Here comes another multi-billion-dollar Green Jobs boondoggle

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 8, 2010 01:08 PM

Gird your loins.

The latest job numbers are out and they’re worse than expected.

Which means it’s time for another White House green jobs boondoggle campaign:

The White House pitched Friday’s jobless report as the start to stabilization while President Barack Obama planned to push for another $5 billion to help create much-needed jobs.

Obama planned an afternoon event to announce more government spending to create tens of thousands of green jobs as the nation is weighed down by an unemployment rate stuck at 10 percent. He also was expected to reiterate the administration’s call for an additional $5 billion in spending for clean energy manufacturing.

Last month, Vice President Joe Biden first proposed that expansion of the clean technology program, which would require Congress to act.

As I noted yesterday, “Green Jobs” really should be called “Purple Jobs” — for the SEIU and Big Labor beneficiaries of the enviro-slush fund.

A reminder of what the green jobs black hole cost Spain:

Every “green job” created with government money in Spain over the last eight years came at the cost of 2.2 regular jobs, and only one in 10 of the newly created green jobs became a permanent job, says a new study released this month. The study draws parallels with the green jobs programs of the Obama administration.

President Obama, in fact, has used Spain’s green initiative as a blueprint for how the United States should use federal funds to stimulate the economy. Obama’s economic stimulus package,which Congress passed in February, allocates billions of dollars to the green jobs industry.

But the author of the study, Dr. Gabriel Calzada, an economics professor at Juan Carlos University in Madrid, said the United States should expect results similar to those in Spain:

“Spain’s experience (cited by President Obama as a model) reveals with high confidence, by two different methods, that the U.S. should expect a loss of at least 2.2 jobs on average, or about 9 jobs lost for every 4 created, to which we have to add those jobs that non-subsidized investments with the same resources would have created,” wrote Calzada in his report: Study of the Effects on Employment of Public Aid to Renewable Energy Sources.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:14 pm, happy2behere said:

    Betcha few people (if any) can name a “green jobs” company that makes a profit for their investors, either.

  2. #2
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:15 pm, Thomas said:

    We’re screwed 08!

  3. #3
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:15 pm, granite said:

    Once again;
    dangerous, America-hating, opposite worldview-holding idiots pouring gasoline on a fire that they started in the first place.

  4. #4
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:16 pm, letget said:

    I don’t suppose this bho ever thought of giving tax breaks to small businesses, who hire people, with the 5b he wants to spend on green crud jobs? IS NOT gonna happen!
    L

  5. #5
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:30 pm, xler8bmw said:

    STOP THE F******G SPENDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. #6
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:35 pm, cheapseat said:

    what the hell is a green job? at this point americans are looking for jobs which provide them with some green. carter 1 kept pumping this crap, solar and wind power. that was before 1980, yet 30 years later carter 2 is still pumping this pipe dream of the professorial class, and it still can’t operate effectively. if you want to be cold, in the dark, and without mobility, GO GREEN!

  7. #7
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:39 pm, John Deaux said:

    B flat.

    It’s just one note and I can keep on striking it.

  8. #8
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:41 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Tonight where I live it the quarter moon, no wind, and -15 degree Fahrenheit.

    Oh ya, solar and wind are going to keep me warm……

  9. #9
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:47 pm, rambler said:

    This is what happens when an administration is filled with public sector employees. None have any private sector experience. Jobs don’t grow on trees and can’t be printed like money. Bho has surrounded himself with people who are impressed with their own intelligence. True brilliance is obvious. The fact that these clowns have to continue to remind us of their billiance proves that they have none. It’s time for true action, which won’t happen with Bho et al.

  10. #10
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:47 pm, Uplander said:

    Green Jobs; Green Weeny.
    We need ‘Real Jobs’ that contribute to the strength of our Republic.

  11. #11
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:49 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    More like Gangrene Jobs.

  12. #12
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:54 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    what the hell is a green job?

    green job n. (grēn jäb)

    1) Any job created by the government; i.e., any job that causes 2 to 3 real jobs to be lost by it’s creation. 2) Parasitic organisms; i.e. mold, mildew, pus

  13. #13
    On January 8th, 2010 at 1:58 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    the U.S. should expect a loss of at least 2.2 jobs on average, or about 9 jobs lost for every 4 created

    In Dem math, this is a plus. Besides, we just print the money right – it won’t be inflationary or anything…

  14. #14
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:02 pm, stevevvs said:

    If only we followed Austrian Economic Theory…….

  15. #15
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:02 pm, stevevvs said:
  16. #16
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:03 pm, revolution said:

    Let’s turn to our leader:

    ARESNIO STEELE!!!

    BTW, Arsenio gave himself a solid “B” for his performance as head of the RNC.

    “Ladies and genltemen. Please welcome Arrrseniooooooooooooo Steele!”

    “Yo, what up dog! Give it up fo my new shoes! Tonight we gonna have Prince and the Revolution, baby! Give it up fo Prince, now! Ah right. Then we gonna have some…”

  17. #17
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:07 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Pure idiocy.

    They spend money repaving or widening highways instead of providing incentives for business that will create sustainable jobs.

    Seriously, did you notice how many paving projects have been underway? I bet more than you normally see. Your Tax Dollars going to waste.

    happy2behere said: #1

    Betcha few people (if any) can name a “green jobs” company that makes a profit for their investors, either.

    Your suspicions are likely correct. And if someone were to find a “green business” in the black, you’d also find that they’ve been subsidized with tax dollars to get there. Ya know…. more money like that $5 Billion Obama wants to dole out.

    Oh… wait a minute…. Has China Ok’ed this $5 Billion? Though we’re on the hook to pay it back, it’s was their money originally. Maybe we should ask them first.

  18. #18
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:09 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    TooMuchTime said:

    green job n. (grēn jäb)

    1) Any job created by the government; i.e., any job that causes 2 to 3 real jobs to be lost by it’s creation. 2) Parasitic organisms; i.e. mold, mildew, pus

    LOL.. sad but all too true. Good one.

  19. #19
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:12 pm, xler8bmw said:

    Let’s remmeber it failed miserably in Spain and historically always fails…..oh wait Obama and crew don’t care about historical failures.

    http://www.cnsnews.com/Public/Content/Article.aspx?rsrcid=46453

  20. #20
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:24 pm, jangar said:

    Obama planned an afternoon event to announce more government spending to create tens of thousands of green jobs as the nation is weighed down by an unemployment rate stuck at 10 percent. He also was expected to reiterate the administration’s call for an additional $5 billion in spending for clean energy manufacturing.

    Clearly, he has no intention of leading this country out of the economic crisis we are in.

    So how’s that Hope&Change going for YOU Obama voters?

    Seriousness aside, the last green job I saw was the one I coughed up after quitting smoking.

  21. #21
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:25 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    The stimulus is necrotic, time to excise!

  22. #22
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:31 pm, jangar said:

    stevevvs said:
    If only we followed Austrian Economic Theory…….

    You mean like numbnutz in Kalifornia?

  23. #23
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:32 pm, PerturbedOne said:

    “Green Jobs”?…….Soylent Green is people!

  24. #24
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:37 pm, Coregis said:

    I would rather have the stimulus paying for road and bridge improvements that can have a positive impact on the economy (both because of the pay to the workforce, as well as improved travel times, etc.) than I would these green jobs that are nearly always money losers and don’t benefit anyone but a few well-placed investor. The idea of a public good is lost with green job.

  25. #25
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:42 pm, jangar said:

    I would rather have the stimulus paying for road and bridge improvements that can have a positive impact on the economy

    Any Federal stimulus dollars must be matched with state dollars, collected by increasing your taxes. I would rather they quit with this $h!t right now and we have an election.

  26. #26
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:49 pm, Uplander said:

    @stevevvs
    Yeppers. Go von Mises. Go Hayek.
    @Jangar, different Austrian.
    ‘Human Action’,
    ‘The Fatal Conceit’
    ‘The Road To Serfdom’

  27. #27
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:53 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    If one had to waste $800 billion dollars, hiring white male contruction workers to fix the roads would be better than nothing. You’d at least have some better roads.

    But as Robert Reichhhhhh recommended to Charlie Rangel, the stimulus had to avoid white male contruction workers.

    Most of the stimulus spent so far, from my understanding, has been given to states running deficits so they don’t have to tighten their belts, ie, lay off useless SEIU and AFSCME union leeches.

    Ahnold in California wants the money earned by hard working people in the US so Kahleefornya doesn’t have to trim its bloated state government.

  28. #28
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:55 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    The tragedy in all of this is that the obamanites wouldn’t know an innovation if it hit them in the face. Get rid of the taxes and regulations that punish business formation and get out of the way of the innovators and inventors. The problem is that all of these politicians are about power and control – and as a result they hate individual freedom.

  29. #29
    On January 8th, 2010 at 2:57 pm, vinny said:

    “Green Jobs”

    All those human batteries were employed in “green” jobs. Come to think of it, world described in the Matrix is exactly what a socialist utopia would look like. People are employed by the state, they function to benefit the state, and they all share some delusional dream.

  30. #30
    On January 8th, 2010 at 3:20 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    NEWS FLASH!!!!

    Obama is going to spend more money he doesn’t have.

    . . . good thing he had a press conference to announce he’s going to spend more money again.

  31. #31
    On January 8th, 2010 at 3:20 pm, Coregis said:

    At least roads produce a tangible product used by us commoners!

  32. #32
    On January 8th, 2010 at 3:23 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    green job n. (grēn jäb)

    1) Any job created by the government; i.e., any job that causes 2 to 3 real jobs to be lost by it’s creation. 2) Parasitic organisms; i.e. mold, mildew, pus

    See “snow job”.

  33. #33
    On January 8th, 2010 at 3:27 pm, jangar said:

    See “snow job”.

    Related – “blow job”.

  34. #34
    On January 8th, 2010 at 3:29 pm, jangar said:

    The tragedy in all of this is that the obamanites wouldn’t know an innovation if it hit them in the face. Get rid of the taxes and regulations that punish business formation and get out of the way of the innovators and inventors.

    But where would the money come from for the Obama voter welfare do-nothings?

  35. #35
    On January 8th, 2010 at 3:40 pm, happy2behere said:

    NJ-Aviator – about a year ago I did some research to see if there were any green industry companies worth looking at for investment. Some professional info I received said there weren’t any at the time.

    Yet, I keep seeing websites and blogs cheerleading for the green industry. So I blog back and ask, “Name one green industry company that makes a profit for its investors.” And not yet have I received a reply. Doesn’t mean none exist, but it sure silences the cheerleaders.

  36. #36
    On January 8th, 2010 at 3:40 pm, Uplander said:

    Highway jobs jobs are temporary jobs best handled by the State Highway Departments, or as Governor of New Mexico once said’What is orange and sleeps 4?
    Answer ‘a DOT truck’.
    The decrepit state of highways is closely related to a state’s dependence on federal funds for maintenance. When that responsibility is handled by the State regardless of Federal involvement there is much more consistency. Check Michigan, the essense of too much dependence on ‘Large Central Budgeting’. Is there anything in the Constitution about Highway construction?
    The first 6,000 miles of road in this country were privately owned and maintained.

  37. #37
    On January 8th, 2010 at 3:45 pm, jangar said:

    “Name one green industry company that makes a profit for its investors.” And not yet have I received a reply.

    And you won’t. They are all primarily subsidized by the US Government. Even Pickens was smart enough to pull his money out.

  38. #38
    On January 8th, 2010 at 3:52 pm, happy2behere said:

    Sorry – Green industry company = a profit driven business whose primary function is to make, manufacture, resell, provide, or install products that substanially reduce energy consumption.

  39. #39
    On January 8th, 2010 at 3:53 pm, happy2behere said:

    Jang, you’re probably right.

  40. #40
    On January 8th, 2010 at 4:17 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    The picture in this post is a prime example of Astroturfing.

    Who paid for all the green helmets?

    Also, note how the signs being held up are not unique, hand-made signs (like the ones at the 9/12 Tea Party were), but rather manufactured signs that were distributed to the (likely paid) “demonstrators”.

  41. #41
    On January 8th, 2010 at 4:18 pm, cicerokid said:

    Green Jobs boondoggle

    How do you make a handkerchief dance? You blow a little boogie in it. they have picked my pocket, might as well them them pick my nose, too. There’s a green job for you!

    Government Jobs Overtake Goods-Producing Jobs.

    This can’t be good.

  42. #42
    On January 8th, 2010 at 4:55 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    The real “green jobs” plan would be to use the $billlion$ to start building NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS. Start by outlawing the useless licensing requirements and building 1 tested design–a lot like France did 35 years ago.
    ***
    Provide cheap power–defund our country’s enemies–Iran, Russia, Venezuela. Defund the Saudi government that uses the profits of oil sales to build terrorist training Madrassas all over the world–and in our country.
    ***
    Drill Here–Drill now.
    ***
    The bottom line would be real jobs, real infrastructure improvement, real reduction of greenhouse gases. And lower energy prices for all.
    ***
    Nahhh–just a bad dream. Let’s throw the $billion$ down the “green dream” rathole again–for no real benefit to anyone–except to “democrat” / liberal / socialist / statist / marxist / communist Comrade Obama (PBUH) and his congressional / government ilk and supporters.
    ***
    My Chihuahua can come up with a better and cheaper plan than the Messiah can. And she works for dog food.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  43. #43
    On January 8th, 2010 at 5:21 pm, Hangfire said:

    On January 8th, 2010 at 4:55 pm, rocketman said:
    My Chihuahua can come up with a better and cheaper plan than the Messiah can. And she works for dog food.

    Your Chihuahua is smarter than my Basset Hound, and uses less fuel.

  44. #44
    On January 8th, 2010 at 5:26 pm, sims said:

    at 2:53, Ed Mahmoud abu alKahoul said:

    Yes, Wisconsin is one of the states who used stimulus $ to close the deficit gap so as not to lay off gov’t workers. The budget is still not balanced, even with $2.2B from the Feds. Gov. Doyle(D)WI will not be running for re-election. He is joining the other Dem rats leaving the sinking ship of American fiscal irresponsibility. “Kahleefornya” isn’t alone in bloated state government.

  45. #45
    On January 8th, 2010 at 5:33 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, Agree with Rocketman. Build Nuclear Plants with the billions being currently pissed away and send depleted uranium tipped MOABs to all our pals overseas. Closed loop system!

  46. #46
    On January 8th, 2010 at 5:37 pm, Regulus said:

    I was watching Glenn Beck’s show a few days ago, and he illustrated on his chalkboard the folly of “green jobs” by pointing out where they would really go: not to America, with its built-in obstacles in the form of EPA/DEQ/OSHA/labor unions/lawyers, but instead to China — where all they have to do is erect the factory, round up the child labor, and start rolling out the solar panels.

    When 3/4 of our economy depends on nothing more than consumer spending, and when the only growth industry here is government, we’re past the point of no return on our way over the waterfall.

    “Green jobs” fantasies notwithstanding, in 21st Century America the only thing we “manufacture” is Americans — and we import a lot of them, too.

  47. #47
    On January 8th, 2010 at 5:38 pm, sims said:

    at 4:55, rocketman said:

    YES!
    Not only is it the “green jobs rathole”, me thinks it will be another “Fortress Singapore” or “Maginot Line”; a big fat fantasy that will be revealed by a catastrophy (like Iran getting nukes and oil prices going upward of $400 per barrel).

  48. #48
    On January 8th, 2010 at 6:01 pm, Blackstone said:

    From Michelle’s first link:

    “The economy is in a rough situation,” Labor Secretary Hilda Solis acknowledged in an interview with The Associated Press. She said she thinks companies are reluctant to ramp up hiring because they’re waiting to see what new stimulative steps the government might take to provide relief.

    This is exactly why the economy won’t recover until we get sane people in government who’ll tell businesses not to wait for government to hand out goodies, because it ain’t gonna happen. Time to break the cycle of addiction.

  49. #49
    On January 8th, 2010 at 8:06 pm, jangar said:

    Your Chihuahua is smarter than my Basset Hound, and uses less fuel.

    …smaller carbon footprint and reduced emissions.

  50. #50
    On January 8th, 2010 at 8:10 pm, southsideironworks said:

    If green jobs(in the current context) were the future, someone would already be doing it.

    Barack “Quixote” Obama will tilt at windmills until the money is all gone.

  51. #51
    On January 8th, 2010 at 8:36 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    She said she thinks companies are reluctant to ramp up hiring because they’re waiting to see what new stimulative boneheaded steps the government might take to provide relief further hurt the economy.

    FIFY

  52. #52
    On January 8th, 2010 at 8:51 pm, jangar said:

    She said she thinks companies are reluctant to ramp up hiring because they’re waiting to see what new stimulative boneheaded steps the government might take to provide relief further hurt the economy…and their investment.

    FIFY x2

  53. #53
    On January 8th, 2010 at 10:57 pm, bjc said:

    *Hey P-BO, please get out of the way and let the free market create REAL jobs; We have lost millions of jobs permanently thanks to you, with no end in sight; Who needs a “Katrina” when we have this disaster nationwide thanks to P-BO and his Communist Clown Cluster.
    *Windmills and Solar will not heat my home in these frigid winters; We continue to need REAL energy!

  54. #54
    On January 9th, 2010 at 4:03 am, Papa Louie said:

    the U.S. should expect a loss of at least 2.2 jobs on average, or about 9 jobs lost for every 4 created

    Obama doesn’t care about jobs lost. He only counts jobs “created or saved”.

    The original stimulus bill was supposed to create green jobs. How well did that work? Why should we set aside money for more of the same? It all seems to be going down a big green hole. When we stop subsidizing these green jobs won’t they disappear along with the money we spent?

    “You know, these people have a constant tendency to see what is not working and say, let’s double down on it. …only government is able to look at something that is a complete failure and say, what we need is more of it.”

    – Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, Jul 8, 2009

  55. #55
    On January 9th, 2010 at 4:19 am, Papa Louie said:

    President Obama is leading an extreme left-wing crusade to bankrupt America“, McCain says in one of the radio ads his campaign is airing.

    That’s what McCain is saying today. But what did he say in 2008 when he was running against Obama and his words actually counted for something?

    “You have nothing to fear from an Obama presidency.”
    – John McCain, Oct 10, 2008

    I’m glad to see that McCain is no longer blinded by the light radiating from The One. I only wish it had happened sooner.

  56. #56
    On January 9th, 2010 at 8:41 am, cheapseat said:

    THE U.S. NOW HAS MORE GUBMINT EMPLOYEES THAN PEOPLE WHO BUILD THINGS, MINE THINGS, MAKE THINGS, GROW THINGS, AND MANUFACTURE THINGS. NO WONDER WE NEED “GREEN JOBS”. WHEN EVERY PERSON IN THE U.S. THAT PRODUCES ANYTHING HAS TO CARRY ONE UNION OVERPAID OVER PENSIONED UNDER WORKED GUBMINT (_*_) ON HIS BACK, WE NEED TO TURN THOSE HEMERROIDS INTO SOYLENT GREEN.

  57. #57
    On January 9th, 2010 at 9:21 am, RobM1981 said:

    Can you imagine being one of the 85,000 people who just lost their job – never mind the MILLIONS already out of work – and hear your “leader” say “we’re on the right course?”

    Barack Obama has taken to channeling Baghdad Bob. “Name it and claim it” isn’t leadership.

    And how cold does it have to get before this imbecile realizes things aren’t getting warmer? How many more eMails have to leak, showing that the “proven science” was made up? How many more times does China, or current creditor of choice, have to flip him the bird and choose a meeting with BRAZIL over Barry before he realizes that his “global group hug” is now the laughing-stock of realpolitik?

    He is a *total* failure, but I truly don’t believe he knows it. I believe he has surrounded himself so completely with yes men and NBC affiliates, he doesn’t realize that the jig is up. More than half of the populace see him for the incompetent, NON-intellectual, empty suit that he really is.

    If/when he finally learns of this, he is going to go fetal. His thin skin and narcissism will overload. I’m expecting Nixon-Strength paranoia.

    Watch for nervous tic’s in the next 12 months. This clown is GOING to find out what people really think about him, and he is NOT going to handle it well.

  58. #58
    On January 9th, 2010 at 9:34 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Papa Louie said:
    That’s what McCain is saying today. But what did he say in 2008 when he was running against Obama and his words actually counted for something?

    But Papa Louie NOW the Senator is saying “Dear Friends please send money-Help, I have fallen and I can’t get up“. As soon as Life Alert is made of recycled materials I shall send him one.
    Senator Lindsey Graham is pushing Green and receiving HuffingtonPost praise.
    There are indeed uses and places for wind and solar energy-those uses will expand with evolving technology. And that will have nothing to do with the Green movement, McCain, Graham or Blue Lips w/ears.

  59. #59
    On January 9th, 2010 at 10:42 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    I’ve almost finished Sarah Palin’s GOING ROGUE book. She has some very good insights into energy policy–and a good track record on her work with the Alaska to U.S.A. border area gas pipeline and gas sources.
    ***
    We need an honest, clear sighted person like her to help fix this energy mess. SARAH’CUDA for POTUS, JOHN BOLTON for VP–the America First ticket.
    ***
    Let’s put Comrade Obama (PBUH) and his ilk onto “funemployment” in 2010 and 2012–FIRE THEM! Let’s get some return on our energy money spending.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  60. #60
    On January 9th, 2010 at 11:29 am, 24Klady said:

    Someone remind me of the definition of insanity again….something about doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

    In just about every family I know, someone is out of work and it’s placing a hardship on everyone. Those unemployed are not on the public dole, they’re being supported by family or friends. Many are professionals and have seen their jobs either outsourced or lost to an H1-b holder. It’s criminal but we keep buying that crap from China and employing millions from or in India for IT work. If this isn’t a time to check ourselves I don’t know when that moment will come?

  61. #61
    On January 9th, 2010 at 7:25 pm, ScottyDog said:

    If Barry Soetoro aka Obama wanted to create jobs all he would have to do is allow oil drilling on all federal lands and open up the offshore oil leases that have been denied by the Federal Government.

    No need to build useless wind mills that will have no impact on the job market.

    If he was really serious he could put a moratorium on H1B visas and enforce the borders.

    I know I am dreaming….

  62. #62
    On January 10th, 2010 at 1:15 am, T J Green said:

    Planned obsolescence? Naw, far more frustrating… Intelligent Inefficient Design.

  63. #63
    On January 10th, 2010 at 8:39 am, Buy Danish said:

    As David Horowitz quipped here, “Green jobs are a patronage system for Communists”.

  64. #64
    On January 10th, 2010 at 10:20 am, happyscrapper said:

    Want green jobs??? Build nuclear power plants!!! DUH. Soon, we will be stuck with no means of heating our homes during the coming ice age. And why? The short-sightedness of the environmental wackos who haven’t figured it out…if you obstruct every single source of power…we will die. Wind and solar are not the answer and everyone knows it. The libs love to emulate Europe, yet France uses nuclear big time and apparently that is a no-no. How is all this obstructionism working out for us, folks? Isn’t it TIME to take our country back from the environmentalists? They have had way too much power over our lives and they are going to destroy us.

  65. #65
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:26 am, cheapseat said:

    TODAYS AP STORY, ROAD AND BRIDGE JOBS DON’T EFFECT THE UNEMPLOYMENT NUMBERS. SHOVEL READY, IS JUST PATRONAGE READY.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook