The indelible whiteness of MSNBC
MSNBC host Chris Matthews, MSNBC reporter Norah O’Donnell, and MSNBC guest Joan Walsh shamelessly played the race card against Sarah Palin and her book-buying audience last week.
In Michigan, O’Donnell smugly noted that Palin’s fans were “largely white — almost no minorities in this crowd.” Matthews parroted the line, assailing the “white crowd.” Walsh likened the gathering to a “paranoid tea party.” Matthews hammered away at the “monochromatic” scene.
Ahem. Check out the masthead of MSNBC TV, “The Place for Politics.” Wear sunglasses and SPF 30 lotion. You’ll need protection from the blinding white glare:

Take a closer look:

White and white.

White.

White.

Pallid white and pasty white.

Does it get any whiter than this?
Oh, and these are the colors of the gang that sneered at Palin’s “white crowd:”

Self-righteously white x 3!
MSNBC’s p.c. pontificators have some nerve clucking about lack of racial diversity.
After the Don Imus debacle, NBC hired a “diversity leader.” By the left-wingers’ own tallying in 2007, guess which network boasted the whitest programming on cable TV during a randomly selected period? Hint: Starts with “M” and ends with “SNBC.”
Palin-bashing racial bean-counters in monochromatic houses shouldn’t throw stones.
***
Speaking of the MSNBC ghouls, Allahpundit’s got video of when Sarah met Andrea Mitchell.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
S.E. Cupp, Hustler, and the four stages of conservative female abuse
May 23, 2012 02:13 PM by Michelle Malkin
142 CommentsPalin officially endorses desperate, clingy Orrin Hatch; time to rally around Dan Liljenquist
May 22, 2012 11:32 PM by Michelle Malkin
83 Comments1997 Fordham Law Review article: Elizabeth Warren was Harvard’s ‘first woman of color’
May 15, 2012 11:38 PM by Doug Powers
83 CommentsNoted MSNBC mocker of Sarah Palin’s intellect doesn’t do so well on Jeopardy
May 15, 2012 10:33 AM by Doug Powers
82 CommentsCNN anchor astonishment after student in viral photo with Obama won’t say she’s voting for him
April 27, 2012 05:51 PM by Doug Powers
53 CommentsWhere’s the DOJ? Twitter lynch mob thirsts for Zimmerman’s blood
April 23, 2012 10:58 AM by Michelle Malkin
93 CommentsAnother “novelty” swipe at a conservative Tea Party woman
April 22, 2012 10:59 AM by Michelle Malkin
105 CommentsWaPo: Florida special prosecutor to charge George Zimmerman; Update: 2nd degree murder
April 11, 2012 02:28 PM by Doug Powers
302 Comments
Categories: Keith Olbermann,Media Bias,Race relations,Sarah Palin
Nice Deb
» The Organized Left Now Stalking Romney
NewsBusters.org
» Very Annoyed Matthews Rips ‘Horse’s Ass Right-Wingers’ Who Cite ‘Thrill Up My Leg,’ Calls C-SPAN Host a ‘Jackass’

Nice Deb
» Uncovered Ad Shows Obama Appeared At 1996 Event Hosted By Democratic Socialists of America
Nice Deb
» Uncovered Ad Shows Obama Appeared At 1996 Event Hosted By Democratic Socialists of America


NewsBusters.org
» Reuters's Freeland: 'Anorexic' Americans Think Tax Bite Too Heavy When In Fact It's Dangerously Thin











With blacks comprising about 13% of the US population (US Census Bureau), how much black involvement would you need, or expect, to see?
On MSNBC Andrea Mitchell is treated like hers don’t stink while she puts down everything conservative… it sure was great to see her held back while Sarah treated her like the smelly old colostomy bag she is.
MSNBC gets points for employing a dead person (Andrea Mitchell), the world’s most sanctimonious horses’ ass (Olbermann) and the runner up for that position (Maddow) who also gets extra points for being noisily and snottily lesbian. Horses’ asses, dead people and lesbos. THAT is diversity if I ever saw it. Oh, yeah.
LOL “Smelly old colostomy bag she is” LOL
(regarding Andrea Mitchell) LOLOL
Good one. And accurate too.
Hypocrites.
Any reason to hate someone is fine with them. They shall have their reward.
You still avoid answering the question. That’s expected. You are channeling Charlie Rangel perhaps.
They made an “observation”??? Why? That was the question. What was the grand purpose of this observation? Turrets syndrome? They just blurted it out?
I expect you’ll say you can’t speculate. Oh but you can. But that’s fine. Denial is a classic liberal trait these days. You are fitting right in with their party line.
And don’t lump me in with Sharpton or Jackson. Nice try at an insult. You really have no idea of what you’re talking about.
Don’t you remember that snotty kid in jr. high school who called you a name but didn’t actually call you a name? Its like that.
I see white people.
blanco