Michelle Malkin » Muslim soldier Nidal Hasan to fellow military doctors: “We love death more then (sic) you love life!” Updated

Muslim soldier Nidal Hasan to fellow military doctors: “We love death more then (sic) you love life!” Updated

By Michelle Malkin • November 9, 2009 11:31 PM

I want to see the whole thing. Every American should demand to see the whole damned thing. And then you need to demand to know the names of every higher-ups in the military and the government who read or saw this thing and did nothing about it.

I’m talking about the chilling slide presentation that Fort Hood jihadist Nidal Hasan gave at Walter Reed Hospital while a senior-year psych resident in June 2007. The Washington Post publishes details of the slide presentation, though not the original document itself. [Update: Good! WaPo publishes the full slide presentation here.]

Goodbye, “Do no harm.” Hello, “We love death more then (sic) you love life!”

As a senior-year psychiatric resident at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Maj. Nidal M. Hasan was supposed to make a presentation on a medical topic of his choosing as a culminating exercise of the residency program.

Instead, in late June 2007, he stood before his supervisors and about 25 other mental health staff members and lectured on Islam, suicide bombers and threats the military could encounter from Muslims conflicted about fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, both Muslim countries, according to a copy of the presentation obtained by The Washington Post.

“It’s getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims,” he said in the presentation.

“It was really strange,” said one staff member who attended the presentation and requested anonymity because of the investigation of Hasan. “The senior doctors looked really upset” at the end. These medical presentations occurred each Wednesday afternoon, and other students had lectured on new medications and treatment of specific mental illnesses.

This sentence misses the point:

Investigators looking into Hasan’s background are examining his religious beliefs, whether he harbored extremist views, and whether he was in contact with others who may have encouraged violence against U.S. soldiers.

Who needs “contact with others who may have encouraged violence against U.S. soldiers?” The point is that Hasan told the military all they needed to know about what he came in contact with that encouraged violence against U.S. soldiers.

The title of Hasan’s power-point presentation was “The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military.” It consisted of 50 slides. In one slide, Hasan described the presentation’s objectives as identifying “what the Koran inculcates in the minds of Muslims and the potential implications this may have for the U.S. military.”

To quote another lone jihadist, “it’s in the Koran.”

He also sought to “Describe the nature of the religious conflicts that Muslims may have” who serve in the U.S. military and to convince the Army that it should identify these individuals.

Other slides delved into the history of Islam, its tenets, statistics about the number of Muslims in the military, and explanations of “offensive jihad,” or holy war…

…Under a slide titled “Comments,” he wrote: “If Muslim groups can convince Muslims that they are fighting for God against injustices of the ‘infidels’; ie: enemies of Islam, then Muslims can become a potent adversary ie: suicide bombing, etc.” [sic]

The last bullet point on that page reads simply: “We love death more then (sic) you love life!”

Under the “Conclusions” page, Hasan wrote that “Fighting to establish an Islamic State to please God, even by force, is condoned by the Islam,” and that “Muslim Soldiers should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly — will vary!”

The final page, labeled “Recommendation,” contained only one suggestion:

“Department of Defense should allow Muslims (sic) Soldiers the option of being released as ‘Conscientious objectors’ to increase troop morale and decrease adverse events.”

“Adverse event” = Hasan’s own foretelling euphemism for bloody jihad against his own fellow American soldiers.

Evil showed it hand that day at Walter Reed. But the response to evil was all too typical:

The warning signs were etched right there on his own business card. But no one acted.

P.C.-paralyzed America, heal thyself.

Posted in: Homeland Security, Islam

Printer Friendly

comments (129)

trackbacks (5)

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments

« Older Comments

#840534

On November 10th, 2009 at 6:53 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

Well said planetgeo. Casey, like Obama, doesn’t know what his words imply.
#840540

On November 10th, 2009 at 7:05 pm, purealchemy said:

I guess we are to assume that slideshow presentation was accepted as part of his residency requirements.
What did any of that have to do with psychiatric medicine?
#840543

On November 10th, 2009 at 7:09 pm, Dan Lee said:

The Army psychiatrist suspected of killing 13 people at Fort Hood reportedly warned senior Army physicians in 2007 that the military should allow Muslim soldiers to be released as conscientious objectors instead of fighting in wars to avoid “adverse events.”

He yelled Allah Akbar before shooting..

Those are more than enough proof that this was a terrorist act.
#840544

On November 10th, 2009 at 7:13 pm, Dan Lee said:

I should add that those things show both motive & a goal..
#840567

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:10 pm, purealchemy said:

Dan Lee, how are you doing post-job loss?
#840577

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:41 pm, Dan Lee said:

Well, we’re surviving.. Trying to start my own business & probably going to go to work doing some armed security for a while to make sure we have enough money..

God has always provided for me, so I’m not that worried about the money part..

I am however very concerned about the seemingly accelerated decline of our civil liberties by this administraton, & how it’s minions n the private sector are punishing those who speak out against it.
#840578

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:41 pm, Dan Lee said:

Thanks for asking!
#840580

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:43 pm, purealchemy said:

I only ask because I appreciate your message and presence.
You make real sacrifices as opposed to Michelle Obama. Sheesh.
#840581

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:46 pm, Dan Lee said:

I wonder if you can get kicked out of the military for singing “Onward Christian Soldiers” these days?

Probably… Well unless your name is Achmed? Then everyone would just be confused, & probably leave you alone…
#840582

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:48 pm, purealchemy said:

Do you have a blog or am I confusing you with someone else?
#840583

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:52 pm, Dan Lee said:

I did, but I got too busy trying to get my business going so I shut it down for now.. I will be back though when the season is right again.. >=)
#840585

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:54 pm, purealchemy said:

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:46 pm, Dan Lee said:
I wonder if you can get kicked out of the military for singing “Onward Christian Soldiers” these days

So glad to hear someone else feels that way.
#840586

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:55 pm, purealchemy said:

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:52 pm, Dan Lee said:
I did, but I got too busy trying to get my business going so I shut it down for now..

COOL! I thought that was you!

I will miss your contribution!
#840588

On November 10th, 2009 at 8:59 pm, Dan Lee said:

Well thanks.. I’ll be back at it. I just want to be sure I have enough money lawyer up against Cair & the likes..

I have a enough assault weapons for any physical threat, but the legal threats are quiet a bit more expensive..

We all know how much liberals like to sue people & engage in the politics of personal destruction..
#840590

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:11 pm, Leatherneck said:

I’m all for letting them out of the military before more murders happen in the name of a false god called allah.

If Christ comes back, and destroys all the swine, How am I going to have the smell of victory in the house on the weekends?

“Smmmmm, I love the smell of bacon in the morning. It smells like, it smells like…VICTORY!”

BZO, or Die!
#840592

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:16 pm, purealchemy said:

Dan Lee, are you feeling like you will be the next to snap?
#840593

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:18 pm, purealchemy said:

Leatherneck, do you believe Christ is coming back?
#840594

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:20 pm, purealchemy said:

What is BZO?
#840596

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:22 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

“We love death more then (sic) you love life!”

But of course.

The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.

John 10:10
#840598

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:33 pm, Dan Lee said:

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:16 pm, purealchemy said:

Dan Lee, are you feeling like you will be the next to snap?

Haha.. If I was do you think I’d be dumb enough to tell anyone?

That’s no way to achieve an effective paramilitary strike purealchemy..

Besides.. I’d leave the onesies & twosies to the suicidal, & keep my powder dry for an organized Revolution..
#840599

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:35 pm, purealchemy said:

Yes, you would be dumb enough to tell anyone.

I know you.
#840603

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:47 pm, Dan Lee said:

purealchemy.. You don’t know anything.. I’ve read your insane troll postings. You’re what I call, a “confused” individual, & I try to take pity on such lowly creatures as you, so don’t make me change my mind. ok?
#840605

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:50 pm, purealchemy said:

WHAT!

Dear Sir, I hope you are jerking my chain!
#840606

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:51 pm, purealchemy said:

Gotta find me a snark…..

*splat*
#840607

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:52 pm, Dan Lee said:

Of course..
#840609

On November 10th, 2009 at 10:01 pm, jangar said:

So let me get this straight…

The military establishment did not want to offend the faith of a Muslim officer, but has no problem forbidding Christian clergy from praying in Jesus name.

We once were free…
#840613

On November 10th, 2009 at 10:04 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

Happy birthday, Marine Corps!

Forgive me for posting the following again, but it is highly relevant…

Did you ever wonder why the Marine Corps Hymn starts with the words:

From the Halls of Montezuma
To the shores of Tripoli

The “shores of Tripoli” refers to our military’s first battles with Muslim terrorists.

The Barbary Powers conflict began during the American Revolution when Muslim terrorists from four different Islamic nations (Tunis, Morocco, Algiers, and Tripoli) began making indiscriminate attacks against the property and interests of what they claimed to be “Christian” nations (America, England, France, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Sweden, etc.).

The Barbary Powers (called Barbary “pirates” by most Americans) attacked American civilian and commercial merchant ships (but not military ships) wherever they found them. Prior to the Revolution, American shipping had been protected by the British navy, and during the Revolution by the French navy. After the Revolution, however, America lacked a navy of her own and was therefore left without protection for her shipping. The vulnerable American merchant ships, built for carrying cargoes rather than fighting, were therefore easy prey for the warships of the Barbary Powers, which seized the cargo of the ships as loot and took their seamen (of whom all were considered Christians by the attacking Muslims) and enslaved them. [17]

In 1784, Congress authorized American diplomats John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson to negotiate with the Muslim terrorists. [18] Negotiations proceeded, and in 1786, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson candidly asked the Ambassador from Tripoli the motivation behind their unprovoked attacks against Americans. What was the response?

The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the laws of their Prophet [Mohammed] – that it was written in their Koran that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners; that is was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners; and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise. [19]

- Source
#840614

On November 10th, 2009 at 10:04 pm, purealchemy said:

Wahoo! Greg Gutfeld made it on the Hannity panel tonight because he lived in Britain for awhile.

A great “Red Eye” moment!
#840615

On November 10th, 2009 at 10:06 pm, purealchemy said:

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:52 pm, Dan Lee said:
Of course..

Double snark.

Double splat.

Team players watch “Red Eye” on Fox in the wee hours.
#840617

On November 10th, 2009 at 10:11 pm, Leatherneck said:

#593,

Jesus won the deed to this world back from Satan. G-d the Father will send the word back before the wrath of G-d is poured out on the world.

However, one must be ready to meet one’s maker every day as we turned our back on G-d first. Now, we pay.

BZO means battle site zero your weapon. For Jarheads, it is being able to hit your target between 0 to 300 yards. After that, you have to change your dope. Dope=elevation, and/or windage.
#840641

On November 11th, 2009 at 1:50 am, Christian Soldier said:

Lt. Col. Peters said it best;
We’ve got to stop the BS….
C-CS
#840945

On November 11th, 2009 at 1:47 pm, purealchemy said:

On November 10th, 2009 at 9:47 pm, Dan Lee said:
purealchemy.. You don’t know anything..

Actually, you are correct. I’m just a little artsy-fartsy, semi-neurotic, girlie groupie who likes to hang around here with the cool, smart, worldly-wise fellows.
#844029

On November 18th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, Politicalguano said:

How come so many muslim doctors become mass murderers? Is the practice of medicine antithetical to Islam?
Of course I don’t expect any real explanation from Muslims – just the usual ad hominem attacks to divert from answering the question.