See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On November 16th, 2009 at 10:56 am, Pasadena Phil said:

   Just the kind of protest Sarah Palin should be showing up for. “The Other McCain” has an interesting post today about what Dick Armey said last week that first appeared to be a territorial swipe at Sarah but when read in its entirety, pretty much sums up what has been wrong with Republicans posing as conservatives: they don’t participate on the street. Here is what he said:

   Armey also disputed the notion that Palin stands ready to tap into the energy of the vast crowds that have come out at the kinds of “tea party” protests FreedomWorks and others have helped pull together.”You don’t tap into that energy unless you join it. You’ve got to be there, you’ve got to show up. And you can’t remain removed and aloof and send in a memorandum or post something on your blog, and have these folks belief that you’re really part of the movement,” Armey said.
   “You have to really go out and walk and work among them. And I’ve seen very few people who are willing to do that. The fact is, these folks are saying, ‘You know, the problem with all you big-shot politicians is you sit on your pedestals and make your pronouncements. Why don’t you join us? Get on the street. And go to work for something. Roll up your sleeves and be involved with us.’ ”
   “And they don’t have a lot of time for someone who stands removed and says, ‘Right on.’ They’re not looking for a cheerleader; they’re looking for a captain of the team,” Armey said.

   Does this remind anyone of every single Republican candidate in 2008 while we conservatives were fighting the amnesty wars from the streets all on our own? Doesn’t that sound like every single Republican/conservative candidate today?

   I hereby apologize (Happily and with relief) for what I said about Dick Armey over the past week.

2. #2
   On November 16th, 2009 at 10:59 am, englishqueen01 said:

   The thing you forget is in San Francisco, alot of the voters think Pelosi is a wishy-washy moderate and wish she were more left wing.

3. #3
   On November 16th, 2009 at 11:05 am, Truesoldier said:

   On November 16th, 2009 at 10:59 am, englishqueen01 said:
   The thing you forget is in San Francisco, alot of the voters think Pelosi is a wishy-washy moderate and wish she were more left wing.

   I was thinking the same thing when I heard Pelosi’s rating in her own district was around 30%. The SF Libs are jsut pissed that she hasn’t been able to get the left’s agenda through quick enough and they are getting impatient.

   In a way it makes sense that the libs would be pissed, after all they have control of the Senate, the House and the White House and still have not been able to fully enact their wacky agenda.

4. #4
   On November 16th, 2009 at 11:16 am, walterc said:

   In a way it makes sense that the libs would be pissed, after all they have control of the Senate, the House and the White House and still have not been able to fully enact their wacky agenda.

   And they all know that once a government program is created, it’s near impossible to get rid of it.

5. #5
   On November 16th, 2009 at 11:18 am, cheapseat said:

   hard to imagine being more left than nancy and still wanting to be an american. perhaps these people need a year in a workers paradise such as cuba or venezuela. oh to be living in the lap of luxury with the time to mentally solve all the world’s problems. calling all college profs, DO SOMETHING, DON’T JUST SPEECHIFY.

6. #6
   On November 16th, 2009 at 11:19 am, Rorschach said:

   BRAINS!… (it’s what the Demoncraps need….)

7. #7
   On November 16th, 2009 at 11:21 am, tre said:

   I suppose Mayor Gavin Newsome is modilizing the SWAT Team to put-down that insurrection.

8. #8
   On November 16th, 2009 at 11:56 am, Desert Dave said:

   Speaking of Newsome, I was surprised to learn he was married to Kimberly Guilfoyle from Fox News, back when she was a SF prosecutor. I have a feeling he’s not really a committed leftist, just politically expedient. I think he would gladly lean more to the right if he was in a City where that would help. But still, seems like an odd match…guess that’s why they’re no longer married.

9. #9
   On November 16th, 2009 at 11:56 am, rocketman said:

   ***
   It must really suck to be a conservative in Frisco. You are sure in the minority there.
   ***
   I don’t know what kind of statement the White guy in BLACKFACE paint is trying to make. He looks like a “plant” from the left. Engage Comrade Obama and SanFranNan on issues–not on skin color. Keep it classy.
   ***
   John Bibb
   ***

10. #10
    On November 16th, 2009 at 12:19 pm, sandspur said:

    @ Rocketman
    I think he is supposed to represent a zombie. You know, already dead, but it still makes him sick. At least, that’s my take on it.

11. #11
    On November 16th, 2009 at 12:24 pm, b-cat said:

    I thought it was a Obama mask.

12. #12
    On November 16th, 2009 at 12:33 pm, bradley said:

    I DID live in San Francisco for 8 years, and when I moved it felt like I’d gotten out of jail. PC idiocy left and right. One day I saw a billboard advertising the San Francisco Dog Show, and realized they were having the annual debutante ball again.

13. #13
    On November 16th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On November 16th, 2009 at 11:19 am, Rorschach said:

    BRAINS!… (it’s what the Demoncraps need….)

    Integrity would be nice but that might be over reaching. SanFranNan did say “being a women is no longer a pre-existing condition”-she did not mention STUPID, DISHONEST or BOTOX INTOXICATION.

14. #14
    On November 16th, 2009 at 1:36 pm, Reg.conservative said:

    at 11:56 am, Desert Dave said:
    Speaking of Newsome, I was surprised to learn he was married to Kimberly Guilfoyle from Fox News,

    That was a shocker!
    then I though of Carville and Matalin .

15. #15
    On November 16th, 2009 at 1:39 pm, cicerokid said:

    What was Guilfoyle thinking!

16. #16
    On November 16th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, Rorschach said:

    On November 16th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said: …“being a women is no longer a pre-existing condition”…

    Especially for all the wannabe transwomen in SF…

17. #17
    On November 16th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Pelosi’s stuff is old news for now …

    We should be concentrating on the Senate and HarryCare…

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

18. #18
    On November 16th, 2009 at 5:00 pm, graysonret said:

    This is what Pelosi really wants; control over everything, in the name of health care:

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6917328.ece

    I keep looking to socialist health care abroad to get an idea of the future.

19. #19
    On November 17th, 2009 at 11:55 am, thejim said:

    Kimberly finally got it right though, she dumped him.

20. #20
    On November 18th, 2009 at 7:23 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    No folks, don’t listen to Sarah Palin, there’s no such thing as ‘death panels’..

21. #21
    On November 18th, 2009 at 2:56 pm, wren said:

    Dana Walsh is running for Congress against Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco.

    You can watch the video of her speech at this Bay Area Patriots “Sick-In” at this link:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9uDaYdCyv0