See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On January 8th, 2010 at 5:35 pm, spaceycakes said:

   mrcakes says that Carville looks like someone in the middle of becoming an anaconda.

2. #102
   On January 8th, 2010 at 8:12 pm, jangar said:

   mrcakes says that Carville looks like someone in the middle of becoming an anaconda.

   Yoda with a circumcision gone bad.

3. #103
   On January 9th, 2010 at 1:33 pm, Member-VRWC said:

   In the video Hannity states that he would feel safer getting on an airplane if everyone had to go through a scanner because that would eliminate the chance of another panty bomber. So he is willing to be further inconvenienced for the perception of increased security.

   Hey, Sean, that’s all you get from this scanning device idea — the perception of, not actual, increased security. Talk about the ultimate in PC. As MM is wont to say, “CRIKEY!!!”

   When are you willing to understand that most of the people who fly on airplanes have no intention of causing anyone bodily harm and that to screen everyone equally is a complete waste of time and money. We should be focusing on people who fit a profile of those who have demonstrated a propensity to cause bodily harm. That doesn’t include you, Sean, or anyone’s grandmother.

   And, Sean, since you are willing to be subjected to a full body scan, let me ask you this. When do you draw the line? If the next attempt at blowing up an airplane is done by someone who crammed explosives us his a$$, are you willing to be subjected to a full cavity search before boarding an airplane just so you can fall asleep and snore?

   Enough of the PC already. It provides NOTHING in the way of security.