<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coburn defends the Party of No; Durbin blasts &#8220;styptic-hearted Republicans;&#8221; Update: Video added</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Another sneaky Saturday in the Senate &#8212; and Teddy K&#8217;s ghost rises again; Update: Nelson caves&#8230;but says he &#8220;reserves the right&#8221; to change his mind; Nelson&#8217;s Medicaid payoff</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-1192175</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Another sneaky Saturday in the Senate &#8212; and Teddy K&#8217;s ghost rises again; Update: Nelson caves&#8230;but says he &#8220;reserves the right&#8221; to change his mind; Nelson&#8217;s Medicaid payoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-1192175</guid>
		<description>[...] No. Hell no. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No. Hell no. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Raymond</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-868786</link>
		<dc:creator>James Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-868786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;James Raymond...&lt;/strong&gt;

How many people wrote disagreeing with you?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>James Raymond&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>How many people wrote disagreeing with you?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piano music</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-864581</link>
		<dc:creator>piano music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-864581</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;piano music...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hello :) I bookmarked this site. Thanks heaps for this!... if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Pianoforte Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>piano music&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hello <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I bookmarked this site. Thanks heaps for this!&#8230; if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Pianoforte Links <a href="http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org</a> Enjoy!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Snooper Report</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-860391</link>
		<dc:creator>The Snooper Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-860391</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;When It&#039;s Time To Say NO!...&lt;/strong&gt;

from Michelle Malkin...Coburn defends the Party ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>When It&#8217;s Time To Say NO!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>from Michelle Malkin&#8230;Coburn defends the Party &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonewolf</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859665</link>
		<dc:creator>lonewolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859665</guid>
		<description>We need about 400 more like Coburn in DC. Oklahoma is proud of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need about 400 more like Coburn in DC. Oklahoma is proud of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimsdale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859645</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859645</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On December 18th, 2009 at 1:15 pm, letget said:

firestorm31,
Stypic pen was used to stop the bleeding when men cut themselves shaving. I do not know if they make them anymore.
L&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Maybe he is right: the styptic pencil was used to stanch bleeding after a close shave.  

If we can stop the fiscal bleeding by stopping this farce, it will be a very close shave indeed....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On December 18th, 2009 at 1:15 pm, letget said:</p>
<p>firestorm31,<br />
Stypic pen was used to stop the bleeding when men cut themselves shaving. I do not know if they make them anymore.<br />
L</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe he is right: the styptic pencil was used to stanch bleeding after a close shave.  </p>
<p>If we can stop the fiscal bleeding by stopping this farce, it will be a very close shave indeed&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elm Creek Smith</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859601</link>
		<dc:creator>Elm Creek Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859601</guid>
		<description>Almost forgot the ice storms in the winter when everyone else gets snow. Last January we were without power for a week, and all the wires in our neighborhood are underground. It&#039;s pretty bad when the GRDA transmission lines get taken down by ice.

ECS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost forgot the ice storms in the winter when everyone else gets snow. Last January we were without power for a week, and all the wires in our neighborhood are underground. It&#8217;s pretty bad when the GRDA transmission lines get taken down by ice.</p>
<p>ECS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elm Creek Smith</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859600</link>
		<dc:creator>Elm Creek Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859600</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On December 18th, 2009 at 2:51 pm, tre said: 
If you’re a looney, leftwing liberal, then you wouldn’t like it here. It’s hot during the summer. We get thunderstorms and tornados. In fact, the worst tornado in world history struck Oklahoma City in 1999. Everybody has guns.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And we carry them concealed. I also just got a series 581 Ruger Mini-14 as my Christmas rifle. Doesn&#039;t everybody get a Christmas rifle?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Everybody drives trucks and SUVs. You just wouldn’t like it here, so stay away.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ditto.

ECS
Owasso, Cherokee Nation, I.T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On December 18th, 2009 at 2:51 pm, tre said:<br />
If you’re a looney, leftwing liberal, then you wouldn’t like it here. It’s hot during the summer. We get thunderstorms and tornados. In fact, the worst tornado in world history struck Oklahoma City in 1999. Everybody has guns.</p></blockquote>
<p>And we carry them concealed. I also just got a series 581 Ruger Mini-14 as my Christmas rifle. Doesn&#8217;t everybody get a Christmas rifle?</p>
<blockquote><p>Everybody drives trucks and SUVs. You just wouldn’t like it here, so stay away.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ditto.</p>
<p>ECS<br />
Owasso, Cherokee Nation, I.T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin.musculus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859579</link>
		<dc:creator>martin.musculus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859579</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read whats here, passing through, I really have a hard time reading the boards now-a-days... and I read such things as surprise at Liebermann, that ignorance abounds in the younger voters (note: almost everyone is a &quot;younger voter&quot; to me... [grin]), and I am simply in amazement...

Why? Why are you surprised?

As for Liebermann -- (NB: I don&#039;t care if I&#039;m mispelling his name...) 
He&#039;s always operated this way. What has changed? His lips kiss you while the stilletto slips between the ribs... As most of our current cockroachs infesting both Houses do.

And King Cockroach... He&#039;s a &quot;&lt;em&gt;man on a mission&lt;/em&gt;&quot;. I don&#039;t care what anyone says, he&#039;s true to his beliefs. Just because his belief is enslavement fo all, it doesn&#039;t change that fact. And that is why he&#039;s getting what he wants. He really believes in the Evil that seeds his soul.

Honest disagreement is ok, but until we stop the &lt;strong&gt;LOTE&lt;/strong&gt;-ing around, we&#039;ll keep sliding into enslavement.

It is good seeing The People rise up and fight this. I hope that we can change this by voting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read whats here, passing through, I really have a hard time reading the boards now-a-days&#8230; and I read such things as surprise at Liebermann, that ignorance abounds in the younger voters (note: almost everyone is a &#8220;younger voter&#8221; to me&#8230; [grin]), and I am simply in amazement&#8230;</p>
<p>Why? Why are you surprised?</p>
<p>As for Liebermann &#8212; (NB: I don&#8217;t care if I&#8217;m mispelling his name&#8230;)<br />
He&#8217;s always operated this way. What has changed? His lips kiss you while the stilletto slips between the ribs&#8230; As most of our current cockroachs infesting both Houses do.</p>
<p>And King Cockroach&#8230; He&#8217;s a &#8220;<em>man on a mission</em>&#8220;. I don&#8217;t care what anyone says, he&#8217;s true to his beliefs. Just because his belief is enslavement fo all, it doesn&#8217;t change that fact. And that is why he&#8217;s getting what he wants. He really believes in the Evil that seeds his soul.</p>
<p>Honest disagreement is ok, but until we stop the <strong>LOTE</strong>-ing around, we&#8217;ll keep sliding into enslavement.</p>
<p>It is good seeing The People rise up and fight this. I hope that we can change this by voting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reshas1</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859569</link>
		<dc:creator>reshas1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859569</guid>
		<description>My aunt sent this to the RNC awhile back, maybe it helped..


Our party could turn the tables on Democrats who accuse Republicans of being the &#039;Party of NO!&#039;.
Being a member of the &#039;Party of No!&#039; should be worn as a badge of honor.
 
These are some of this administration&#039;s policies we say NO! to:
 
        No to: Massive spending bills passed without debate, or even being read.
        No to: Zero transparency or accountability on how the money is being spent.
        No to: A huge expansion of nanny government without the consent of the governed.
        No to: Our form of government being changed at warp speed into Socialism.
        No to: The idiocy of not using American resources to meet America&#039;s energy needs.
        No to: A Cap and Trade bill that will lower the standard of living of every American by onerous
                  taxes. (Except the opportunists who fabricated the scam and are now set 
                  to reap billions from it)
        No to: The destruction of our health system. 
        No to: Explosion of the national debt. 
        No to: Nationalization of private companies
        No to: The destruction of wealth and redistribution of what&#039;s left.
        No to: Policies which have resulted in an unemployment rate that hasn&#039;t topped out yet. 
        No to: The bailouts - banks, AIG, automakers, etc.       
 
Republicans must be the &#039;PARTY OF NO&#039; to stop the obscene power grab by this out of control government
or we will witness the end of the most successful form of government the world has ever known. It will
be replaced by a form of government in which power is restricted to a few. That is known as an oligarchy.
 
The simple phrase, the &#039;Party of NO!&#039; should resonate with Republicans, Independents, and even some
Democrats who didn&#039;t realize what Obama meant by &#039;change.&#039;
 
I am proud to be a member of the &#039;Party of No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My aunt sent this to the RNC awhile back, maybe it helped..</p>
<p>Our party could turn the tables on Democrats who accuse Republicans of being the &#8216;Party of NO!&#8217;.<br />
Being a member of the &#8216;Party of No!&#8217; should be worn as a badge of honor.</p>
<p>These are some of this administration&#8217;s policies we say NO! to:</p>
<p>        No to: Massive spending bills passed without debate, or even being read.<br />
        No to: Zero transparency or accountability on how the money is being spent.<br />
        No to: A huge expansion of nanny government without the consent of the governed.<br />
        No to: Our form of government being changed at warp speed into Socialism.<br />
        No to: The idiocy of not using American resources to meet America&#8217;s energy needs.<br />
        No to: A Cap and Trade bill that will lower the standard of living of every American by onerous<br />
                  taxes. (Except the opportunists who fabricated the scam and are now set<br />
                  to reap billions from it)<br />
        No to: The destruction of our health system.<br />
        No to: Explosion of the national debt.<br />
        No to: Nationalization of private companies<br />
        No to: The destruction of wealth and redistribution of what&#8217;s left.<br />
        No to: Policies which have resulted in an unemployment rate that hasn&#8217;t topped out yet.<br />
        No to: The bailouts &#8211; banks, AIG, automakers, etc.       </p>
<p>Republicans must be the &#8216;PARTY OF NO&#8217; to stop the obscene power grab by this out of control government<br />
or we will witness the end of the most successful form of government the world has ever known. It will<br />
be replaced by a form of government in which power is restricted to a few. That is known as an oligarchy.</p>
<p>The simple phrase, the &#8216;Party of NO!&#8217; should resonate with Republicans, Independents, and even some<br />
Democrats who didn&#8217;t realize what Obama meant by &#8216;change.&#8217;</p>
<p>I am proud to be a member of the &#8216;Party of No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purealchemy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859564</link>
		<dc:creator>purealchemy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859564</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I agree with Alan Keyes who said that Obama’s support of leaving born alive infants to die shows that Obama’s conscience is seared&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The fact that Obama could defeat Alan Keyes for Illinois senator when Keyes obviously won their televised debate on so many levels and is truly an African-American, really makes me fear for this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I agree with Alan Keyes who said that Obama’s support of leaving born alive infants to die shows that Obama’s conscience is seared</p></blockquote>
<p>The fact that Obama could defeat Alan Keyes for Illinois senator when Keyes obviously won their televised debate on so many levels and is truly an African-American, really makes me fear for this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorro</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859551</link>
		<dc:creator>zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859551</guid>
		<description>As futile as it may sound, 10 of us called Specter and Casey&#039;s offices in DC expressing our desire that they vote NO on socialized health-care.  I will continue to call them and urge them to consider the will of their constituents, vote NO.  I doubt these liberals will heed our requests but we must not falter in our counter-insurgency.  We the People will be Victorious in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As futile as it may sound, 10 of us called Specter and Casey&#8217;s offices in DC expressing our desire that they vote NO on socialized health-care.  I will continue to call them and urge them to consider the will of their constituents, vote NO.  I doubt these liberals will heed our requests but we must not falter in our counter-insurgency.  We the People will be Victorious in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITookTheRedPill</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859546</link>
		<dc:creator>ITookTheRedPill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859546</guid>
		<description>On December 18th, 2009 at 5:20 pm, jamesgreenidge said: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Often overlooked is Obama percentage approvals are massively skewed by a “blind black bedrock” 90%+ race favoritism vote for him — no matter what issue. Be VERY interesting to see if it’s possible to filter this factor out and see the race-free “true” percentages of any poll!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Have you seen the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/demographic_notes_barack_obama_approval_index&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Demographic notes&lt;/a&gt; on the Rasmussen Obama Approval Index?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Seventy-two percent (72%) of Democrats now offer their approval while 80% of Republicans disapprove. Among voters not affiliated with either major party, just 36% approve. 

Seventy-seven percent (77%) of liberals approve while 76% of conservatives disapprove. The bad news for the President is that there are a lot more conservatives in the country than liberals. However, he gets a bit of a boost because 57% of moderate voters still offer their approval. 

The President earns approval from 37% of White voters and 98% of African-American voters. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

OK, so...

Overall, 44% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President&#039;s performance. 

And...

Seventy-two percent (72%) of Democrats now offer their approval 

And...

Seventy-seven percent (77%) of liberals approve 

And...

&lt;b&gt;The President earns approval from&lt;/b&gt; 37% of White voters and 
&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;98% of African-American voters&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/b&gt; 

So tell me, who is racist???

Don&#039;t tell me that 98% of &quot;African-American&quot; voters approve of President Obama because they are Democrats or because they are Liberals.  

Democrats and Liberals only approve of Obama at the rate of 72% and 77%, respectively.  

What accounts for that &lt;strong&gt;98% approval&lt;/strong&gt; from &quot;African-American&quot; voters?  If it&#039;s not attributable to just political party and/or political ideology, what&#039;s left?

It&#039;s pretty obvious that that 98% approval is due to &quot;African-American&quot; voters judging Obama by the color of his skin.

So, I ask again, &lt;a href=&quot;http://itooktheredpill.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/whos-racist/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;WHO&#039;S RACIST???&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

-Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t care about the color of Obama&#039;s skin.  I have always disapproved of Obama because of the content of his character. 

