See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #201
   On January 1st, 2010 at 5:50 pm, zyzzyg said:

   On January 1st, 2010 at 3:46 pm, emjem24 said: #188

   Sigh… wow, I hit a nerve (I guess). Given, you don’t know me at all and your propensity to get out of shape over some of the more humorous, non-relevant things that MM mentions about Obummer, I’ll take your criticism with a grain of salt.

   I am not talking about what MM says, I am talking about what you said about me. Your assertion from Post #73 regarding me is false.

   Moreover, me knowing you, or you knowing me is not the issue. The issue is your bald face untrue assertions. I don’t need to know you to realize that you are a liar when your posted words speak for themselves.

   I think you’ve also appointed yourself the arbiter of what is and isn’t relevant Obummer criticism. I think much of what you say can be over-the-top. You seem invested in being devil’s advocate. Again…. you tend to project what you want on the rest of us who don’t bend to your expectations.

   Stop thinking.

   I’ve not appointed myself anything. Just like everyone here, I have an opinion, and I give it. Yet, you continue think and to make unfounded assertions that mischaracterize and misrepresent the facts.

   Actually, you “implied” ODS on several people who post on this blog. You also make assertions you cannot always back up (especially concerning the motivations and decisions of the current administration).

   Nope. I implied nothing. I actually said that people who post on this blog suffer from ODS.

   You have to prove that I made assertions that I cannot backup with regard to the current Administration.

   Cut and paste, cut and paste.

   Listen, cutting and pasting to support your assertions is like adding footnotes to a paper. You just can’t say things without backing them up.

   I’m a scurvy liar? In what way? You’ve accused certain threads and certain posts of meeting ODS criteria so perhaps, you shouldn’t be too hasty in calling me or others you disagree with “scurvy liars.”

   Yes you are a liar. Read Post #135 again. It explains how I concluded that you lied, and are a liar.

   You attributed to me things that are simply untrue. I challenged you to prove your assertion, and you still haven’t. Not only have you lied, but you are not even addressing the lie.

   What has me saying someone has ODS got to do with you lying? Maybe other than givng you the opportunity to take a tangent and avoid providing some substance to back up your claim in Post #73 about me.

   And, I was hardly hasty in calling you a liar. Besides, the element of time is irrelevant. When you lie, you lie, and that will always be the case. It is timeless.

   Moreover, I did not call others a scurvy liar. I called you a scurvy liar. Yet, another opportunity to substantiate your claim by cutting and pasting where I did say such a thing about others. Though I doubt you will because I have never called anyone other than you a scurvy liar. See you lied again.

   I have not called anyone a liar for disagreeing with me. In fact re-read Post #135 and note that I agreed with you that I have said people have ODS.

   And, stop hiding behind others.

   There are a LOT of us who don’t like this president with good reasons. Dial down your emotional hysteria for a moment to realize that you’re accusing me of the same things that you often do.

   Fine. Like the President, or not. I say, as I always have, take him to task over substance, or in words, for “good reasons.”

   Nope. I do not lie. Nor, do I make unfounded assertions. You lie. You make unsubstantiated assertions. You are making them now, for goodness sakes.

   Then again, I’m accused of being a “scurvey liar” by someone who has some trouble with the truth himself.

   Emjem, you are liar. I never said the things you attributed to me in Post #73. I challenged you to prove it. You can’t, can you? And, that makes you a liar.

   As for me having trouble with the truth, prove it. Cut and paste it.

   I am still willing to accept your apology.

   Until then, you are and remain a liar.

2. #202
   On January 1st, 2010 at 8:38 pm, NC BLUE said:

   Happy New Year Michelle and all the patriots on this blog. I hope the good Lord pours out his blessings on all of you and your families in 2010. I am grateful that Rush will be back to spread the truth about this great country. Keep up the good work all.

3. #203
   On January 1st, 2010 at 9:08 pm, changer1701 said:

   Lord, some people need help. I strongly disagree with Lefty pundits and so forth, but I’d never write them and include such filth.

4. #204
   On January 1st, 2010 at 9:17 pm, xblade said:

   …cuz no man would want you.

   Clearly the opinion of a man who is into men.

5. #205
   On January 1st, 2010 at 9:35 pm, MtsEdge said:

   Public shaming, especially when these emails were sent in a somewhat private manner, will win absolutely no one.

   Sorry, I disagree. In fact, public shaming is a very effective way to discourage bad behavior. Our society has gotten away from the concept of shame, and spends way too much time trying to shield little darlings from the consequences of their behavior. I think that’s why Sheriff Joe is so popular with law-abiding citizens.

   Michelle’s post is kind of like putting these miscreants into a 21st century stocks, where good folks can throw virtual tomatoes at them.

   P.S. NCBLUE, thank you. I add my own wish for a Happy and blessed New Year to all the patriots!!

6. #206
   On January 1st, 2010 at 9:40 pm, 24Klady said:

   I understand the reluctance to report threats and accusations made via e-mails, but if the TSA can seek out bloggers for sending out an airline memo that everyone and their brother knew the contents – someone needs to step on creeps for these kind of threats. There is a fine line between between hate mail and being a stalker.

   MM – hope you’ve covered your tracks to not easily be tracked by these nutroots. Either a big dog or a full security system is in order – in lieu of either, run to your nearest firing range and learn to use the biggest thing your small arm can fire.

7. #207
   On January 2nd, 2010 at 1:43 am, shimauma2 said:

   And since when has SHAME not been an effective way to change individual behavior, if only by stopping it by making it too emotionally painful to continue

   Well said. It’s the lack of shame that got this country in the condition it’s been in since jimmy carter showed his belly to the the terrorists. Actually, it may have even gone as far back as the 60′s hippys’ free love and drugs. We all know those pervs grew up to become politicians and college professors who use therapy to justify their sins.

8. #208
   On January 2nd, 2010 at 3:47 am, Photios said:

   Ah, feel the liberal™ love.

   I hope that you all have a healthy and prosperous new year, despite the best efforts of our incompetent government.

9. #209
   On January 2nd, 2010 at 11:14 am, longhorn734 said:

   But I have also noted that liberal are more apt to attack persons and avoid issues.

   As a practicing Muslim (who is married to a Catholic and takes pride in helping people of all faiths) who frequents this site, I beg to differ.

   I’d love to see a top ten of hateful comments to this site side by side with these disgusting emails. There are just as many vile, disgusting conservatives as there are vile, disgusting liberals.

10. #210
    On January 2nd, 2010 at 5:41 pm, Tantor said:

    Didja ever notice how lefties always mix sex and politics? If they hate something, and they hate a lot, they always hate in sexual terms. You can’t help but think that these are people with deep-seated sexual problems which they are acting out in public.

11. #211
    On January 2nd, 2010 at 6:31 pm, BruceB said:

    What is so funny and stupid is that they give their names.

    “Hey bob. saw your post on MM site. Can’t have any like that working for me.Bad for business. Your fired.”

12. #212
    On January 2nd, 2010 at 7:04 pm, happy2behere said:

    Is it possible to call someone a liar in less than 1,000 words? Can you please stop abusing the “cut/paste/comment” format? Enough already!

13. #213
    On January 2nd, 2010 at 7:32 pm, shooter said:

    2010 – We might need to start with grounding some of the children.

14. #214
    On January 3rd, 2010 at 7:56 am, underjl said:

    Michelle, this is enough show the far left for what it really is, and it is everything it accuses conservatives of but a lot worse.

    Just based on what you’ve posted here, it’s quite clear to me that this should prompt DHS to do another study–this time on the potential threat from the left, characterized by people who strongly support Obama, who verbally assault those who don’t.

    This makes Nancy P’s rantings about tea parties even more of a sick joke.

15. #215
    On January 3rd, 2010 at 7:59 am, underjl said:

    Follow-up to my last.

    If possible, get more mileage out of this and expose the left for what it really is — ignorant, ill-informed, academically lazy, anti-intellectual, dishonest, racist.

    It’s the very worst American has to offer, and it’s in control of the government.