See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Michigan Taxes Too Much
2. Prose Before Hos
3. Villainous Company
4. The Snooper Report
5. Ace of Spades HQ
6. Dave Lucas » Can We All Get Along - Or Not?
7. Common Sense Political Thought
8. Moonbattery
9. Support Your Local Gunfighter
10. buy pianos
11. Ed Driscoll » The Unbearable Whiteness Of Chris Matthews
12. Michelle Malkin » White liberal TV host can’t stop talking about president’s skin color
13. Hollywood Liberals’ Jim Crow Problem - constitutionalconservative’s Diary - RedState

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #101
   On November 23rd, 2009 at 9:42 pm, rightisright said:

   Why is it that liberals are so blind to their own racism and biases?

   KOOL-AIDE!

2. #102
   On November 23rd, 2009 at 10:14 pm, zyzzyg said:

   On November 23rd, 2009 at 8:23 pm, Major O said: #846524

   Oh stop, zigzag. You’re being purposefully obtuse and today it’s just tiresome.

   No, you stop.

   What other reason would prompt the likes of Matthews to mention the crowds were mostly white? Just STOP with the inane, “Yep,
   [insert some lame observation here}”
   Sometimes you just get too much of people like you, you know?

   I don’t know. Maybe he should be asked before assumptions are made about his intent, or whether those people are actually racist.

   And, if people like you get too much of people like me, maybe you ought not take me to task and comment on my posts.

   As I am wont to say here on many occasions, I’ve been black all my life and I can tell you without a second’s hesitation that in America, the ONLY reason anybody points out that a given gathering is “mostly white” is because they view the circumstance as a negative–period.

   The next time my family is together (probably this Thursday) I’ll say something like that, they will all pretty much say, yeah so what, but what about your niece’s husband and their children? Sorry, but no negatives here. Though it is true that race is a deeply woven thread in the fabric of our nation.

   My hunch is you doggone well know this so please do us all a favor and just stop with the feigned “I didn’t hear the word ‘racist’” as if that word has to be explicitly said in order to assert its reality.

   Did you hear the word racist? Do you think those people are racist? Nothing feigned on my part. No it does not always have to be said, but you have to be more than white to be a racist.

   Just stop. It’s getting dumb.

   No, you stop.

3. #103
   On November 23rd, 2009 at 10:36 pm, happy2behere said:

   Maybe the MSNBC anchors did not outright label anyone racist because it could cause them some legal trouble. If one were an anchor and didn’t want to have legal trouble, one might use the same sort of tactics MSNBC used. In other words, some might come as close to saying it as they could, while still having plausible deniability. Hum, did I spell that right?

4. #104
   On November 23rd, 2009 at 10:48 pm, Republicanvet said:

   MSNBC. Self-righteous and self-whiteous.

5. #105
   On November 23rd, 2009 at 10:52 pm, Republicanvet said:

   On November 23rd, 2009 at 10:14 pm, zyzzyg said:

   On November 23rd, 2009 at 8:23 pm, Major O said: #846524

   Oh stop, zigzag. You’re being purposefully obtuse and today it’s just tiresome.

   No, you stop.

   What other reason would prompt the likes of Matthews to mention the crowds were mostly white? Just STOP with the inane, “Yep,
   [insert some lame observation here}”
   Sometimes you just get too much of people like you, you know?

   I don’t know. Maybe he should be asked before assumptions are made about his intent, or whether those people are actually racist.

   That pig Matthews doesn’t deserve any slack. Why give him any?

6. #106
   On November 23rd, 2009 at 11:33 pm, AmericaFirst said:

   Andrea Mitchell… HA! Hilarious video. That liberal sea hag knows she will never get an interview from Sarah, so the tentacled octopus is practically falling over and sliming the cops like it’s a Beatles concert. Well Andrea, you’ll be 65 in a couple of years. You and your lunatic hubby Alan Greenspan can sit back and reflect on America’s zero interest housing bubble he brought to this country. You’ll have plenty of free time to watch President Sarah fire then prosecute every liberal hiding under their desks in her new administration.

7. #107
   On November 24th, 2009 at 12:35 am, BrianNY said:

   Silly Rabbit…MSNBC doesn’t care about black people after the first week in November.

8. #108
   On November 24th, 2009 at 1:19 am, Dimsdale said:

   With blacks comprising about 13% of the US population (US Census Bureau), how much black involvement would you need, or expect, to see?

9. #110
   On November 24th, 2009 at 7:15 am, Rob said:

   On MSNBC Andrea Mitchell is treated like hers don’t stink while she puts down everything conservative… it sure was great to see her held back while Sarah treated her like the smelly old colostomy bag she is.

10. #112
    On November 24th, 2009 at 8:07 am, bradley said:

    MSNBC gets points for employing a dead person (Andrea Mitchell), the world’s most sanctimonious horses’ ass (Olbermann) and the runner up for that position (Maddow) who also gets extra points for being noisily and snottily lesbian. Horses’ asses, dead people and lesbos. THAT is diversity if I ever saw it. Oh, yeah.

11. #113
    On November 24th, 2009 at 8:08 am, bradley said:

    LOL “Smelly old colostomy bag she is” LOL

    (regarding Andrea Mitchell) LOLOL

    Good one. And accurate too.

12. #114
    On November 24th, 2009 at 9:01 am, jangar said:

    Hypocrites.

    Any reason to hate someone is fine with them. They shall have their reward.

13. #115
    On November 24th, 2009 at 9:09 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Oh, then please do tell us what their point was about all these white people.

    They made an observation. If you want to assign motive to MSNBC, or to the newscaster my friends says are racists, then you, Sharpton and Jackson can respond to all the dog whistles you want.

    You still avoid answering the question. That’s expected. You are channeling Charlie Rangel perhaps.

    They made an “observation”??? Why? That was the question. What was the grand purpose of this observation? Turrets syndrome? They just blurted it out?

    I expect you’ll say you can’t speculate. Oh but you can. But that’s fine. Denial is a classic liberal trait these days. You are fitting right in with their party line.

    And don’t lump me in with Sharpton or Jackson. Nice try at an insult. You really have no idea of what you’re talking about.

14. #116
    On November 24th, 2009 at 9:54 am, happy2behere said:

    Don’t you remember that snotty kid in jr. high school who called you a name but didn’t actually call you a name? Its like that.