Single-payer on the Senate floor; Update: Dems end bill reading with questionable tactics

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 16, 2009 12:40 PM

If you have cable TV, tune in to C-SPAN now. Or watch live here.

This is transparency in action.

The Senate’s chief socialist, Bernie Sanders, offered a single-payer health care amendment. It would open Medicare to all regardless of age, income, etc., and would be paid through higher income taxes. The normal procedure on the Senate floor would have been to dispense with the reading of the amendment. But “to alert taxpayers to this latest Washington scheme to take away your health care decisions,” Senator Coburn’s office writes, Sen. Coburn demanded that the full text of the 767 page Sanders amendment be read by the Senate clerk.

It’s being read now.

The clerk just read a droning bureaucratic section on government oversight of hearing aid tests and another on “dietary management” services.

(Fun fact: It took 17 minutes to read the 6 page table of contents.)

Big Nanny dreams and schemes laid bare.

***

10:55am Eastern. The clerk is now reading a section involving dental services, with specific details about “molars” and “posterior teeth.”

Ed Morrissey notes the strategy:

What does this do? It makes a hash out of Harry Reid’s plan to move the bill through the Senate by Christmas. Twelve hours of floor time for just a single amendment means that no other business can be conducted until at least Friday. Coburn apparently launched this effort in response to an attempt by Reid to shove the bill to a cloture vote without giving everyone enough time to read the bill or peruse the CBO analysis, due this week.

It’s a reminder that even with a supermajority, Reid needs to work with the minority to keep momentum. He can’t pull a Nancy Pelosi jamdown in the upper chamber, and any further attempts will mean weeks of bill reading as the legislation effectively filibusters itself.

It’s on.

***

Jim DeMint: “If Reid won’t slow down this debate, we will do it for him.”

Coburn calls out Baucus and Dems admitting they don’t have time to read or understand Reid’s plan:

***

Update: Hmmm. The Dems had Sanders pull his amendment a little before 3:00pm Eastern.

Roll Call reports:

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Wednesday afternoon withdrew his proposal to create a single-payer insurance system after Republicans compelled Senate clerks to spend hours reading his 767-page amendment to the health care bill as a way to slow down work on the legislation. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) forced clerks to begin reading the amendment in the Republicans’ first attempt at stalling the health care bill.

How Sanders was able to withdraw his amendment is unclear — under the chamber’s rules it appears that a motion to withdraw would not be in order during the reading of the bill. However, the Senate Parliamentarian — in what a GOP aide called “an incredibly bizarre decision” — ruled Sanders’ request was allowable.

Coburn, who originally forced the reading of the amendment, attempted to call for the “regular order,” which would be the reading of the amendment. However, the presiding officer recognized Sanders long enough for him to withdraw, saying it was within the Senator’s rights to do so.

More on the rules from Philip Klein at the American Spectator.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Health care

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:46 pm, letget said:

    WOW! Thank you Senator Coburn. This has got to be killing the d’s!
    L

  2. #2
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:46 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Wethal posted on this in the abortion thread.

    All I can say, is Dr. Coburn, who delivers babies, not kills them, rocks.

    Coburn for President in 2012.

    (I faxed his Oklahoma office last month asking him to form an exploratory committee.)

  3. #3
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:48 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Thank God one GOP Solon has guts. I just wish someone had forced a reading of the original Reid monstrosity.

    BTW, there should be a law, if a bill can’t be read in one day in Congress, it shouldn’t be introduced.

  4. #4
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:49 pm, happyscrapper said:

    We turned it on, but probably won’t watch it, as Rush is on the radio. But, Senator Coburn is a true hero. I didn’t realize it was this easy to delay a bill. Why hasn’t it been tried before this??

  5. #5
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:49 pm, happyscrapper said:

    BTW, there should be a law, if a bill can’t be read in one day in Congress, it shouldn’t be introduced.

    Unfortunately, that makes way too much sense!!

  6. #6
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:53 pm, letget said:

    If they had to read the entire bill before it was voted on, they would not get it done before Christmas. Please, someone ask for the entire bill be read.
    L

  7. #7
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:54 pm, Edouard said:

    Bernie Sanders is the only Senator in Washington who actually literally dares to call himself a socialist.

    However, it’s only that semantic distinction that sets him apart from the other public option and single payer socialist advocates, who are currently working so feverishly to shove our Shining City down to the bottom of the Hill.

    Thank you Senator Coburn!

    KILL THE BILL!

  8. #8
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:54 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Please, someone ask for the entire bill be read.
    L

    I’m not sure they can do that. Otherwise, wouldn’t they have done it before now?

  9. #9
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:55 pm, happyscrapper said:

    KILL THE BILL!

    This just might do it!

  10. #10
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:55 pm, Wethal said:

    The whole bill is over 2000 pages. Heh….

  11. #11
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:55 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “dietary management” services.

    These people are idiots.

  12. #12
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:57 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “dietary management” services.
    These people are idiots.

    Oh, I’m sorry, I didn’t realize this referred to Michelle Obama dishing out soup in her $500 shoes. My bad.

  13. #13
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, letget said:

    happyscrapper,
    I have no idea if they can or can not read the entire bill. I do seem to recall someone, don’t remember who, did say they were going to ask for the entire bill be read. I guess they chickened out!
    L

  14. #14
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:54 pm, happyscrapper said:
    Please, someone ask for the entire bill be read.
    L
    I’m not sure they can do that. Otherwise, wouldn’t they have done it before now?

    You dear sweet naive child. So innocent in the ways of the demon.

  15. #15
    On December 16th, 2009 at 12:59 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    It’s being read now.

    Page 1, paragraph 1: “I know the majority is against this, but it’s the lobbyists who will make me rich.”

  16. #16
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:00 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah thank you Senator for not letting the Dems do another Colon Blow on another socialist bill.

  17. #17
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, happyscrapper said:

    You dear sweet naive child. So innocent in the ways of the demon.

    Cheddar, you are so funny. I love your posts!!

  18. #18
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:04 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    and another on “dietary management” services.

    Does that mean the Government is going to be tracking my BM’s?

  19. #19
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:05 pm, Hangfire said:

    KILL BILL.

    YOU DA MAN, TOM. OKIES RULE!

  20. #20
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:06 pm, stillontheroad said:

    “dietary management” services?
    Does this mean the Feds have a say in what and how much I will be allowed to eat? Will they ration tree bark and grass clippings by age group?

  21. #21
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:07 pm, RedDog said:

    What about flatulence services? Who writes this nonsense? The government is hip deep in terrorists posing as legislators and staffers. I would like to see a list of the groups who contributed language to enable the Socialists/Dems/Marxists, whatever, to write this.

  22. #22
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:10 pm, Gorebot said:

    The two Oklahoma Senators (Coburn & Inhoffe) should be President and Vice President, respectively.

    Sadly, the Idiot American Electorate is nowhere near intelligent enough to comprehend such truths.

  23. #23
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:10 pm, 5minutes said:

    “Posterior teeth”… otherwise known as “teeth you’ll be pulling out of your posterior once the government is done chewing on your butt.”

  24. #24
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:16 pm, battleaxe said:

    Rogue Cheddar: “Does that mean the Government is going to be tracking my BM’s?”

    Why not? The EPA will be regulating your breathing…

  25. #25
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:18 pm, Edouard said:

    letget said:

    happyscrapper,
    I have no idea if they can or can not read the entire bill. I do seem to recall someone, don’t remember who, did say they were going to ask for the entire bill be read. I guess they chickened out!

    He didn’t chicken out, that was Coburn, same guy who’s asking this amendment to be read. He was just waiting for his chance and now he’s taking it. Definite kudos to Senator Coburn here.

  26. #26
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, John Deaux said:

    10:55am Eastern. The clerk is now reading a section involving dental services, with specific details about “molars” and “posterior teeth.”

    Would that be “cheaper to pull them than to fill them”?

  27. #27
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:22 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Howard Dean is right. Pull the bill. Time for a full retreat before the real carnage begins. This is like watching meat jump into the meat grinder.

  28. #28
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:23 pm, letget said:

    Edouard,
    I did not recall it was Dr. Coburn. I am very happy he is doing this now. You people here from OK should be SO proud of your Senators! I sure am.
    L

  29. #29
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:23 pm, Hangfire said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, John Deaux said:
    Would that be “cheaper to pull them than to fill them”?

    Hmmm…. Not sure I want the government filling anything in my posterior.

  30. #30
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, Paul Revere said:

    That’s a lot of trees right there in that bill!

    I wonder if this is making Nancy Pelosi blink faster.

  31. #31
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:26 pm, John Deaux said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:23 pm, Hangfire said:

    Hmmm…. Not sure I want the government filling anything in my posterior.

    Sorry, that’s been happening since the Dems got Congress.

  32. #32
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:27 pm, Wethal said:

    According to Redstate, Coburn also wanted unanimous consent that everyone had read and understood the bill. Baucus objected:

    MR. BAUCUS: RESERVING THE RIGHT TO OBJECT.

    I CERTAINLY AGREE WITH THE BASIC UNDERLYING IMPORT THAT WE SHOULD KNOW WHAT WE’RE VOTING ON HERE. I MUST SAY TO MY GOOD FRIEND THAT PRESUMES A CERTAIN LEVEL OF — OF PERCEPTION ON MY PART AND UNDERSTANDING IN DELVING INTO THE MINDS OF THE SENATOR, THAT NOT ONLY DO THEY READ, BUT TAKE THE TIME TO UNDERSTAND? WHAT DOES UNDERSTAND MEAN? UNDERSTAND THE FIRST, SECOND LEVELS OF QUESTIONS?

    I THINK IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO CERTIFY THAT ANY SENATOR FULLY UNDERSTOOD. THEY HEY READ, BUT NOT FULLY UNDERSTAND FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS.

    MR. COBURN: I WOULD CLARIFY MY REQUEST. THAT THE INDIVIDUAL CERTIFY THEMSELVES. I’M NOT ASKING SOME GROUP OF SENATORS TO CERTIFY SOME OTHER SENATOR. I’M SAYING TOM COBURN TELL HIS CONSTITUENCY I’VE READ THIS PUPPY, I’VE SPENT THE TIME ON IT, I’VE READ THE MANAGER’S AMENDMENT, AND I, IN FACT, CERTIFY TO THE PEOPLE OF OKLAHOMA, I KNOW HOW TERRIBLE IT’S GOING TO BE FOR THEIR HEALTH CARE.

    MR. BAUCUS: THE SENATOR IS ALWAYS FREE TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION HE WANTS. IF HE WANTS TO CERTIFY HE HAS READ IT, HE HAS UNDERSTOOD IT, THAT’S THE SENATOR’S PRIVILEGE.

    MR. COBURN: THE SENATOR WON’T ACCEPT THAT WE AS A BODY ON 1/6 OF THE ECONOMY OUGHT TO KNOW WHAT WE’RE DOING.

    MR. BAUCUS: I CAN’T CERTIFY ANY MEMBER OF THE SENATE HAS DONE ANYTHING AROUND HERE. NEITHER CAN THE SENATOR FROM OKLAHOMA. IF THE SENATOR WANTS TO CERTIFY IT, THAT’S GREAT. ON ANY MEASURE. BUT I CAN’T CERTIFY ON 100 DIFFERENT SENATORS. THAT’S UP TO THE DIFFERENT SENATORS. THAT’S UP TO THEIR MENTAL CAPACITIES AND CONSCIENCES AND SO FORTH. I CAN’T CERTIFY THAT.

  33. #33
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
  34. #34
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:31 pm, sharprightturn said:

    YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!

    That’s my Senator…you go, Coburn.

    Love it.

  35. #35
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:38 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Rogue Cheddar: “Does that mean the Government is going to be tracking my BM’s?”

    Crap and tax. This is a case where “I see BM’s” won’t require a rocket scientist.

  36. #36
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:38 pm, DanMan said:

    Awesome!

  37. #37
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:38 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    THAT’S UP TO THEIR MENTAL CAPACITIES AND CONSCIENCES AND SO FORTH.

    I.e. ‘slim’ and ‘none’.

  38. #38
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:45 pm, 5minutes said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:16 pm, battleaxe said:

    Rogue Cheddar: “Does that mean the Government is going to be tracking my BM’s?”

    Why not? The EPA will be regulating your breathing…

    Talk about greenhouse gases…

  39. #39
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:46 pm, cheapseat said:

    andrea mitchell chooses michael steele on why repubs asked to read a bill that everyone knows is doa and the reading is just a delaying tactic. steele didn’t ask the followup of why sanders offered the amendment when it is doa and just a delaying tactic.

  40. #40
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    BTW, there should be a law, if a bill can’t be read in one day in Congress, it shouldn’t be introduced.

    Oh, I have long been a proponent that if a bill cannot be read and understood by an 8th grader from some shining examples of liberal governance (Milwaukee Public Schools, Detroit), then it shouldn’t be a bill.

    Seeing as MPS and DPS are two of the lowest scoring districts in the nation (despite, in Milwaukee, throwing millions of dollars at the district), it should be interesting to see what bills looked like.

    No more than 20 pages, written in plain English. If you do more than that, it’s not about effective legislation, it’s about statist control.

  41. #41
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Rogue Cheddar: In the UK, they monitor your garbage so why not the more intimate aspects of you bodily functions.

  42. #42
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, cheapseat said:

    the drudge headline says “this close”, but i remember the GET SMART line of “missed by that much.”

  43. #43
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:54 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:
    Rogue Cheddar: In the UK, they monitor your garbage so why not the more intimate aspects of you bodily functions.

    It is unfortunate that the UK never really learned the lessons of 1776.
    The US may also have to revisit them.

  44. #44
    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:57 pm, Truesoldier said:

    About time some Republicans grew a pair and used them!

    I will say I give credit to Bernie Sanders for actually offering an amendment that truly tells the public what the ultimate goal is of the liberals. I may not agree with single payor helath care, but at least he was honest about what he wants.

  45. #45
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:00 pm, SheetAnchor said:

    In support of Senator Coburn, everyone should call his office to express their immense gratitude for his courage in using his Senatorial legislative power to stop a government takeover of our healthcare system, and moving this nation toward socialism.

    Senator Coburn’s Offices:

    Washington D.C.:
    172 Russell Senate Office Bldg.
    Washington, DC 20510
    Main: 202-224-5754
    Fax: 202-224-6008

    Tulsa:
    1800 South Baltimore
    Suite 800
    Tulsa, OK 74119
    Main: 918-581-7651
    Fax: 918-581-7195

    Oklahoma City:
    100 North Broadway
    Suite 1820
    Oklahoma City, OK 73102
    Main: 405-231-4941
    Fax: 405-231-5051

  46. #46
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:00 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Senator Coburn, please demand the reading of every single piece of legislation that is submitted from now on. If they want to submit 2000+ page bills, fine. Let’s hear it.

  47. #47
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Olympia Snowe: I don’t like this ride, Harry.
    Harry Reid: Faster!
    Max BAUCUS : Harry, do me a favor? Tell those people to stop
    paddling back there.
    Harry Reid : Faster!
    Susan Collins : We’re going too fast!
    Harry Reid : Faster! Faster!
    Olympia Snowe : We’re gonna sink, I know it!
    Susan Collins : Why doesn’t he stop the boat?
    Harry Reid : Faster!
    Max BAUCUS : Hang on, Olympia! Just close your eyes and hang
    on tight!
    Chucky Shumer: What’s happening?
    HARRY REID: Faster!
    OLYMPIA SNOWE: What is this, a freak-out?
    Max BAUCUS: Hey, this isn’t funny, Harry !!
    Roland Burris: You can’t possibly see where you’re going, Harry
    HARRY REID: You’re right. I can’t.
    Chucky Shumer: Boy, what a great series this would make.
    Roland Burris: Harry …..!! .
    BOB BYRD: This is kind of strange . . .
    Joe Lieberman: Yeah, strange, Bob, but it’s fun! Ha ha!
    HARRY REID: This is terrific!
    Claire McKaskill: Ugghhhhhh . . .
    Roland Burris : How much to get off the boat, Harry?
    Claire McKaskill: Ugghhh . . . I think I’m gonna be sick.
    Roland Burris: I can take a joke, but this has gone too far.
    Max BAUCUS: Tell that little guy to turn us around,
    Harry!
    Claire McKaskill: Aaaaaaa! Now I am gonna be sick!
    OLYMPIA SNOWE: Save me, Max….!
    BOB BYRD: (reacting when Obamas face appears on the
    wall) Joe!!!!!
    Joe Lieberman: It couldn’t be.

    (A few screams . . .)

    HARRY REID:
    THERE’S NO EARTHLY WAY OF KNOWING
    Roland Burris: Heh, heh . . . he’s singing . . .
    HARRY REID:
    WHICH DIRECTION WE ARE GOING
    THERE’S NO KNOWING WHERE WE’RE ROWING
    Roland Burris:
    (echoing) ROWING . . .

    HARRY REID:
    OR WHICH WAY THE RIVER’S FLOWING

    IS IT RAINING
    IS IT SNOWING
    IS A HURRICANE A-BLOWING

    Bleh!
    Not a speck of light is showing
    So the danger must be growing
    Are the fires of hell a glowing?
    Is the grisly reaper mowing?
    Yes! The danger must be growing
    For the rowers keep on rowing
    And they’re certainly not showing
    Any signs that they are slowing!

    (Harry Reid screams. Chaos in Congress)

  48. #48
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:04 pm, happy2behere said:

    What phrase does not belong?
    a. Senator
    b. Conscience
    c. Mental Capacities

  49. #49
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Baucus is a real jackass isn’t he.

  50. #50
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, Hangfire said:

    Someone with a name like Baucus should be wearing leather sandals and a toga.

    I wonder how many mpg his chariot gets?

  51. #51
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:10 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    More good news! Rubio has overtaken Crist in FL!

    That is good news. I guess it is time for the Crist campaign to find another Hitler video produced by Rubio! After the first go around, I am convinced Crist is a Democrap. He thinks his opponent is the enemy – a Dem tactic.

    I imagine our founding fathers are shaking their heads (and fists).

  52. #52
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, Southpaw said:

    BTW, there should be a law, if a bill can’t be read in one day in Congress, it shouldn’t be introduced.

    Looking at it from another perspective, it’s too bad the amendment wasn’t 70,000 pages, taking three monthd to read. If the Senate can’t conduct business, it can’t do more harm.

  53. #53
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, Hangfire said:

    Baucus probably travels by litter, and has 8 Nubians carry it.

    Of course, the Nubians vote Democrat.

  54. #54
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:19 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Don’t they have to keep someone in the room while it is being read? So the republicans need to take turns having someone in the room. I assume they will work that out!! They shouldn’t let one or two people do all the work!

    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:46 pm, cheapseat said:
    andrea mitchell chooses michael steele on why repubs asked to read a bill that everyone knows is doa and the reading is just a delaying tactic. steele didn’t ask the followup of why sanders offered the amendment when it is doa and just a delaying tactic.

    I thought the exact same thing. That was a no-brainer, yet he didn’t say it. He is trying, but misses a lot of chances to get a point across!

  55. #55
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:22 pm, happyscrapper said:

    The pres doesn’t care what kind of bill it is. He just wants a bill. Any bill. What a bozo. Even Howard Dean said that the people in Congress are passing junk, just to get something passed! Just listening to this amendment is like trying to read Chinese. What a bunch of gibberish. Is this what the entire bill is like? Can anyone speak English in Congress??

  56. #56
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:24 pm, 29Victor said:

    I’m sorry sir, it seems that my intelligence circuits have melted.

  57. #57
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:25 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    THey should have had ‘Master Thespian’ William Shatner read it, with his beatnik band providing appropriate riffs.

  58. #58
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Rush just said that a reporter said, “The GOP is using delay tactics by having a clerk read the entire amendment. This could take until midnight. That hardly seems fair to the clerk.” That is the mentality of the MSM news reporters. Like they are going to use the same clerk the whole time. And, isn’t liberty worth the effort? If I had to read a bill for three days solid to save my country, I would do it.

  59. #59
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:30 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:25 pm, Dexter Alarius said:
    THey should have had ‘Master Thespian’ William Shatner read it, with his beatnik band providing appropriate riffs.

    Yeah, and I bet Sarah Palin would even volunteer to take a shift!

  60. #60
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    One Ted Kennedy’s DYING LAST WISHES was his proxy committee vote in the affirmative for Tom Coburn’s amendment to require all in Congress to enroll in public option coverage if that is included in the bill.

    Though Ted won’t be coming down for breakfast, it was my understanding that there are two reasons to vote for an amendment – because you really like it – or – you really hate it and voting for it allows you to bring it up for reconsideration on the floor to kill it.

    We’ll never know which was the reason that Ted voted to require all in Congress to enroll in a public option but – it WAS one of his very last wishes in the Senate. Why aren’t liberals mentioning Ted’s last wishes and .. does anyone know what happened to that amendment? Did it already get axed?

    Prescription for the Goose

  61. #61
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:33 pm, nacho475 said:

    thank you Sen. Coburn!

    i agree that they should read and understand these bills. if they can’t or won’t they should be removed from office. they act like this is an imposition. congress and the president need to be reminded daily that they RAN for office- they didn’t inherit it!

    unfortunately my embarrassment of a Senator thinks it’s ok to call flight attendants B—-. While the other one sits silently next to him.

  62. #62
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, happyscrapper said:

    It still stuns me every time I think about it…that the people who we elected to represent us and watch out for our interests are willing to vote for a massive bill that will negatively impact every man, woman and child in this country, without even reading what is in it!! This is the biggest travesty in the history of our republic. Treason is too mild a word.

  63. #63
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:51 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    It just occurred to me that on the very day after former Vermont governor Howard Dean (who last week declared that the debate over capitalism vs socialism is settled in favor of socialism) calls for the Obamacare bill to be pulled, the only declared socialiest in the Senate and fellow Vermonter Sanders introduces an amendment that will accomplish exactly what Dean asked for. Coincidence? Maybe.

    Whether what is happening today was what they expected, surely Samders knew he was throwing a monkey wrench into the machinery.

  64. #64
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:53 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Senator Coburn,

    THANK YOU!!!

    You are doing exactly what a majority of U.S. Citizens want you to do, and we thank you for doing it!

  65. #65
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:53 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Never forget:

    Regardless of what happens in this debate, or the next, or the next after that, these people’s goal will always be single payer.

    I just wish more people would argue on Constitutional grounds, as it’s a far more powerful argument against this garbage – more powerful even than its demonstrable ineffectiveness. The supreme law of the land must be reestablished in this country or we’re all screwed.

    Kiss your freedoms goodbye now while you still have them.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  66. #66
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:54 pm, Send_Me said:

    How in this great country of mine can a socialist get elected to a Senate seat? Please, someone answer me that. I’ve dedicated my life to fighting communists, among other enemies of this country, and here my own countrymen are voting them into office? Good grief…
    He’s talking now. Keep it up, buddy. You’re only wasting more of your own time, much like the villain going into a monologue before being thwarted by the good guys.

  67. #67
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:55 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
  68. #68
    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:59 pm, Misscheryl said:

    We Okies are proud of Coburn.

    I’d love to see him run for president in 2012. I’ll promise on thing – he is a true conservative and problably so much so, than it would scare a lot of people in the center from voting for him. I’d love to see it happen though. You want a true conservative – you’re looking at one in Coburn.

  69. #69
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:00 pm, denver republican said:

    The C-Span website says that Sanders has pulled his amendment. :-(

  70. #70
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:54 pm, Send_Me said:

    How in this great country of mine can a socialist get elected to a Senate seat?

    Have you ever been to Vermont? Ben & Jerry’s? The state is crawling with card-carrying communists.

  71. #71
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Truesoldier said:

    I say demand the whole bill be read to them. This way no Senator can claim they don’t know what is in it without fear of being told that they must not have paid attention to the reading. Not to mention this would tie up the Senate for so long that our country would be safe for awhile. Seems like a win win situation to me.

  72. #72
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:04 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah I see the update on dental services. MM please let us know when they get to posterior services and discuss provisions for Reid’s sphincter necktieotomy.

  73. #73
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:05 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Anyone else hear about the threat Rahm Emanual made to Senator Nelson from Nebraska if he refuses to vote for this bill?

  74. #74
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pm, Send_Me said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    Have you ever been to Vermont? Ben & Jerry’s? The state is crawling with card-carrying communists.

    So I guess I shouldn’t visit the place while wearing my uniform or Reagan tshirt, right?

  75. #75
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Is there funding to cover addadicktomy operations? You know, for cross-dressing Republicans like Lindsey Graham.

  76. #76
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:12 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pm, Send_Me said:

    At least not your US uniform. They threatened to secede from the union over the Iraq war a couple of years ago. They probably wouldn’t recognize the Reagan t-shirt. That’s a long time ago for weed toters.

  77. #77
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:12 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah where’s my Senator; the luscious and honorable Barbara Mikulski??!! Was there a sale at the Carpet Barn or is she at her beautician Earl Scheibb?

  78. #78
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:14 pm, flaming_o said:

    This is brilliant strategerizing. Maybe the next logical step would be to force Congress to read every stinking page of every stinking bill they try to move on. That way, I figure they’ll end up passing almost nothing and causing as little damage as possible on the rest of us.

  79. #79
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:15 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    The Offut AFB closing threat.

    Nice to know the Marxist in Chief would cheerfuly increase the risk of nuclear attack on the United States in his goal of destroying capitalism and our constitutional Republic.

    2010. Last chance to win one side of Congress back, and block the Traitor in Chief, with the ability not to bring spending legislation to the floor, and hold oversite hearings to try to curb ACORN, Holder’s corrupt and politicized DoJ, shenanigans with the census, amnesty, etc.

    If the American voters are stupid enough to return a Demonratic majority to the House, or, more likely, enough votes are stolen or manufactured fraudulently (like Governor Gregoire or Senator Franken), to keep an all Demonrat Congress, our Constitutional Republic, our representative democracy, and our free market economy (or some real semblance of one), will either disappear for ever or there will be a violent revolt to restore the Constitution.

    Two more years of unchecked Demonrat control, massive voter fraud, like Holder’s war on states trying to enforce ID verification to register or vote, and amnesty, will guarantee a corrupt one party state with sham elections. Best case, Mexico under the PRI for over 70 years. Best case.

    In my humble opinion.

  80. #80
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:15 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Yes Ed, that’s the one I’m talking about.

  81. #81
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:16 pm, denver republican said:

    Have you ever been to Vermont?

    I was watching White Christmas the other day. There’s a scene where Judy is talking to Phil about finding someone to pretend to be engaged to in the hopes it’ll nudge her sister in the same direction. She includes in her litany of qualifications “it’ll have to be a man” and Phil says “that’s an absolute must”. And I thought “my, how times have changed”.

  82. #82
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:22 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah

    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    Is there funding to cover addadicktomy operations? You know, for cross-dressing Republicans like Lindsey Graham.

    Unfortunately that’s the least of his maladies. He suffers from a fatal case of human Möbius strip …

  83. #83
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:24 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    Go Dr. Coburn Go! Being from OK I am glad he is my Senator and actually speaks up for all Americans not just his home State!

    Coburn 2012…hmmm…not a bad idea…put him together with Michelle Bachmann?

  84. #84
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:15 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    If … enough votes are stolen or manufactured fraudulently (like Governor Gregoire or Senator Franken), to keep an all Demonrat Congress…

    Two more years of unchecked Demonrat control, massive voter fraud…

    Have you seen this?

    NY Board of Elections certifies fraudulent NY-23 Election Results
    COMMISSIONER OPENLY ADMITS MACHINES IN ERIE COUNTY WERE PROGRAMED TO SWITCH VOTES

  85. #85
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:52 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:22 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    human Möbius strip … I had to look that up. I learned something today.

  86. #86
    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:53 pm, MacEamonn said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 3:05 pm, Misscheryl said:
    Anyone else hear about the threat Rahm Emanual made to Senator Nelson from Nebraska if he refuses to vote for this bill?

    Here’s a link to the reporter who broke this story blog: Source: Dems Threaten Nelson In Pursuit of 60

  87. #87
    On December 16th, 2009 at 4:07 pm, Send_Me said:

    So now we have Sen. Dick Durbin talking about supporting the troops. Sure, the same guy who compared me and my brothers-in-arms to Pol Pot’s goons and Gulag guards. Thanks… Richard.

  88. #88
    On December 16th, 2009 at 4:09 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    I heard Bernie the Commie will withdraw his amendment.

    Now, lather, rinse and repeat. Make them read every sylabble on every last amendment and appendix.

  89. #89
    On December 16th, 2009 at 4:42 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Flashback:

    Elected Senate Democratic leader in November 2004, tough-minded Reid successfully halted much Republican legislation, despite having only 44 Democrats in the 109th Congress.

    So, will PBS praise Sen. Coburn as even more “tough-minded” and “successful”, seeing as there are only 40 Republicans in the current Senate?

    No, of course they won’t.

  90. #90
    On December 16th, 2009 at 4:49 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    I goofed. Here’s the proper link for that last quote:

    Elected Senate Democratic leader in November 2004, tough-minded Reid successfully halted much Republican legislation, despite having only 44 Democrats in the 109th Congress.

  91. #91
    On December 16th, 2009 at 4:52 pm, Major O said:

    How Sanders was able to withdraw his amendment is unclear — under the chamber’s rules it appears that a motion to withdraw would not be in order during the reading of the bill. However, the Senate Parliamentarian — in what a GOP aide called “an incredibly bizarre decision” — ruled Sanders’ request was allowable.

    It wasn’t a “bizarre decision.” It was a brazen move that is tantamount to open tyranny if it is not procedurally allowed and the GOP needs to call them on it ASAP.

  92. #92
    On December 16th, 2009 at 4:54 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    From Michelle’s update above:

    How Sanders was able to withdraw his amendment is unclear — under the chamber’s rules it appears that a motion to withdraw would not be in order during the reading of the bill. However, the Senate Parliamentarian — in what a GOP aide called “an incredibly bizarre decision” — ruled Sanders’ request was allowable.

    Wow.

  93. #93
    On December 16th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, flenser said:

    under the chamber’s rules it appears that a motion to withdraw would not be in order during the reading of the bill. However, the Senate Parliamentarian — in what a GOP aide called “an incredibly bizarre decision” — ruled Sanders’ request was allowable.

    Always remember that for the left, the “rules” are whatever is most helpful to advancing the lefts agenda.

    There’s a memorable scene in Animal Farm in which the rules the animals have agreed to live under are being rewritten on the fly by the pigs.

  94. #94
    On December 16th, 2009 at 5:04 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    The Senate parliamentarian is from the majority party. Further, the presiding officer of the Senate (I’d assume it is Reid today), while advised by the parliamentarian, is not required to follow the advice of the parliamentarian, and is the ultimate arbiter of what is permitted in the Senate.

    I looked this up a while ago. Reid can make up rules as he goes along, essentially.

  95. #95
    On December 16th, 2009 at 5:11 pm, flenser said:

    Reid can make up rules as he goes along, essentially.

    He can, of course. He can even change the rules so that only 55 votes are needed to overcome a filibuster rather than 60.

    It’s still changing the rules to suit the Dems though.

  96. #96
    On December 16th, 2009 at 5:23 pm, cicerokid said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 2:29 pm,

    happyscrapper said:
    Rush just said that a reporter said, “The GOP is using delay tactics by having a clerk read the entire amendment. This could take until midnight. That hardly seems fair to the clerk.” That is the mentality of the MSM news reporters. Like they are going to use the same clerk the whole time.

    Let Barry Hussein read it. He reads real good.

  97. #97
    On December 16th, 2009 at 5:25 pm, Paul Revere said:

    Who is the parliamentarian?

  98. #98
    On December 16th, 2009 at 5:26 pm, cicerokid said:

    Wow.

    under the chamber’s rules it appears that a motion to withdraw would not be in order during the reading of the bill.

    Murtha is writing the rules.

  99. #99
    On December 16th, 2009 at 5:36 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    The House and the Senate each has an Office of the Parliamentarian to provide expert advice and assistance on questions relating to the meaning and application of that chamber’s legislative rules, precedents, and practices.

    The Speaker began naming a parliamentarian in 1927; the Senate first recognized its parliamentarian in 1935. At present, the House parliamentarian is assisted by a deputy, four assistants, and two clerks. The Senate office currently comprises the parliamentarian, two senior assistant parliamentarians, the assistant parliamentarian, and the parliamentary assistant.

    The responsibilities of the two offices are similar. These derive from the need of Representatives and Senators, and their staff, for access to confidential and nonpartisan expertise regarding the
    intricacies of the legislative process. The parliamentarians and their assistants/deputies make their
    authoritative knowledge available to all members on the floor during plenary sessions and from their offices at all other times.

    The most visible service that each office provides is in advising the Member presiding over House or Senate plenary sessions as to the appropriate procedure to be followed, the appropriate way in which to phrase any statements the chair needs to make, and the appropriate responses by
    the chair to parliamentary inquiries and points of order. Whenever the House or Senate is in session, the parliamentarian or one of the office’s deputies/assistants is present on the floor at all times. In the House, the parliamentarian on duty sits or stands near the right hand of the Member who is presiding. In the Senate, the parliamentarian on duty always is seated at the rostrum immediately below the presiding officer’s desk.

    Because of the complexity of the legislative procedures that govern the floor sessions of each house, Representatives and Senators have long felt the need for expert professional assistance, especially for those called upon to preside. The parliamentarians and their staffs provide this assistance in several ways. For routine situations and situations that can be anticipated in advance, the office may prepare written guidance for the Members who are presiding to inform them as to what they are expected to say or do to implement the applicable procedures of that house. In other
    circumstances, the parliamentarians convey their advice verbally to the presiding Representative or Senator—for example, when that Member needs to respond to a parliamentary inquiry or rule on a point of order.

    As a staff official, neither parliamentarian is empowered to make decisions that are binding on the
    House or Senate.
    The parliamentarians and their deputies/assistants only offer advice that the presiding Representative or Senator may accept or reject; individual Members may appeal rulings. For more information on appeals, see CRS Report 98-306, Points of Order, Rulings, and Appeals in the Senate and CRS Report 98-307, Points of Order, Rulings, and Appeals in the House of Representatives, both by Valerie Heitshusen. vheitshusen@crs.loc.gov

  100. #100
    On December 16th, 2009 at 5:45 pm, jrgdds said:

    On December 16th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, John Deaux said:

    10:55am Eastern. The clerk is now reading a section involving dental services, with specific details about “molars” and “posterior teeth.”

    Would that be “cheaper to pull them than to fill them”?

    I consider Universal Health Care to be an HMO on steroids. Being a dentist, I have dealt with HMO’s; I can tell you that in dentistry they always pay the most for procedures that provide the most economical care. From the HMO’s perspective, the most economical dental care is full mouth extractions and a set of dentures. The HMO’s pay out would be a fraction of what they would payout for regular cleanings, fillings, as well as root canals and crowns that a person might need during their lifetime to maintain and save their teeth.
    The HMO’s most economical care in medicine is supervised neglect then death. We are in trouble if Universal Health Care is ever allowed to pass. “Obama lied and Granny died, but not before she had a chance to gum her food.”

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Obama Chief of Staff: No More Compromise on Contraceptive Mandate

February 12, 2012 04:26 PM by Doug Powers

114 Comments

An offer they can’t refuse

Choosing Life and Beating the Odds

February 11, 2012 11:50 AM by Doug Powers

32 Comments

‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’

February 10, 2012 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

199 Comments

Former Democrat Rep. Regrets Vote for Obamacare Due to Contraceptive Coverage

February 7, 2012 03:40 PM by Doug Powers

75 Comments

She wasn’t kidding

How to Make a Liberal Politician Stand Up Against Intrusive Government

February 6, 2012 04:28 PM by Doug Powers

95 Comments

Mixed messages

The SIGA scandal: Calls for investigation mount

January 27, 2012 02:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments

Confirmed: Romneycare = Obamacare

January 26, 2012 10:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

156 Comments


Categories: Health care

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook