See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. The Snooper Report
2. Urbin Report
3. Be John Galt
4. Gerald Walpin Cleared: IG Walpin Cleared Wants Job
5. Kenneth Bach Shreds Gerald Walpin Documentss
6. piano trio

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On November 11th, 2009 at 12:34 pm, d1carter said:

   Did Mr. Walpin get his dead fish?

2. #2
   On November 11th, 2009 at 12:34 pm, California Red said:

   Bet they expected him to sit and roll over. Is there ny recourse for the American Taxpayer when our independent inspectors are smeared and their investigations stymied at the bequest of the Executive Branch? I am happy tha Walpin’s name is cleared (was there ever any doubt?), but what about the fruits of his investigation.

3. #3
   On November 11th, 2009 at 12:35 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

   Burke: So, now, if I went and made a major security situation out of it, everybody steps in; Administration steps in, and there’s no exclusive rights for anybody, nobody wins! So I made a decision, and it was… wrong. It was a bad call, Ripley. It was a bad call.

4. #4
   On November 11th, 2009 at 12:36 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

   I can wholeheartedly apologize for not being at all sorry. And it really is the least I can do.”
   April Winchell

5. #5
   On November 11th, 2009 at 12:37 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

   “Why should I apologize because God throws in crystal chandeliers, mahogany floors, and the best construction in the world?”
   Jim Bakker

6. #6
   On November 11th, 2009 at 12:39 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

   “It seems that whatever we do is somehow beyond reproach – murder, rape, drunk driving—as long as we go on a TV show and apologize.”
   Eric Stoltz

7. #7
   On November 11th, 2009 at 12:40 pm, regularguy said:

   You can protest in the streets, it does no good. You can write your Congressmen, it does no good. You can whistleblow inside the government, it does no good. If we vote them out, will it do any good?

8. #8
   On November 11th, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

   “I would like to apologize for referring to George W. Bush as a deserter. What I meant to say is that George W. Bush is a deserter, an election thief, a drunk driver, a WMD liar, and a functional illiterate. And he poops his pants.” Michael Moore

9. #9
   On November 11th, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

   We need to win the House in 2010 so the House can hold oversight hearings in January 2011 on the endemic corruption tolerated by Holder.

   Get Walpin to testify, than get Holder under oath to rebut.

   Should be a marvelous display of “I can’t recall”s on Holder’s part to avoid outright perjury.

10. #11
    On November 11th, 2009 at 12:57 pm, purealchemy said:

    Does he get his job back?
    I thought they dismissed him because of implied senility.

11. #12
    On November 11th, 2009 at 1:06 pm, SpeakEasy said:

    In your list of things the Obama led FBI has covered up don’t forget the cessation of the investigation of Nidal Hasan, the Ft Hood shooter. We deserve a full accounting. Hopefully, it will lead to an impeachment and many heads rolling out of the White House.

12. #13
    On November 11th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    There’s too much at stake — a $6 billion national service slush fund for the friends of Barack and meddling Michelle Obama. Walpin is too much of a threat to the Americrooks racket.

    The culture of corruption continues.

    There you go, jumping to conclusions again.

    It’s all so incomprehensible, I need to go watch a basketball game.

13. #14
    On November 11th, 2009 at 1:22 pm, California Red said:

    Ed nailed it. There won’t be hearings in this Congress. But it seems like when you screw with the independent inspector generals you tread on the Nixonesque corruption. Remember the flap over the Bush Administration firing of US Attorneys? Where is the similiar outrage in the media for Obama and Holders selective enforcement of laws as they see fit. Where is the outcry over the politicization and coercion of supposedly indepdendent inspectors general? It’s a rhetorical question.

14. #15
    On November 11th, 2009 at 1:23 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Where is the similiar outrage in the media for Obama and Holders selective enforcement of laws as they see fit.

    Katie Couric is too busy selling Agassi’s book.

15. #16
    On November 11th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On November 11th, 2009 at 12:57 pm, purealchemy said:
    Does he get his job back?
    I thought they dismissed him because of implied senility.

    Exactly! He needs to sue them for back-pay and then be given his job back. He was fired for no reason. Age discriminiation, if nothing else. I pray he doesn’t let this just drop. He is OWED, big time!!

16. #17
    On November 11th, 2009 at 2:33 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    What I meant to say is that George W. Bush is a deserter, an election thief, a drunk driver, a WMD liar, and a functional illiterate. And he poops his pants.” Michael Moore

    Projection.

17. #19
    On November 11th, 2009 at 4:16 pm, Savage24 said:

    You have to remember that the FBI works for the Justice Department, and the Justice Department works for the White House. It’s no damned wonder nothing gets done. The corrupt condone corruption!

18. #21
    On November 11th, 2009 at 5:10 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Remember the flap over the Bush Administration firing of US Attorneys?

    Bill Clinton fired all 93 Attorney Generals and there wasn’t a peep from the MSM about it.

    Bush fires 6 Attorney Generals, the media goes ape and we are still talking about it today.

    GSP

19. #22
    On November 11th, 2009 at 5:13 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Hey, at least Walpin did not pull a Vince Foster.