I agree with Alan Keyes who said that Obama&#039;s support of leaving born alive infants to die shows that Obama&#039;s conscience is seared.

(On repeated occasions, Obama opposed the Born Alive Infant Protection Act in Illinois).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 18th, 2009 at 5:20 pm, jamesgreenidge said: </p>
<blockquote><p>Often overlooked is Obama percentage approvals are massively skewed by a “blind black bedrock” 90%+ race favoritism vote for him — no matter what issue. Be VERY interesting to see if it’s possible to filter this factor out and see the race-free “true” percentages of any poll!</p></blockquote>
<p>Have you seen the <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/demographic_notes_barack_obama_approval_index" rel="nofollow">Demographic notes</a> on the Rasmussen Obama Approval Index?</p>
<blockquote><p>Seventy-two percent (72%) of Democrats now offer their approval while 80% of Republicans disapprove. Among voters not affiliated with either major party, just 36% approve. </p>
<p>Seventy-seven percent (77%) of liberals approve while 76% of conservatives disapprove. The bad news for the President is that there are a lot more conservatives in the country than liberals. However, he gets a bit of a boost because 57% of moderate voters still offer their approval. </p>
<p>The President earns approval from 37% of White voters and 98% of African-American voters.
</p></blockquote>
<p>OK, so&#8230;</p>
<p>Overall, 44% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President&#8217;s performance. </p>
<p>And&#8230;</p>
<p>Seventy-two percent (72%) of Democrats now offer their approval </p>
<p>And&#8230;</p>
<p>Seventy-seven percent (77%) of liberals approve </p>
<p>And&#8230;</p>
<p><b>The President earns approval from</b> 37% of White voters and<br />
<b><em>98% of African-American voters</em>.</b> </p>
<p>So tell me, who is racist???</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t tell me that 98% of &#8220;African-American&#8221; voters approve of President Obama because they are Democrats or because they are Liberals.  </p>
<p>Democrats and Liberals only approve of Obama at the rate of 72% and 77%, respectively.  </p>
<p>What accounts for that <strong>98% approval</strong> from &#8220;African-American&#8221; voters?  If it&#8217;s not attributable to just political party and/or political ideology, what&#8217;s left?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty obvious that that 98% approval is due to &#8220;African-American&#8221; voters judging Obama by the color of his skin.</p>
<p>So, I ask again, <a href="http://itooktheredpill.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/whos-racist/" rel="nofollow"><b>WHO&#8217;S RACIST???</b></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.</p>
<p>-Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t care about the color of Obama&#8217;s skin.  I have always disapproved of Obama because of the content of his character. </p>
<p>I agree with Alan Keyes who said that Obama&#8217;s support of leaving born alive infants to die shows that Obama&#8217;s conscience is seared.</p>
<p>(On repeated occasions, Obama opposed the Born Alive Infant Protection Act in Illinois).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeakEasy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859541</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeakEasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859541</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On December 18th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, Flyoverman said:Good for Coburn. As far as I am concerned it is time for “bayonets and &lt;strong&gt;entrenching tools&lt;/strong&gt;.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh yeah. Weapons of opportunity. Good stocking stuffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On December 18th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, Flyoverman said:Good for Coburn. As far as I am concerned it is time for “bayonets and <strong>entrenching tools</strong>.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh yeah. Weapons of opportunity. Good stocking stuffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesgreenidge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/18/coburn-defends-the-party-of-no-durbin-blasts-styptic-hearted-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-859538</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesgreenidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=40445#comment-859538</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On December 18th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, thejim said:&lt;/strong&gt;
Anybody but me wonder who makes up the “40%” (Rassmussen poll) that favor/supports the National Health Care bill being proposed?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Often overlooked is Obama percentage approvals are massively skewed by a &quot;blind black bedrock&quot; 90%+ race favoritism vote for him -- no matter what issue. Be VERY interesting to see if it&#039;s possible to filter this factor out and see the race-free &quot;true&quot; percentages of any poll!

James Greenidge
Queens NY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>On December 18th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, thejim said:</strong><br />
Anybody but me wonder who makes up the “40%” (Rassmussen poll) that favor/supports the National Health Care bill being proposed?</p></blockquote>
<p>Often overlooked is Obama percentage approvals are massively skewed by a &#8220;blind black bedrock&#8221; 90%+ race favoritism vote for him &#8212; no matter what issue. Be VERY interesting to see if it&#8217;s possible to filter this factor out and see the race-free &#8220;true&#8221; percentages of any poll!</p>
<p>James Greenidge<br />
Queens NY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

