark poem.

  7. #708
    On November 8th, 2009 at 12:55 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 11:30 am, zeroangel said:

    I was talking about legislating morality (for example the objection to gay marraige and such)

    There are and I think you’ll agree certain kinds of morality that are in the best interest of society. Things like child pornography or for that matter anything to do with the exploitation of children sexually. Certainly the mistreatment of women and children generally although there should be some distinctions made where none exist now between child abuse and old school disciplining of a child. As children respond as individuals not as some always rational and compliant automaton as some might have us believe. There certainly is quite a vast difference in response to various forms of discipline between the nine I’ve helped raise.
    We get into a grey area to my way of thinking when we talk of gay marriage. I’m of the opinion that the sacrament of marriage is one thing. The state should probably leave that to people’s beliefs and not even regulate that. The state does need to in some way create legal partnerships for those who live their lives in either matrimony or some other similar arrangement. This of course has more to do with the treatment of property and other benefits than with whether or not the sacrament of marriage has been performed.
    There are other kinds of social legislation that I oppose. I oppose the destruction or removal of memorials or commemorations just because there may be religious symbolism involved. If someone is so thin skinned and intolerant as to be offended by someone else’s monument then they need remedial education in the meaning of the word freedom. I was particularly angered when there was a legal and legislative movement to take down the cross commemorating the casualties at Pearl Harbor built in Kolekole pass on the US Army Post at Scholfield Barracks. When stationed in Hawaii in the 1980s a group of us of many religions would hike up to the cross on 7 December as a focal point to remembering those who died during the attack at all the bases in the State. No one cared that it was a cross, it was a memorial to fallen comrades. Likewise, I’m against legislation against flag burning in protests. I don’t like it. I’d be very angry seeing it. But, I think it is protected by freedom of expression just as the display of a cross, a crescent, a star of David or other such symbols are as well.

  8. #709
    On November 8th, 2009 at 1:09 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, purealchemy said:

    unfortunately, I often take things too personally and literally, as Chappy well knows.
    Frankly, I am not adept at interpreting poetry or poetic literature but I am trying hard to grasp your snark poem.

    I guess that makes you human. That’s an ok thing in my book. Just try to remember, that sometimes what we say here isn’t about you, it’s about things we hear like it every day.
    In explanation of the poem, it was one that the gentleman from the DEA who ran our little piece of the war on drugs in Colombia thought suited me well. As he believed that my appearance and demeanor tended to belie my capacity as “the most casually violent person I know” as he put it. This from a man who walked into a group of drug lords and captured them by pulling the pins from two hand grenades and telling them “you have two choices, and my left hand doesn’t work so good anymore.” It also plays on my habit of working in the night and probably too often stated opinion that hot showers and flush toilets are man’s greatest inventions.

  9. #710
    On November 8th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, purealchemy said:

    In explanation of the poem, it was one that the gentleman from the DEA who ran our little piece of the war on drugs in Colombia thought suited me well.

    Considering your handle/moniker here, I assumed it had personal significance to you.

    As he believed that my appearance and demeanor tended to belie my capacity as “the most casually violent person I know” as he put it

    Wow!

  10. #711
    On November 8th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, purealchemy said:

    Wow!

    Personally, I think he was wrong. My better half will tell you I’m just a large teddy bear. In fact, that’s pretty much most people around here’s opinion.

    But, yeah, I do carry my fetish for hot showers or baths a bit too far sometimes. :-)

  11. #712
    On November 8th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, purealchemy said:

    ssnark, Did you grow up without those luxuries?

    As for reading poetry, I often find it helps me to read it backwards. In case of the Snark poem, that seems to work especially well.

  12. #713
    On November 8th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, purealchemy said:

    On November 6th, 2009 at 5:23 pm, chapoutier said:

    For some reason, Michelle Bachmann is the new target of the loony left.

    No. She has been a favorite target of ours for some time. Ahhhh…I remember like it was yesterday the first time we mocked her…It was the 2007 State of the Union when she assaulted Bush…good times


    Chaps
    , previously I thought your reference to “ours” was to the people on the right who hang out here, but now I think I understand that you were grouping yourself with the “loony left”.

  13. #714
    On November 8th, 2009 at 2:26 pm, zeroangel said:

    Ssnark:

    Another brief post, my Ma is over today and spending time with me, my wife and Junior.

    We more or less agree ref gay marriage. I think the state should be out of marriage entirely and just issue “civil unions” for any kind of arrangement to include a polygamous one. It is my feeling that polygamy laws can’t be enforced anyway and the only people that get hurt are the 2nd and further wives (or husbands, though that doesn’t seem to exist) and their children by not having their union recognized.

    As for religious symbols I agree none should be taken down. I am not big on govt. spending, anyway. However, I don’t like it when someone puts up something with some of my tax dollars that corresponds to a religion I don’t practice. If anyone is putting up anything religious on public grounds they should expect that any other group be allowed to do the same. I generally don’t like too many radical atheist groups (for various reasons we can discuss another time) however, if a nativity scene goes up on public land, any other religious or non-religious (in this case any atheist group) organization should be allowed to put up their own display even if it offends the sensibilities of the first group. You can see how this arrangement could get out of hand, therefore, I’m generally of the opinion that sometimes it’s best for everyone to just leave it alone where public funds and publics property are concerned.

    OK, TTYL.

  14. #715
    On November 8th, 2009 at 3:33 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 2:26 pm, zeroangel said:

    It is my feeling that polygamy laws can’t be enforced anyway and the only people that get hurt are the 2nd and further wives (or husbands, though that doesn’t seem to exist) and their children by not having their union recognized.

    I’m not so sure about that, sometimes it can be. In others it becomes something of a tyranny. My own culture sanctioned polygamy especially when we ruled half a world. A lot of that was done through strategic marriages to create alliances in blood. But, I’ve seen more recently with a group of such at a post I won’t name where it fostered an abusive relationship where the most junior of spouses literally took a beating. So, I’m not so sure.

    if a nativity scene goes up on public land, any other religious or non-religious (in this case any atheist group) organization should be allowed to put up their own display even if it offends the sensibilities of the first group.

    It could get quite out of hand. Still, I miss some of those things as they bring to me a time of great innocence that I treasure. I guess I grow maudlin with age.

  15. #716
    On November 8th, 2009 at 3:42 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, purealchemy said:

    ssnark, Did you grow up without those luxuries?

    My gosh no! My grandmother and mother would have had fits if we didn’t bathe or shower at least daily. Even if we were in the ocean four to six hours a day. I learned to treasure those things after deploying to the field or to an overseas deployment with the US Army at least once every six months, the usual cycle being six months overseas, six months PMCS/light duty/range training, six months deployed training at JRTC/NTC/CMTC with more range training and out again to overseas deployment. That was until September/October 2001 when it became overseas six months, Conus six months with the twelve month schedule crammed into those six months and back out again.

  16. #717
    On November 8th, 2009 at 3:49 pm, purealchemy said:

    I can definitely see how that routine would make one crave a shower!

  17. #718
    On November 8th, 2009 at 4:07 pm, purealchemy said:

    My own culture sanctioned polygamy especially when we ruled half a world.

    What culture is that? I think I know don’t want to say.

  18. #719
    On November 8th, 2009 at 5:22 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    No, ZeroBrains, I have now resumed openly mocking you. I see you are too idiotic to see this unless it is pointed out to you. Nothing new there either.

  19. #720
    On November 8th, 2009 at 5:33 pm, purealchemy said:

    WarEagle,

    Back to the Hasan thing, don’t you think the main concern about his being allowed in those meetings is the information he could take with him and possbily provide to radical groups he might be affiliated with, not so much whether he actively participated?

  20. #721
    On November 8th, 2009 at 5:49 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Pure,

    I doubt a great deal of “secret” information would have been divulged in these meetings.

    My main concern is that this administration is full of people like Van Jones, Bill Ayers, Hasan and Barack and Michelle Obama, who HATE AMERICA and will do anything to hurt it.

    Their anti-American theories have done and will continue to cause enormous damage to this nation and cause immeasurable suffering here and abroad.

    Frankly, the Obama Administrations recent “relaxation” of missile technology restrictions for China will do more harm than Hasan was able to do. But, like his commie-loving buddies, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Obama cannot help but do things to help those people and nations who mean to do America harm.

  21. #722
    On November 8th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, purealchemy said:

    My main concern is that this administration is full of people like Van Jones, Bill Ayers, Hasan and Barack and Michelle Obama, who HATE AMERICA and will do anything to hurt it

    Me, too! But do we really have any indication there’s any affiliation between Hasan and any of those others?
    To me, just the fact that he was allowed in such meetings is too close for comfort.

  22. #723
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:03 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 4:07 pm, purealchemy said:

    What culture is that? I think I know don’t want to say.

    I’m a Mongol and most people’s assumptions especially in Southwest Asia and the Middle East give me an advantage. But, remember the Snark, some are Boojums and not at all what they expected.

  23. #724
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:15 pm, zeroangel said:

    Ssnark:

    No doubt polygamy can lead to issues (abuse of women). I wonder if that’s stems so much from the polygamy itself or the other aspects of the cultures or religions that permit it. I think it’s the latter. In any case, I still see the laws as unenforceable. After all, a polygamist can have just one legal marriage and the rest just done in private and treated as “live-in friends.” I don’t see how it can be enforced. In my mind, anything unenforceable shouldn’t be a law.

    WE82:

    No, ZeroBrains, I have now resumed openly mocking you.

    Of course you have, because you are too weak willed and pathetic to even take your own advice from this thread. As I have said to you many times, I truly pity you.

  24. #725
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:24 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:15 pm, zeroangel said:

    I wonder if that’s stems so much from the polygamy itself or the other aspects of the cultures or religions that permit it. I think it’s the latter. In any case, I still see the laws as unenforceable. After all, a polygamist can have just one legal marriage and the rest just done in private and treated as “live-in friends.” I don’t see how it can be enforced. In my mind, anything unenforceable shouldn’t be a law.

    To a degree it may be cultural. But the situation that I pointed out wasn’t exactly, it was just human behavior where a ‘pecking order’ had been established and those at the bottom were treated like recruits in the old Soviet Army. We humans like our hierarchies. :-) . Someday, we’ll discuss the ‘open marriage’ and ‘group living’ arrangements of the 1960s and mostly 1970s. Interesting times those. I’m not sure I like it having seen how it can go wrong. But, I guess there’s a bit of hypocrisy on my part at play here having once found myself with a wife and women who called themselves ‘my harem’. It isn’t all that most men think it’s cut up to be either.

  25. #726
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:38 pm, purealchemy said:

    I’m a Mongol and most people’s assumptions especially in Southwest Asia and the Middle East give me an advantage.

    I was assuming you were talking about the Ottoman Empire but didn’t think about Mongols.
    What are the assumptions?

  26. #727
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:44 pm, purealchemy said:

    Oops! Just looked it up. The Mongol Empire was the largest contiguous empire in the history of the world.

  27. #728
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:45 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    No, ZeroBrains, I urged others to ignore you. And since they didn’t I decided, for their benefit, to resume mocking you for the utterly moronic things you continue to say.

    You are perhaps one of the 10 stupidest people in New Jersey and that is saying a great deal.

  28. #729
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:52 pm, purealchemy said:

    I am ignoring zero but in his defense, I don’t think he’s stupid, just misguided.

  29. #730
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:58 pm, chapoutier said:

    Dont worry, zero. Ten stupidest in Jersey would still score you top 2% in Piedmont, SC. With the added bonus of probably having all your teeth.

  30. #731
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:58 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Pure & Snark,

    I lived near the Tatar Republic in the Former Soviet Union and met many Tatars who are descendants of the Golden Horde. Oddly enough, many were blond with blue eyes.

    The first few times I took the train through Kazan I would try to decipher the words on the train tracks and it made no sense. Then I realized not all the words were Russian even though they were in Cyrillic Script. Once I realized the language was akin to Turkic I stopped trying to read it.

    Some of my Tatar friends would visit Turkey where they could converse with Turks with the Turks speaking in Turkish and they responding in Tatar and having little problem understanding one another.

    Interestingly enough, many of the Tatars I met would invite me to their homes to enjoy pork barbecue and beer so they might explain their Muslim roots to me. I don’t think any of them ever saw the irony in the invitation…

  31. #732
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:59 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    And of course Chappy is one of the 5 stupidest people in DC. Chappy makes George W. Bush and Joe Biden look like geniuses…

  32. #733
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:07 pm, purealchemy said:

    Fascinating tale, WarEagle!

  33. #734
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:07 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:38 pm, purealchemy said:

    I was assuming you were talking about the Ottoman Empire but didn’t think about Mongols.
    What are the assumptions?

    #839384
    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:44 pm, purealchemy said:

    Oops! Just looked it up. The Mongol Empire was the largest contiguous empire in the history of the world.

    In much of the Middle East and SouthWest Asia people assume I’m Muslim. The fact that I studied the Koran, Shari’a and Kabbalah extensively as part of my professional education, helped bolster that assumption. There is also the fact that some of my ancestors actually ruled in parts of the areas I’ve been assigned to. In a way its strange at times to see a modern place and remember the family history of that same place. It also doesn’t hurt to know the means they used to keep their erstwhile allies under control.

  34. #735
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:08 pm, zeroangel said:

    Ssark:

    It isn’t all that most men think it’s cut up to be either.

    Of this I have no doubt.

    WE82:

    And since they didn’t I decided, for their benefit, to resume mocking you

    Did you just say, “I meant to do that” again?

    I would try to decipher the words on the train tracks and it made no sense.

    Maybe you should master English first?

    chap:

    Top 2%, all my teeth and the pride of knowing my side kicked a$$ in the Civil War.

  35. #736
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:09 pm, purealchemy said:

    While I’m here, I’ll defend Chappy also.
    He is exceedingly smart and witty.
    And I apologize to him for joining in with WarEagle to describe him as a “tool”.

  36. #737
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    Such a wit WarEagle!

    I swear I remember you opening for Paula Poundstone back in the late 80s.

  37. #738
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:11 pm, purealchemy said:

    There is also the fact that some of my ancestors actually ruled in parts of the areas I’ve been assigned to. In a way its strange at times to see a modern place and remember the family history of that same place. It also doesn’t hurt to know the means they used to keep their erstwhile allies under control.

    Wow! That is COOL!
    Weren’t the Mongols considered exceptionally fierce warriors? And good on horseback?

  38. #739
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:12 pm, chapoutier said:

    no prob pure

  39. #740
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:25 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    ZeroBrain,

    I see you have nearly perfected your illiteracy in a single language. Congratulations on that monumental achievement. Your special ed teachers must be sooo proud of you…

    And yes, I intended to say that I had resumed mocking you. You are getting very good at recognizing the difference between “mocking” and “ignoring.” Keep it up and you may finally get a gold star on your paper!

    As they say in large parts of the FSU, Так чайников!

  40. #741
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:31 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    This is rich. A Muslim lunatic murders more than a dozen US soldiers and wounds scores and our DHS is worried about a backlash against Muslims.

    If the stupid witch had been doing her job maybe she would have noticed that this radical Muslim was plotting against America before he unleashed mayhem on our shore!

    When will the idiot leftists realize that we are not the enemy! Maybe they should change the name of the department to “Department of Terrorist Protection.” Janet Napolitano needs to find another line of work…

    Homeland chief warns against anti-Muslim backlash

    (AP) – 12 hours ago

    ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The U.S. Homeland Security secretary says she is working to prevent a possible wave of anti-Muslim sentiment after the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas.

    Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims following Thursday’s rampage by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who reportedly expressed growing dismay over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    The shootings left 13 people dead and 29 wounded.

    Napolitano was in the United Arab Emirates on Sunday for talks with security officials and a meeting with women university students in Abu Dhabi.

  41. #742
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:35 pm, purealchemy said:

    What does WND have to say about it? :wink:

  42. #743
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:37 pm, chapoutier said:

    getting very good at recognizing the difference

    So he’s apparently one step ahead of you, who, as recently as yesterday, was insisting he was ignoring zero, despite all evidence to the contrary.

    Now you’ve decided you are going to stop ignoring him after it was clear you never were in the first place.

    But whatever. What I really want to know is how I can sign up for this Ignore List you apparently have. Is there an application fee? Do I have to fillout some form in triplicate?

  43. #744
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:39 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:58 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Pure & Snark,

    I lived near the Tatar Republic in the Former Soviet Union and met many Tatars who are descendants of the Golden Horde. Oddly enough, many were blond with blue eyes.

    Not so odd really, I’ve been mistaken for Amerind, Colombian, Mexican, Nicaraugan, Filipino, Korean, Russian, Swiss, and a host of other ethnic and racial groups. My own father had grey/green eyes and looked like he was half caucasian. As I mentioned earlier we held the empire together by strategic marriages. So we’re a very polyglot people ethnically. You might say we’re more Heinz 57 than many other mixtures of humanity.

  44. #745
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, purealchemy said:

    Oh, looky here. (any problems with this one, Chaps?)

    HOMELAND INSECURITY
    Muslims: ‘America’s chickens have come home to roost’
    U.S. Islamic street preachers declare Fort Hood victims got just desserts

    ——————————————————————————–
    Posted: November 06, 2009
    10:20 pm Eastern

    By Bob Unruh
    © 2009 WorldNetDaily

    A radical Muslim group was videotaped condoning the massacre at Fort Hood by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan because it was a military target.

    “America’s chickens have come home to roost,” shouted a representative of the group.

    A website run by Revolution Muslim is also honoring Hasan, the man accused of killing 13 people at Fort Hood in Texas, as an “officer and a gentleman,” saying his actions should not be denounced.

    The massacre, which also left more than two dozen injured, was called a “pre-emptive attack” by supporters of the group.

  45. #746
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:45 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    The Tatar Republic wanted to change from the Cyrillic alphabet to the Latin alphabet a few years ago. I understand it was a very controversial decision and I am not sure it has ever been implemented.

    I have wondered why they decided on the Latin alphabet instead of the Arabic alphabet they used prior to the Bolshevik imposed change to Cyrillic.

  46. #747
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:49 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    And of course Chappy demonstrates his ignorance again. I advised people to ignore ZeroBrain. I ignored most of his idiotic comments until I chose to mock him!

    You see, it is my choice, Chappy, and not yours to decide when I ignore people and when I mock them. Like I am mocking you now for your basic lack of intellectual acumen for not knowing the difference.

    George and Joe send their regards for making them look so smart…

  47. #748
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:51 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Pure,

    I wonder how long before DHS shock troops will be providing a protective cordon around “Revolution Muslim” HQ to protect them from us?

    I wish our government were on the side of America. It would make me feel a little better about the taxes I pay…

  48. #749
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:51 pm, ssnark said:

    HOMELAND INSECURITY
    Muslims: ‘America’s chickens have come home to roost’
    U.S. Islamic street preachers declare Fort Hood victims got just desserts

    If only they would place themselves conveniently in the defense of Islam somewhere like Iraq or Afghanistan, So that they can learn whose chickens are roosting where. Personally, I’d love to introduce them to my friends Mr. M21 and Mr. 7.62 NATO. I think they might find that while 168 grains of enlightenment and a trip to paradise.

  49. #750
    On November 8th, 2009 at 8:56 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    After this, I really think I am going to have to purchase a firearm. I am not sure who is ultimately the greater threat to our nation though. It is a close race between the “Muslim Revolution” and the Obama Administration.

    The bigger problem is the Obama Administration thinks conservatives are the major threat to America and is actively “protecting” radical Muslims on our own shores from us!

    We really need to take our country back from the Marxist barbarians in suits.

  50. #751
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:00 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    And speaking of security, if you are having problems with viruses on a Windows PC go here and download a Linux boot disk with a built-in virus scanner: http://download.bitdefender.com/rescue_cd/.

    Download the ISO and burn it to a CD.

    A friend has had a virus for months. Norton would detect it but couldn’t remove it. BitDefender seems to be taking care of it in short order.

    Another option is Knoppicillin but it is in German and unless you are comfortable with German it gets a bit confusing. But you can find that tool here: http://www.heise.de/software/download/knoppicillin_download_edition/37894.

    These are “useful tools” as opposed to “useless tools” that troll here so regularly.

  51. #752
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:01 pm, purealchemy said:

    Personally, I’d love to introduce them to my friends Mr. M21 and Mr. 7.62 NATO. I think they might find that while 168 grains of enlightenment and a trip to paradise

    I nominate ssnark to replace Napolitano!

  52. #753
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:01 pm, zeroangel said:

    WE82:

    Chap’s already pointed out your stupidity. Honestly, ignore me. Your juvenile taunts aren’t even funny anymore. It’s really quite pathetic. This is not a put down. Watching you flounder around like this is gut wrenching.

    I advised people to ignore ZeroBrain. I ignored most of his idiotic comments until I chose to mock him!

    …and then you come out looking like a hypocritical fool, which is exactly what you are. Anyway, as we say in NJ, “go F*CK yourself!” *smile*

  53. #754
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:14 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Ah, ZeroBrain resorts to profanity. Why am I not surprised that ZB doesn’t understand that it is my choice to advise people to ignore him and yet taunt him when I choose?

    That is nearly as witty as “your mother” from the other day. I’d warn you about trying to be so witty but since you have no brain you obviously can’t do any damage to that organ…

  54. #755
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:17 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Oh, and if you are having trouble ignoring ZB and Chappy (which must be French for “No Brain) go to hulu.com and watch The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes. It never drops the “F-bomb.”

    http://www.hulu.com/the-adventures-of-sherlock-holmes

  55. #756
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:22 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    From the Associated Press.

    Ft Hood shooter showed signs of trouble
    Angela K. Brown and Richard Lardner – Associated Press Writers – 11/8/2009 6:10:00 AM

    FORT HOOD, Texas – In retrospect, the signs of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s growing anger over the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan seem unmistakable. But even people who worried his increasingly strident views were clouding his ability to serve the U.S. military could not predict the murderous rampage of which he now stands accused.

    In the months leading to Thursday’s shooting spree that left 13 people dead and 29 others wounded, Hasan raised eyebrows with comments that the war on terror was “a war on Islam” and wrestled with what to tell fellow Muslim solders who had their doubts about fighting in Islamic countries.

    “The system is not doing what it’s supposed to do,” said Dr. Val Finnell, who complained to administrators at a military university about what he considered Hasan’s “anti-American” rants. “He at least should have been confronted about these beliefs, told to cease and desist, and to shape up or ship out.”

    Finnell studied with Hasan from 2007-2008 in the master’s program in public health at the military’s Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md., where Hasan persistently complained about perceived anti-Muslim sentiment in the military and injected his politics into courses where they had no place.

    “In retrospect, I’m not surprised he did it,” Finnell said of the shootings. “I had real questions about what his priorities were, what his beliefs were.”

    Hasan, who was shot by civilian police and taken into custody, was in intensive care but breathing on his own late Saturday at an Army hospital in San Antonio. Officials refused to say if he was talking to investigators.

    At least 17 victims remained hospitalized with gunshot wounds, and nine were in intensive care late Saturday. On Sunday, numerous church services honoring the victims were planned both on the post and in neighboring Killeen.

    Military criminal investigators continue to refer to Hasan as the only suspect in the shootings but won’t say when charges would be filed. “We have not established a motive for the shootings at this time,” said Army Criminal Investigative Command spokesman Chris Grey.

    A government official speaking on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to discuss the case said an initial review of Hasan’s computer use has found no evidence of links to terror groups, or anyone who might have helped plan or push him toward the shooting attack. The review of Hasan’s computer is continuing and more evidence could emerge, the source said.

    Hasan likely would face military justice rather than federal criminal charges if investigators determine the violence was the work of just one person.

    Hasan’s family described a man incapable of the attack, calling him a devoted doctor and devout Muslim who showed no signs that he might lash out.

    “I’ve known my brother Nidal to be a peaceful, loving and compassionate person who has shown great interest in the medical field and in helping others,” said his brother, Eyad Hasan, of Sterling, Va., in a statement. “He has never committed an act of violence and was always known to be a good, law-abiding citizen.”

    Still, in the days since authorities believe Hasan fired more than 100 rounds in a soldier processing center at Fort Hood in the worst mass shooting on a military facility in the U.S., a picture has emerged of a man who was forcefully opposed to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, was trying to elude his pending deployment to Afghanistan and had struggled professionally in his work as an Army psychiatrist.

    “I told him, `There’s something wrong with you,’” Osman Danquah, co-founder of the Islamic Community of Greater Killeen, told The Associated Press on Saturday. “I didn’t get the feeling he was talking for himself, but something just didn’t seem right.”

    Danquah assumed the military’s chain of command knew about Hasan’s doubts, which had been known for more than a year to classmates at the Maryland graduate military medical program. His fellow students complained to the faculty about Hasan’s “anti-American propaganda,” but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal complaint.

    Others recalled a pleasant neighbor who forgave a fellow soldier charged with tearing up his “Allah is Love” bumper sticker. A superior officer at Darnall Army Medical Center at Fort Hood, Col. Kimberly Kesling, has said Hasan was quiet with a strong work ethic who provided excellent care for his patients.

    Twice this summer, Danquah said, Hasan asked him what to tell soldiers who expressed misgivings about fighting fellow Muslims. The retired Army first sergeant and Gulf War veteran said he reminded Hasan that these soldiers had volunteered to fight, and that Muslims were fighting each other in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Palestinian territories.

    “But what if a person gets in and feels that it’s just not right?” Danquah recalled Hasan asking him.

    “I’d give him my response. It didn’t seem settled, you know. It didn’t seem to satisfy,” he said. “It would be like a person playing the devil’s advocate. … I said, `Look. I’m not impressed by you.’”

    Danquah said he was disturbed by Hasan’s persistent questioning but never told anyone at the sprawling Army post about the talks, because Hasan never expressed anger toward the Army or indicated any plans for violence.

    “If I had an inkling that he had this type of inclination or intentions, definitely I would have brought it to their attention,” he said.

    Hasan was promoted from captain to major in 2008, the same year he graduated from the master’s program. Bernard Rostker, a military personnel expert at the Rand Corp., said a shortage of officers and psychiatrists meant Hasan’s advancement was all but certain absent a serious blemish on his record, such as a DUI or a drug charge.

    Hasan reportedly jumped up on a desk and shouted “Allahu akbar!” _ Arabic for “God is great!” _ at the start of Thursday’s attack.

    “Hopefully, they can put together the pieces and find out what in the world was in his mind and why he went crazy,” Danquah said. “Aaaaah, it’s sad. Those soldiers could have been my soldiers.”

  56. #757
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:36 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:01 pm, purealchemy said:

    I nominate ssnark to replace Napolitano!

    While I”m flattered, I could never serve under Mr. Obama. It is the reason I retired recently. I would not be a part of breaking faith with my troops. It is my opinion that he will betray them if he hasn’t already.

  57. #758
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:39 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    ssnark,

    I suspect a lot of good soldiers will retire in the next few years as they find their oath to protect and defend the constitution will be increasingly at odds with orders issued from the Obama Administration.

  58. #759
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:43 pm, purealchemy said:

    I could never serve under Mr. Obama. It is the reason I retired recently.

    Wow, you are a great patriot.

  59. #760
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:46 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:39 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I suspect a lot of good soldiers will retire in the next few years as they find their oath to protect and defend the constitution will be increasingly at odds with orders issued from the Obama Administration

    What really frosts my cookies is that my eldest boy is going through BCT even as I write this. He’ll be out there when the “chickens come to roost” through Mr. Obama’s lack of a viable war policy. I wish I could do something about it. But he felt called as I did many years before. I fear that this next few years will be worse for the military than the Vietnam era had been. I hope and pray that I am wrong.

  60. #761
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:49 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Will the officers who knew of Hasan’s “anti-American propaganda” yet failed to act be held accountable? Will Political Correctness continue to be the driving force in America? Will the government ever fulfill its responsibility to the citizens of this nation and protect us from “enemies, foreign and domestic?”

    Danquah assumed the military’s chain of command knew about Hasan’s doubts, which had been known for more than a year to classmates at the Maryland graduate military medical program. His fellow students complained to the faculty about Hasan’s “anti-American propaganda,” but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal complaint.

  61. #762
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:50 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    With any luck my children will never have to server under America’s first Marxist regime. I certainly will not encourage them to enlist as long as Obama and his ilk are in office.

  62. #763
    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:55 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 9:43 pm, purealchemy said:

    Wow, you are a great patriot.

    Am I? I am very conflicted as I have a son just entering military service in the US Army. He’s in BCT now and I keep thinking, did I do the right thing since I won’t be able to do much to help him. I realize that he has to stand on his own hind legs or he’ll never be the man he can be. At the same time I want to be there to protect him from the MAJ Hasan’s of the world. So I wonder sometimes, did I do the right thing? I know Mr. Obama’s mother and both grand parents. My late first wife taught at Punahou High School. His mother was a friend of my late wife’s. So I knew of him long before he came to National attention. What I knew was not impressive. In fact it caused me to vote for John McCain III, a man who was better for having been a POW but not worth spit on his father’s shoes.

  63. #764
    On November 8th, 2009 at 10:33 pm, purealchemy said:

    ZINGER! Let’s hear the goods on Jugears!

  64. #765
    On November 9th, 2009 at 12:06 am, purealchemy said:

    At the same time I want to be there to protect him from the MAJ Hasan’s of the world. So I wonder sometimes, did I do the right thing?

    Of course you did.

  65. #766
    On November 9th, 2009 at 12:07 am, ssnark said:

    Pretty much there’s nothing you don’t know by now. His grandmother raised him because his mother didn’t have time chasing after anyone who might upset her parents MidWestern conservative values. I get the impression that Mrs. Dunham tried very hard to be a good parent to the boy and his half sister. But Mr. Dunham was pretty much aloof and didn’t approve of Sidney’s habitual miscegenation. Mrs. Dunham wasn’t an ordinary working class stiff as Mr. Obama tries to make out. Yes, they lived in an 850 sq. ft. two bedroom apartment but it was in what was then an upscale part of Manoa and 850 sq. ft. is a lot of space in Hawaii where Honolulu is nearly as densely populated as Japan. Mrs. Dunham was the Senior Vice President of Trust Operations for the largest bank in the Pacific Rim, Bank of Hawaii. She was pretty much an old dragon as I found out dealing with her as a trustee of an old friend and mentor’s estate. Sidney was a person that was always coming to my wife with tales of woe caused by the men she sought. She was one of those people who allowed herself to be done too and was a pitiable figure were it not for the fact she eschewed any real parental role preferring to be her children’s buddy. Barack was pretty much always in search of a father figure but his choices were nearly as bad as his mothers. It was a wonder and perhaps the intervention of his grandmother (I don’t actually know for sure) that kept him from juvenile detention. He was smart but a so-so student in High School although, so-so at Punahou is nothing to be sneered at especially not at a tuition of $47,000/yr.+ fees and books. He learned to prevaricate early in life and the more he got away with it the more he used it to his advantage. He had few real friends because of the chip he carried on his shoulder and was more likely to be seen with all the washed up hippies and former radicals that were in his mom’s circle of acquaintances. Why my wife befriended her was a function of her former radicalism and the fact that she picked up stray people like some people pick up stray dogs. It was generally a sort of sad and pitiable thing about those kids. I was surprised to find out that he was the Harvard Law School graduate junior Senator from Illinois and didn’t believe he was the same guy till so informed by another mutual friend from those days and of course when I found out Mrs. Dunham was his grandmother.
    That’s pretty much it. There’s some gossipy things that caused us to keep our son away from him. But that’s pretty much not stuff that is worthwhile to pass on. Suffice it to say someone got blamed for something that the accused says Barack did. Nothing major just the kind of stuff teens do when they’re being stupid.

  66. #767
    On November 9th, 2009 at 8:00 am, Mainah said:

    snark, provided you are telling the truth (Not an accusation, just any rational person listens to internet stories with a grain of salt) I am interested to know if you believe he was born in the US?

  67. #768
    On November 9th, 2009 at 8:34 am, WarEagle82 said:

    It is funny how few people recall anything concerning young Barack. Yet most often, when they do it contradicts what young Barack has said about himself.

    There is a great deal in his past that he wants to remain hidden. And he has spent millions on keeping it hidden.

    Kind of makes you wonder what they mean by “transparency.”

  68. #769
    On November 9th, 2009 at 8:50 am, jangar said:

    Kind of makes you wonder what they mean by “transparency.”

    “Transparency” translation – they will fill your email inbox with all sorts of crap, from all sorts of sources. It’s transparent what they are doing.

  69. #770
    On November 9th, 2009 at 10:29 am, Dave Turson said:

    On November 8th, 2009 at 7:58 pm, chapoutier said:
    Dont worry, zero. Ten stupidest in Jersey would still score you top 2% in Piedmont, SC. With the added bonus of probably having all your teeth.

    Karma will avenge for the toothless. I hope Chap lives long enough to crack the plate of his false teeth while mumbling something about The One and the glorious days of his reign.

  70. #771
    On November 9th, 2009 at 11:01 am, purealchemy said:

    His fellow students complained to the faculty about Hasan’s “anti-American propaganda,” but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal complaint.

    There ya go, Barn!

  71. #772
    On November 9th, 2009 at 11:06 am, purealchemy said:

    ssnark,

    Thanks a bunch for your in-depth reporting.
    Does Barack have any more real friends by now? I wouldn’t put it past our FLOTUS to throw him under her bus under the right circumstances.
    Recently she was asked on TV what about him annoyed her the most. She replied, “I don’t have enough time.”

  72. #773
    On November 9th, 2009 at 11:12 am, purealchemy said:

    . He learned to prevaricate early in life and the more he got away with it the more he used it to his advantage.

    Prevaricate is Barry in a nutshell.
    That could be his next book, “The Audacity of Prevarication.”
    Redundant?

  73. #775
    On November 9th, 2009 at 6:28 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 9th, 2009 at 8:00 am, Mainah said:

    snark, provided you are telling the truth (Not an accusation, just any rational person listens to internet stories with a grain of salt) I am interested to know if you believe he was born in the US?

    Skepticism is always healthy as is critical thinking.
    Here’s my take on it. In the Archives of the Honolulu Star Bulletin within days of his birth in 1965 and announcement to that effect was published. Now some question remains as to whether he was indeed born in Kapiolani Hospital (I believe he was.) or in Seattle where Sidney went to wait on a summons by Barack Sr. and stayed with friends there. But that’s the only two places she was at about that time. Barack Sr. was busy playing footsie at Hah-vahd with a couple of other rebellious lasses who wanted to tick daddy off. Sidney found out about it and headed back to Hawaii.

  74. #776
    On November 9th, 2009 at 6:43 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 9th, 2009 at 11:06 am, purealchemy said:

    ssnark,

    Thanks a bunch for your in-depth reporting.
    Does Barack have any more real friends by now?

    Shoot, how would I know. I didn’t have a thing to do with him when he grew up and left the islands and only dealt with him because of his mom and grandmother and only while I was getting my college education, for a brief while when stationed at CinCPac and home on leave and my wife and child were the center of my universe then.

  75. #777
    On November 9th, 2009 at 8:01 pm, purealchemy said:

    ssnark.

    Write me at home dude:

    prairiegrass@mindspring.com

  76. #778
    On November 9th, 2009 at 8:31 pm, purealchemy said:
  77. #779
    On November 9th, 2009 at 10:23 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On November 9th, 2009 at 6:28 pm, ssnark said:

    I’m confused. Who is Sidney?

  78. #780
    On November 10th, 2009 at 2:02 am, ssnark said:

    On November 9th, 2009 at 8:31 pm, purealchemy said:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOBpUGZLziQ&NR=1

    I am in the snark fan club !

    LMAO! I love it!

  79. #781
    On November 10th, 2009 at 2:48 am, ssnark said:

    #839994
    On November 9th, 2009 at 10:23 pm, MtsEdge said:

    I’m confused. Who is Sidney?

    My bad! The memory is going to heck with age or maybe its that I address any woman not my wife as Ma’am or Mrs or Miss so and so. I meant Ms. Stanley Ann Soetoro nee Dunham and perhaps Obama though that ‘marriage’ is open to question. Known to many as ‘Ann’. Named after her father whose name I also misremembered but knew it.
    One more little tidbit about Ms. Stanley Ann Dunham, is that she was very pro-communist and well studied in Marx, Lenin and Mao tse Tung. She engaged in proselytizing her communist teachings whenever possible or not dealing with some boyfriend/Significant Other crisis. She pretty much abandoned Barack in Hawaii when he didn’t fit in in Indonesia or some such causing him to be sent home to Hawaii while yet married to Mr. Soetoro who was an associate of the father of another of my wife’s friends. She did a bit of globe trotting in Asia and Africa accompanied by her daughter through Soetoro who was still a toddler girl and would be foisted off on Mrs. Dunham when she was about 5 IIRC. Ms. Dunham also had several apartments in the Manoa area on Poki St. near my aunt’s home, Alexander St., near the old rental home my wife and I lived in for about 10 years, and another on Spreckles I think.
    I also mis-remembered his birth year. This is a quote from the Honolulu Star Bulletin on 29 July 2009. “If any doubt is left, both the Honolulu Star-Bulletin and The Honolulu Advertiser included Obama’s birth in vital-statistics columns in August 1961, available on microfilm in the main state library. Were the state Department of Health and Obama’s parents really in cahoots to give false information to the newspapers, perhaps intending to clear the way for the baby to someday be elected president of the United States?”
    The fact is it’s not microfilm it’s microfiche. But essentially correct in that the announcement does exist.

    Still he can’t be that old. I’d swear he couldn’t be older than 44 not 48.

  80. #782
    On November 10th, 2009 at 6:21 am, purealchemy said:
    I’m confused. Who is Sidney?

    My bad! The memory is going to heck with age or maybe its that I address any woman not my wife as Ma’am or Mrs or Miss so and so. I meant Ms. Stanley Ann Soetoro nee Dunham

    I wondered about that but didn’t get around to checking it. Another “S” name.
    Too busy trying to figure out yet another “S” word. *snark*

  81. #783
    On November 10th, 2009 at 6:57 am, MtsEdge said:

    My bad! The memory is going to heck with age or maybe its that I address any woman not my wife as Ma’am or Mrs or Miss so and so. I meant Ms. Stanley Ann Soetoro nee Dunham

    Interesting. I didn’t know whether you knew of another name for Ms. Dunham, since you seemed to remember so many other vital (and far more interesting) details.

    “If any doubt is left, both the Honolulu Star-Bulletin and The Honolulu Advertiser included Obama’s birth in vital-statistics columns in August 1961, available on microfilm in the main state library. Were the state Department of Health and Obama’s parents really in cahoots to give false information to the newspapers, perhaps intending to clear the way for the baby to someday be elected president of the United States?”

    WRT this thing about mis-representing BHO Jr’s place of birth “b/c he may one day become pres” that’s a logical fallacy that continues to trip up those who merely seek the truth. His mother would have had ample reason to pretend his birth was in the US since she was obviously a hypocrite who talked the talk about communism but didn’t want to walk the walk (e.g., by relocating to China or Russia). She knew he’d be better off if he was seen as an American citizen, regardless of the path he took in life (which I doubt she was really concerned about, either). So she exploited Hawaii’s lax law regarding certificates of live birth. This argument has been so easily poked full of holes, it’s laughable that we keep being presented with it to justify BHO’s lack of disclosure about this very simple and foundational item of his life.

  82. #784
    On November 10th, 2009 at 7:16 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 10th, 2009 at 6:57 am, MtsEdge said:

    nteresting. I didn’t know whether you knew of another name for Ms. Dunham, since you seemed to remember so many other vital (and far more interesting) details.

    Other than that she went by ‘Ann’ more often than not. I guess it goes to show the era I grew up in, a time when a man never called a woman by her first name except if they were engaged, married or a close family member of a like age or younger than the man. So, first names and nicknames would have been used by my wife, not me. I stuck with ‘ma’am’ as it was safe.

    ” that’s a logical fallacy that continues to trip up those who merely seek the truth. His mother would have had ample reason to pretend his birth was in the US since she was obviously a hypocrite who talked the talk about communism but didn’t want to walk the walk (e.g., by relocating to China or Russia). She knew he’d be better off if he was seen as an American citizen, regardless of the path he took in life (which I doubt she was really concerned about, either). So she exploited Hawaii’s lax law regarding certificates of live birth.

    The timelines for her attendance at the UH as can probably be backed up by transcripts if not eyewitnesses and her attendance at UW in Seattle would not give her much time to get to Kenya where some ‘birthers’ believe he was born. Some 7 to 14 days total between her leaving Hawaii at the end of first summer semester at the UH and first appearance in Seattle for the fall semester in UW. The latter may be shortly after the birth of Barack Obama. The former would put her late in the third tri-mester and not a time when travel especially the two transoceanic flights would be terribly comfortable and from all that I gather, Barack Obama Sr. didn’t have a lot of casual spending loot for a trans-continental ticket for two to his homeland. The only thing that is a bit uncertain is the address listed on that birth certificate. It lists the address of a pair of UH faculty members who lived there into the 1970s. But, perhaps there’s something not so uncommon at least from my point of view. Back in those days, an out of wedlock birth would be kept as secret as possible and shamed parents may have kicked their daughter out of their home at the time. I know it continued to happen into the late 1960s and even early 1970s. One of the girls in my high school class listed on of her teacher’s addresses as her ‘residence’ on the birth certificate because she was actually living on the steps of the Church of the Crossroads near the UH and ate at their soup kitchen.
    As to the laxity of Hawaii’s birth certificate issuance practices. I wonder if you thought about the fact that long form certificates are issued in hospital facilities where the proper equipment to weigh and foot print the baby would be available. Whereas, ambulances in those days were station wagons with the back seat pulled out. It’s about a 30 minute drive to Kapiolani Women’s and Children’s hospital in the best of times from the 4000 block of Kalanianaole Hwy. and he may have been delivered en route. That almost happened to me when I was born. Thankfully, or not as the case may be I was a long difficult labor. But, Mr. Obama’s birth might have been a quick delivery. In which case, the limited equipment on the ambulances of 1961 would not have a scale for neonates or the equipment to take footprints and other processes that are called for on the long form birth certificate. Hence a possible reason he has a short form that makes far more sense than a starving student from a poor family in Kenya suddenly coming up with the near $10K that a trip for two to Kenya would have cost in those days on the only carrier going there from Hawaii Pan Am Flight 002 their West bound Clipper Class flight around the world. (I always envied the fact that the Government paid my dad to fly on that storied flight for his TDY trips.) I was told they had table linens and silver service even for coach on that flight and three hot meals were served in the eighteen hour flight across the Pacific. Talk about the way to fly!

  83. #785
    On November 11th, 2009 at 8:56 am, MtsEdge said:

    On November 10th, 2009 at 7:16 pm, ssnark said:

    Glad to read your reply. Again, it is quite intriguing to read your account and perspective on things.

    WRT to the idea that a “poor starving student from Kenya” would foot the bill for his child to be born in Hawaii, you have already pointed out what all of us know…that the Dunhams were decidedly NOT poor, and we know that they ultimately reared this child. Why rule out the possibility that they sent for their daughter after the child was born? Or another commonly cited fact that the Hawaii certification does NOT attest to the PLACE of birth?

  84. #786
    On November 11th, 2009 at 7:56 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 11th, 2009 at 8:56 am, MtsEdge said:

    the Dunhams were decidedly NOT poor, and we know that they ultimately reared this child. Why rule out the possibility that they sent for their daughter after the child was born?

    Partly its a timing thing. too few days between leaving the UH and going to school in Seattle. It’d take in relative time two whole days to get from Hawaii to Kenya because of the International dateline. It will take only one entire day going the other way. The Dunhams probably would have had a fit at that point footing the bill for Barack Sr. to go home with his erstwhile wife (You know as far as anyone knows the two of them never co-habited with each other.) So assuming you meant literally that the Dunhams brought their daugher home. Who picked up the outbound tab? Not Barack Sr.’s dad as he wasn’t all that well off. Not the Luo tribe they’re not that well off. Then of course there’s the where is she on that fine day in August. The birth certificate seems to indicate she was living with a couple (married) of her professors. We do know this much the Certificate of Live birth was issued for a Birth in the State of Hawaii and the Island of O’ahu in the City and County of Honolulu (see the imprinted Seal). That’s something that might not have been possible in 1961 for Mrs. Dunham to pull off. She was after all haole which is the equivalent of being the ‘N’ word in Milwaukee or Chicago with all of the negatives that go with it. So you probably wouldn’t have seen some Japanese civil servant whose uncle was at Manzanar and who was a card carrying member of the HGEA. They wouldn’t lift a finger in someone’s favor to falsify a birth certificate. Now if they were a relative and the Dunhams had none in Hawaii, that might be a different story. So, you can be sure that much is true, that he was born somewhere on Oahu. My conjecture is that Barack Jr. was born on an ambulance or in her landlord’s car enroute to Kapiolani Women’s and Children’s Hospital. Kind of like a few other people who lived on the Windward side of the island and didn’t make it there back then across the two lane ‘Old Pali Road’ which didn’t open till the mid-1960s. The traffic on Kalanianaole Hwy has always be abominable. So my guess is he was born somewhere along the way and not in a hospital. Also, Mrs. Dunham wasn’t yet the bank SVP she would be ten years later. So while the two made a good living they were still middle class at that point.

  85. #787
    On November 12th, 2009 at 9:06 am, MtsEdge said:

    ssnark, have you seen an actual birth certificate (COLB) for Barack, Jr.? I have only seen an electronic version.

    And even if he was born in an ambulance, as you suggest, why indicate a hospital of birth on his COLB?

    WRT “falsifying” a COLB, my understanding is that this is a legal document that certifies that yes, a child was born, SOMEWHERE. Not necessarily in Hawaii. It may be legally flawed, but it is still a legal document for the State. Perhaps you can enlighten me on this.

    Putting aside all of these glaring and unresolved questions, even if he was born in Hawaii, which I still seriously doubt, but even if I conceded this point, he still has a citizenship issue. His father was NOT a U.S. citizen, therefore he would have had (at best) dual citizenship w/Britain and the U.S. How did he travel to Pakistan in the 1980’s w/o renouncing any ties to the US that he may have had?

    All of these questions can be cleared up without any further speculation if only BHO would be “transparent” with his own records. I have no faith nor trust in a person who is so un-forthcoming about what should be simple matters.

  86. #788
    On November 12th, 2009 at 7:39 pm, ssnark said:

    On November 12th, 2009 at 9:06 am, MtsEdge said:

    ssnark, have you seen an actual birth certificate (COLB) for Barack, Jr.? I have only seen an electronic version.

    Nope, and could care less to do so. I’ll take the State document at its face value.

    WRT “falsifying” a COLB, my understanding is that this is a legal document that certifies that yes, a child was born, SOMEWHERE. Not necessarily in Hawaii. It may be legally flawed, but it is still a legal document for the State. Perhaps you can enlighten me on this.

    From the document itself, if you’ve seen it. It states that he was born in the “City, Town or Location of birth” Honolulu, from the “Island of Birth”, Oahu, and “County of Birth” Honolulu. That’s the legal location of his birth. Apparently confirmed by the State of Hawaii Department of Health twice over. Including apparently from Snopes, that there is on file a standard Certificate of Live Birth. I have absolutely no reason to doubt the veracity of Dr. Fukino who made one of the attestations to the authenticity of the document.
    I won’t convince anyone who wants to believe otherwise. But, the secret to surviving in combat is to be able to recognize what is important. My gut says this isn’t important.

  87. #789
    On November 12th, 2009 at 8:09 pm, MtsEdge said:

    I have absolutely no reason to doubt the veracity of Dr. Fukino who made one of the attestations to the authenticity of the document.

    I tend to prefer the truth based on empirical evidence, rather than hearsay. The Hawaii Dept. of Health official who claims to have seen the birth certificate makes the rest of us at least one person removed from the actual document.

    When there is overwhelming data disproving the protestations of an individual, the situation calls for more than “I have no doubt” that the person is telling the truth. “Because he/she said so” is not much evidence, IMHO. Meanwhile, there are specific analyses (here’s another one) that have been performed on this document that point to a forgery or other discrepancy in this situation. These leads should be followed to their logical end. Again, all of this could be avoided by simply releasing for public viewing the ACTUAL document.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Attention, NYC: White House still stuck on stupid

February 8, 2010 12:06 PM by Michelle Malkin

32 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Courting Disaster hits #9 on NYTimes best-seller list

February 4, 2010 09:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Lady Qaeda found guilty, blames Israel

February 3, 2010 07:12 PM by Michelle Malkin

47 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Video: The confession of KSM

February 3, 2010 11:55 AM by Michelle Malkin

18 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

“From A to Z.”

Tonight on C-SPAN: Exposing the Fort Hood cover-up

February 2, 2010 05:07 PM by Michelle Malkin

25 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Cirque du Jihad: Coming to a federal court near you?

January 29, 2010 03:08 AM by Michelle Malkin

77 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

Retreat: White House plays jihadi musical chairs

January 28, 2010 09:37 PM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Britain’s new anti-terrorism plan: Bribes for Bombers!

January 28, 2010 12:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Mo’ money.


Categories: Islam, War



Mudville Gazette

» New Standards in Journalism
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook