<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Desiree Rogers show up to House hearing on Crashergate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:38:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; A hard-hitting MSM investigation of Chicago crony bundler Desiree Rogers?; Update: WH invokes separation of powers</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-1179627</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; A hard-hitting MSM investigation of Chicago crony bundler Desiree Rogers?; Update: WH invokes separation of powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-1179627</guid>
		<description>[...] will not show up to the House hearing on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will not show up to the House hearing on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; DLTDHYOTWO: Desiree Rogers steps down, but not out</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-897278</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; DLTDHYOTWO: Desiree Rogers steps down, but not out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-897278</guid>
		<description>[...] Desiree Rogers, and the Chicago Way: Land of no consequences; Update: House panel to hold hearing Will Desiree Rogers show up to House hearing on Crashergate? A hard-hitting MSM investigation of Chicago crony bundler Desiree Rogers?; Update: WH invokes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Desiree Rogers, and the Chicago Way: Land of no consequences; Update: House panel to hold hearing Will Desiree Rogers show up to House hearing on Crashergate? A hard-hitting MSM investigation of Chicago crony bundler Desiree Rogers?; Update: WH invokes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Power</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-850099</link>
		<dc:creator>American Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-850099</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Salahi E-Mails Show Confusion Over State Dinner Invite ...&lt;/strong&gt;

We have two new reports suggesting that Tareq and Michaele Salahi misunderstood the nature of their e-mail communications with Michele Jones, the White House appointee to the Pentagon....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Salahi E-Mails Show Confusion Over State Dinner Invite &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>We have two new reports suggesting that Tareq and Michaele Salahi misunderstood the nature of their e-mail communications with Michele Jones, the White House appointee to the Pentagon&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849797</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849797</guid>
		<description>She should show up.  Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She should show up.  Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849743</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849743</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not a woman!  That&#039;s a MAN baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not a woman!  That&#8217;s a MAN baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guerro</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849623</link>
		<dc:creator>guerro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849623</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs120.snc3/16765_1308761761881_1315703036_854583_1486099_n.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Can I see your invitation?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs120.snc3/16765_1308761761881_1315703036_854583_1486099_n.jpg" rel="nofollow">Can I see your invitation?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SixDegrees</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849597</link>
		<dc:creator>SixDegrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849597</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If the White House staff/Secret Service can’t keep grifters like the Salahis or petty illegal alien con artists like Martinez-Gonzalez out of the president’s home, what does that say about the feds’ ability to keep far more dangerous intruders out of our homeland?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let&#039;s see - since neither the White House staff nor the Secret Service has anything to do with national security even remotely of the kind you&#039;re talking about, the answer to this would be...it says nothing about it at all.

Got anything harder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If the White House staff/Secret Service can’t keep grifters like the Salahis or petty illegal alien con artists like Martinez-Gonzalez out of the president’s home, what does that say about the feds’ ability to keep far more dangerous intruders out of our homeland?</p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s see &#8211; since neither the White House staff nor the Secret Service has anything to do with national security even remotely of the kind you&#8217;re talking about, the answer to this would be&#8230;it says nothing about it at all.</p>
<p>Got anything harder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spaceycakes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849546</link>
		<dc:creator>spaceycakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849546</guid>
		<description>The Devil may do so, &lt;strong&gt;Rogue&lt;/strong&gt;, but the &lt;em&gt;nouveau riche&lt;/em&gt; just luuurve to bust out the ostentatious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Devil may do so, <strong>Rogue</strong>, but the <em>nouveau riche</em> just luuurve to bust out the ostentatious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849541</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849541</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Good point. They’re all untouchable. For now…. But when Washington changes hands, they may regret setting the precedent of trying to prosecute members of the previous administration.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well, we won&#039;t need any precedent to prosecute these traitors.  Their record of treason is indesputable.  If most of these a@@holes don&#039;t end up in prison, it will be a travesty of justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Good point. They’re all untouchable. For now…. But when Washington changes hands, they may regret setting the precedent of trying to prosecute members of the previous administration.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, we won&#8217;t need any precedent to prosecute these traitors.  Their record of treason is indesputable.  If most of these a@@holes don&#8217;t end up in prison, it will be a travesty of justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ-Aviator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849526</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ-Aviator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849526</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;simcoe said:

   &lt;blockquote&gt; Diva Desiree would have to answer questions under oath&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You say that like it’s supposed to mean something. “Under oath” means absolutely nothing to the people of Chicago D.C.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Good point.  They&#039;re all untouchable.  For now.... But when Washington changes hands, they may regret setting the precedent of trying to prosecute members of the previous administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>simcoe said:</p>
<blockquote><p> Diva Desiree would have to answer questions under oath</p></blockquote>
<p>You say that like it’s supposed to mean something. “Under oath” means absolutely nothing to the people of Chicago D.C.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Good point.  They&#8217;re all untouchable.  For now&#8230;. But when Washington changes hands, they may regret setting the precedent of trying to prosecute members of the previous administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truesoldier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849435</link>
		<dc:creator>Truesoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849435</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On December 1st, 2009 at 11:17 am, CommentGuy said:
Well they say now they were invited and that is leading to speculation of it this was a setup to distract from other current issues.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My thought is that if they were in fact invited (and I dont just mean Michelle O saying they were opening up the WH so it will truly once again be the people&#039;s house)the Obamas decided to throw the Secret Service under the bus (after all in the mind of the Obamas they are expendable help)when someone discovered how bad it would look that the Obama&#039;s had this unscrupulous couple hobnobbing with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On December 1st, 2009 at 11:17 am, CommentGuy said:<br />
Well they say now they were invited and that is leading to speculation of it this was a setup to distract from other current issues.</p></blockquote>
<p>My thought is that if they were in fact invited (and I dont just mean Michelle O saying they were opening up the WH so it will truly once again be the people&#8217;s house)the Obamas decided to throw the Secret Service under the bus (after all in the mind of the Obamas they are expendable help)when someone discovered how bad it would look that the Obama&#8217;s had this unscrupulous couple hobnobbing with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasadena Phil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849407</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasadena Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849407</guid>
		<description>The story being reported at Drudge implies that this was a &quot;balloon boy&quot; stunt under contract with NBC and that they were actually invited via connections (GE CEO Immelt?). Is this another of those &quot;Chicago Way&quot; deals among insiders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story being reported at Drudge implies that this was a &#8220;balloon boy&#8221; stunt under contract with NBC and that they were actually invited via connections (GE CEO Immelt?). Is this another of those &#8220;Chicago Way&#8221; deals among insiders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogue Cheddar</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849399</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue Cheddar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849399</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On December 1st, 2009 at 12:24 pm, spaceycakes said: 
I’m sure she’ll choose something crass, like Versace, to wear.

Gads.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I thought the Devil wore Prada?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On December 1st, 2009 at 12:24 pm, spaceycakes said:<br />
I’m sure she’ll choose something crass, like Versace, to wear.</p>
<p>Gads.</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought the Devil wore Prada?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walterc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849389</link>
		<dc:creator>walterc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849389</guid>
		<description>What bothers me about this whole fiasco, is that instead of reality show wannabees, this could have been an islamist bomber intent on killing the Indian PM in the White House.  How hard would it have been for them to carry a vial of nerve gas or anthrax (or some other chemical/bio weapon that wouldn&#039;t show on a metal detector)in her purse?  

This story should not be taking up the airwaves with health care being debated, but it should be getting investigated at the highest secret service levels.

As much as I dislike The Won, the security of our national leaders should be the highest priority.  On the upside, most of the GOP leaders didn&#039;t get invited, so they would have been available to take over int he event of a mass murder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What bothers me about this whole fiasco, is that instead of reality show wannabees, this could have been an islamist bomber intent on killing the Indian PM in the White House.  How hard would it have been for them to carry a vial of nerve gas or anthrax (or some other chemical/bio weapon that wouldn&#8217;t show on a metal detector)in her purse?  </p>
<p>This story should not be taking up the airwaves with health care being debated, but it should be getting investigated at the highest secret service levels.</p>
<p>As much as I dislike The Won, the security of our national leaders should be the highest priority.  On the upside, most of the GOP leaders didn&#8217;t get invited, so they would have been available to take over int he event of a mass murder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spaceycakes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/01/will-desiree-rogers-show-up-to-house-hearing-on-crashergate/comment-page-1/#comment-849385</link>
		<dc:creator>spaceycakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=39384#comment-849385</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure she&#039;ll choose something crass, like Versace, to wear.

Gads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;ll choose something crass, like Versace, to wear.</p>
<p>Gads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

