Bombshell: Obama bringing KSM to NYC for trial; former Bush AG Mukasey responds: “High risk of attack”

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 13, 2009 09:04 AM

It’s Friday. The president is flying off to Asia. Congress is not in session. Perfect time to drop a bombshell on the American people:

The Obama administration is bringing 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed to New York City for a civilian trial.

No, it’s not a joke. Via the NYT:

Self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees will be sent to New York to face trial in a civilian federal court, an Obama administration official said Friday.

The official said Attorney General Eric Holder plans to announce the decision later in the morning.

The official is not authorized to discuss the decision before the announcement, so spoke on condition of anonymity.

Bringing such notorious suspects to U.S. soil to face trial is a key step in President Barack Obama’s plan to close the terror suspect detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Obama initially planned to close the detention center by Jan. 22, but the administration is no longer expected to meet that deadline.

It is also a major legal and political test of Obama’s overall approach to terrorism. If the case suffers legal setbacks, the administration will face second-guessing from those who never wanted it in a civilian courtroom. And if lawmakers get upset about notorious terrorists being brought to their home regions, they may fight back against other parts of Obama’s agenda.

Here is the e-mail the DOD’s Director Victim Witness Program sent out to victims, survivors, and family members of jihadi attacks this morning (via Sgt. Tim Sumner, brother-in-law of FDNY Joseph G. Leavey, 45, Ladder 15, WTC):

You are receiving this email because you have been identified as a victim, survivor, or victim family member of an Al-Qaeda attributed attack and have requested to be kept informed of events involving detainees charged in military commissions or being held in the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility in connection with those attacks.

We would like to inform you that the U.S. Departments of Defense and Justice will be making an important public announcement later this morning. At 10:30 am Eastern Standard Time, the Office of Justice for Victims of Overseas Terrorism will post information for victims about the announcement on its password protected victims’ website. At 11:00 am the Defense and Justice Departments will issue a joint press release notifying the public of the information, and there will also be a press conference. In addition, the Defense Department will notify victims about the information by email.

Both the Defense Department (Karen Loftus) and the Justice Department (Heather Cartwright) are sending out this e-mail to ensure that as many victims as possible receive it. We apologize if you receive duplicates. If you know of other victims who may be interested in the information, please pass this on to them.

Here’s what Tim sent in response:

We have an announcement as well: we will fight with every remaining breath in our bodies both their bringing KSM and the rest of the 9/11 conspirators to federal courtrooms within walking distance of where they slaughtered our loved ones. And whomever finds Manhattan’s federal courthouse near Ground Zero a “sentimental favorite” for the 9/11 trials is a damn fool and they ALL ought to be fired. Pass that message on, far, wide, and up and down the chain-of-command.

See here for a petition to the president.

If this White House thought Tea Party activists were an “angry mob,” wait until they see the backlash from 9/11 family members and their supporters nationwide. We’re not going to sit down and shut up about the reckless, security-undermining Obama 9/10 agenda and conflict-of-interest-ridden AG Eric Holder.

Call them out.

***

I’ve written extensively over the years on the perils of civilian trials for terrorists. See here and here and here for a refresher course in the Ally McBeal
approach to terror.

Here’s a taste of what we have to look forward to:

The idea of prosecuting suspected terrorists like burglars or drug dealers seems to make sense in principle, but jury trials for War on Terror suspects are fraught with peril.

“In ordinary civilian trials, there is no significant cost to sharing everything the government knows,” notes Johns Hopkins international law professor Ruth Wedgwood. “But this does not hold against the background of Al Qaeda’s stated ambition of mounting new attacks.” Affording accused Al Qaeda operatives the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial threatens to compromise classified information necessary to prosecute future terrorist trials. Other rights guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment’s the right to subpoena witnesses and compel them to testify, the right to an attorney, can interfere with interrogations of captured suspected Al Qaeda agents. Moreover, in civilian courtrooms, prosecutors are severely restrained from closing off classified information under the existing federal Classified Information Procedure Act. Anonymous testimony and intelligence based on hearsay are often inadmissible in civilian courts. And while the lives of those immediately involved in say, a mob trial, might be endangered, the entire nation may be at risk when we allow suspected members of a terrorist network to partake in the discovery process.

The prosecution of the 1993 World Trade Center bombers in our civilian court system, though successful, demonstrated the pitfalls of prosecuting the War on Terror like an episode of the TV show “Ally McBeal” — a courtroom comedy. The trials gave the bin Laden network a multi-million-dollar, tax-subsidized defense team, free translation services, personal dry-cleaning services, and access to information that was allegedly used by Islamists to evade surveillance.

All of the convicted World Trade Center bombers received life sentences. Two had faced the death penalty, but were spared by a minority-dominated jury that swallowed the race-baiting of traitorous defense witness Ramsey Clark (the former U.S. attorney general under Lyndon Johnson). Clark testified that no member of a racial minority group — African-American, Arab or otherwise — could expect a fair trial in the U.S. He also blamed the Gulf War and U.S. sanctions on Iraq for creating the psychological “suffering” that led to the embassy attacks. On another front, convicted mastermind Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman may have exploited his right to counsel in order to establish a terrorist message center from behind bars. His lawyer, Lynne Stewart, was indicted in the fall of 2003 on charges of providing material support to terrorists and went to trial in May 2004; she is accused of aiding a plot to kidnap and kill people to help win the release of Rahman and making false statements regarding her efforts to pass messages between Rahman and third parties…

Stewart was convicted of aiding terrorists and lying to the government in 2005 — for which she received a slap on the wrist. She is still free pending appeal.

***

Andy McCarthy exposes the underlying Obama/Holder agenda. The 9/11 show trials are a payoff to the Bush-haters and transnational Left:

We are now going to have a trial that never had to happen for defendants who have no defense. And when defendants have no defense for their own actions, there is only one thing for their lawyers to do: put the government on trial in hopes of getting the jury (and the media) spun up over government errors, abuses and incompetence. That is what is going to happen in the trial of KSM et al. It will be a soapbox for al-Qaeda’s case against America. Since that will be their “defense,” the defendants will demand every bit of information they can get about interrogations, renditions, secret prisons, undercover operations targeting Muslims and mosques, etc., and — depending on what judge catches the case — they are likely to be given a lot of it. The administration will be able to claim that the judge, not the administration, is responsible for the exposure of our defense secrets. And the circus will be played out for all to see — in the middle of the war. It will provide endless fodder for the transnational Left to press its case that actions taken in America’s defense are violations of international law that must be addressed by foreign courts. And the intelligence bounty will make our enemies more efficient at killing us.

And read this timely excerpt from McCarthy’s invaluable Willful Blindness: “Bring my lawyer! — That’s what’s so beautiful about America.”

***

Update: Just heard that former Bush AG Michael Mukasey will be addressing the Federalist Society National Lawyer’s Convention today at the Mayflower in Washington, D.C. at 2:15pm today and will take on the White House decision to prosecute Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in his speech.

Update: Details on Mukasey’s speech…

Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey said today that it is highly likely that terrorists will attack New York City as a consequence of the Obama administration’s decision to send five alleged Sept. 11 plotters there for trial in federal court.

During a question and answer period following a speech to a conservative legal group, Mukasey was asked about the possibility that there might be an escape by one or more prisoners.

“The [Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan] is a very secure place….Is it secure? Of course, it’s secure. They’re not going to escape,” Mukasey told a conference of the Federalist Society. “The question is not whether they’re going to escape. The question is whether, not only that particular facility, but the city [at] large, will then become the focus for mischief in the form of murder by adherents of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed–whether this raises the odds that it will. I would suggest to you that it raises them very high.”

Mukasey said the men now to be tried in New York should have been left before military commission proceedings at Guantanamo that were already in progress.

“The plan seems to be to abandon the view that we’re in a war,” Mukasey said. “I can’t see anything good coming out of this. I certainly can’t see anything good coming out of it very quickly. And it think it would have been far preferable to try these case in the venue that Congress created for trying and where they were about to be tried.”

And more thorough coverage of Mukasey’s speech from Philip Klein here.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I’m a little confused here. I thought this POS had joyfully confessed to the 9-11 plot. Why is he even getting a trial? I can solve this problem with a .45 and one round.

    He was “tortured” into confessing. This way they get him off on all major charges. He will develop a mystery case of prostate cancer, be pardoned, and end up Rev Wright’s neighbor in a multi-million dollar home in Chicago. Paid for with TARP money. BTW, he got your flu shot too.

  2. #102
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:22 pm, California Red said:

    If I were his lawyer I’d move for a change of venue. Impossible for NY jurors to be impartial. Then I’d get my hands on every bit of evidence the Government has. The media is going to love that. This is going to be a circus for the next three decades when you figure in appeals and the unlikely event that there would be an execution. Sadly, our Government is allowing our Constitution to be used against us. The Constitution was never meant to protect foreign enemey combatants engaged in warefare against us. Neither to citizens intending to overthrow the Government.

  3. #103
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:24 pm, planetgeo said:

    This is all intended to have the ultimate objective of making it almost impossible for us to fight wars and conduct intelligence operations on the (non-uniformed) enemy. Just consider the following direct effects of allowing these enemy combatants to be tried in US courts:

    1) Arresting soldiers may now be forced to return to the US to testify in court.

    2) Any confessions obtained “under duress” or harsh interrogations may now be inadmissible.

    3) Discovery proceedings may be used to reveal all communications of our intelligence gathering and classified documents.

    This is utterly diabolical in its full ramifications. The shocking part is why our Supreme Court has allowed it to happen. There were numerous precedents from prior wars that should have been followed to deny this circus.

    Our justice system has completely collapsed and is about to leave us defenseless against our enemies.

  4. #104
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:26 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    It cannot be a coincidence that Obama tosses this grenade over his shoulder just as he leaves for China to BEG for cooperation from their banks (aka communist government).

    Over the past week, the Asian “central banks” have dropped all pretense that they are not diversifying their reserves away from not only the dollar, but from ALL Western fiat (paper) currencies. This could be the death of fiat currency and the only reserve currency will be gold.

    We are back to mercantile international economics. And Obama is negotiating for us (God help us.) This is usually when big wars happen.

  5. #105
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Don’t forget that the Obama Administration has already said that even if they are acquitted that they reserve the right to still detain the terrorists.

    “Detain the terrorists” – as in – “I’m sorry Bill (Ayers) for detaining you these last few minutes, I just wanted to thank you for supporting my candidacy. The tea was delicious.”

  6. #106
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:30 pm, tre said:

    Duh One has a pre-12/7/1941 mentality!

  7. #107
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    If I were his lawyer I’d move for a change of venue.

    Somewhere off a dirt road in Texas comes to mind.

  8. #108
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:46 pm, greenfairie said:

    THIS has me furious.

    It was as I’ve said before about Maj. Jihad; our leaders are willing to sacrifice the lives of ordinary Americans to placate the Arabs. We are nothing to Obama, not the least of which are the victims and survivors of 9/11.

    In that case, Obama ought to go run for president in some Arab/Muslim country and get out of mine.

  9. #109
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:48 pm, bmac727 said:

    BHO & his handlers are not only tone deaf – they are deaf, dumb & blind kids playing pin ball with our Security & Safety. This is an unbelievably stupid & insensitive decision after last wk’s Islamist Terrorist Attack on Fort Hood!

  10. #110
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:51 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Obama has just stenciled a bulls-eye on New York City, every witness, and every member of a potential jury panel.

  11. #111
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:56 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Just wait and see how much worse the news from China will be after The Obama Show comes back home.

  12. #112
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:07 pm, b-cat said:

    Just wait and see how much worse the news from China will be after The Obama Show comes back home.

    China is rapidly enlarging and modernizing their navy. They have no reason to do so other than to prepare for conflict with us. Could be Taiwan, could be something else.

  13. #113
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:15 pm, Misscheryl said:

    This is an unbelievably stupid & insensitive decision after last wk’s Islamist Terrorist Attack on Fort Hood!

    You’re going under the assumption that Obama has compassion and empathy. Let’s be honest, these aren’t exactly personality traits of a narcassist.

  14. #114
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:17 pm, sbw999 said:

    For liberals this is better than sex. They get to see their hated USA put on trial for being the evil international bully they believe it to be. When does the focking cavalry arrive??? I cannot stand to even read the day’s headlines anymore.

  15. #115
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:17 pm, Misscheryl said:

    “narcissist” aaaarrrggghhh

  16. #116
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, rooster said:

    Absolute douche bags! Yes I mean KSM and the terrorist, but the harshest condemnation should go fairly and squarely to the leaders of all douche bags, who are wasting precious oxygen…..Obama and the his anti-American democrat party. What worthless dirt bags they have evolved into along with the dishonest media.

  17. #117
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:20 pm, Paul Revere said:

    Eric Holder cheerleader Lindsey Graham…where are you? Lindseeeeeeeey…wheeeeere…aaaaaaare…yooooooooou?

  18. #118
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:31 pm, d1carter said:

    The only good I can see of this is that it may bring down BHO and his little band of thugs.

  19. #119
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:32 pm, JonB said:

    How it is that this country continually lets the Obamanation make deliberate actions that directly support terrorists is beyond me.

  20. #120
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:32 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    This will be the “OJ” circus all over again—except this time it will speak volumes about the morality of our leaders.

    Call to the Nobel Peace Prize winner…

    Step up and take the punishment due Khalid… surely that is least we can expect from the lib-anointed “messiah”

  21. #121
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:32 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:24 pm, planetgeo said:
    Our justice system has completely collapsed and is about to leave us defenseless against our enemies.

    One result that I hope comes from this is that our military realizes that there is simply no point in taking prisioners anymore, and they simply take care of business on the battlefield. I realize that this diminishes our opportunities to get information from these dirtbags, but when this is the alternative…

  22. #122
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:34 pm, Cosmo said:

    This man, although he looks like a hairy Rosie O’Donnell in the photo, is PURE EVIL.

    I have first-hand account information where he confessed to be the “sword-man” who sliced Daniel Pearl’s head.

    He deserves nothing but a death worthy of Benito Mussolini. Let him hang by his toes at ground zero and let the Big Apple take a bite out of him.

    There is a special place reserved in hell for him. I’d sooner try a dog in civilian court for biting someone than give this man the benefit of a society which he’s dedicated his existence to wiping out.

    Of course, if he is convicted and given life, he’ll most likely last a week before he’s “sentenced” by jury of his jumpsuit-wearing peers, so it may not turn out all bad…

  23. #123
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:36 pm, wren said:

    For those who don’t understand how evil KSM is, refer them to page 154 of The 9/11 Commission Report.

    KSM’s original plan for 9/11 was to hijack 10 planes, 9 of which would crash into targets on both coasts.

    KSM was to land the 10th plane at a US airport and deliver a speech against the US.

    Pick up a copy of The 9/11 Commission Report and share this information with everybody you know.

  24. #124
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    Is there a “Jack Ruby” in the house…. hellooooo….

  25. #125
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    This is such a travesty on so many levels. Mayor Bloomberg is clueless and misses the entire point.

    Khalid relishes the thought of being tried in the city he attacked, and would like nothing more than to be consumed by a nuclear event during the “trial”.

    Ready those virgins allah!

  26. #126
    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:59 pm, rambler said:

    Wow! Imagine sending the Gitmo terrorists for a trial in New York. What a gift to all those BHO supporters in that state. Happy now? It’s really to bad that the Gitmo detainees were not dropped out of a plane on the way to Gitmo. This current administration has reached new levels of American hating. It’s time for New York state to put a stop to this.

  27. #127
    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:00 pm, Truesoldier said:

    On November 13th, 2009 at 1:32 pm, Lan Astaslem said:
    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:24 pm, planetgeo said:
    One result that I hope comes from this is that our military realizes that there is simply no point in taking prisioners anymore, and they simply take care of business on the battlefield. I realize that this diminishes our opportunities to get information from these dirtbags, but when this is the alternative…

    Sad thing is they would then be prosecuted for unnecessary use of force. We saw this coming when I was about to leave Iraq in early 2005. The DoD lawyers were trying to implement a plan that would have us count our rounds prior to heading outside the wire and count them again after a firefight. They would then use a formula the lawyers devised in which they would take the number of enemies and the number of rounds expended to determine if we had used unnecessary force against the enemy.

    Luckily Rummsfeld put a stop to that lunancy before it could be fully implemented.

  28. #128
    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:01 pm, Dan Lee said:

    Barack HUSSEIN Obama is a closet muslim & a Traitor who should be in jail himself..

    I for one am not surprised..

  29. #129
    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:32 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Have you noticed that Barrack Hussein Obama is leaning a bit toward the muslim side ..shall I list the events? I agree that he is a closet Muslim and what else would be be with that name. His actions are speaking louder than his teleprompter. How insensitive to do this trial when we just had another muslim kill 14 of our people. Wonder why Obama can’t call him a terrorist?

  30. #130
    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:40 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Looks like the American citizens will have to defend themselves after this is all over. the government will complete the “sell-out” after this circus of a trial. Our enemies will have no hesitation attacking since they love death more than life and have a stab at a civilian trial. Lock and load.

  31. #131
    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, William said:

    Another irrational, dangerous, thoughtless decision and act from our Lord and Savior, the Messiah, the One, Mister Hope and Change, Mister “Yes, We can!” and his Attorney General, Eric “the Discriminator” Holder, Mister “Black racists, violent Black Panther thugs who intimidate voters don’t get investigated or prosecuted” Holder.

    The inmates now run the asylum.

    William

  32. #132
    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:46 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    What is this BS called “rules of engagement” in war. Have any of our past enemies had to do this. War is war and its not over until one side is decimated. Can you imagine giving the wwii japanese or nazis, or vietcong rules of engagement? They don’t fight by rules of engagement, they keep shooting until every American is dead. Just look at Fort Hood. If Hasan wasn’t shot he would have shot everyone. Where are the terrorsts’ rules of engagement? Get politics out of war.

  33. #133
    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:47 pm, William said:

    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:40 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Looks like the American citizens will have to defend themselves after this is all over. the government will complete the “sell-out” after this circus of a trial. Our enemies will have no hesitation attacking since they love death more than life and have a stab at a civilian trial. Lock and load.

    Perhaps those who care will increase gun sales over the next few months, and also the enrollment in marksmanship-gun handling courses will go through the roof.

    Not to worry, thought, our over rated, not really as smart as people try to paint Him to be, our Lord and Savior, the Messiah, the One, Mister Hope and Change, Mister “Yes, we can!,” Barrack Hussein Obama will take care of us, establish peace on earth, get the lion to lay with the lamb, get the Muslim to befriend with the Jew, and other wonderful events, and He will share all the wealth of the earth so everyone has food, shelter, clothing, a television set, a car, laundry facilities, a home, an so on.

    Praise our Lord and Savior! Peace be unto Him! Praise His Holy Name!

    Barrack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm!

  34. #134
    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:47 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    This will be the “OJ” circus all over again—except this time it will speak volumes about the morality of our leaders.

    It can’t be anything other than a media circus. I don’t see a very good outcome prosecuting this as a criminal case.

  35. #135
    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:59 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    William, I am past the weapons/ammo buying and now I am concentrating on logistics, and body armor.

  36. #136
    On November 13th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    The Obama administration is bringing 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed to New York City for a civilian trial.

    A civilian trial.

    Yeah, Skippy. Good going on that one.

    At some point, the following needs to become enforceable.

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  37. #137
    On November 13th, 2009 at 3:16 pm, Rob said:

    I would announce they were going to a double secret location for the rest of their lives and then I would put a bullet in their heads and burn the bodies.

    All that is going to happen from this travisty is more recruiting for terrorism, a demonstration of American weakness, and pain for the families.

  38. #138
    On November 13th, 2009 at 3:21 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Every time something of this magnitude takes place Mr Dithers is off on some world wide trip, golly gee he sure likes to travel doesn’t he. For a Southeaset Asia/Asian tour to promote trade. I will not even go there. This schlock and BS miesterwants nothing better than put us on trial, not those thugs that masterminded 9/11.
    Me, there was a Viking punishment involving a post, a nail and a torch that fits the bill for these Islamofacists.

  39. #139
    On November 13th, 2009 at 3:34 pm, rooster said:

    mmmmm, mmmmm, mmmmm
    barak hussein obama
    he came from overseas
    to bring our nation to its knees
    mmmmm, mmmmm, mmmmm

  40. #140
    On November 13th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, bjc said:

    *This administration will have blood on it’s hands because of this, no question about it!
    *”A jury of his peers”, no problem; Just impanel Dick Turban, Harry Reid, John Kerry, Jack Murtha, Nazi Pelosi, Rev. Wright, Jimma Carter, Bill Ayres, Rev. Wright, and, of course, P-BO, mmm mmm, mmm!

  41. #141
    On November 13th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, happyscrapper said:

    This is the last straw. This administration is purposely spitting in our faces! How long do they think they can get away with angering 90% of the American people before a SERIOUS backlash will ensue? This is reaching a boiling point. Get ready to fight or hunker down.

  42. #142
    On November 13th, 2009 at 4:14 pm, reshas1 said:

    From Rush…

    “Eric Holder said these terrorists will be tried by ‘a jury of their peers.’ These guys are not citizens! Who the hell are their peers? The only one I can think of is Chris Matthews.”

    I add, Rosie, Olby, Sheehan, Code pinkos, etc.

  43. #143
    On November 13th, 2009 at 4:42 pm, davod said:

    Actually – Obama being away leaves the impression that when the cats away the mice will play.

    Do you want to bet tha the media will give him a pass if this blosw up. He was out of the country.

  44. #144
    On November 13th, 2009 at 4:56 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    PLEASE TELL ME YOU ARE NOT SERIOUS! PLEASE!

    On November 13th, 2009 at 2:00 pm, Truesoldier said:

    Sad thing is they would then be prosecuted for unnecessary use of force. We saw this coming when I was about to leave Iraq in early 2005. The DoD lawyers were trying to implement a plan that would have us count our rounds prior to heading outside the wire and count them again after a firefight. They would then use a formula the lawyers devised in which they would take the number of enemies and the number of rounds expended to determine if we had used unnecessary force against the enemy.

    Luckily Rummsfeld put a stop to that lunancy before it could be fully implemented.

  45. #145
    On November 13th, 2009 at 5:27 pm, graysonret said:

    The one faction that the Left needs in order to control the country, the way they would like to control it, is to have the military on their side. History has always proven it. Unfortunately, for them, they don’t see that. They keep “loathing” the one faction that could cement their power. It will turn on them one day.

  46. #146
    On November 13th, 2009 at 5:49 pm, Lindsay said:

    On the bright side, this could be Obama’s knell of doom?

    I have to try to think something good will come of the Obammy administration over-reaching to please Code Pinkos and radical Islam, while slapping the faces of 9/11 families and the rest of the USA…

  47. #147
    On November 13th, 2009 at 6:02 pm, zorro said:

    Pray for our Great Country, friends.

    I am outraged and I fear for the safety of the poor judge, jury and prosecutor and their families who will have to live the rest of their lives under an Al Qaeda death threats.

    Obama’s actions are more than just a crooked politician paying off his leftist supporters, his actions are insane.

  48. #148
    On November 13th, 2009 at 6:03 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    There is a way to deal with this horrific Obama decision. The American people have a right to freedom of assembly, and protest is part of that freedom. I would hope that the 9/11 families, their supporters, and decent people in the nation would go to the NYC federal courthouse and block all of the entrances day after day after day. In addition, I would ask the police to stand aside and participate by refusing to arrest anyone acting peacefully in the crowd. The civil disobedience tactics of the left have been vicious and violent over the years. There is no reason not to take a peaceful page out of their book.

  49. #149
    On November 13th, 2009 at 6:14 pm, Truesoldier said:

    On November 13th, 2009 at 4:56 pm, WarEagle82 said:
    PLEASE TELL ME YOU ARE NOT SERIOUS! PLEASE!

    I wish I was, but I am not. That is what happens when the non-combatants start to run the war. The first example I saw in 2004 of the war being handled by the bureaucracy was when I was assigned as a mechanic to the “green zone” as part of the Abassador route security detail (that would be for Breemer). When our guys went out to execute the warrant against Al Sadr (that the Iraqi government issued) and Breemer had our guys take him to Al Sadr’s house to talk him into giving up. Well Al Sadr told Breemer that he would not give up and if he had him arrested his foolowers would cause such a riot it would cause utter havoc. Breemer fell for it and refused to let our guys arrest Al Sadr (we had Al Sadr and his guards outnumbered 3 to 1 with multiple Armored vehicles and plenty of firepower). Al Sadr used it to raly the Mahdi Militia as a victory over the Americans and the rest is history.

  50. #150
    On November 13th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, MacEamonn said:

    If there is anyone that thinks these people can’t walk, released by a liberal judge because of “government miscnduct” all they need do is look at “The Ones” “peeps”, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn adventures in our legal system:

    Were they ever convicted of “terrorism” charges?

    No. Ayers faced federal riot and bombing-conspiracy charges, but those charges were dropped because of illegal wiretaps, break-ins and mail interceptions by authorities. Dohrn served less than a year behind bars for non-bombing activities tied to the group

  51. #151
    On November 13th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, aggiebc said:

    Funny, the liberals gripe about Bush’s “unprecedented power grab by the executive,” but they don’t seem to have a problem when Obama suspends proceedings of military commissions established by Congress (under the constitutional authority of Congress to establish lower courts and their jurisidiction), and decides, by himself, that he’s going to remove these terrorists from those courts to a civilian court (a decision usually reserved for a judge).

    Not to mention it sounds like he’s just handing these terrorists a claim that they can’t get a fair trial in NYC in such close proximity to the “man caused disaster” they “allegedly” caused.

  52. #152
    On November 13th, 2009 at 6:21 pm, orlandocajun said:

    The gift that keeps on giving…

    I say let Obama continue to step in it. He’s offering a clear distinction between left wing loons and conservatives. The man literally does something stupid every single day.

    2010 should be a good year for conservatives if this keeps up.

  53. #153
    On November 13th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, MacEamonn said:

    On November 13th, 2009 at 6:21 pm, orlandocajun said:
    The gift that keeps on giving…

    I say let Obama continue to step in it. He’s offering a clear distinction between left wing loons and conservatives. The man literally does something stupid every single day.

    2010 should be a good year for conservatives if this keeps up.

    Assuming we survive “The Ones” incompetence and marxism.

  54. #154
    On November 13th, 2009 at 6:40 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The DoD lawyers were trying to implement a plan that would have us count our rounds prior to heading outside the wire and count them again after a firefight. They would then use a formula the lawyers devised in which they would take the number of enemies and the number of rounds expended to determine if we had used unnecessary force against the enemy.

    This is so utterly stupid.

  55. #155
    On November 13th, 2009 at 7:32 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “2010 should be a good year for conservatives if this keeps up”

    Amen!

  56. #156
    On November 13th, 2009 at 7:34 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    ATTORNEY GENERAL PLANS TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY AGAINST 9/11 SUSPECTS…

    If you can’t trust Attorney General-the New Black Panthers Did Nothing Wrong-Eric Holder what Leftist can you trust? I do believe this has more to do with letting Leftist defense lawyers rummage through our National Security files and embarrassing Bush than anything else. If letting Khalid Sheik Mohammed walk it would be a small price to pay-Bush did it. The Politics of Destruction is in full court mode.

    The ManChild manages to be in Tokyo for the announcement-how quaint.

  57. #157
    On November 13th, 2009 at 7:37 pm, Dan Lee said:

    I do want to thank Michelle so much for her blog, because it’s one place that I know for sure President Obama’s aides keep track of & read.

    So I’d like to just say from the bottom of my Heart:

    Your boss is a morally corrupt traitor & by far the worst & most unqualified President this country has ever had. After this betrayal of America, I view him as just as much an enemy of my country as Osama Bin Laden. I hope you seriously re-consider the eternal implications of working for Barack Hussein Obama, a soldier of Satan himself..

    My sincere condolences to the families & close friends of the 9/11 victims. I’m so sorry that this heartless traitor Obama has broken your hearts once again.

  58. #158
    On November 13th, 2009 at 7:39 pm, JohnnyAngel said:

    We. Are. So. ***ked.

  59. #159
    On November 13th, 2009 at 7:42 pm, JohnnyAngel said:

    Khalid Sheik Blutarsky. “Cheee-boy-guh cheee-boy-guh cheee-boy-guh…”

  60. #160
    On November 13th, 2009 at 8:09 pm, Viper1 said:

    Obama and Holder should be put on trial for this.

  61. #161
    On November 13th, 2009 at 8:14 pm, Truesoldier said:

    On November 13th, 2009 at 7:34 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    ATTORNEY GENERAL PLANS TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY AGAINST 9/11 SUSPECTS…

    Yeah, but the trail actual has to get a conviction first.

  62. #162
    On November 13th, 2009 at 8:30 pm, graysonret said:

    I agree with some that this will be nothing more than a media circus; another OJ trial. All day long the MSM will be broadcasting everything live. News sites will be full of it, and little else, for months. I hope to be able to come to this site and see what news is really important, instead of the endless parade of “experts” and their speculations, and interviews with everyone even remotely involved, or live within 5 miles of the courthouse.

  63. #163
    On November 13th, 2009 at 8:38 pm, stonemeister said:

    I just saw Gerald-o on O-Reilly. What a farking a$$hole! He’s claiming it would be so wonderful to try these douchebag war criminals in NYC!! And giving them the rights of a US citizen that these sub-human vermin do not deserve? I am LIVID!

    If I ever see that hominid Rivera on the street, I’ll sp…no, wait, that would lower me to his/its level, wouldn’t it?

  64. #164
    On November 13th, 2009 at 8:47 pm, guspapa said:

    Here is what I think the intent of this little smoke screen is, I think that it is intended to be another Alinski (not Lewinsky for all you old Clinton Fans, moment.

    Distracting from:
    Gitmo not being closed within the 1 year “promise”. (not my preference), The TARP failure,

    The Budget (hard to associate budget with government money management- these are truly mutually exclusive concepts).

    Unemployment Numbers anyone?

    Devaluation of the Dollar

    Government takeover of the Private Sector?

    Class Warfare, Redistribution of Wealth?

    I think that we are on the verge of having the Obama Administration prove to us how our Constitution does not work, is no longer relevant and must be either discharged into the dustbin of history or re written to adjust itself to the now not so “outdated”, “Progressive” Agenda. (New Constitution that will need ACLU and UN Approval)

    Obama the “Constitutional” Scholar? I would suggest the “Constitutional” Destroyer.

    Kiss My A## “Professor” er Yer Honour, er Mr President, ow, that hurts….

    How are things going in China? Hard to get that great Wagu Beef there but I know that they have really nice big Prawns, (the water looks a little weird, but don’t ask questions they’ll never agree to Kyoto)

    And a big Shoutout to all you other dude’s and dudettes out there

    ‘specially if you have been hurt somehow
    Or helped in the Campaign…..

  65. #165
    On November 13th, 2009 at 9:21 pm, rightisright said:

    China is rapidly enlarging and modernizing their navy. They have no reason to do so other than to prepare for conflict with us. Could be Taiwan, could be something else.

    You really think Odopo would go to war over a freedom loving country like Taiwan, never going to happen. Besides China, Russia or any country with a big mouth and nuts to with it scare the hell out of Odopo. What made anyone think this pinko Maxist would fight for America a country he hates.

    His actions are not out of ignorance, they are out of a plan of to destroy America as we know her, plain and simple. I hope all you fools that voted for this lying bastard pay through your nose. Oh was that being vindictive, tough nooggies you dolts. How could you independents be so blind as not to see what he was? A MARXIST!

  66. #166
    On November 13th, 2009 at 9:29 pm, rightisright said:

    One result that I hope comes from this is that our military realizes that there is simply no point in taking prisoners anymore, and they simply take care of business on the battlefield.

    I would strongly suggest embedded reports start wearing protective gear head to toe…you know the ones, the lyin’ bastards that are always looking to show out brave soldiers in a bad light.

  67. #167
    On November 13th, 2009 at 9:33 pm, eCurmudgeon said:

    This trial has nothing to do with Khalid Sheik Mohammed and everything to do with setting up a proxy framework for the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld War Crimes Tribunal the political left is still demanding (and expecting) from Obama.

  68. #168
    On November 13th, 2009 at 9:38 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On November 13th, 2009 at 12:48 pm, bmac727 said:

    BHO & his handlers are not only tone deaf – they are deaf, dumb & blind kids playing pin ball with our Security & Safety. This is an unbelievably stupid & insensitive decision after last wk’s Islamist Terrorist Attack on Fort Hood!

    I suspect they are neither stupid nor tone deaf… I suspect this decision, on top of all of the others, is deliberately intended to outrage.

    To what purpose, I have many other suspicions…

  69. #169
    On November 13th, 2009 at 10:18 pm, OneMonkeysUncle said:

    Doesn’t say much about Truth, Justice, and the American Way, if you clowns don’t even trust the Justice System to ensure the appropriate conclusion. It’s almost like you’re worried about what would come out at a trial of this kind… Hmm, what could the former administration be hiding that you’re so afraid of?

  70. #170
    On November 13th, 2009 at 10:29 pm, love2rumba said:

    Doesn’t say much about Truth, Justice, and the American Way, if you clowns don’t even trust the Justice System to ensure the appropriate conclusion. It’s almost like you’re worried about what would come out at a trial of this kind… Hmm, what could the former administration be hiding that you’re so afraid of?

    OMU, you are one stupid ape.

  71. #171
    On November 13th, 2009 at 10:31 pm, graysonret said:

    Not to change the subject, but speaking of trials, I see William Jefferson got 13 years for his “freezer antics”. I suppose tomorrow, they’ll be screaming “racism”, but not to worry. It will take a long time for the never-ending appeals, bribes, and “tough guy” visits, before he serves it, if Obama doesn’t pardon him, with Sharpton and Jackson flanking him.

  72. #172
    On November 13th, 2009 at 11:21 pm, granite said:

    On November 13th, 2009 at 10:29 pm, love2rumba said:

    Thank you for saving me the trouble.

    Some posters are just so “beyond”, that what they say makes rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic seem like a worthwhile endeavor.

  73. #173
    On November 13th, 2009 at 11:51 pm, Dan Lee said:

    You know one of the most sickening parts is the additional money they will waste on security alone to protect these worms from the sniper bullets that they should have already all had in their heads.

    NY Taxpayers & probably the rest of us will actually be paying protection money to the Feds to keep them alive..

    This is a complete betrayal of Our Country..

  74. #174
    On November 13th, 2009 at 11:52 pm, Mister P said:

    Lawyers please advise:

    I saw Weiner, a New York congressman on O’Reilly saying he wants KSM executed. Isn’t a defendant until PROVEN guilty. Has Weiner just given the lawyers for this Terrorist grounds for a mistrial?

    Just asking.

  75. #175
    On November 14th, 2009 at 12:10 am, Dan Lee said:

    On November 13th, 2009 at 11:52 pm, Mister P said:

    Lawyers please advise:

    I saw Weiner, a New York congressman on O’Reilly saying he wants KSM executed. Isn’t a defendant until PROVEN guilty. Has Weiner just given the lawyers for this Terrorist grounds for a mistrial?

    Just asking.

    The main problem here is that they’ve been given the same constitutional rights as any other US citizen once they are tried in our court system, instead of a Military court. The attack was an act of war, & they are enemy combatants. Evidence is handled differently, & there are so many other complications that could arise out of this whole thing. It’s a legal catastrophe waiting to happen.

  76. #176
    On November 14th, 2009 at 12:13 am, Dan Lee said:

    Don’t worry though, this whole thing will create or save about 1000 media, security, & legal jobs for our economy..

    That’s about 900 more than Obama’s stimulus package ACTUALLY created..

  77. #177
    On November 14th, 2009 at 12:14 am, Micheleeroo said:

    Obama & AG Holder must think this is the surest way to get the terrorist off the hook, whether by mistrial or whatever. Holder is the most anti-american AG we’ve seen. And Obama is so pro-terrorist its unbelievable!
    Please, people, vote these clowns out in 2012!

  78. #178
    On November 14th, 2009 at 12:27 am, Papa Louie said:

    OneMonkeysUncle said:

    Doesn’t say much about Truth, Justice, and the American Way, if you clowns don’t even trust the Justice System to ensure the appropriate conclusion.

    Oh, you mean the same American Justice System that found OJ Simpson not guilty of murder because he stretched out his fingers just enough to make it look like the glove didn’t fit? Or the Justice System that convicted Lynne Stewart of aiding terrorists and then set her free pending appeal? That Justice System?

    What assurance do we have that the judge in the case won’t be some liberal clown who thinks like OneMonkeysUncle and holds a grudge against this country? He’ll have plenty of reasons to rule out evidence: no miranda, no speedy trial, harsh interrogation, and no lawyer present during questioning.

    The judge could require sensitive secrets to be handed over to lawyers to help them prepare their case. The judge could also allow other terrorists and jihadist symphathizers into this country as witnesses for the defense. I’m sure that wouldn’t put anybody at risk.

    Even if they convict, there will be endless and costly appeals. Would the judge turn them loose pending appeal? Who knows? But for years they’ll have to let them out of super max to attend trials and assist in their own defense. Nothing could go wrong there. Victims of 911 will have to deal for years with these terrorists in their neighborhood. Many of them will probably die before the trials and appeals ever end and they see justice carried out — if it is ever carried out.

  79. #179
    On November 14th, 2009 at 12:40 am, Dan Lee said:

    On a somewhat related note that shows where his loyalty lies:

    President Obama was asked recently if it was the “right decision” to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Obama did not answer the question, instead he said he would be “honored” to visit the two cities.

  80. #180
    On November 14th, 2009 at 2:08 am, Papa Louie said:

    Dan Lee said:

    President Obama was asked recently if it was the “right decision” to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Obama did not answer the question, instead he said he would be “honored” to visit the two cities.

    Yes, he said he would be honored to visit, but not on this trip, on some future visit. I’m sure he’ll put Hiroshima and Nagasaki on his apology tour schedule just as soon as he’s finished apologizing to Muslims, Europeans, and Africans (for the legacy of colonialism). He has already apologized to Germans for World War II, so Japan is probably high up on his list. He’ll get to it soon, I’m sure.

  81. #181
    On November 14th, 2009 at 2:29 am, Papa Louie said:

    The federal trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his four co-defendants is expected to be one of the costliest cases tried in New York City, with security precautions that will likely exceed previous high-profile terror and mobster cases.

    Federal and city officials will have to bolster the infrastructure at the U.S. District courthouse downtown, including barriers, guard houses and a special area for reading classified documents. And a large number of federal marshals will be assigned to safeguard the judge, jurors and witnesses, former federal prosecutors said. …

    The government will likely set up a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, a secure, enclosed area of a building, guarded 24-hours a day, that would hold classified or top secret documents in the case. No photocopies would be allowed and documents would have to remain there.

    I wonder if Sandy Berger is on any of the defense teams yet.

    It just occurred to me why democrats are so anxious to have these expensive trials in civilian courts. Who gives six times more in political contributions (mostly to democrats) than the evil oil companies? That’s right, lawyers do. That’s why democrats are willing to cut medicare and doctors fees to help reduce health care costs but refuse to even consider the idea of tort reform. These trials will keep many lawyers employed for many years.

  82. #182
    On November 14th, 2009 at 4:24 am, Papa Louie said:

    New York Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly also said that holding the trial in the city most devastated by the 2001 attack is appropriate, and he pronounced the Police Department prepared to meet any security challenge.

    The Commissioner’s over-confidence worries me. I’m sure Fort Hood thought they were fully prepared to meet any security challenge, as well. If the NYPD was unprepared to stop the devastation of the original 9/11, why should we believe they are now prepared to stop “9/11 the Sequel”? Terrorists are not likely to follow the exact same plot for the sequel.

    Maybe the NYPD doesn’t have their head in the sand like the FBI. But I’m not yet convinced. The FBI decided that Nidal Hassan was not a threat even after learning that he had contacted Al Qaeda numerous times seeking “spiritual advice” from an Imam who was a spiritual advisor to several 9/11 hijackers. Not only that, but they now claim that this was not enough evidence to justify opening a formal investigation into Hassan’s activities.

    A soldier is privately communicating with the enemy and the FBI believes it is not enough reason to conduct a formal investigation? If that is a common attitude among law enforcement now days, I doubt anyone is “prepared to meet any security challenge”.

  83. #183
    On November 14th, 2009 at 5:41 am, Sea_Dog said:

    This is this administration’s classic ‘misdirection’ – Friday late, Congress not in session, Reid’s Health Care up for vote next week (?) – let’s get everyone outraged at something else and get their eye off healthcare.

  84. #184
    On November 14th, 2009 at 8:12 am, Flyoverman said:

    This trial is so wrong in so many ways there is not enough room or time to even express it. Obama ad Holder know it. Therefore, I am convinced this is a political act on their part.

    Their objective is not to put these men on trial. Their obective is to create a villian that will distract everyone through the 2010 election. The villan are actually multiple villans; the Bush Administration and the CIA.

    Their “rope a dope” approach is to present a fat target for the defense by treating these terrorists under civilian standards after they were treated as POW’s and war criminals. The fat target is the CIA and the Bush Administration.

    OBAMA’S OBJSTIVE IS TO PUT BUSH AND THE CIA ON TRIAL, not these people.

    Every dictator wants to create an outside distraction. The Obama administration wants no external enemies. That would outrage the Left. This makes their base happy and creates the villan a tyrant needs to distract while they pursue their agenda.

    Obama is NOT dumb. All things in his world are politcal. This is good politics; to hell with the country if they keep power.

  85. #185
    On November 14th, 2009 at 9:18 am, stillontheroad said:

    OneMonkeysUncle said:

    You never fail to give that Simian hoot from that pig pen of liberalism you and your ilk wallow in. What is it about the word Terrorist and Terrorism that your squirrel cage of a mind cannot grasp? These animals are stateless – they have no right to be tried under any court of law let alone ours. They have no rights – period. If you are talking rights, they have as much as those people in the twin towers on 9/11. But you are a collaborator and a 5th columnist. That group of swine that plot in basements to take down the very government and system that allows you to plot and weasel.

  86. #186
    On November 14th, 2009 at 9:29 am, rambler said:

    Were I the pilot of the plane transporting those GITMO terrorists to NYC, I’d consider it my duty to see that the plane never made it to our shore.

  87. #187
    On November 14th, 2009 at 9:53 am, graysonret said:

    I suspect there will be at least one, maybe 2, terror attacks in NYC. This will really hurt the democrats come election time. It will certainly dump Obama’s approval way low. It is a very bad mistake, moving them, but the government is steeped in “pc” behavior.

  88. #188
    On November 14th, 2009 at 10:02 am, Flyoverman said:

    On November 14th, 2009 at 9:29 am, rambler said:

    I’d consider it my duty to see that the plane never made it to our shore.

    We will provide you with a quality parachute, perfectly packed, and a reserve of similar to boot, alon with life raft, etc. etc.

    Just give us the date, time, and location of your pickup. ;)

  89. #189
    On November 14th, 2009 at 10:05 am, Flyoverman said:

    On November 14th, 2009 at 9:53 am, graysonret said:

    I suspect there will be at least one, maybe 2, terror attacks in NYC. This will really hurt the democrats come election time.

    It will also hurt the Americans at the point of attack.

    Bottom line is these ideologs will put a city of 10 million at risk for the sake of their ideological purity and political objectives.

    To h@11 with the people in the bullseye. They, like aborted babies, are acceptable casualties for the “greater good.”

  90. #190
    On November 14th, 2009 at 10:16 am, Jimmie said:

    How brave and self indulgent to risk other peoples children just to show the world that “he” is better than “them”?…and this is worst possible insult to the muslims…to be forced to swear on the Bible and lie to the world. Possibly if they were sworn in on the Koran…they might tell the truth and then this whole thing could be over before to many school children have to die (taking over a school will be one of the most likely attacks)….How many times can you mock Justice before the word becomes meaningless?

    Wouldn’t it be a shame…maybe a crime….if this was done because someone thought it would be “fun” to put the “previous administration” trial….all those children at risk just so they can put George Bush on the stand and grill him for weeks on end?…… and George will submit very humbly of course….

  91. #191
    On November 14th, 2009 at 10:23 am, jangar said:

    Obama continues to give America the middle finger. Nothing more than that, no other reason to do this or anything else he has done thus far.

  92. #192
    On November 14th, 2009 at 10:31 am, graysonret said:

    To h@11 with the people in the bullseye. They, like aborted babies, are acceptable casualties for the “greater good.”

    If it does happen, it will be time for the conservative movement to strike, and hard, keeping up the pressure until they are all humilated and sent home in disgrace.

  93. #193
    On November 14th, 2009 at 10:47 am, WarEagle82 said:

    I was on jury duty at the Federal Courthouse in Alexandria, VA back when Zacarias Moussaoui was on trial. I was instructed to call in every day to see if I was needed over a two week period.

    Finally after about 4 or 5 days they admitted that they were petrified of terrorist attacks and I would not be asked to come to the courthouse and I would not need to call each day.

    These people learn nothing.

  94. #194
    On November 14th, 2009 at 11:01 am, Bogtrotter said:

    I hope this causes even more taxpayers to leave the city forever.

  95. #195
    On November 14th, 2009 at 11:28 am, DBNinKY said:

    Other than to give liberals a trial of the Bush administration by proxy, I see no earthly reason for these platforms-for-terrorists, a.k.a., “trials,” to take place anywhere else but Gitmo.

    Hopefully a change of venue order will be issued and these show-trials moved outside NYC/NY, for the safety of all New Yorkers.

  96. #196
    On November 14th, 2009 at 12:07 pm, William said:

    Think about the jury members.

    Who on this forum wishes to be on THAT jury?

    Not me.

    Jury members are likely to be in grave danger to their own personal safety as well as the safety of their family and loved ones. Their homes and property are likely to be in danger as well.

    Does anyone really believe that the 1.2 to 1.5 billion Muslims on planet earth, ad their enablers and sympathizers, plus the millions of leftists-fifth columnists here in the USA and abroad won’t threaten jurors and their families, and won’t attempt violence, harassment, and intimidation?

    Remember, according to the Messiah, Barrack Hussein Obama, the United States of America is NOT a Christian nation but it IS one of the Largest Muslim nations in the world, having one of the largest Muslim populations in the world. The USA has many Muslims, including many Jihadis right here on our soil.

    It only takes one, but the potential exists that many “just one” Jihadis, acting on their own, multiplies the threat and potential for damage.

    One man recently slaughtered dozens in Ft. Hood, Texas, killing at least 14 people. Another shot several at LA Airport, while another crashed an aircraft full of innocent passengers. Still another ran own university students in the University of Carolina campus, while another entered a Jewish Community Center and shot eight women.

    Another shot and killed his two daughters, while another beheaded his wife, all on US Soil, all done by Muslims, all because they were Muslims, motivated by their belief in Islam itself and the hatred fomented by their Islamic belief.

    Another man, with an illegal alien youth, killed more than a dozen people in a three week terror rampage in which they terrorized the Washington, D.C. area, sniping at innocent people, and that was done AFTER a nationwide killing spree, also motivated by Islamic pretensions.

    No. I don’t want to serve as a juror in those terrorist civilian Federal trials. They will be in grave danger, as will the judges and prosecuting attorneys. After the trial they will continue to be in grave danger.

    Add to the danger to innocent citizens selected as jurors and the danger they will face, plus the time they spend away from their families, their jobs, school, etc., inconveniencing them and their families, businesses, and employers, and you have citizens suffering for violent thugs. Then conside the millions, and possibly billions of dollars that these show trials will cost and you have an even greater burden on the taxpayer.

    Then the police and security channelled toward this trial, siphoning off police from protecting the citizens of New York and you have an even greater burden on the citizens, all for the beneit of blood and death lusting Jihadis.

    Add to that the danger to local residents and businesses, employees, and passersby as NYC becomes a target by other Jihadis sympathetic to the cause and willing to blow themselves up and take a few dozen, few hundred, or few thousand “infidels” with them for the cause.

    It isn’t worth it!

    This entire idea is a sick idea from a President, AG, and administration which does not have a clue and should be put in a insane asylum, not serving in the highest office in the US government!

  97. #197
    On November 14th, 2009 at 12:38 pm, greenfairie said:

    William’s right…any juror is putting himself and his family in danger, not to mention risk losing his job given the amount of time he would have to take off to serve. (An employer can’t fire someone for simply being on a jury, but an employer can cut that guy as part of a “layoff” process.) Jurors would have to look over their shoulders the rest of their lives.

    This is another thing that the administration didn’t think about. But Obama and Holder couldn’t care less about ordinary people. It’s all about their moral vanity, placating the Arabs/the far left, and getting their big chance to put Bush/Cheney on trial.

  98. #198
    On November 14th, 2009 at 12:42 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On November 14th, 2009 at 12:07 pm, William said:
    Think about the jury members.

    Who on this forum wishes to be on THAT jury?

    My kids are grown. Will they be upset if I come to court with an M4? ;)

  99. #199
    On November 14th, 2009 at 12:55 pm, frontierguy said:

    LMAO

    Hey New Yorkers, are you loving that hope and change you asked for? I know the response from those of you who are not complete lunatics….. I didn’t know he would do this kind of stuff…..

    Next time, listen to what the candidate is saying and find out who and what are in control of the House and Senate before you vote. This country cannot afford too many more moronic decisions like putting the democrat surrender monkeys in charge.

  100. #200
    On November 14th, 2009 at 1:00 pm, jangar said:

    This entire idea is a sick idea from a President, AG, and administration which does not have a clue and should be put in a insane asylum, not serving in the highest office in the US government!

    mmmmmm, mmmmmm, mmmmmm!

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook