House ethics committee foxes guard the corruptocrat henhouse

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 11, 2010 09:55 AM

Guess how many members of Congress — a swamp teeming with tax cheats, conflict of interest-laden wheeler-dealers, and corner-cutters– have been punished by the House ethics committee?

Zero, zip, nada:

Nearly three years after Congress approved sweeping ethics rules to “drain the swamp,” as incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi put it, no member of Congress has been punished for wrongdoing.

In that time, allegations of sexual misconduct and financial impropriety have been lodged against lawmakers. The most serious rebuke in the past year: a “letter of qualified admonition” to Sen. Roland Burris, D-Ill., after the Senate ethics panel concluded he misled lawmakers and inappropriately offered to raise campaign funds for then-governor Rod Blagojevich as Burris sought the Senate appointment. “Three years later, it’s the same old, same old,” said Melanie Sloan of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

Democrats took control of the House of Representatives in January 2007 and quickly approved ethics rules that barred lawmakers from taking gifts or meals from lobbyists and their clients. The action came largely in response to the scandal of former lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who pleaded guilty to providing gifts to public officials in exchange for favors.

Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said lawmakers are held to the “highest ethical standard” and pointed to the independent Office of Congressional Ethics as one example.

The office, authorized in March 2008, vets complaints and sends them to the House ethics committee for final action. It launched 25 investigations during the first nine months of 2009, the most recent data available. Nine were sent on to the ethics committee for further action.

The committee has acknowledged 10 pending cases, including an inquiry into Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., and whether he failed to disclose rental income and improperly solicited donations for a public service center named in his honor. Spokesman Emile Milne said Rangel “looks forward to the conclusion of the review he himself requested.”

On the right, Judicial Watch recently named its Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians, including House Reps. Barney Frank, Charlie Rangel, Nancy Pelosi, Jack Murtha, and Jesse Jackson, Jr.

On the left, CREW’s most corrupt list includes Murtha, Rangel, Jackson, Jr., Rep. Alan B. Mollohan (D-WV), Rep. Laura [Deadbeat] Richardson (D-CA), Rep. Pete Visclosky (D-IN), Rep. Maxine [OneUnited Bank] Waters (D-CA), and Rep. Don [Pork King] Young (R-AK).

The Culture of Corruption boomerang has returned to smack the donkeys right back in the face.

Countrywide Sen. Chris Dodd won’t be the last to lose his office.

***

Commenter Flyoverman quips: “The only ethics committee with any clout is an informed electorate.”

Amen.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:02 am, Misscheryl said:

    They all need to be voted out! Criminals everyone and enough with robbing the American tax payer coffers. What I would like to see done with these people, I’d be arrested for saying..but I’ll say it anyway. They all need to be lined up in a firing squad and shot for being the traitors they are. Since we can’t shoot them, vote them out!

  2. #2
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:08 am, Flyoverman said:

    “Birds of a feather……”

    The only ethics committee with any clout is an informed electorate.

    Why would they punish anyone whose conduct is no different than theirs? If you expect Congress to police itself, you are expecting virtue among whores.

  3. #3
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:13 am, xler8bmw said:

    Term Limits

    Now they need to serve the rest of their terms in jail as well as a few more for good measure.

  4. #4
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:15 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    OF COURSE there’s been no punishments! There’s nothing to punish since this is the “most ethical Congress evah!”
    /Pelosi-bot mode off

  5. #5
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:16 am, JusDreamin said:

    The only ethics committee with any clout is an informed electorate.

    Well said Fly.
    Thanks for the lists Michelle

  6. #6
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:16 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    Did the House “Ethics” Committee ever take any action against former Louisiana Congressman William “Dead Fish” Jefferson? Or was the only action taken against him legal?
    ***
    But it’s O.K.–since the evil republicans also do this stuff–they are just “gitten some for themselves”–to “hep out the poor people”!
    ***
    TERM LIMITS NOW–and vote out all democRATs, corrupticans, and RINOS. An Equal Opportunity Texas style pointy toe cowboy BOOT IN THE A** for these crooks.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  7. #7
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:17 am, cheapseat said:

    puhhhleese; you want these crooks to start pointing fingers at themselves? how many lawyers sue other lawyers for malpractice? 95% of these congresscritters are lawyers. they all know that they hang together, or they hang separately. they won’t even slap a crook like jefferson on the wrist until he is convicted despite overwhelming evidence of bribery and corruption. the only way to drain that swamp is for americans to start doing their duty, and voting these corrupt (_*_)s out, even if they are your congressman and your party. IF THEY STINK, FIND A LESS ODIFEROUS LIAR AND PUT HIM/HER IN FOR A WHILE. THIS CROWD REEKS.

  8. #8
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:17 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Now they need to serve the rest of their terms in jail as well as a few more for good measure.

    I don’t remember where I read it, but someone mentioned that Congress-critters should be limited to 2 terms: 1 in Congress, 1 in prison.

  9. #9
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:23 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    House ehtics

    is added to

    Republican leadership

    as my favorite oxymorons

  10. #10
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:24 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    The corruption is so wide and deep they dare not get too involved, probe too deeply. Now there is plenty of time and interest in smacking down Joe Wilson for his You Lie outburst-that they will not tolerate. In a House of liars lying must not be noted. That Obama had just referred to his critics as Liars was not noted.

    I fear there are all too many Republicans afraid to pry open this can of worms. Every two years the people have a chance to replace a House member-it is up to them.

  11. #11
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:25 am, RedDog said:

    There’s got to be a way the states can do an end around the statists in DC. This is nuts. We have to shut them down. Their actions are tantamount to a soft coup of the US government.

  12. #12
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:27 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:08 am, Flyoverman said:
    “Birds of a feather……”

    The only ethics committee with any clout is an informed electorate.

    Why would they punish anyone whose conduct is no different than theirs? If you expect Congress to police itself, you are expecting virtue among whores negro dialect form a light-skined Obama.

    FIFY

  13. #13
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:27 am, Savage24 said:

    The way I understood it, the so called House Ethics Committee took bribes from Charlie Rangel just before they were to investigate him. Corruption runs rampant in this government and this is the year we should vote every one out of office. Vote all incumbents out even the ones that are not corrupt because they allow this corruption to exist.

  14. #14
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:29 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Dexter Alarius said:
    I don’t remember where I read it, but someone mentioned that Congress-critters should be limited to 2 terms: 1 in Congress, 1 in prison.

    AKA: the Illinois plan ;)
    They are moving the Governor’s mansion next to Stateville prison to save gas.

  15. #15
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:33 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said lawmakers are held to the “highest ethical standard” and pointed to the independent Office of Congressional Ethics as one example.

    In other words, “Once you lose integrity, the rest is a peice of cake.”

  16. #16
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:38 am, walterc said:

    This years bumper sticker:
    “Re-elect No One 2010.”

  17. #17
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:42 am, JammieWearingFool said:

    Another day, another corrupt Democrat.

    Add Gary Ackerman to the list.

  18. #18
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:42 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:25 am, RedDog said:

    There’s got to be a way the states can do an end around the statists in DC. This is nuts. We have to shut them down. Their actions are tantamount to a soft coup of the US government.

    Vote them all out! It’s just not hard to vote against the incumbent. Even if the Dems don’t do it, if Republicans do it, they end up with a better party. That’s the key problem with “our side” at the moment. They are just as bad.

  19. #19
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:43 am, Uplander said:

    “The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that you’ve got it made.”
    Jean Giraudoux
    (French diplomat, dramatist, & novelist (1882 – 1944))

  20. #20
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:45 am, Uplander said:

    I know this is off topic but.
    My Medicare premium just went up 325%. Thank You Mr President.

  21. #21
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:52 am, Flyoverman said:

    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:42 am, JammieWearingFool said:
    Another day, another corrupt Democrat.

    Add Gary Ackerman to the list.

    It would seem more efficient to simply put them all on the list and then identify the few that are not corrupt.

    You know, like finding ten righteous people in Sodom.

  22. #22
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:54 am, JammieWearingFool said:

    It would seem more efficient to simply put them all on the list and then identify the few that are not corrupt.

    A Herculean task finding the Democrat who isn’t corrupt.

  23. #23
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:57 am, Flyoverman said:

    A Herculean task finding the Democrat who isn’t corrupt.

    true…..true….

  24. #24
    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:58 am, SpeakEasy said:

    I have never understood why our representatives are not viewed the same as the military; If you serve for 20 years you get a pension of half of your highest salary. If you commit a crime, you are released. If you are released for committing a crime you forfeit your pension.

    Cutting the pensions to 50%, even before instituting the 20 year rule, would save a lot of money in itself and is something we could do immediately.

  25. #25
    On January 11th, 2010 at 11:07 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:38 am, walterc said:

    This years bumper sticker:
    “Re-elect No One 2010.”

    That would look just peachy next to my Dump McCain bumper sticker.

    From Zazzle and ScurvyDawg
    SAVE AMERICA!RE-ELECT NO ONE! BUMPER STICKERS

    Note:
    Got to get a bigger bumper.

  26. #26
    On January 11th, 2010 at 11:24 am, dan708 said:

    It’s long been true; Dems don’t punish other Dems and Repubs don’t punish other Repubs. I don’t know any other solution besides voting them out. Problem is, there are too many sheeple in this country (and especially here in PA) who just keep voting in the same old stale names.

  27. #27
    On January 11th, 2010 at 11:33 am, b-cat said:

    Dems don’t punish other Dems and Repubs don’t punish other Repubs.

    Not true. Repubs get run out of town when they get caught in a scandal. Dems get protected.

  28. #28
    On January 11th, 2010 at 11:36 am, Lindsay said:

    Thanks for staying with this, Michelle.
    Continue holding their smelly feet to the fire!

  29. #29
    On January 11th, 2010 at 11:45 am, granite said:

    On January 11th, 2010 at 11:33 am, b-cat said:

    Not true. Repubs get run out of town when they get caught in a scandal. Dems get protected.

    I just do not know if that is 100% accurate; but, it sure is close enough for me to say, “Correct”.

  30. #30
    On January 11th, 2010 at 11:45 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:45 am, Uplander said:
    I know this is off topic but.
    My Medicare premium just went up 325%. Thank You Mr President.

    …and there is a marriage penalty built in too.

  31. #31
    On January 11th, 2010 at 11:47 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    …sorry. Not in Medicare but into the health “care” bill.

  32. #32
    On January 11th, 2010 at 12:59 pm, walterc said:

    On-my-soap-box said:

    …and there is a marriage penalty built in too.

    And yet the gays still want to get married.

    Bizarro World indeed.

  33. #33
    On January 11th, 2010 at 1:21 pm, Blackstone said:

    On January 11th, 2010 at 11:24 am, dan708 said:

    Problem is, there are too many sheeple in this country (and especially here in PA) who just keep voting in the same old stale names.

    That’s because they bring home the bacon to their respective districts. It’s corruption of the voters. Term limits won’t help, because Congressmen with clout will simply appoint successors and confer their clout on them. What we need (besides voters who refuse to give away their birthright for a bowl of porridge) is a President who’ll declare all-out war on pork. That’s part of why I “held my nose” in 2008 and voted for McCain. As atrocious as he is on so many other issues, he at least seemed to put his money where his mouth was when it came to stopping earmarks.

  34. #34
    On January 11th, 2010 at 2:02 pm, JustAThought said:

    On January 11th, 2010 at 10:54 am, JammieWearingFool said:

    It would seem more efficient to simply put them all on the list and then identify the few that are not corrupt.

    A Herculean task finding the Democrat who isn’t corrupt.

    The truly IMPOSSIBLE task is finding a politician, Democrat, Republican or Independent, that doesn’t have at least SOME of each of the following traits:

    1) Liar
    2) Thief
    3) Philanderer
    4) Compromised morals
    5) Low-priced integrity

  35. #35
    On January 11th, 2010 at 2:16 pm, denver republican said:

    Guess how many members of Congress — a swamp teeming with tax cheats, conflict of interest-laden wheeler-dealers, and corner-cutters– have been punished by the House ethics committee?

    Zero, zip, nada:

    I’m surprised it’s that many.

  36. #36
    On January 11th, 2010 at 2:49 pm, rambler said:

    None of them is ethical, since the bar was set at ground level. Vote them all out! None of them should have a pension plan. That is one of the reasons that we have career politicians. They don’t deserve a retirement plan when it comes out of our pocket. They screw us when they are in power and they screw us when they retire.

  37. #37
    On January 12th, 2010 at 2:20 am, Papa Louie said:

    Nearly three years after Congress approved sweeping ethics rules to “drain the swamp,” as incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi put it, no member of Congress has been punished for wrongdoing.

    What’ll ya bet that left-wing pundits in the not-to-distant-future will use that fact to praise Nancy Pelosi? They will point to the statistic that no members of Congress were punished as proof that it WAS the most ethical Congress in history.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook