Thanks, I won’t be giving up.

Indeed. There is no expiration date on this:

I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

On November 20th, 2009 at 10:12 am, swede said:

I actually wish y’all success. Just don’t see it happening. God bless and good luck.

Thanks, I won’t be giving up.

On November 20th, 2009 at 10:51 am, happyscrapper said:
Has Obama appointed ANYONE who is NOT a radical? Even ONE person? If so, who? I would be curious to know. I realize he kept a few Bush carry-overs and they are not radicals. But everyone Obama has chosen has been totally radical in some way, either socialist, communist, or other disgusting “ist”. I have not heard of even one moderate in his past either (the little of his past that is not hidden because it is so bad he would be executed as a traitor if it came out). How in Gods’ name did we end up with an ANTI-AMERICAN President?? He hates this country because he is not a citizen of it. The information was all there, but people chose to ignore it. I get so angry when I talk to someone who voted for this traitor, I have to walk away. Not a healthy atmosphere in this country. How can you be “tolerant” towards idiots who have helped destroy this country?? I am a bit more tolerant towards those who express regret and apologize for their stupidity.

Great post…repeat “hope and change” endlessly, work white guilt and run a candidate who lies better than Bill Clinton. The result; after eight years of demonizing of GWB we get we get the totally unqualified radical Barack Hussine Obama.

The refusal to discuss or investigate in detail Obama’s past is most frustrating, and it’s why he is still in office.

Never said crazy, and I’ve seen the “evidence.” To date it all has to be filed under “Things that make you go hmmmmmmm.” There is yet to surface any definitive proof, and that is what is needed.

Swede, to me, where he was actually born is moot. His father was never an American citizen (verifiable fact) and that means he is NOT a “natural born citizen” as the drafters of the Constitution understood the term to mean.

If Congress wants to declare Obama a “natural born citizen” in the context of Article I, Section 2, then we need to know where the line is. If it is not “a citizen born on American soil to parents that were BOTH American citizens”, then what is it?! We have a right to know.

BOB said:
Even here few want to talk about it, and those who do speak up are just crazy, “birthers”.

Never said crazy, and I’ve seen the “evidence.” To date it all has to be filed under “Things that make you go hmmmmmmm.” There is yet to surface any definitive proof, and that is what is needed.

Regardless of what Orly Taitz has, she comes off as a fruit cake, and should not be the front person for your quest. Just sayin’. I actually wish y’all success. Just don’t see it happening. God bless and good luck.

Even here few want to talk about it, and those who do speak up are just crazy, “birthers”.

The DNC has admitted there were two, one for Hawaii and a different one for the other 49 states, both signed and notarized on the same day. The Hawaii one includes wording that says Obama is eligible “per the U.S. Constitution” the other 49 have no such wording.

There has been no explanation given, just stonewalling. Media interest in this…zero. Interest if it were anyone but Obama would be off the charts.

It is a fact that Obama was born a British subject, who has yet to prove that he was born on U.S. soil (versus at the Queens’ Hospital on sovereign “Crown Lands”, or other non-U.S. soil).

Either of those is sufficient to say that Obama has failed to qualify to hold the office of President and Commander in Chief.

Not only can we show that Obama is a usurper, we can show that Pelosi is guilty of perjury.

We can remove two Democratic Socialists for the price of one.

OK, Speaker Pelosi, How Did the DNC Certify Obama’s Eligibility?

During the Bush administration, liberals like Patrick Leahy and Chuck Schumer cried that Bush shouldn’t nominate such “extreme” people to the bench. I just love how the hypocrites in charge follow their own advice.

Go back and review what Barack Hussein Obama said when he voted against the confirmation of the extremely well qualified John Roberts:

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama on the Confirmation of Judge John Roberts

On November 20th, 2009 at 12:49 am, McCloud9 said:
I have my doubts that Soetoro was born in the United States. Orly Taitz has alot of evidence that is Very Convincing. She even has PROOF that the man living in OUR White house has used 39 DIFFERENT Social Security Numbers!
What really got me scratching my head is what took place in Denver during Obamas/Soetoros Nomination…
PLEASE anyone explain WHY Nancy Pelosi SIGNED & NOTORIZED two Certifications dated both on Aug. 28th? Now THAT is one thing I HAVE PROOF of.

The DNC has admitted there were two, one for Hawaii and a different one for the other 49 states, both signed and notarized on the same day. The Hawaii one includes wording that says Obama is eligible “per the U.S. Constitution” the other 49 have no such wording.

There has been no explanation given, just stonewalling. Media interest in this…zero. Interest if it were anyone but Obama would be off the charts.

http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/ObamaQueensHospital.jpg

http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/IssueHospitals.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaScrubbing.htm

Why is it that we aren’t allowed to see an initial birth certificate, complete with hospital name and doctor’s signature?