<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Murtha dead at 77</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:14:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PianoDraft</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-3/#comment-897513</link>
		<dc:creator>PianoDraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-897513</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PianoDraft...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hello ;) Thanks heaps for this indeed!... if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Piano Links http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org Enjoy!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PianoDraft&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hello <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks heaps for this indeed!&#8230; if anyone else has anything, it would be much appreciated. Great website Super Piano Links <a href="http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.en.Grand-Pianos.org</a> Enjoy!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; The sun rises. Birds sing. Olbermann lies.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-3/#comment-890723</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; The sun rises. Birds sing. Olbermann lies.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-890723</guid>
		<description>[...] anyone with working eyes can read, the column was published on February 12. Murtha died on February 8. According to Olbermann&#8217;s MSNBC Math, this is &#8220;less than 24 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] anyone with working eyes can read, the column was published on February 12. Murtha died on February 8. According to Olbermann&#8217;s MSNBC Math, this is &#8220;less than 24 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; John Murtha: Requiem for a corruptocrat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-3/#comment-889802</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; John Murtha: Requiem for a corruptocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-889802</guid>
		<description>[...] time has passed since John Murtha&#8217;s death to reckon with his true record. No tears for the wreckage, poison, and damage to the public trust [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time has passed since John Murtha&#8217;s death to reckon with his true record. No tears for the wreckage, poison, and damage to the public trust [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corkie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-3/#comment-889166</link>
		<dc:creator>corkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-889166</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 11th, 2010 at 11:05 am, Roland said:

You just saying my arguments are weak or that I’m too stupid to understand gets old and boring fast.

If you are too stupid to understand my arguments so you feel compelled to insult me instead of responding to the arguments, then you really should just keep your mouth shut.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I assume that &quot;you&quot; doesn&#039;t mean me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 11th, 2010 at 11:05 am, Roland said:</p>
<p>You just saying my arguments are weak or that I’m too stupid to understand gets old and boring fast.</p>
<p>If you are too stupid to understand my arguments so you feel compelled to insult me instead of responding to the arguments, then you really should just keep your mouth shut.</p></blockquote>
<p>I assume that &#8220;you&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corkie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-3/#comment-889164</link>
		<dc:creator>corkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-889164</guid>
		<description>Yes, I myself agree that religion doesn&#039;t always observe the principles of conventional logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I myself agree that religion doesn&#8217;t always observe the principles of conventional logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-2/#comment-889162</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-889162</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Roland, I’m sorry that jsmiddleton4 and others haven’t presented you with a framing of reality that you consider rationally consistent. You might just have to accept that you might not receive such a presentation here.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I thought it was clear I didn&#039;t actually expect to get a rational framing from them. 

However, rational discussion can only begin when you hold out the possibility the other party(ies) are engaging in rational dialogue of some sort. Then you seek to understand how they frame a rationally consistent view, even if it involves different assumptions than you have.

I was doing that with them. They were not doing that with me. Nor did you.

Try telling me what you really think sometime, corkie. Try building a rational argument. You just saying my arguments are weak or that I&#039;m too stupid to understand gets old and boring fast.

If you are too stupid to understand my arguments so you feel compelled to insult me instead of responding to the arguments, then you really should just keep your mouth shut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Roland, I’m sorry that jsmiddleton4 and others haven’t presented you with a framing of reality that you consider rationally consistent. You might just have to accept that you might not receive such a presentation here.</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought it was clear I didn&#8217;t actually expect to get a rational framing from them. </p>
<p>However, rational discussion can only begin when you hold out the possibility the other party(ies) are engaging in rational dialogue of some sort. Then you seek to understand how they frame a rationally consistent view, even if it involves different assumptions than you have.</p>
<p>I was doing that with them. They were not doing that with me. Nor did you.</p>
<p>Try telling me what you really think sometime, corkie. Try building a rational argument. You just saying my arguments are weak or that I&#8217;m too stupid to understand gets old and boring fast.</p>
<p>If you are too stupid to understand my arguments so you feel compelled to insult me instead of responding to the arguments, then you really should just keep your mouth shut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeroangel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-2/#comment-889148</link>
		<dc:creator>zeroangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-889148</guid>
		<description>OK, I went back and checked. You seemed to agree that religion at it&#039;s core is &lt;em&gt;&quot;illogical&quot;&lt;/em&gt; you claimed it was a &lt;em&gt;better descriptor.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I went back and checked. You seemed to agree that religion at it&#8217;s core is <em>&#8220;illogical&#8221;</em> you claimed it was a <em>better descriptor.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeroangel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-2/#comment-889145</link>
		<dc:creator>zeroangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-889145</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;corkie&lt;/strong&gt;:

Remind me, didn&#039;t you yourself agree last time this subject came up that belief in god (any god) is irrational (or was it illogical) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>corkie</strong>:</p>
<p>Remind me, didn&#8217;t you yourself agree last time this subject came up that belief in god (any god) is irrational (or was it illogical) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corkie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-2/#comment-889114</link>
		<dc:creator>corkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-889114</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 10th, 2010 at 11:39 am, zeroangel said:

it might give you some perspective&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It gives the perspective of someone that chose to be such a slave to Occum&#039;s Razor that he decided he had insufficient motivation to believe in God.

I assume this guy knows that Occum&#039;s Razor often leads to incorrect explanations - sometimes the correct explanation is more complicated than an incorrect explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 10th, 2010 at 11:39 am, zeroangel said:</p>
<p>it might give you some perspective</p></blockquote>
<p>It gives the perspective of someone that chose to be such a slave to Occum&#8217;s Razor that he decided he had insufficient motivation to believe in God.</p>
<p>I assume this guy knows that Occum&#8217;s Razor often leads to incorrect explanations &#8211; sometimes the correct explanation is more complicated than an incorrect explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corkie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-2/#comment-889101</link>
		<dc:creator>corkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-889101</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 9th, 2010 at 4:41 pm, Roland said:

I am here trying to get you and others to present some other kind of framing of reality that is rationally consistent&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Roland, I&#039;m sorry that jsmiddleton4 and others haven&#039;t presented you with a framing of reality that you consider rationally consistent. You might just have to accept that you might not receive such a presentation here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 9th, 2010 at 4:41 pm, Roland said:</p>
<p>I am here trying to get you and others to present some other kind of framing of reality that is rationally consistent</p></blockquote>
<p>Roland, I&#8217;m sorry that jsmiddleton4 and others haven&#8217;t presented you with a framing of reality that you consider rationally consistent. You might just have to accept that you might not receive such a presentation here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elm Creek Smith</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-2/#comment-888960</link>
		<dc:creator>Elm Creek Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-888960</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 8th, 2010 at 5:32 pm, Misscheryl said: 
my motto:

If you can’t say anything nice, come sit next to me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There seems to be quite a crowd, Misscheryl. Are you in the middle of that?

Condolences to deadguy&#039;s family.

The sigh of relief you&#039;re hearing comes from the Memorial at Quantico.

ECS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 8th, 2010 at 5:32 pm, Misscheryl said:<br />
my motto:</p>
<p>If you can’t say anything nice, come sit next to me.</p></blockquote>
<p>There seems to be quite a crowd, Misscheryl. Are you in the middle of that?</p>
<p>Condolences to deadguy&#8217;s family.</p>
<p>The sigh of relief you&#8217;re hearing comes from the Memorial at Quantico.</p>
<p>ECS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Murtha, Dr. Hendricks and socialized medicine</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-2/#comment-888707</link>
		<dc:creator>John Murtha, Dr. Hendricks and socialized medicine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-888707</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;John Murtha, Dr. Hendricks and socialized medicine...&lt;/strong&gt;

That a man who&#039;s willing to work under compulsion is too dangerous a brute to entrust with a job in the stockyards - never occurred to those who proposed to help the sick by making life impossible for the healthy....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Murtha, Dr. Hendricks and socialized medicine&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>That a man who&#8217;s willing to work under compulsion is too dangerous a brute to entrust with a job in the stockyards &#8211; never occurred to those who proposed to help the sick by making life impossible for the healthy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeroangel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-2/#comment-888606</link>
		<dc:creator>zeroangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-888606</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Flyoverman&lt;/strong&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;There is another way to solve the “contradiction.” Keeping looking. You’ll get there. Be patient.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
For you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQJrud71gL8

...I doubt it will change your mind, but it might give you some perspective. Enjoy!

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PS&lt;/strong&gt;. Apparently it is the end of a series that might be worth a look as well.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Flyoverman</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>There is another way to solve the “contradiction.” Keeping looking. You’ll get there. Be patient.
</p></blockquote>
<p>For you:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQJrud71gL8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQJrud71gL8</a></p>
<p>&#8230;I doubt it will change your mind, but it might give you some perspective. Enjoy!</p>
<p><em><strong>PS</strong>. Apparently it is the end of a series that might be worth a look as well.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeroangel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-2/#comment-888596</link>
		<dc:creator>zeroangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-888596</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is this thread turning into a Zeroangel-type Christian-bashing session?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Did someone call my name?

This hypocrisy right here (from &lt;strong&gt;Trollman&lt;/strong&gt;) sums up the whole idiocy of this argument:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Which is why I don’t go to HA anymore. If AP doesn’t want to believe in God, fine, but don’t go around bashing people who do, just out of spite.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The &lt;em&gt;atheists &lt;/em&gt;are doing the bashing? This coming from a person who point blank calls atheists &lt;strong&gt;evil &lt;/strong&gt;simply for not believing and claims that the creator of the universe will &lt;em&gt;torture us for eternity&lt;/em&gt;. 

Riiight... no spite or malice there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is this thread turning into a Zeroangel-type Christian-bashing session?</p></blockquote>
<p>Did someone call my name?</p>
<p>This hypocrisy right here (from <strong>Trollman</strong>) sums up the whole idiocy of this argument:</p>
<blockquote><p>Which is why I don’t go to HA anymore. If AP doesn’t want to believe in God, fine, but don’t go around bashing people who do, just out of spite.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The <em>atheists </em>are doing the bashing? This coming from a person who point blank calls atheists <strong>evil </strong>simply for not believing and claims that the creator of the universe will <em>torture us for eternity</em>. </p>
<p>Riiight&#8230; no spite or malice there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/john-murtha-dead-at-77/comment-page-2/#comment-888458</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=43352#comment-888458</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Seriously, the argument from evil is old. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s older than the Book of Job. And it&#039;s never been rationally answered because there is no rational answer that does not involve admitting that other than for acting through us, God is powerless to help us in this world.

No lightning strikes. No parting of seas. No shaking of the ground. No giving your enemy blindness at a propitious moment.

Only inner strength and wisdom.

Primitive religion is all about whose &#039;volcano&#039; God has the biggest whang, so that apparent lack of earthly power cannot be admitted.

Saying your God can&#039;t smite your enemies, but He will win in the end anyway just doesn&#039;t hack it with primitive types. 

Sadly, humans are almost all primitive in their thinking. All emotion. You cling to the Big Power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Seriously, the argument from evil is old. </p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s older than the Book of Job. And it&#8217;s never been rationally answered because there is no rational answer that does not involve admitting that other than for acting through us, God is powerless to help us in this world.</p>
<p>No lightning strikes. No parting of seas. No shaking of the ground. No giving your enemy blindness at a propitious moment.</p>
<p>Only inner strength and wisdom.</p>
<p>Primitive religion is all about whose &#8216;volcano&#8217; God has the biggest whang, so that apparent lack of earthly power cannot be admitted.</p>
<p>Saying your God can&#8217;t smite your enemies, but He will win in the end anyway just doesn&#8217;t hack it with primitive types. </p>
<p>Sadly, humans are almost all primitive in their thinking. All emotion. You cling to the Big Power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

