The state of Obama’s dis-union

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 27, 2010 09:49 AM

My syndicated column today torches President Obama’s fiscal freeze follies. A new CBO reports says the year-old Porkulus will now cost $75 billion more than originally estimated. Which is why the White House is scrambling to de-emphasize its spending discipline pose and talk about something else. Anything else. Like new legislation “restricting foreign corporations from getting involved in federal election.” More money for schools. Bio-terrorism. The teleprompter will roll and Obama will try and muster up a “new tone.” But no matter how many times he recites his rote promise to “fight for you,” it’s obvious Obama has lost his “swagga.” He’s only one year into his tenure and already musing openly and repeatedly about being a one-term president — a rhetorical crutch that’s even annoying his ideological bedfellows on the Left. What should the GOP do? Many think he deserves praise for paying cynical lip service to cutting spending and reducing the size of government. As I note in the column below, I’m in the “bury” camp.

***

The Spender-in-Chief’s fiscal freeze follies
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2010

There are more loopholes in President Obama’s proposed “spending freeze” than in an Olympic volleyball net. Gargantuan government entitlements (Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid) are exempt. A half-trillion in unspent stimulus money is exempt. Foreign aid is exempt. The Democrats’ proposed $154 billion jobs bill (Stimulus II) is exempt.

Pet federal education programs will be exempt (including $4 billion for the White House “Race to the Top” standards initiative and an additional $1.35 billion he just requested in the 2011 budget). Green jobs spending will be exempt (Obama proposed $10 billion in new clean energy spending earlier this month). Electorally-driven tax credit expansions will be exempt. The health care takeover plan is not included. As even the New York Times reported, the “estimated $250 billion in savings over 10 years would be less than 3 percent of the roughly $9 trillion in additional deficits the government is expected to accumulate over that time.”

Which amounts to a molecule in a drop of the ocean of red ink in which American taxpayers have been drowning.

The current Spender-in-Chief unveiled details of this lofty new work of political fiction on Monday with more fanfare than a new Twilight title. It was supposed to be the centerpiece of the State of the Union address. But by Tuesday morning, President Obama’s illusion of fiscal discipline had been shredded left, right, and center. By Tuesday afternoon, irritated White House spokesman Robert Gibbs was already downplaying the gimmickry. It’s just something Obama will “mention,” Gibbs bristled.

After campaign videos of Obama repeatedly deriding “hatchet”-wielding spending freezes spread like Kudzu across the Internet, official White House blogger Jared Bernstein tried to control the widespread hypocrisy charges:

“During the campaign, you may recall that John McCain touted option 1 – the hatchet approach of an across-the-board freeze. The President was critical of that approach then, and we would be critical of it now. It’s not what we’re proposing. To the contrary, the entire theory of the President’s proposed freeze is to dial up the stuff that will support job growth and innovation while dialing down the stuff that doesn’t. Under our plan, some discretionary spending will go up; some will go down. That’s a big difference from a hatchet.”

…President Obama deeply understands the various imperatives of this moment in time, even if they don’t always point in the same direction.

So, he had a hatchet on Monday when he wanted headlines praising his return to austerity in the wake of the GOP’s Massachusetts Senate victory; a scalpel on Tuesday when he needed to mollify the big government Left. What will he wield at the State of the Union address on Wednesday night? A variable-speed Dremel rotary tool?

Some conservative Beltway analysts are cheering Obama’s fiscal freeze follies as a step in the right direction, a rhetorical victory, and a “good start.” Pardon me for not joining in the standing ovation for the latest performance of White House Kabuki theater. Praising the president for carrying on the charade of budget reform because a few piddly cuts are real is like complimenting the Naked Emperor’s fingernails: So, he didn’t have any clothes. At least his cuticles were real. It’s a start!

Moreover, who believes this freeze will last for the entire, cynically-timed three-year period that the White House announced less than 72 hours ago? McDonald’s French Fries have a longer shelf life than Obama’s pledges of fiscal accountability. All it’ll take is one more bad jobs report, one Chicken Little Congress-induced panic, to drop the budget restrictions faster than reality dad Jon Gosselin’s ex-girlfriends.

One year after riding into town on a wave of adulation and ambition, Obama has lost his “swagga.” His pre-State of the Union appearances have been listless and perfunctory. His dependence on a teleprompter – even for a standard, 6-minute stump statement at an elementary school — is now the butt of universal mockery. And his political machine has been forced to lay down enough fake Astroturf support to cover a football field. This is the time to nail the phonies in the White House, not to beg for meetings in hopes of bipartisan problem-solving. There’s little triumph in Obama’s empty “concessions” on the need to cut spending. They are fueled not by sincere commitment to reining in Washington’s appetites, but by craven political self-preservation. The president has lately regressed into his “I will fight for you” campaign sloganeering — by which, of course, he means, “I will fight for me.” There will be no hands reaching across the aisle. Obama’s too busy using them to point fingers at everyone else for his own political meltdown.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On January 27th, 2010 at 9:59 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    In short… ‘fail‘.

    .. even annoying his ideological bedwettingfellows on the Left.

    FIFY

  2. #2
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:00 am, no2pcbs1 said:

    the state of the union teleprompter driven line of bs, will be more of zero’s lies. two things zero can be counted on being consistent, lying and accepting responsibility for nothing.

  3. #3
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:05 am, JHSII said:

    I will point out that there never has been a hand reaching out across the aisle from Obama – unless it’s been balled into a fist.

  4. #4
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:05 am, walterc said:

    I heard someone a couple weeks ago (Beck maybe?) say Obama running the country was akin to the captain of the Titanic backing up after hitting the iceberg and then going full speed ahead to ram it again and claim “we’re moving forward.”

    That’s what it feels like to me.

  5. #5
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:07 am, JHSII said:

    I won’t be watching the STFU speech from Obama tonight – because that’s what I’ve been getting from his regime since even before day 1.

  6. #6
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:08 am, backwoods conservative said:

    I wonder if he’ll wear a tie this time.

  7. #7
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:10 am, babiesgrandma said:

    Once again: You Lie!

  8. #8
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:14 am, GraniteMan said:

    The chickens are coming home to roooooossssstt! Oh, if only the media had asked even simple questions of this unknown from the cesspool of Chicago politics instead of being cheerleaders.

  9. #9
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:16 am, Flyoverman said:

    HOW TO START EACH DAY WITH A POSITIVE OUTLOOK
    1. Open a new file in your computer.
    2. Name it ‘All Politicians’
    3. Send it to the Recycle Bin.
    4. Empty the Recycle Bin.
    5. Your PC will ask you: ‘Do you really want to get rid of ‘All Politicians?’
    6. Firmly Click ‘Yes.’
    7. Feel better?

  10. #10
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:17 am, Savage24 said:

    We will get another hour of lies from Obama, 15 munutes of the State of the Union,and 45 minutes of his insufferable ego. Then another two hours from the media pundits telling us what he said. All you have to remember is the “you got me” attitude of this clown.

  11. #11
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:19 am, MacEamonn said:

    Did anyone else hear that even Christopher Buckley has appearently come to his senses on Barry O? Here is a link to his satirical look at tonight’s State of the Union Speech: The Audacity of Oops
    by Christopher Buckley

  12. #12
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:22 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    … and he announced canceling the moon mission. They’ve spent over $30 billion in climate research in order to scare us into believing the hoax that the world was going to end if we didn’t stop burning coal and gasoline but a mission to return to the moon? Naaa, in Obama’s ‘mind’ money spent on NASA’s REAL job wouldn’t do anything for him so it’s a waste.

  13. #13
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:27 am, Speakup said:

    You lie!
    Joe Wilson

    All together now.

  14. #14
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:27 am, nail49 said:

    Obama’s too busy using them to point fingers

    Note to Obama: Next time you go pointing fingers of blame, note how many of your own fingers are pointing right back at you…

    http://www1.free-clipart.net/cgi-bin/clipart/directory.cgi?direct=clipart/Hands&img=12

  15. #15
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:27 am, NC BLUE said:

    I—-I—–I—–I—–I—-I—-I—-I—-I—-I—-. and George Bush sucks. Thank You and —-Bless America. Fill in the blanks. I can’t stand seeing or listening to this lying sack of s###.

  16. #16
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:30 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    What will he wield at the State of the Union address on Wednesday night? A variable-speed Dremel rotary tool?

    How about a ‘Slap Chop!’ from the ShamWow Guy?

  17. #17
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:34 am, iamsaved said:

    He’ll be doing the put your right foot in, hokey-pokey thing tonight attempting to fool all of the people all of the time with his “moderate” stance on issues. The “populist” thing.

    The hot air that kept this empty suit standing in place has vacated and I think the suit is about to crumble to the floor.

  18. #18
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:34 am, happyscrapper said:

    Obama will try to spin and will end up making a total fool of himself. This can’t possibly go well for him. I plan to watch. I don’t want to miss a single minute of this buffoon’s demise.

  19. #19
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:39 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:34 am, happyscrapper said:
    Obama will try to spin and will end up making a total fool of himself. This can’t possibly go well for him. I plan to watch. I don’t want to miss a single minute of this buffoon’s demise.

    I don’t plan to watch, I’ve already seen the “Hindenburg”

    “Oh, the humanity!”

  20. #20
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:43 am, DBNinKY said:

    …the President’s proposed freeze is to dial up the stuff that will support job growth and innovation while dialing down the stuff that doesn’t.

    Well then dial down all of it Mr. B, because at ten percent unemployment (~18% actual), none of it is working!

    Timely article, MM!

  21. #21
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:44 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    I don’t see how Comrade Obama (PBUH) can present anything meaningful about his first year in office. His statist / socialist / communist actions have damaged our economy and prolonged our recession. His actions on national security have emboldened our country’s enemies and made more terrorist attacks more likely. His wild spending on worthless projects continues to damage our financial situation. No meaningful action on achieving energy independence has been taken–but the money is being thrown down the “green” energy toilet. And don’t mention the 10+ percent unemployment rate.
    ***
    Now The Messiah will try to convince us that after increasing government spending by 20 percent and racking up $Trillons more in future debt–in a recession yet–that a few percent “reduction” in spending will fix everything!
    ***
    Any car dealer doing this stuff would be put out of business for violating the truth in advertising laws. And he might end up in jail also.
    ***
    Yes–I am going to watch another great Messiah Teleprompter event. And I won’t believe a word of it. EPIC FAIL! And this C**P SANDWICH won’t go down better with hot sauce or spicy mustard either.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  22. #22
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:46 am, TigerLady said:

    I don’t plan to watch. I’d rather have a root canal….on all my teeth. What’s he going to say? More “uh” and lies. I’ve heard enough of his lies.

  23. #23
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:48 am, zyzzyg said:

    So much is going here.

    Yep, the spending cuts do not amount to much, but it is a spending cut. Maybe, just maybe, spending cuts will begin to feel good, and it might become a habit for both the Administration and Congreed and transfer to earmarks, also not much of a percentage of spending, but a journey that begins with one small step.

    As for the the hatchet thing, he has been consistent. Calling it hatchet Monday and scalpel Tuesday is more about how the media characterized the leaks. Notice the abscence of quotes about what ‘he wanted’.

    Everyone has their own agenda and puts forth their spin based on that agenda. Heck, there were tax cuts associated with the stimulus but they are often ignored. Yep, they were small, but they were still tax cuts.

    I wish there were a media outlet that said, we were leaked information on what the President will say at the SOTU, but we are withholding it until he actual delivers it. We will not be spun, nor will we spin, or be used as a flag pole to raise that flag and see who salutes.

  24. #24
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:53 am, happyscrapper said:

    Yep, the spending cuts do not amount to much, but it is a spending cut. Maybe, just maybe, spending cuts will begin to feel good, and it might become a habit for both the Administration and Congreed

    I assume you are joking…right?

  25. #25
    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:58 am, granite said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:48 am, zyzzyg said:

  26. #26
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:00 am, granite said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:58 am, granite said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:48 am, zyzzyg said:

    #25 was not an inadvertent, premature click.

    Rather, it was an accurate, pithy statement.

  27. #27
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:04 am, SpeakEasy said:

    Zyzzyg,
    Raising the spending limit, twice, and then freezing it is not much of a cut now is it? Don’t fall for the BS. Here’s a clue, when his lips start moving he is lying.

    It is important to remember that, as with water, when you freeze some things they actually expand. I am looking for a serious contraction in government spending, not a freeze on the highest limits yet.

  28. #28
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:11 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Rogue Cheddar said:
    How about a ‘Slap Chop!’ from the ShamWow Guy?

    But that is not all! He’ll double this monstrosity for FREE! Just pay separate shipping and handling.

    And Christopher Buckley can pound sand-the wimp made his choice-let him live with it. “I was for Bambi before I was against Bambi” does not impress.

  29. #29
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:12 am, docflash said:

    During the speech tonight the networks need to have someone in a corner of the screen ring a bell everytime he says (I).They can call it a created job.

  30. #30
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:22 am, Marshall Russ said:

  31. #31
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:24 am, J S Ragman said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:30 am, Rogue Cheddar said:
    What will he wield at the State of the Union address on Wednesday night? A variable-speed Dremel rotary tool?

    Hey, Rogue

    Get the tools!

  32. #32
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:28 am, zyzzyg said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:53 am, happyscrapper said: #24

    I assume you are joking…right?

    Don’t assume because it makes an . . . well, you know the rest.

    And, no I am not joking. The longest journey does begin with one step. Maybe, this small cut will lead to other cuts, maybe even larger cuts.

  33. #33
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:30 am, Laree said:

    The State of the Union “Rescue,Restore, Rebuild. Mr Spock makes his move.

    “When the men on the chessboard
    Get up and tell you where to go”

  34. #34
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:32 am, NC BLUE said:

    Obama is a TOOL!!!!

  35. #35
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:35 am, Marshall Russ said:

    Problems with the link above. Couldn’t write a comment.

    Only in liberal fantasy land can a president be invited to the House of Reps. and not say you’re sorry for not doing what needed to be done and, not be fired.

  36. #36
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:35 am, dan708 said:

    My Dem-leaning local paper usually publishes just one MM column a week. I doubt if this will be the one. Too bad.

  37. #37
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:36 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    zyzzyg: Yep, the spending cuts do not amount to much, but it is a spending cut. Maybe, just maybe, spending cuts will begin to feel good, ..

    happyscrapper said: I assume you are joking…right?

    I assumed LSD.

  38. #38
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:39 am, Marshall Russ said:

    I planned on throwing away a million dollars this year! I decided not to do that because I don’t have it. I saved a million dollars this year already!!! I am so smart, I can hardly stand myself!!!

  39. #39
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:40 am, Truesoldier said:

    Here is the best way to sum up the so called spending cuts:

    Liberal programs = exemptions

    The only thing that will get spending cuts will be things that Obama disagrees with or that disagree with him. Here is a start to the list:

    1. CIA = cuts
    2. FBI terrorist investigations = cuts
    3. Abstinence education = cuts
    4. Imigrationn enforcement = cuts
    5. Justice Department prosecution of liberals conducting voter fraud (ACORN) or voter itimidation (NBPP) = cuts

    Feel free to add to the list

  40. #40
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:40 am, zyzzyg said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:04 am, SpeakEasy said: #27

    Zyzzyg,
    Raising the spending limit, twice, and then freezing it is not much of a cut now is it? Don’t fall for the BS. Here’s a clue, when his lips start moving he is lying.

    It is important to remember that, as with water, when you freeze some things they actually expand. I am looking for a serious contraction in government spending, not a freeze on the highest limits yet.

    You have a valid point. I agree that larger more substantiative cuts would be a good thing.

    Think back to all the hyperventilating that went into cancelling the Jet that was not used in Iraq or Afghanistan, (the name of the Jet escapes me at this point).

    We, yes the America people and our representative, are like crack addicts. We have to be weaned.

    Sometimes it is two steps forward and one step backwards. I prefer to be positive and support the decision. And, will continue to be positive and continue to support cuts, and more cuts, and more cuts. And yes, even when it might be my sacred cow gets gored.

    We must get used to cuts and this is a small step. Albeit a very small step, of hopefully larger cuts to come.

  41. #41
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:43 am, Truesoldier said:

    zyzzyg: Yep, the spending cuts do not amount to much, but it is a spending cut. Maybe, just maybe, spending cuts will begin to feel good, ..

    and soon there will be unicorns frolicking in the grassy fields with rainbows and butterfly’s were the children play and a chocolate river running nearby where the children can stop and have a tasty treat while sitting on gumdrop cushions….

  42. #42
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:44 am, MarcoPolo said:

    This is why lawyers shouldn’t run the economy. We need business people in those chairs.

  43. #43
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:46 am, John Deaux said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:48 am, zyzzyg said:

    Did you cut and paste that from Ellie Light’s next letter?

  44. #44
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:52 am, tiredofit08 said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:16 am, Flyoverman said:

    HOW TO START EACH DAY WITH A POSITIVE OUTLOOK
    1. Open a new file in your computer.
    2. Name it ‘All Politicians’
    3. Send it to the Recycle Bin.
    4. Empty the Recycle Bin.
    5. Your PC will ask you: ‘Do you really want to get rid of ‘All Politicians?’
    6. Firmly Click ‘Yes.’
    7. Feel better?

    only thing I’d add is ‘All Politicians 2010/2012″ otherwise excellent!!

  45. #45
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:53 am, SpeakEasy said:

    I agree with your overall optomism, but my point was this is not really a “cut.” If I stole $100 from you then gave you $20 back, would you thank me for the $20 or have me arrested for the $80? If your answer is thank me, please include your banking information.

  46. #46
    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:59 am, thejim said:

    I doubt many citizens tune in for another b/s teleprompter address. The media can’t even resell it with their endless “recaps”. The whole Obambi mess is headed in the right direction; Down the toilet. Now, if only we had real Patriots in leadership positions, people that actually cared about the country, not just about their own careers and staying in office.

  47. #47
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:08 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 10:48 am, zyzzyg said:
    So much is going here.

    Yep, the spending cuts do not amount to much, but it is a spending cut. Maybe, just maybe, spending cuts will begin to feel good,

    Who are you kidding! Teh Awesome Won and the rest of the Dems would rather take a cheese grater to their nethers!

    :shock: !

    Hey! That’s another tool! Maybe he’ll use a cheese grater!

  48. #48
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:09 pm, Southpaw said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:40 am, Truesoldier said:
    Here is a start to the list:

    1. CIA = cuts
    2. FBI terrorist investigations = cuts
    3. Abstinence education = cuts
    4. Imigrationn enforcement = cuts
    5. Justice Department prosecution of liberals conducting voter fraud (ACORN) or voter itimidation (NBPP) = cuts

    Feel free to add to the list

    He cancelled the moonlanding project.
    Obama: Yes we can. No we can’t.
    He does realize he just lost the state of Florida in 2012, doesn’t he?

  49. #49
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:10 pm, iamsaved said:

    One area Obama will cut spending and will have as much effect as freezing white house salaries will be closing all DOJ investigations against Democrat or Democrat supporting crooks.

    As for the White House freeze, he didn’t go far enough – he could cut the entourage for the lady in waiting and quit paying his czars.

  50. #50
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:16 pm, BOB said:

    I’m going to a free Blues Concert tonight at the Catholic boys school, Subiaco Academy, at Subiaco, Arkansas. It’s Michael Burks, and starts at 7:45 PM.

    SOTU avoidance at it’s best!!

  51. #51
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:23 pm, John Deaux said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:10 pm, iamsaved said:

    As for the White House freeze, he didn’t go far enough – he could cut the entourage for the lady in waiting and quit paying his czars.

    I assume you mean other than the Spending Cut Czar he’s going to appoint. Of course, he’ll need a staff of his own and office space, and a travel budget to actually see what the effects of the cuts would be. About $25 billion a year should do it.

  52. #52
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:29 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    BOB said: I’m going to a free Blues Concert tonight at the Catholic boys school, Subiaco Academy, at Subiaco, Arkansas. It’s Michael Burks, and starts at 7:45 PM.

    SOTU avoidance at it’s best!!

    and if that doesn’t work out there’s always….

  53. #53
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:37 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    And now – the final indignity! The people of Indonesia are petitioning to tear down the Little Barry Statue…

  54. #54
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:37 pm, happy2behere said:

    3% is NOT a good start, its a passive-agressive FOff.

  55. #55
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:41 pm, Dave Turson said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:40 am, zyzzyg said:

    We must get used to cuts and this is a small step. Albeit a very small step, of hopefully larger cuts to come.

    Hurry up…Obama needs help filling his ice cube trays.

  56. #56
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:41 pm, Southpaw said:

    At the end of this year the U.S. manned space program will end…permanently.

    Way to go Mr. Obama, I’m sure John F. Kennedy would be proud of you.

    A dismal day in American history.

  57. #57
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:42 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I assumed LSD.

    I assumed LGM.

  58. #58
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:50 pm, BOB said:

    zyz…..You seem to be one of those people who, no matter how many times they have listened to obvious and provable lies, they are always willing to believe the next lie might actually be the truth.

    Perhaps this still works on people like that?

  59. #59
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:52 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    I assumed LGM.

    Slowly I turned…..

  60. #60
    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:52 pm, BOB said:
  61. #61
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:07 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    BOB said:
    Perhaps this still works on people like that?

    Wow! So now we know WHY the teleprompter is so essential; it would be almost impossible to concoct stuff like that extemporaneously.

  62. #62
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:08 pm, zyzzyg said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:43 am, Truesoldier said: #41

    and soon there will be unicorns frolicking in the grassy fields with rainbows and butterfly’s were the children play and a chocolate river running nearby where the children can stop and have a tasty treat while sitting on gumdrop cushions….

    LOL

  63. #63
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:10 pm, zyzzyg said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:46 am, John Deaux said: #43

    Did you cut and paste that from Ellie Light’s next letter?

    No.

  64. #64
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:16 pm, John Deaux said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:52 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Slowly I turned…..

    He’s more of a swoop and poop, rather than the endless drubbing.

    I have fond memories of Niagara Falls.

    Niagara Falls!

  65. #65
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:17 pm, zyzzyg said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:41 pm, Dave Turson said: #56

    Hurry up…Obama needs help filling his ice cube trays.

    Yep, that was funny. Though to put out a fire that large it would require major cuts to defense and entitlements. I doubt there are the votes in Congress to accomplish that. We can’t even get individual members to stop earmarking, and those aren’t even cubes but shaved ice.

    I’ve got no problem with starting small as long as the cuts continue and grow.

  66. #66
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:26 pm, zyzzyg said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 12:50 pm, BOB said: #59

    zyz…..You seem to be one of those people who, no matter how many times they have listened to obvious and provable lies, they are always willing to believe the next lie might actually be the truth.

    Perhaps this still works on people like that?

    Hidden hypnosis? LOL.

    This thread is discussing the SOTU and specifically the ‘leaked’ small cuts Pres Obama will propose.

    Since the SOTU has not been given yet, exactly what lies are you talking about? Please, come back to the topic at hand, and contribute to it with substance. I will do my best to respond to you, and that is not a lie.

  67. #67
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:42 pm, nail49 said:

    I am looking for a serious contraction in government spending, not a freeze on the highest limits yet

    SpeakEasy et al: Recall that in the past the D’s labeled the R’s smaller increases in government spending as “cuts.”

    Thus, they will argue their smaller increases (5-10%) vs what they believe is necessary (say, 10-20%) are, in reality, cuts.

  68. #68
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:48 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:26 pm, zyzzyg said:
    Since the SOTU has not been given yet, exactly what lies are you talking about?

    That’s called a pre-emptive strike!

  69. #69
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:50 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    I remember fondly the many lies of the Clinton Administration and look upon those as the ‘Good Ol’ Days’.

  70. #70
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:58 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    NASA OUTSOURCING future projects!

    I guess welfare’s more productive and inspirational than space.

    Talk about eating your own high-technology seed-corn!

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  71. #71
    On January 27th, 2010 at 2:08 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Who’s going to tune in tonight?

    I’m not.

  72. #72
    On January 27th, 2010 at 2:14 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    OT a little but related to blowback against Obama and the Dems.

    Updated January 27, 2010
    Toomey Surges Over Specter in Poll as Fundraising Shows Strong Fourth Quarter Draw

    By Jake Gibson

    – FOXNews.com

    A new poll out of Pennsylvania shows former Republican Rep. Pat Toomey leading Democratic Sen. Arlen Specter by 14 points in a general election match-up, one indicator of the fundraising prowess that Toomey revealed Wednesday.

  73. #73
    On January 27th, 2010 at 2:22 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    As good citizen of the Soviet I will watch Blue Lips w/ears deliver “You Lie” tonight-digitalis and Pepto Bismol at the ready. It will be interesting to discover just how many times a grown man can refer to himself in one speech.

    “My fellow Americans and you Typical White Folks I come to tell you about Me!”
    ===
    God Bless America except for the Blue States- with special dispensation for Massachusetts at the moment.

  74. #74
    On January 27th, 2010 at 2:29 pm, Regulus said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 2:08 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Who’s going to tune in tonight?

    I’m not.

    Nor I. That’s what we have Michelle for — ordinarily I don’t like saying things like “I’m glad it’s you and not me!”, but in this case I’m glad someone else will be working on developing an ulcer and high blood pressure when Hope-a-Dope gets on stage and lies his a@@ off some more.

  75. #75
    On January 27th, 2010 at 2:35 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    I can’t wait to hear the edicts and proclamations tonight from Barack the XIV and Michelle Antoinette. I am sure that tomorrow we will all awaken with a renewed vision of America courtesy of our little monarch

    Let them eat cake

  76. #76
    On January 27th, 2010 at 3:03 pm, jsr said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:58 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    NASA OUTSOURCING future projects!

    Yes, it looks like if we ever have a project to return to the moon we will have to pay the Indians to do it for us. We could do it ourselves but it looks like all our NASA engineers and scientists will be tied up studying global warming. Pathetic.

  77. #77
    On January 27th, 2010 at 3:04 pm, Truesoldier said:

    So much for the spending freeze (like we ever really beleived it anyway):

    On Thursday, January 28th, the President and Vice President travel to Tampa, FL for a town hall meeting to make a major economic announcement – the awarding of $8 billion in Recovery Act grants to begin to build a high speed rail infrastructure across the country. ∙ A half dozen Cabinet Members and senior Administration officials will fan out to communities across the country to highlight specific awards on Thursday.

  78. #78
    On January 27th, 2010 at 3:05 pm, Truesoldier said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 3:03 pm, jsr said:
    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:58 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    NASA OUTSOURCING future projects!
    Yes, it looks like if we ever have a project to return to the moon we will have to pay the Indians to do it for us. We could do it ourselves but it looks like all our NASA engineers and scientists will be tied up studying global warming. Pathetic.

    The Russians said they will transport our astronauts for $51million a piece.

  79. #79
    On January 27th, 2010 at 3:15 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 11:32 am, NC BLUE said:

    Obama is a TOOL!!!!

    more like a pile of crap….

  80. #80
    On January 27th, 2010 at 4:19 pm, rambler said:

    Who is going to tune in tonight?

    Too busy to watch. I need to watch some paint dry.

  81. #81
    On January 27th, 2010 at 4:23 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    if any of you have Dish Network go check out the menu for Fox and the SOTU….part of it is in spanish!! say what??

    “Presidente Barack Obama se dirige al Congreso y a la nacion”….

    Shame on DISH Network…

  82. #82
    On January 27th, 2010 at 4:53 pm, sbw999 said:

    Good grief, politicians are so dang full of ****. Once again liberals depend upon the uber-stupidity of their constituents to lap up this crap, and smile and ask for more. Thank God for the internet, and people like you Michelle to expose these phony schemes. Is it any wonder people are so cynical of government? How about this instead for the State of the Union speech:

    Announce that the remaining $550 billion of “stimu-less” will be returned to the Treasury to pay down the soaring national debt.

    Announce an across the board 20% cut in the budgets of every single department of federal spending except defense, and social security. The baseline will be the budget figures from the year before O-Spender got into office and raised federal spending through the roof.

    Announce that the Bush tax cuts will not be allowed to expire, and announce tax breaks on small businesses, and individuals.

    That would be change we could believe in.

    I would like to see a coherent Republican response for once hammering home these points. Ronald Reagan used to show us charts…how about reviving that again?! Communicate with the people!!

  83. #83
    On January 27th, 2010 at 4:59 pm, Misscheryl said:

    I agree sbw999. It’s about control and has nothing to do with helping the economy. If they wanted to stimulate the economy, they’d give every American a big fat check to spend as THEY see fit, and then cut taxes. When our state has a tax free weekend, people spend money like crazy. Gee it’s just not rocket science.

    Obama, congress et al. want total control of our lives.

  84. #84
    On January 27th, 2010 at 5:06 pm, ThatSamIAm said:

    *PREDICTION ALERT*

    I predict that the MSM and all the loyal socialist progressives will be falling over themselves immediately after to declare this the greatest SOTU address in the history of our country. No! The greatest speech in the history of mankind!! Tingles and chills will be felt by all.

    The blithering idiots on MSNBC will be orgasmic over every word uttered by The One, B.H. Obama. The chants of YES WE CAN will ring across the airwaves once more. It will be said that Obama has once again proven that he is the salvation of the world and anything that’s wrong today is STILL the fault of GWB.

  85. #85
    On January 27th, 2010 at 5:09 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    Hmmm. I must have misunderstood the proposal this AM. My understanding was he was proposing to FREEZE about 3% of the total budget. Not cut anything. There is a huge difference. Most folks in the business world would jump for joy at spending freezes. Instead we are seeing job cuts and spending reductions in the 8-10% ranges. Did I misunderstand?

  86. #86
    On January 27th, 2010 at 5:22 pm, swede said:

    rambler said:
    Who is going to tune in tonight?
    Too busy to watch. I need to watch some paint dry.

    I’m shocked, SHOCKED at all of you. How could you possibly not watch when the most important concerns of modern times will be made manifest? The mesmeric question of whether Michelle O will show up in a sleeveless dress in January. What designer and color? And for the love of Pete, what about bling?!? This could rock the free world, and you guys are bugging out?

  87. #87
    On January 27th, 2010 at 5:38 pm, Mister P said:

    I think it is time that Obama resign. He is even incompetent for Leftist. He has nothing to offer.

  88. #88
    On January 27th, 2010 at 5:57 pm, cheapseat said:

    who cares what this (_*_) says, it’s all bullcrap. he isn’t even a good or convincing liar like clinton. this trainwreck is going to continu for 3 more years.

  89. #89
    On January 27th, 2010 at 6:28 pm, rightwingrocker said:
  90. #90
    On January 27th, 2010 at 6:31 pm, Wyatt Earp said:

    There will be so much bull coming out tonight that Mike Rowe should be called in. Lordknows that cleaning up Washington is a “Dirty Job.”

  91. #91
    On January 27th, 2010 at 6:41 pm, sbw999 said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 5:38 pm, Mister P said:

    I think it is time that Obama resign. He is even incompetent for Leftist. He has nothing to offer.

    Not just Obama. Liberals have nothing to offer but big government tyranny.

  92. #92
    On January 27th, 2010 at 6:48 pm, bjc said:

    *If P-BO were to be given some truth serum before the SOTU address, his speech would consist of, “Thanks to all for coming to see ME here tonight, and, oh yes, Death to America”; Nothing more, nothing less!

  93. #93
    On January 27th, 2010 at 6:55 pm, BOB said:

    On January 27th, 2010 at 1:26 pm, zyzzyg said:

    Hidden hypnosis? LOL.

    This thread is discussing the SOTU and specifically the ‘leaked’ small cuts Pres Obama will propose.

    Since the SOTU has not been given yet, exactly what lies are you talking about? Please, come back to the topic at hand, and contribute to it with substance. I will do my best to respond to you, and that is not a lie.

    Just so I have it correct, when you listen to Obama tonight, you will begin listening with the assumption that what Obama says is going to be the truth..is that correct?

  94. #94
    On January 27th, 2010 at 7:08 pm, Leatherneck said:

    If the Marxist has any brains, he will not wear his UN puke blue tie!

  95. #95
    On January 27th, 2010 at 7:17 pm, Southpaw said:

    Based on the mood of the country (ugly), this isn’t going to be a SOTU speech, it’s going to be a PITW speech.
    (Pissing-In-The-Wind)

  96. #96
    On January 27th, 2010 at 8:12 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    this is all you’ll be seeing tonight….

    http://www.psbandit.com/obama_doll.jpg

  97. #97
    On January 27th, 2010 at 8:15 pm, Hulka said:

    ZZ:

    Think back to all the hyperventilating that went into cancelling the Jet that was not used in Iraq or Afghanistan, (the name of the Jet escapes me at this point).

    That would be the F-22, the most advanced fighter the world has ever seen. Decades ahead of the Russians and Chinese. Wonderful Jet.

    As to your reference to Afghanistan and the F-22, as that is all you seem to recall about the jet (not even the name), no, it was not used there, nor should it have been.

    We have other assets designed for that role (CAS). The F-22 is an Air Dominance fighter.

    It is 5th Generation and will dominate the airspace if we encounter a peer or near-peer adversary. That is its primary role.

    I caution, do not get stuck in the-war-we-fight-today-will-be-the-war-we-fight-tomorrow mind-set. The military is always being accused of this when in fact, that accusation could not be further from the truth.

    It takes decades to conceive, design, develop, manufacture and field a fighter. It is not something we could do over-night. The time to find that out is not when you have American troops being killed by adversary aircraft, aircraft that were designed and built while the US sat by and flew 4th generation (or 4.5 generation) F-15′s well into their 3rd decade of combat service.

    The Air Force had to make a choice, the JSF (F-35) or the F-22, and the JSF seemed to be the answer because it is multi-mission rather than single mission. The JSF is also 5th generation AND costs nearly as much as the F-22, and will likely cost the same as we move beyond OTD&E and LRIP.

    Just so you know the facts.

  98. #98
    On January 27th, 2010 at 8:22 pm, tbear44 said:

    I think I will have to pass on the TOTUS SOTU.

  99. #99
    On January 27th, 2010 at 8:36 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    Yes, as a technology driver, NASA was one of best investments this country’s ever committed to! In fact such research and exploration has its grass roots back to the founding Fathers; The Lewis & Clark Expedition was Thomas Jefferson’s equivalent of Project Apollo, and he’d no idea what wonders that’d reap! Myself I’m so TIRED of hearing the ignorant anti-NASA crowd! In the late 1960s the libs and ghettos were all crying “Stop the space program so we can spend to build paradise on Earth!!” Well, we haven’t been to the moon for almost fifty years now. See any entitleme– er, “paradises” anywhere??

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  100. #100
    On January 27th, 2010 at 9:56 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    To the contrary, the entire theory of the President’s proposed freeze is to dial up the stuff that will support job growth and innovation while dialing down the stuff that doesn’t.

    OK, let’s review:

    1. Obamacare — doesn’t support job growth
    2. Cap & Trade — doesn’t support job growth
    3. Amnesty for illegals — doesn’t support job growth

    Start dialing down, BO. IOW, time to stick a fork in ya. You’re done.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Cincinnati-Area School Pays Kids to… Show Up to School

February 13, 2012 09:43 PM by Doug Powers

14 Comments

Video: Mr. America

February 13, 2012 10:23 AM by Michelle Malkin

32 Comments

Greece Erupts After Vote for Austerity Measures to Secure Another Bailout

February 12, 2012 10:19 PM by Doug Powers

55 Comments

Preview of coming attractions?

More CPAC speeches in 20 words

February 11, 2012 06:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

75 Comments

US State Department Expands Travel Warning for Mexico

February 11, 2012 03:29 PM by Doug Powers

43 Comments

War zones

‘Occupy CPAC’ Protester Paid $60 a Day

February 10, 2012 02:32 PM by Doug Powers

45 Comments

Living wage?

‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’

February 10, 2012 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

199 Comments


Categories: Barack Obama,fiscal stimulus,Politics

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook