Thank you, Tim Tebow

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 29, 2010 01:00 PM

Thank you, Tim Tebow and family, for exposing the appalling intolerance of the feminist Left and the abortion peddlers.

Thank you, for standing up and speaking out for what you believe in. And thank you, Focus on the Family, for spreading the Tebow family’s message:

Focus on the Family will broadcast the first Super Bowl ad in its history February 7 during CBS Sports’ coverage of the game at Dolphin Stadium in South Florida.

The 30-second spot from the international family-help organization will feature college football star Tim Tebow and his mother, Pam. They will share a personal story centered on the theme of “Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life.”

Jim Daly, president and CEO of Focus on the Family, said the chance to partner with the Tebows and lift up a meaningful message about family and life comes at the right moment in the culture, because “families need to be inspired.”

As SBA List says: “When someone this prominent is willing to put himself out there with a positive message about Life, we need to defend him.”

Send your message of encouragement here.

Background video:

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Abortion

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:02 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Love for family, I can hear the howls of anger and derision already. Nice vid.

  2. #2
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:03 pm, Mister P said:

    Who was that Fox Business anchor O’Reilly had on last night, who was almost incoherent in her rant against Tebow?

  3. #3
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:04 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Evil screams against goodness and light.

  4. #4
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:10 pm, Gothampc said:

    Let’s hope the half time show doesn’t include any costume malfunctions.

  5. #5
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:13 pm, cheapseat said:

    free speech (if and only if you spout liberal speech.)

  6. #6
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:13 pm, Brian72 said:

    Women’s Rights Groups: Your Double Standard is Showing

    Women’s Rights groups, like NOW, commendably call out advertisers and networks for airing sexist and demeaning portrayals of women that lead to young women’s diminished self-esteem and acceptance of roles as mere sexed-up objects.

    What a ridiculous situation they’re getting themselves into now with their protest of CBS airing a pro-life ad during the upcoming Super Bowl game. The ad will feature Heisman trophy winner Tim Tebow and his mom, and they’ll speak to the sanctity of life and the beautiful potential within every innocent child as Mrs. Tebow acknowledges her choice to give Tim life, despite less than ideal circumstances. Messages like this empower women! This speaks to the strength and commitment and nurturing spirit within women. The message says everything positive and nothing negative about the power of women – and life. Evidently, some women’s rights groups like NOW do not like that message.

    NOW is looking at the pro-life issue backwards. Women should be reminded that they are strong enough and smart enough to make decisions that allow for career and educational opportunities while still giving their babies a chance at life. In my own home, my daughter Bristol has also been challenged by pro-abortion “women’s rights” groups who don’t agree with her decision to have her baby, nor do they like the abstinence message which she articulated as her personal commitment. NOW could gain ground and credibility with everyday Americans, thus allowing their pro-women message to be heard by more than just their ardent supporters, if they made wiser decisions regarding which battles to pick. They should call attention to and embrace the Tebows’ message, instead of covertly and overtly disrespecting what Mrs. Tebow, Bristol, and millions of other women have chosen to do (in less than ideal circumstances).

    My message to these groups who are inexplicably offended by a pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life message airing during the Super Bowl: please concentrate on empowering women, help with efforts to prevent unexpected pregnancies, stay consistent with your message that for too long women have been made to feel like sex objects in our “modern” culture and that we can expect better in 2010. But don’t let your double standard glare so vividly as to undo some of the good to which you could contribute.

    And CBS: just do the right thing. Don’t cave. Have the backbone to run the ad.

    To the Tebows: thank you. America is listening. We appreciate you.

    - Sarah Palin

  7. #7
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:17 pm, happy2behere said:

    Yes, thanks. The moniker happy2behere is because I too am grateful my mother did not “chose” to abort. Children are a blessing from the Lord.

  8. #8
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:20 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Why is Tim Tebow more controversial than having The Who (featuring pedophile Pete Townsend) play the halftime show??

  9. #9
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:21 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Well, it just makes it all the more obvious which “choice” they really are for.

  10. #10
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:21 pm, verogolfer said:

    Tim Tebow is not only a great Christian and a great football player, he’s at my alma mater, the University of Florida. Go Tim!

  11. #11
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:22 pm, Anita said:

    The liberals want free speech rights for terrorists who kill innocent civilians and not for people who believe in Life.

    Pathetic.

  12. #12
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:22 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    From the Post article:

    Terry O’Neill, the president of the National Organization for Women, said she had respect for the private choices made by women such as Pam Tebow but condemned the planned ad as “extraordinarily offensive and demeaning.”

    Hmmm… so the GoDaddy striptease and the waterfountain / wet tshirt / catfight ads are not demeaning, but Pam Tebow telling about her courage and strength is? I’m so glad that I have grown out of all of the feminist, progressive tendencies I used to have. Liberals give me a headache.

  13. #13
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:23 pm, swede said:

    I met Tebow at his church in Florida a few years ago. He’s the real deal. Here’s a kid who’s won the Heisman and two national championships, yet is genuinely humble and stands up for what he believes.

    BTW the focus of the ad is not “anti choice”. His mom talks about how she almost had an abortion when pregnant with Tim. She makes an impassioned appeal to young girlswomen in the same situation to make the right choice. I don’t see how anyone could object to this message.

  14. #14
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:23 pm, DanMan said:

    Hits so close to home. I mean a direct shot from 1976. Thank you Tebows, my wife and I can relate.

  15. #15
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:24 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    I would like to see Kirk Cameron (or someone willing to take on the project) do a re-make of the movie “It’s a Wonderful Life”, only with a ‘here’s what it would have been like had you been aborted’ theme. I think that would make a powerful message.

  16. #16
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:26 pm, Lindsay said:

    I am a Florida State fan, but I think Tim Tebow is a good guy.

    He has the leftist having meltdowns, with Joy Behar at her best:
    http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/sports_college_uf/2010/01/joy-behar-on-tebow-he-just-as-easily-could-have-been-a-rapist-pedophile.html

  17. #17
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:27 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    Remember, the Left only supports “choice” IF you make the choice they want you to make.

    Choose life, choose to homeschool, choose abstinence, choose monogamy…
    That’s not the “choice” they want to allow you to have.

  18. #18
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Terry O’Neill, the president of the National Organization for Women, said she had respect for the private choices made by women such as Pam Tebow but condemned the planned ad as “extraordinarily offensive and demeaning.”

    Well she can always click over to the lingerie bowl – nothing demeaning about that…

  19. #19
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:33 pm, swede said:

    Lindsay said:
    I am a Florida State fan

    Still in mourning for Bobby B no doubt. Fear not, I really think Jimbo is going to surprise us. Will miss Bowden though. A class act.

  20. #20
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:34 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Joy Behar said this about the controversy:

    “The only argument against any of it is, that, you know, he could just as easily become some kind of a rapist pedophile. I mean, you don’t know what someone’s going to be

    Yeah, she actually said that.

  21. #21
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:35 pm, DanMan said:

    Our local MM offers these photos from a recent pro-life rally in Austin. The difference in the looks on their faces is worth a thousand words.

    http://blogs.chron.com/texassparkle/2010/01/pro_life_march_in_austin_2010.html?

  22. #22
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:39 pm, Brian72 said:

    From the WaPo story Michelle linked above:

    “By offering one of the most coveted advertising spots of the year to an anti-equality, anti-choice, homophobic organization, CBS is aligning itself with a political stance that will damage its reputation, alienate viewers, and discourage consumers from supporting its shows and advertisers,” the letter said.

    Terry O’Neill, the president of the National Organization for Women, said she had respect for the private choices made by women such as Pam Tebow but condemned the planned ad as “extraordinarily offensive and demeaning.”

    That’s not being respectful of other people’s lives,” O’Neill said. “It is offensive to hold one way out as being a superior way over everybody else’s.”

    Can you believe this? Threatening with hints of a boycott, and the President of the National Organization for Abortions lecturing others about “respecting lives”?

    These hags are really unbelievable.

    In a statement to POLITICO, NOW President Terry O’Neill said that Palin is “missing our point.”

    “The goal of the Focus on the Family ad is not to empower women. It’s to create a climate in which Roe v. Wade can be overturned,” O’Neill said. “There are always going to be women who need abortions. In this country, one in three women will have an abortion.”

    “Focus on the Family has cynically set it up so they can say anyone who disagrees with airing this ad is disrespecting one woman and her choice. NOW respects every woman’s right to plan her own family and insists our laws do the same,” said O’Neill.

    Sarah Palin is most certainly not “missing your point”.

    You want babies to die.

    You want a one sided “choice” coin.

    Only one choice is acceptable, the other is to be derided and ridiculed.

    I am positive that of all people, Sarah Palin gets that better than most.

    These are the people who declared that the first female VP nominee on a Republican ticket in history was not really a woman, after having given John Edwards an award of “Woman of the Year” a couple of years ago. How is that feeling now, nags? Silky Pony did a lot to advance women’s rights, like the choice to have an affair with a man married to a woman with terminal cancer, but Sarah Palin is not a woman at all.

    Simply amazing.

  23. #23
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:39 pm, Lindsay said:

    swede, actually,as much as I like Bobby, I was ready for Jimbo to take over. So no, you are wrong on that one. We have a divided house with one son a Gator, another a Seminole. Tim Tebow is a good Christian, and I support him in what he has done for his beliefs.

  24. #24
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:39 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:35 pm, DanMan said:

    Smiling people at a rally = probably pro life.
    Scowling people at a rally = probably pro “choice.”

    I’ve seen it too often to believe otherwise.

  25. #25
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:40 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    They say his passing motion is inefficient for an NFL grade quarterback, but he has the leadership and drive to make it anyway, in my opinion.

    Don’t know whether he will get into the ministry himself when he retires, but he may do more for life issues entering politics on a pro-family platform.

  26. #26
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:42 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:40 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    entering politics

    Amen. We need real conservative leaders in office. I’m sick of RINOs.

  27. #27
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:43 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    The bisexual Pete Townsend says he was only “investigating” child porn when he was caught looking for it on his computer.

    He could be telling the truth, the real pedophile freaks like Gary Glitter seem unable to stop themselves, and have repeated run ins with the law.

    Last I heard Glitter was in trouble in Vietnam. That’d be one execution by a communist government I wouldn’t get too upset about.

  28. #28
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:53 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Joy Behar said this about the controversy:

    “The only argument against any of it is, that, you know, he could just as easily become some kind of a rapist pedophile. I mean, you don’t know what someone’s going to be

    Oh give it a rest already Joy! Bill Clinton hasn’t been President in ages!

  29. #29
    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:55 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    O’Neill said. “There are always going to be women who need abortions. In this country, one in three women will have an abortion.”

    Really? It’s worse than I thought!

  30. #30
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:01 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    I herd some women talk how this ad with create an atmosphere of hate and fear. I could almost hear her say the “science is settled-there is no debate”. Yes indeed Free Speech must only cover Helpful, Correct Speech as determined by the Ministry of Truth.

    Rogue Cheddar said:
    Oh give it a rest already Joy! Bill Clinton hasn’t been President in ages!

    :)

  31. #31
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:01 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:43 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    The bisexual Pete Townsend says he was only “investigating” child porn when he was caught looking for it on his computer.

    If you believe that, I have a network marketing opportunity you may be interested in ;)

    The Onion said it best after Townsend was busted.

  32. #32
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:02 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Yes the women belonged in a herd :oops:

    mooo

  33. #33
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:05 pm, swede said:

    Yes the women belonged in a herd

    mooo

    Duck Arizona…INCOMING!!

  34. #34
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:06 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    When you let the anti-American progressives close down the marketplace of ideas, everyone loses their first amendment rights.

  35. #35
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:08 pm, SpeakEasy said:

    Pam Tebow :I think every woman should be able to choose but prefer they choose life.

    Terry O’Neil: I think every woman should be able to choose but I prefer they choose death.

    Got it.

    Joy Behar : Abort all babies just in case they might not be what we want them to be.

    Okay.(Psycho)

  36. #36
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:08 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    One additional point: The radical left doesn’t want anyone to know that the 50,000,000 babies aborted in the USA since Roe vs Wade were the workforce that is now being provided by the illegal immigrants. And, by the way, in that group of aborted babies was probably a future Steve Job or even Barack Obama.

  37. #37
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:14 pm, SpeakEasy said:

    And, by the way, in that group of aborted babies was probably a future Steve Job or even Barack Obama.

    Don’t I wish. No, I really do.

  38. #38
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:18 pm, Lindsay said:

    I’d like to ask idiot Joy Behar this:

    Of the approximately 42 million global abortions/year, with over 1 million US abortions in that number… how many scientists who could have cured cancer, Parkinson’s Disease, HIV, or developed ideas to enhance our world; musicians who could rival Bach or Beethoven; world leaders such as Reagan or Churchill; or babies given to parents by adoption were killed since Roe vs Wade?

  39. #39
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:18 pm, SpeakEasy said:

    After a little reflection I have to take that back. I just wish he had become a plumber.

  40. #40
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:21 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    “Offensive and demeaning?” These people are total whack jobs! The Tebow experience is one of the most wonderful, positive and uplifing stories you could find.

    The problem is it doesn’t support the NOW narrative and agenda of killing more and more babies every year! More than 1,000,000 babies are killed in America every year! Is NOW not yet satisfied? How many is “enough” for NOW?

  41. #41
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:30 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    “That’s not being respectful of other people’s lives,” O’Neill said. “It is offensive to hold one way out as being a superior way over everybody else’s.”

    … unless it’s OUR way. Then it’s okay to not respect other
    (unborn or pro-life)people’s lives.

  42. #42
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:35 pm, battleaxe said:

    Edna Gladney deserves mention in US history classes as much or more than Roe v. Wade, and certainly more than Oprah. Most will never hear of her.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edna_Gladney
    http://www.adoptionsbygladney.com/

  43. #43
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:37 pm, RedDog said:

    CBS is also going to air an on-line gay men’s hook-up service. Equal time I guess……

  44. #44
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:41 pm, iamsaved said:

    What irony. The group that espouses “choice” protests when someone actualy does make a choice contrary to the feminist’s real agenda. Guess they should change their name to “pro-death”.

  45. #45
    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:54 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    I was told early that I was adopted at birth back in early 50′s. By a chance unusual circumstance I found out 35 years later that my bio mom was young and unwed. Ever since learning that I realized that if the clock had been set ahead 40 odd years, there’s a good chance I wouldn’t be here.

    But abortion was illegal back when I was born so here I am and I feel extra obligated to speak for ten’s of millions of my slain brothers and sisters who were never given the chance to be here to speak for themselves.

    I have trouble formulating the right words though; what can you say to people who stole your one and only chance at life?

  46. #46
    On January 29th, 2010 at 3:11 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    “That’s not being respectful of other people’s lives,” O’Neill said. “It is offensive to hold one way out as being a superior way over everybody else’s.”

    You lash out because that whisper in your ear is telling you an eternal truth. Search you blackened heart, you know it to be true.

  47. #47
    On January 29th, 2010 at 3:23 pm, schmanz said:

    Pro-abortion folks are the queens of the strawman argument. Seeing a positive outcome to an inconvenient pregnancy is like a cross to a vampire.

    In my life, all the pro-abort advocacy ends when I share that our family has 5 awesome adopted nieces and nephews and I am the single mom of an unplanned, and wonderfully successful loving daughter.

    Life beats death everytime.

  48. #48
    On January 29th, 2010 at 3:36 pm, swede said:

    Danceswithdachshunds said: I have trouble formulating the right words though; what can you say to people who stole your one and only chance at life?

    The words you just shared are outstanding. Thanks.It’s not enough to tell a young, unwed pregnant girl to keep her child. We all need to help crisis pregnancy centers and the like to provide real assistance to make it possible for the girls to do so. And we need to make a difference.I had the privilege several years ago of meeting and breaking bread with Mark, a Christian judge in Alabama who makes a difference. He was appointed to Family Court. In AL an underage girl can get an abortion without her parent’s knowledge or consent, but she must get approval from the family court. Mark recognized that there are two people before him, and he appoints an attorney to represent the unborn child.Obviously he is putting his career, reputation and future on the line to make this stand, and he has saved untold lives. I am humbled by people like him and the Tebows.

  49. #49
    On January 29th, 2010 at 3:38 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    Don’t we, the American people, get enough of the perversion of the American family thru so-called sitcoms and movies that use Planned Parenthood, talk about abortion, teen pregnancy, and such? What is the harm in a family-oriented commercial?

  50. #50
    On January 29th, 2010 at 3:45 pm, Hangfire said:

    If there was some way of telling, in utero, whether your baby would be born gay or not, the feminazi’s would be against abortion for that instance, and to hell with the woman’s personal choice.

  51. #51
    On January 29th, 2010 at 3:49 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:37 pm, RedDog said:

    CBS is also going to air an on-line gay men’s hook-up service. Equal time I guess……

    Trolling for PMSNBC anchors are they?

    But CBS is taking commercials for the Super Bowl they normally would not take. What happened to GM and Chrysler is happening everywhere! If we are Offensive and demeaning to NOW, NARAL, Joy Behar or any other of the Death Cult then let it be so.

  52. #52
    On January 29th, 2010 at 3:54 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    They say his passing motion is inefficient for an NFL grade quarterback, but he has the leadership and drive to make it anyway, in my opinion.

    They say Drew Brees is too short….

  53. #53
    On January 29th, 2010 at 3:56 pm, swede said:

    ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    If we are Offensive and demeaning to NOW, NARAL, Joy Behar or any other of the Death Cult then let it be so.

    If we are not offensive to them, we’re doing it wrong.

  54. #54
    On January 29th, 2010 at 4:09 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    O’Neill said. “It is offensive to hold one way out as being a superior way over everybody else’s.”

    That is the very essence of the liberal mindset.

    On EVERY topic.

  55. #55
    On January 29th, 2010 at 4:25 pm, harbormaster said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 4:09 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    O’Neill said. “It is offensive to hold one your way out as being a superior way over everybody else’s ours.”

    That is the very essence of the liberal mindset.

    On EVERY topic.

    There, FIFY.

  56. #56
    On January 29th, 2010 at 4:25 pm, CWinNY said:

    I have a nephew who was born after only 6.5 months gestation. He weighed less than 2 pounds at birth, and is still the smallest baby to have been born in that small hospital and survive. He is now a high school senior, about 6 ft tall, 180 pounds – played sports in high school, etc. When he was born, he was a human being – to my way of thinking, no one can make a credible argument that after 6 months an abortion does not take the life of a human being.

    After that point, the choice comes down to the woman staying pregnant for a couple more months, or killing a person.

    As for our president, who said he wouldn’t want one of his daughters to be burdened with an unwanted child, if she lived in a safe haven state, that is not what the choice would be.

    God bless Tim Tebow for having the courage to express an opinion that differs from that of the liberal media. They will excoriate him for expressing ideals that do not conform to theirs.

  57. #57
    On January 29th, 2010 at 4:36 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    And some nitwit from NOW claimed this ad was “anti-American hate”

    Unbelievable.

  58. #58
    On January 29th, 2010 at 4:41 pm, Dave Turson said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 2:37 pm, RedDog said:
    CBS is also going to air an on-line gay men’s hook-up service. Equal time I guess……

    That’s not true.

  59. #59
    On January 29th, 2010 at 4:46 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    The Left is scared.

  60. #60
    On January 29th, 2010 at 4:48 pm, taggart said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    Well she can always click over to the lingerie bowl – nothing demeaning about that…

    I’ve got two words for everybody: PUPPY BOWL!!!

  61. #61
    On January 29th, 2010 at 4:52 pm, Chief RZ said:

    Just because some women choose to play tennis more than raise their child is no reason to impose their choice on everyone else.

    Right to choose? Well to NOW, only if it means killing babies. To them, apparently, choosing not to kill a baby is not an option!

    Very glad to see this testimony. Perhaps it will further expose the liberal, communists types who murdered 200,000,000 people in Europe and Asia.

  62. #62
    On January 29th, 2010 at 5:29 pm, Dave Turson said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:20 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    Why is Tim Tebow more controversial than having The Who (featuring pedophile Pete Townsend) play the halftime show??

    I’m not an expert on the life of Townsend, but he is not a pedophile.

    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:43 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
    The bisexual Pete Townsend says he was only “investigating” child porn when he was caught looking for it on his computer.
    He could be telling the truth, the real pedophile freaks like Gary Glitter seem unable to stop themselves, and have repeated run ins with the law.

    It appears Townsend is not bisexual.

  63. #63
    On January 29th, 2010 at 5:45 pm, JusDreamin said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:34 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    Joy Behar said this about the controversy:

    “The only argument against any of it is, that, you know, he could just as easily become some kind of a rapist pedophile. I mean, you don’t know what someone’s going to be
    Yeah, she actually said that.

    So by that reasoning, all we have to do is abort every child, that way we wont have to worry about rapists and pedophiles. Deranged woman.

  64. #64
    On January 29th, 2010 at 5:52 pm, zorro said:

    Young men and women like Tim Tebow are the future of our country. Their Faith and fortitude will need to be strong and unwavering to overcome the evil “progressive” culture of death that has taken root in our society.

    May God the Father Almighty continue to Bless and protect them all.

  65. #65
    On January 29th, 2010 at 6:23 pm, vsatt said:

    I come from a family of Dye-hard Auburn fans and my brother, who actually dresses as Auburn Elvis to go to games, named his second son Tebow because he was so impressed by the guy’s faith and character. People laugh when I tell them the name and I admit it seems a bit odd at first, but hey it’s better than naming your kid after a guy who got elected president on lies and slick packaging.

  66. #66
    On January 29th, 2010 at 6:30 pm, Send_Me said:

    So long as they don’t use the phrase, “Choose Life”. It drives me nuts when people do that.

  67. #67
    On January 29th, 2010 at 6:55 pm, jangar said:

    Dexter Alarius said:

    I would like to see Kirk Cameron (or someone willing to take on the project) do a re-make of the movie “It’s a Wonderful Life”, only with a ‘here’s what it would have been like had you been aborted’ theme. I think that would make a powerful message.

    Bingo…you hit the nail on the head!

    I half expected zeroangel to show up and turn this into another science experiment.

  68. #68
    On January 29th, 2010 at 7:01 pm, jangar said:

    No comments deleted…WOW!

  69. #69
    On January 29th, 2010 at 7:17 pm, DougHagin said:

    There are many reasons it is GREAT to be a Gator, and Tim has made us all damned proud time and again. As I wrote on my blog How ‘Bout That Gator!

    Keep it up Tim, we are all behind you!

  70. #70
    On January 29th, 2010 at 7:41 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 4:09 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    O’Neill said. “It is offensive to hold one way out as being a superior way over everybody else’s.”

    That is the very essence of the liberal mindset.

    On EVERY topic.

    I saw harbormaster’s edit, but it really is interesting just the way it is.

    Evan Sayet did an amazing talk for the Heritage Foundation in 2007, called
    How Modern Liberals Think, and he showed how Liberals deny the very existence of right vs. wrong, better vs. worse, and that mindset inevitably leads them to side with wrong over right, each and every time.

    That is why they side with abortion/murder and actively attack those who side with giving birth/life.

  71. #71
    On January 29th, 2010 at 7:44 pm, cubbiegal said:

    In 1943 my grandmother’s doctors were going to give her a legal abortion-she had major complications-without her knowledge and tell her she miscarried.
    My grandparents got wind of it and that was that. My almost 66 year old mother is an only child because of those complications…and needless to say…she’s pro-life.
    Good on ya Tim Tebow!

  72. #72
    On January 29th, 2010 at 7:46 pm, jangar said:

    the very essence of the liberal mindset

    They are captains of their own ship, believing in nothing greater than themselves. Petulant children.

  73. #73
    On January 29th, 2010 at 7:57 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    jangar said:

    They are captains of their own ship, believing in nothing greater than themselves. Petulant children.

    When you have people who think Finding Nemo is a model for a life this is what you get.

  74. #74
    On January 29th, 2010 at 8:44 pm, swede said:

    Liberals deny the very existence of right vs. wrong, better vs. worse, and that mindset inevitably leads them to side with wrong over right, each and every time.

    Relativism vs Absolutism. Though relativists don’t like to admit it, the essence of relativism is – “There is no absolute truth” – which is of course an absurd statement. It is a propositional statement that if true can not be true.

    It is virtually impossible to have a rational dialogue with a liberal who holds this mind set. If you believe a fetus is a human being, and as such entitled to human rights and dignity, they will respond “That’s your truth, I have mine” and actually believe both “truths” can be valid at the same time.

    Absolute, eternal truth exists and can be known. Almost seems silly to have to say it, but the people who are destroying our country deny it.

  75. #75
    On January 29th, 2010 at 9:06 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 7:44 pm, cubbiegal said:

    In 1943 my grandmother’s doctors were going to give her a legal abortion-she had major complications-without her knowledge and tell her she miscarried.

    My grandparents got wind of it and that was that. My almost 66 year old mother is an only child because of those complications…and needless to say…she’s pro-life.

    cubbiegal, thank you for sharing that story. It goes without saying that if the doctors had succeeded in their covert plan to abort your mother, then neither your mother nor you would be alive today.

    And that goes to show how one abortion can take the life of more than one person. I read somewhere that since Roe v. Wade, one out of every three pregnancies has been aborted.

    Most of the babies aborted in the 70′s and 80′s would likely have been parents themselves by now. So the true number of how many lives have been taken by abortion is multiple times the number of abortions that have been performed. It’s well over 100 Million lives.

  76. #76
    On January 29th, 2010 at 9:36 pm, jangar said:

    Most of the babies aborted in the 70’s and 80’s would likely have been parents themselves by now. So the true number of how many lives have been taken by abortion is multiple times the number of abortions that have been performed. It’s well over 100 Million lives.

    And there in lies the population control leftist talking points.

    Holdren, anyone?

  77. #77
    On January 29th, 2010 at 9:41 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Most of the babies aborted in the 70’s and 80’s would likely have been parents themselves by now. So the true number of how many lives have been taken by abortion is multiple times the number of abortions that have been performed. It’s well over 100 Million lives.

    Unfair.

    Murder statistics do not include the potential children of the victims.

    I’m a hardcore pro-lifer, but we discredit ourselves when we distort like that.

    RWR
    ww.rightwingrocker.com

  78. #78
    On January 29th, 2010 at 10:52 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:55 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    O’Neill said. “There are always going to be women who need abortions. In this country, one in three women will have an abortion.”

    Really? It’s worse than I thought!

    Not really. If one woman has three abortions, there are six women who don’t. There are women out there who consider abortion as “birth control.”

    That’s what is scary.

    ECS

  79. #79
    On January 29th, 2010 at 10:55 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Terry O’Neill, the president of the National Organization for Women, said she had respect for the private choices made by women such as Pam Tebow but condemned the planned ad as “extraordinarily offensive and demeaning.”

    Well she can always click over to the lingerie bowl – nothing demeaning about that…

    There’s a lingerie bowl? Cool!

    ECS

  80. #80
    On January 29th, 2010 at 11:21 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 9:41 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Unfair.

    Murder statistics do not include the potential children of the victims.

    I’m a hardcore pro-lifer, but we discredit ourselves when we distort like that.

    You have a right to your opinion, but I think that what I said is neither “unfair” nor “distortion”.

    It is a clear fact from cubbiegal’s comment that if the doctors had been successful in their covert plan to give her grandmother an abortion in 1943, neither cubbiegal’s mother nor cubbiegal would be alive today.

    One abortion would have prevented two lives. That’s a fact, whether you like it or not. And even if you think it’s “unfair” to talk about it, it’s the truth and I think the truth should be told.

    Our population would be about 30 to 40% bigger if not for Roe v. Wade.

  81. #81
    On January 29th, 2010 at 11:58 pm, jangar said:

    Our population would be about 30 to 40% bigger if not for Roe v. Wade.

    A lot of people cannot fathom a number like that. They’ve been brainwashed into believing the Earth cannot support such a population, when in fact it can and is/was designed to support much more.

    Society has bought the evolutionary lie, leaving Genesis without a place in today’s modern thinking.

  82. #82
    On January 30th, 2010 at 1:19 am, William said:

    On January 29th, 2010 at 1:02 pm, Rogue Cheddar said Post # 1:

    Love for family, I can hear the howls of anger and derision already. Nice vid.

    Rogue Cheddar,

    Here is what is wrong with playing that video anywhere, through any venue whatsoever.

    The video sends the wrong message. It includes a man who loves his mother. It portrays a woman who loves her son.

    The video portrays a fairly famous football quarterback, All American, and Heisman Trophy winner.

    It also portrays a heterosexual family unit.

    The video also supports women who choose to carry their baby to term, and not hire an abortionist to rip their baby apart, or burn their baby with chemicals, slaughtering baby in such a way that, if executed upon Barack Hussein Obama, Nancy Pelosi, John F. Kerry, Joe Biden, Joy Behar, Bill Maher, Janeane Garolfolo, Kalhid Sheik Mohammad, the Panty bomber, and other Islamofascist militant Jihadi blood and death, hate filled cult practitioners, would be considered cruel, inhumane, vicious treatment, abuse, and torture.

    Imagine if abortion supporting people like Pelosi, Kerry, Garofolo, Maher, and others were subjected to chemical torture in which their bodies were burned with chemicals, as babies are during chemical abortions. Imagine what would happen if abortion supporters were cut to pieces, or their bodies pulled apart, piece by piece, and tossed into trash bags, then tossed in the garbage, as babies who are executed by abortions are.

    There would be righteous indignation and vociferous condemnation!

    What the video SHOULD show is homosexual males and lesbians raising children, teaching them about the joys of “other loving.

    The video should show how to give anal pleasure, anal penetration by a penis, oral stimulation of the penis, vagina, clitoris, and anus by a person of the same sex, and the video should give pointers to young children how to do this to their little friends, and how it is good to do, a loving thing to do, and acceptable and “Normal.”

    The video should show happy homosexuals holding “happy” children, who aren’t theirs, but are adopted out of the arms of nasty heterosexual, married Foster Parents who have been trying to adopt the children who already call them mommy and daddy for months or years, but whose application is ignored for months or years. The video should show homosexuals, lesbians, transsexuals raising these same children who ripped from the arms of their Foster parents whose applications for adoption of those children who call them daddy and mommy, and shipped across the country to the homosexuals or lesbians, or transsexuals who are total strangers because the Social engineers of Social Service agencies and Psychological Associations, and Adoption services want to stimulate “diversity” and give those people who don’t “get the chance” to raise children as heterosexual married couples are often privileged to do.

    The video should show people like Tebow assaulting children, beating women, cursing, killing kittens, and kicking puppies.

    The video should show women lining up at Abortuaries, with worried, harried, pained looks on their faces, then exiting the abortuaries, holding hands, dancing, singing, skipping along with bright, wide smiles on their faces, joyfully proclaiming how happy they are that they exercised their “Reproductive Right” to slaughter the very reproduced human being they just hired someone to slaughter for them.

    Yes.

    That would be what SHOULD be in the video clip during the Superbowl, for that is what is acceptable to the tolerant, loving, caring, compassionate, abortion promoting, homosexual behavior and agenda advocating left and other opponents of such an innocuous, uplifting video as that of Tebow and his mother celebrating her choice not to have her baby slaughtered, and how she is happy with that choice, and how Tebow loves his mother and appreciates the fact that Nommy did not hate him enough to have him killed.

    How DARE Mrs. Tebow be happy with her “Choice?”

    Doesn’t she, and her son, realize that she did not exercise her REAL choice?

    If she really exercised her “REAL” choice should would have slaughtered that evil, nasty Embryo (if aborted before the end of the eighth week, Post Fertilization) or Fetus (From the ninth week Post Fertilization till term.)

    As anyone with a brain knows, those nasty, evil human embryos and human fetuses are not human, are not alive, but are only potential humans, only potential life, and they are evil, malevolent, demonic little demons and devils and monsters to be feared, hated, hunted, destroyed, and totally eliminated.

    Otherwise we cannot live free and in peace!

    In otherwords. if you love your life, if you are happy to have brought your offspring into the world, you are a masty, evil cretin who is forcing your “anti-Choice” agenda on the world.

    Unless you call the killing of already reproduced offspring “Reproductive Rights,” and unless your “family” is a deviant form of family – homosexuals, lesbians, etc., corrupting children by raising them with their lover as a couple, then you are an evil, mean, malicious thug who should shut the F up!

  83. #83
    On January 30th, 2010 at 1:35 am, mattm said:

    The national office of BHO Church, the United Church of Christ, whines how their ad were rejected in the past but this one will air. Also, they are not purchasing any air time this year. But they bury that.

    http://www.ucc.org/news/ucc-leaders-balk-at-cbs.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+UnitedChurchOfChrist+%28United+Church+of+Christ%29

  84. #84
    On January 30th, 2010 at 1:54 am, shimauma2 said:

    Imagine if abortion supporting people like Pelosi, Kerry, Garofolo, Maher, and others were subjected to chemical torture in which their bodies were burned with chemicals

    sounds like a good start…

  85. #85
    On January 30th, 2010 at 10:35 am, misterbee241 said:

    I saw Jehmu Greene on Fox and Friends Friday morning. She had a very fake, very plastic smile on her face. The kind some guy would have as he pushed a shiv in your back and twisted it. Much like a partial birth abortion. But she was oh so nice and the smile never left her face.

  86. #86
    On January 30th, 2010 at 2:34 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    The fact of the matter is that the United States has the most irrationally radical abortion policies anywhere on Earth. There isn’t another country anywhere that INSISTS upon the allowance of abortions during the final trimester of a child’s life inside their mother, to the point where partial birth abortions are even considered.

    Their ugly response to this ad only raises their true face before the world and the people of America as to their monstrosity and evil. The very idea that something as benign as this ad being “decisive” shows how utterly twisted they are.

  87. #87
    On January 30th, 2010 at 2:37 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    The very idea that something as benign as this ad being “decisive” “divisive” shows how utterly twisted they are.

    There, fixed that…

  88. #88
    On January 30th, 2010 at 3:53 pm, jangar said:

    Their ugly response to this ad only raises their true face before the world and the people of America as to their monstrosity and evil. The very idea that something as benign as this ad being “decisive” shows how utterly twisted they are.

    “Progressives”, as if that is somehow progress…

  89. #89
    On January 30th, 2010 at 4:21 pm, William said:

    In Post # 85 On January 30th, 2010 at 10:35 am, misterbee241 said:

    I saw Jehmu Greene on Fox and Friends Friday morning. She had a very fake, very plastic smile on her face. The kind some guy would have as he pushed a shiv in your back and twisted it. Much like a partial birth abortion. But she was oh so nice and the smile never left her face.

    misterbee241,

    I saw Jehmu Greene on O’Reilly’s program on Thursday evening. She had that arrogant, dishonest, malicious, mean spirited grin on her face and sarcasm in her eyes. It was unpleasant.

    Nevertheless, her verbal content left me wondering, “What does she disagree with?”

    Her statement to Bill O’Reilly, hence the viewing public, did not give a reason for her opposition to the clip.

    Claiming that it is offensive and a sneaky way to circumvent the choice of abortion for all other US women made no sense. A video clip like the Tebow clip in which a mother and her son express their joy at his birth and life, contrasted against the alternative, induced abortion, does not violate anyone’s rights, nor does the video clip, or the display of said clip, in any way actually prevent anyone from hiring a hit man to slaughter his and/or her new child, a tiny, new, living, growing, innocent human being.

    Jehmu Greene and her associates have no case here. She did not show any prevention of other people’s rights or freedoms, and she did not give evidence of a plot to prevent people from having abortions directly caused by the playing of this video tape.

    The message, according to Tebow and the organization who helped sponsor the video clip, is the celebration of the choice of life over the “choice” of induced abortion.

    Have you noticed that, if you ask all those celebrities, media supporters and promoters of abortion, abortion advocates of any and all kinds, “Go back to the time you are already conceived and living inside your mother’s body, developing. Now, would you want your mother to abort you?” most of them would say, if they are honest, “No. I would not want her to abort me.”

    Nevertheless, induced abortion is another case of Yes, to the bad thing to you, but not to me, or, do it to someone else, but not to me.

    The fact that there are still people who deny that a human being, reproduced by two human beings, growing and developing inside a woman’s body, as has been done for thousands of years among human beings, that the person is not alive, not human, and should have no rights and no protections, and that induced abortion is a great thing, when it clearly is not great, it is a malevolent, mean, cruel, vicious act of killing another person and denying them of their already existing life, their liberty, and their pursuit of happiness.

  90. #90
    On January 30th, 2010 at 11:16 pm, jangar said:

    William said:

    Bottom line…they don’t want to be made to feel guilty of their sin. It is a problem as old as time, and one that is not going away anytime soon.

    Pride is deadly.

  91. #91
    On January 30th, 2010 at 11:21 pm, jangar said:

    I saw Jehmu Greene on O’Reilly’s program on Thursday evening. She had that arrogant, dishonest, malicious, mean spirited grin on her face and sarcasm in her eyes. It was unpleasant.

    You mean hard-core leftist? Obama has that look quite often.

  92. #92
    On January 31st, 2010 at 1:12 am, rightwingrocker said:

    One abortion would have prevented two lives. That’s a fact, whether you like it or not. And even if you think it’s “unfair” to talk about it, it’s the truth and I think the truth should be told.

    While this is true (had my mother aborted me as she once considered, at least three lives would have been prevented, since I have two children), we must be fair in our dealings with the opposition. By saying what you are saying, you are also saying that all of the potential offspring of the victims of the 9/11 or Oklahoma City terrorist attacks were victims as well. That’s not going to hold up in any kind of argument because the number of potential offspring always ultimately adds up to the same number – INFINITY.

    It’s best for us, if we want this to be looked at as murder, which we do, to look at the statistics in the same way we do murder. We aren’t being fair with our adversaries otherwise.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  93. #93
    On January 31st, 2010 at 5:54 pm, jangar said:

    We aren’t being fair with our adversaries otherwise.

    And when has our adversary been fair with us, do tell?

  94. #94
    On February 1st, 2010 at 1:40 am, RogersUmp said:

    Joy Behar said this about the controversy:

    “The only argument against any of it is, that, you know, he could just as easily become some kind of a rapist pedophile. I mean, you don’t know what someone’s going to be

    Is she saying it would have been ok to abort Palanski?

  95. #95
    On February 1st, 2010 at 10:24 am, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Our American government was designed for a moral, informed and involved citizenry. Our politicians have suppressed the moral and informed aspects of the republic and they are now seeing the growth of an involved citizenry who favors the informed and moral portion of the equation. And the politicians are scared.

  96. #96
    On February 1st, 2010 at 1:22 pm, frostrt said:

    So, Pam Tebo had no way of knowing what kind of person her son would turn out to be when she first decided to have him.

    YA THINK?!

    Think of it this way Joy; your own mother (and father) had no way of knowing how YOU would turn out . . .

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook