See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On November 24th, 2009 at 11:52 pm, d1carter said:

   Pompous is the key word here…

2. #2
   On November 25th, 2009 at 12:07 am, txvet2 said:

   One can hear pins drop in the MSM newsrooms as they discuss this and the GW hoax.

3. #3
   On November 25th, 2009 at 12:13 am, rocketman said:

   ***
   No need for the AMERICAN PRAVDA media to backtrack–just flush this “story” down George Orwell’s “memory hole” and divert the people’s attention with some non-story.
   ***
   Did you see the First Lady’s chic new outfit? The one she uses while digging for spuds in the White House cut and run garden. And didn’t their Portuguese Water Spaniel look cool?
   ***
   John Bibb
   ***

4. #4
   On November 25th, 2009 at 12:27 am, taylork said:

   What’s the point of apologizing when the only thing people associate the Atlantic with is an ocean?

   Seriously, Sully is a left wing puppet. His sole purpose is to provide “credibility” to left wing blog links by claiming he’s a right winger.

5. #5
   On November 25th, 2009 at 12:29 am, taylork said:

   We also shouldn’t let other “conservative bloggers” off the hook. As I recall, Charles Johnson at LGF cited the ever impartial Rachel Maddow show while impugning tea party activists for this deed.

6. #6
   On November 25th, 2009 at 3:19 am, FruNobulux said:

   On November 25th, 2009 at 12:29 am, taylork said:

   We also shouldn’t let other “conservative bloggers” off the hook. As I recall, Charles Johnson at LGF cited the ever impartial Rachel Maddow show while impugning tea party activists for this deed.

   Chuckie a conservative? Anybody citing Rachel Madcow doesn’t deserve the title.

7. #7
   On November 25th, 2009 at 5:40 am, rlongenbach said:

   taylork,

   LGF hasn’t been conservative for a long time. Early on during the “the enemy of my enemy is still my enemy” wars when anti-Islamists became “associated” with white supremacists, I kind of agreed with LGF…but as more details came out, and his refusal to admit being duped on more than one occasion, I stopped visiting….he’s made evolution his #1 litmus test, which is no where on my scale. (there is nothing that says both evolution and creationism can’t coexist, except in his world I guess)

   Charles is one of those who believes the Republicans aren’t moderate enough to gather populist votes…because the creationists rule the party.

8. #8
   On November 25th, 2009 at 6:29 am, bansharia said:

   Off topic:

   Michelle,
   have you seen this? can it be true?
   this is simply heartbreaking, these have go to be the endtimes:
   http://www.sphere.com/2009/11/24/marijuana-prescribed-to-kids-with-adhd/

9. #9
   On November 25th, 2009 at 6:39 am, bansharia said:

   on topic
   While they ain’t my blogs am a lowly reader/poster the andrew sullivan posts by many “right” bloggers is getting very tiresome and creepy. Who gives a hoot what that guy says and does.
   Piling on while he implodes is not
   admirable. This seems to be a wormhole bloggers can get themself into on both sides of the portals……

10. #10
    On November 25th, 2009 at 6:55 am, LoneRanger said:

    I was astonished when I looked at his blog this morning. Not even a HINT of an apology for his attacks on Michelle. It’s one thing not to be embarrassed by how wrong he was — liberals lack the gene to blush — but not standing up like a man and taking his lumps is pure cowardice.

11. #11
    On November 25th, 2009 at 7:01 am, zorro said:

    The High Judge of Journalism Andrew Sullivan seems too prideful to admit he is not perfect and had made a mistake. Shame on him.

    Proverbs 11:2 When pride comes, then comes dishonor, But with the humble is wisdom.

12. #12
    On November 25th, 2009 at 7:28 am, bansharia said:

    oh boy

13. #13
    On November 25th, 2009 at 8:44 am, tre said:

    They’re right because it’s impossible for them to be wrong!

    If you stand on your head at look at it backwards, then you can clearly see that the evidence show’s Rush Limbaugh held the noose on his neck while Michelle Malkin and Sean Hannity kicked the stool out from under him, then Glen Beck and Laura Ingraham cleaned up the crime scene!

14. #14
    On November 25th, 2009 at 8:56 am, swede said:

    rlongenbach said:
    taylork,

    LGF hasn’t been conservative for a long time.

    For me it was Johnson who put the nail in the Rathergate coffin. Two hundred some pages of the independent investigation report didn’t say as much as Charle’s GIF graphic of the purported Killian memo he superimposed over one made with Word 2000 set on default settings. You don’t need a document expert to know this was not typed on a 70′s vintage typewriter.

    Rathergate was a kind of watershed event vindicating internet journalism, and LGF was a solid conservative voice in the middle of it.

    So, was he really a closet lib all along or did he change?

15. #15
    On November 25th, 2009 at 9:10 am, md1964 said:

    I wish it was policy that a “Retraction” had to be on the front page in a prominate location. The NYT for example, has a habit of front page lies…. then their retraction appearing in a 1 inch block deep on the most Unread pages of that paper.

    The mindless followers only remember the front page, and that is why you have idiots..(like one I work with) who years later will still claim the lie as the total fact..

16. #16
    On November 25th, 2009 at 9:13 am, rooster said:

    Did you see the First Lady’s chic new outfit? The one she uses while digging for spuds in the White House cut and run garden. And didn’t their Portuguese Water Spaniel look cool?
    ***
    John Bibb

    No, no, no, I learned that they ate curry something or other last night and the prime minister of India is a veg-head. Thank goodness we have pravda to keep us informed.

17. #17
    On November 25th, 2009 at 9:31 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Charles Johnson and Randy Andy (The Bareback Queen) Sullivan both went from supporters of Bush and the war on terror to strident liberal critics when Bush refused to endorse gay marriage.

    Draw your own conclusions.

18. #18
    On November 25th, 2009 at 9:50 am, Dimsdale said:

    Yes, he has the added nerve to pompously “correct” me and deride my credentials.

    That’s what pompous asses do.

    On November 25th, 2009 at 9:10 am, md1964 said:
    I wish it was policy that a “Retraction” had to be on the front page in a prominate location. The NYT for example, has a habit of front page lies…. then their retraction appearing in a 1 inch block deep on the most Unread pages of that paper.

    I would modify that slightly to say that any retraction should be placed exactly where the errant story was placed, and in the same typeface and point size.

    The mindless followers only remember the front page, and that is why you have idiots..(like one I work with) who years later will still claim the lie as the total fact..

    Judging by the declining sales of liberal published trash, it is because liberals are too cheap to buy newspapers.

19. #19
    On November 25th, 2009 at 9:51 am, Paul Revere said:

    I really loathe The Left. They live in a fantasy world filled with stereotypes. They are, at best, ignorant.

20. #20
    On November 25th, 2009 at 9:58 am, cheapseat said:

    michelle, you called a hoax on the republican girl, and were right, and you have called a hoax on numerous left wing war hero frauds and this (_?_). the (_ZZZ_) msm has been printing and publishing only the views which fit their agenda for so long they have totally forgotten what the truth really looks like. this is why you and sarah are so vehemently villified. (_*_)s like herr gruppenfuhrer sullivan can (_X_). keep up the good work.

21. #21
    On November 25th, 2009 at 10:04 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    MSM: “Jeez, why couldn’t Michael die this week?!”

    What I want to know is, what is in that GQ article that Obama was seen clutching. I hear it was about “Teh Won”! Oh goody!

22. #22
    On November 25th, 2009 at 10:05 am, Tuesday said:

    Michelle~

    Andrew Sullivan has no redeeming value.

    You won’t be able to draw blood from a turnip. And if ever there is anything worse than a rotten turnip, that’s Andrew.

    His column header should be: Andrew Sullivan of No Class All Mush (drivel)

    At least there was one post in the Daily Kos that lamented their “error” in jumping to conclusions in this. But even that was removed/erase, or else my eyes deceived me – it was there, then it wasn’t!

23. #23
    On November 25th, 2009 at 10:26 am, emjem24 said:

    The sad fact is that many liberals of the Sullivan type will never apologize to conservatives or Republicans in general for “misjudging” or “misrepresenting” them. It just doesn’t fit their archetype.

    Liberals like Sullivan don’t have the testicular fortitude to do the right thing: APOLOGIZE. Just a few. Too bad a majority of these bafoons still defend the likes of the Chosen One, his crew of misfits, and the need for socialism in our society.

    Their house of cards will eventually fall. And it cannot come quick enough.

24. #24
    On November 25th, 2009 at 10:28 am, spaceycakes said:

    Ashley Todd? Hell, I still wanna know about that noose on the Columbia University perfesser’s door…

25. #25
    On November 25th, 2009 at 10:43 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Yes, he has the added nerve to pompously “correct” me and deride my credentials.

    Your credentials are incomplete until you’ve made the scene at Provincetown and been arrested for being a stoner. Neither of you have killed or raped anybody (as far as I know) but that would be the holy grail of credentials.

26. #26
    On November 25th, 2009 at 10:50 am, sonofdy said:

    O/T

    I can’t believe that RUSSIAN state news is covering this but American “journalists” are not

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFt07eAAQ94

27. #27
    On November 25th, 2009 at 10:51 am, RedDog said:

    Let’s see if they’re as intellectually honest about ClimateGate, and the Left’s contortionist double standards on virtually every news event. Few seem to have any personal integrity. Little wonder that our Constitution is now a quaint afterthought in the halls of Congress.

28. #28
    On November 25th, 2009 at 11:15 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    I’ve always liked Michelle Malkin’s clear thinking and honest reporting. If something smells or looks wrong she evaluates it fairly–regardless of which side of the “political fence” it came over.
    ***
    There are not a lot of good Journalists left–she is one of them. I think good Christian (and Jewish) Bible based values make a person think honestly–her faith stands out.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

29. #29
    On November 25th, 2009 at 12:16 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    No, no, no, I learned that they ate curry something or other last night and the prime minister of India is a veg-head. Thank goodness we have pravda to keep us informed.

    You must have the deluxe version of news streaming into your home. When I hit the “off” switch, the news people were asking (threatening) to let me know what Levi Johnston thought about something.

    To be fair, “curry” is as much as most MSM people could tell you about India.

30. #30
    On November 25th, 2009 at 1:02 pm, BadIdeaGuy said:

    Even though it was a suicide/maybe insurance scam, it’s saddening to think that someone would do this to themself.

    On an entirely different note, since Michelle invoked Andrew Sullivan, I don’t know if anyone else saw Iowahawk’s “Dial M for Maternity” post, but I have to say it was one of the funniest things I’ve read this year if you’re familiar with Sullivan’s “Palin Derangement”.

31. #31
    On November 25th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, Bob1234 said:

    We also shouldn’t let other “conservative bloggers” off the hook. As I recall, Charles Johnson at LGF cited the ever impartial Rachel Maddow show while impugning tea party activists for this deed.

    Absolutely. It is clear that Chuckles the Clown owes MM an apology as well. C’mon Chuckie, man up! Ask yourself what Charles Darwin would do.

32. #32
    On November 25th, 2009 at 2:16 pm, Bruce said:

    It’s one thing not to be embarrassed by how wrong he was — liberals lack the gene to blush — but not standing up like a man and taking his lumps is pure cowardice.

    Excuse me, but are we talking about the same Andrew Sullivan? That blogger guy?

    A MAN, you say? Surely not the same guy ….

33. #33
    On November 25th, 2009 at 2:19 pm, jsr said:

    On November 25th, 2009 at 10:50 am, sonofdy said:

    I can’t believe that RUSSIAN state news is covering this but American “journalists” are not

    Who would ever imagined thirty years ago that we would be relying on the Chinese to save capitalism and the Russians would be showing us what is good journalism? If we reach the point that the Europeans start complaining about our lack of military leadership we will have hit bottom. Oh,wait…

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/defence/6646179/Bob-Ainsworth-criticises-Barack-Obama-over-Afghanistan.html

34. #34
    On November 25th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    On November 25th, 2009 at 6:55 am, LoneRanger said:

    but not standing up like a man and taking his lumps is pure cowardice.

    You know, in my book, real men don’t do a lot of things Sullivan does. Nudge nudge, wink wink.

    So it makes sense that he won’t do things that real men do.

35. #35
    On November 25th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, California Red said:

    Maybe he killed himself because “conservative-extremists” drove him over the edge. He couldn’t deal any more with redneck racists listening to Rush and Beck and Malkin and objecting to the census taking. It still could be the conservative movements fault, that is all I am saying.

    Not.

36. #36
    On November 25th, 2009 at 6:33 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Sullivan’s problems are manifold. First, he will NEVER look as good as Michelle Malkin. He is both simultaneously less masculine and less feminine and that obviously kills him.

    Secondly, he is gay and claims to be Catholic. There is something clearly wrong with his mind (see point three) and he might as well claim to be a libertarian supporter of Obama. Oh, wait he claims that too!

    Thirdly, his writings indicate a clear case of AIDS-induced dementia.

    The boy is seriously messed up and it would be hilarious if it weren’t so pathetically sad…

37. #37
    On November 26th, 2009 at 1:12 am, Taqiyyotomist said:

    Funny thing:
    http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=292781#c6353454

    I’m tooting my horn here, yeah. I called this the day after it happened. And yes, I connected this to Todd.

    Another thing about Ashley Todd, Real-Life Moby. She was a Paulian just before “joining” the McCain camp. She then did this heinous act, carving a B on her face and then IMMEDIATELY admitting it, “Yes, I, a REPUBLICAN MCCAIN SUPPORTER, made up a story about a nonexistant black man attacking me.”

    I would bet my every posession that she did this, this double-psycheout, despite martyring herself, for the Progressive Cause, in order to taint Republicans as racists and liars.
    PAULIAN. As in, Ron Paul. As in, the people who lied and cheated every poll they could find, and discussed openly how to do this.

    This little fact gets lost even today, not just by the MSM, but by even the conservative blogs – most still think this girl was really an unhinged McCain supporter, and not an infiltrator with a plan. Most people either have no discernment, or are so jaded with conspiracies that they think NONE EXIST. (THANK YOU MICHAEL MOORE FOR THAT, YOU BASTARD.)

    Her plan worked. And she probably got kudos from all her friends at either Ron Paul’s camp or at DKos and Huffpo.

    Regarding Sparkman: find this bastard’s E-MAILS. I would bet, again, that he was advised to do this, for The Cause by his leftist “friends”, after hearing his intent to kill himself.

    Look for more of this. As I’ve said at other blogs, if another supposed “conservative” does some heinous act that looks like it could bring the wrath of the nation down upon conservatives, CHECK THE PERSON’S EMAILS, CONTACTS AND HUFFPO REGISTRATIONS.

    The Progressives, always true to time-honored form, need their Reichstag Fire. And they will work hard to make it happen, even to the point of personal martyrdom.

38. #38
    On November 26th, 2009 at 1:17 am, Taqiyyotomist said:

    The other scary/funny thing. Go to huffpo on this story and read the comments. They, or 99% of these tinfoil wackjobs, don’t believe the police, but that this new revelation is the work of either: Bush, the Evil Insurance Companies, Rush Limbaugh-listening hick police, or space aliens.

    They have their canon. Nothing – no facts, no knowledge, no information, no logic, no reason – can dissuade them from belief in their canon, once established.

    They have been programmed like Norton Utilities used to be: so thoroughly that deletion or alteration of the program is impossible.

39. #39
    On November 26th, 2009 at 1:24 am, Taqiyyotomist said:

    Cheapseat: “michelle, you called a hoax on the republican girl, and were right”

    She was only a “Republican girl” for as long as it took to do this act, in the days leading up to the election, and admit the next day that she made it up.

    She was a Paulian.

    I wonder did Michelle Malkin, God bless her continually, mention this fact? Or did she also lament that some Republicans are in fact crazy and do this sort of thing? I honestly don’t remember.