See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On February 17th, 2010 at 4:08 pm, thejim said:

   Scary, isn’t it!? America’s enemy occupies the White House.

2. #2
   On February 17th, 2010 at 4:09 pm, TooMuchTime said:

   When is Napolitano going to meet with American citizens and tell us the truth of how she’s going to protect us?

3. #3
   On February 17th, 2010 at 4:09 pm, tiredofit08 said:

   On February 17th, 2010 at 4:08 pm, thejim said:

   Scary, isn’t it!? America’s enemy occupies the White House.

   along with a good portion of his administration and some members of Congress…

4. #4
   On February 17th, 2010 at 4:14 pm, walterc said:

   This program was imported from the United Kingdom. The Obama administration has decided to replicate the UK program to win over Muslims and to get them to collaborate with the federal government.

   I don’t think the Brits are the best example on how to get along with muslim terror groups.

   Why don’t we just use the Saudi programs to win over muslims?

   What a bunch of idiots.

5. #5
   On February 17th, 2010 at 4:19 pm, beenthere said:

   One of the distinguishing features of the Omaba administration is its practice of seeking out ways to get intelligence to the jihadis (the civilian trial of KSM being the current prime example) and its indifference to obtaining intelligence from the enemy, preferring to kill them — unless the Pakistani authorities get there first. This is not how a war is conducted. Is it incompetence? Is it treason? I will let others decide.

6. #6
   On February 17th, 2010 at 4:20 pm, chicagojedi said:

   Yea, cause reaching out to Muslims has worked so well for Britain.

7. #7
   On February 17th, 2010 at 4:20 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

   Sure seems like our President and his cabinet are collaborating with terrorists.

   When do we say “enough” ?

8. #8
   On February 17th, 2010 at 4:22 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

   What ever happened to “Never forget?”

   How many more dots do you need before you “Connect the dots…”

   A Different “9/11 Truth”

9. #9
   On February 17th, 2010 at 4:33 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

   The OIC has 57 member states.

   Hmmm… where have I heard “57 states” before?

   Oh yeah, from the guy who said:

   …uh, because, you know, uh-uh, it is just wonderful to be back in Oregon, and over the last 15 months we’ve travelled, uh, to every corner of the United States. Uh, I’ve now been in fifty – … seven states, I think one left to go. Uh, one left to go. Uh, Alaska and Hawaii I was not allowed to go to, even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not, uh, justify it.

   Was “57 states” a reference to the 57 member states of the OIC?

   Is the “one left to go” the U.S.A.?

   About six weeks before the election, I asked:

   Who Really Runs Obama’s Campaign,
   and What is Their Agenda?

10. #10
    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:35 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:20 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Sure seems like our President and his cabinet are collaborating with terrorists.

    Exactly.

    When do we say “enough” ?

    Good question. We should start with supporting and defending Article II Secion 1 of the United States Constitution.

11. #11
    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:37 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    …this meeting was the beginning of an Obama administration program aimed at devising a new information-sharing framework with the Muslim organizations…

    How else are the Jihadis going to get a head’s up about counter-terrorism tactics so they can come up with work-arounds?!
    Sheesh!
    /s

12. #12
    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:38 pm, Regulus said:

    What ever happened to “Never forget?”

    The donks and their minions will never forget … George W. Bush: The man of all seasons, and the enemy for all occasions.

    Were you expecting them to remember anything, or anyone else?

13. #13
    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:43 pm, Hangfire said:

    At least Neville Chamberlain had good intentions.

14. #14
    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:44 pm, Hangfire said:

    DHS = Quislings

15. #15
    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:47 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Sorry for repeating this from another post, but it is extremely on-topic and everyone needs to know the true history of Muslim terrorism against the USA:

    In 1784, Congress authorized American diplomats John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson to negotiate with the Muslim terrorists. [18] Negotiations proceeded, and in 1786, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson candidly asked the Ambassador from Tripoli the motivation behind their unprovoked attacks against Americans. What was the response?

    The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the laws of their Prophet [Mohammed] – that it was written in their Koran that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners; that is was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners; and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise. [19]

    Would to Heaven we had a navy able to reform those enemies to mankind – or crush them into non-existence.

    - George Washington, Writings, Vol. 28, p. 521, to Marquis de Lafayette, August 15, 1786.

16. #16
    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:49 pm, regularguy said:

    Just more evidence this administration hasn’t a clue about the sophisticated, dedicated nature of our enemies. These muslims are not common criminals needing rehabilitation, they are soldiers to their cause every bit as dedicated as our soldiers are to ours, and “recidivist” every bit as much as we expect our soldiers to be should they escape their captors. There is nothing difficult to imagine about our enemies doing the same–this is warfare. The Muslim Brotherhood purposely has issued marching orders to its members to create other front organizations dedicated to undermining our cause while maintaining a “moderate” cover. The only parties with any understanding of the nature of our enemies are our common soldiers having to endure p.c. ROE’s as they face deadly fanatics. Otherwise, we suffer rank amateurs in charge completely unprepared to fight this cultural war. Bring on the political bloodbath in 2010 and 2012.

17. #17
    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:52 pm, RTater said:

    Islam has never kept its intentions secret. But the truth is too terrifying for some.

    http://drybonesblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/non-believers.html

18. #18
    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:57 pm, Darwin Akbar said:

    It should be no surprise Janet Incompetano wants to follow the British model of “addressing” terrorism. Like her British counterparts, she sees Michael Savage and his listeners as bigger threats than Islamist Muslims and would gladly deport him and those other pesky “right wing extremists” if she could.

    “Pay no attention to that heavily armed, bearded man behind the curtain.”

19. #19
    On February 17th, 2010 at 5:07 pm, spaceycakes said:

    And why is anyone surprised that the media is all over Israel about supposed hit-gangs.

    Duh.

20. #20
    On February 17th, 2010 at 5:15 pm, ronfromhollywood said:

    Janet knows Muslims are allowed to decieve to further Islam right? She knows that doctrine right?

21. #21
    On February 17th, 2010 at 5:22 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    After a little more than a year of the Obama administration it is patently obvious that Amy Bishop is far more rational than any member of the Obama administration and may in fact be representative of the mental state of the average Obama supporter.

    It is time to arm ourselves…

22. #22
    On February 17th, 2010 at 5:36 pm, Lindsay said:

    I’d like DHS to explain this incident:
    http://cbs5.com/national/Arlington.standoff.Kimberly.2.286710.html

    Which then led to this.

23. #23
    On February 17th, 2010 at 5:38 pm, Lindsay said:

    Sorry about second link.

    Please Google: Kimberly “Asma” Al-Homsi

24. #24
    On February 17th, 2010 at 5:46 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Time-a-go, Nappy Jan…

    Time-a-go…

25. #25
    On February 17th, 2010 at 6:41 pm, letget said:

    The sign at our front door window reads,
    I will not surrender. If these rop type in our wh thinks they can make our home go under these flop our heads off, you got another thing to put in your less than

26. #26
    On February 17th, 2010 at 6:46 pm, letget said:

    letget6/41
    WOW, did I not read before sending! I was so bent out of shape, I need to chill a bit! Sorry to all on the last post. These people make me go beyond what is normal in our Republic.
    L

27. #27
    On February 17th, 2010 at 7:02 pm, 24Klady said:

    It’s becoming harder by the day to pass off any of these gigantic failures to incompetence. I can no longer say it’s because they are a new and untried group that is simply just trying to get along and make the world a better place. No, this is deliberate and well thought out. Our economy is in the toilet, our standing in the western world is at all time lows, we owe our very souls to the company store – China. Tax, tax, put more on the welfare and unemployment rolls while patting ourselves on the back.

28. #28
    On February 17th, 2010 at 7:03 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    The only danger Nappy sees comes from “right-wing extremists” who want the Constitution followed.

    How dare they!

    The Brits are one of the WORST examples to follow, unless your intent is to surrender your country….. oh, wait….

29. #29
    On February 17th, 2010 at 7:04 pm, 24Klady said:

    Failed to add: cozy up to those that would defeat us politically, monetarily, and religiously.

30. #30
    On February 17th, 2010 at 7:08 pm, 24Klady said:

    Never thought I’d say that Sarkozy is doing a better job than we are trying to put the threat of an ever growing menace back in the bottle. We invite them to sit down and chat over tea, and ask if any of them would like to instruct our soldiers at Ft. Hood in the glories of their faith. Oh, and throw in the FBI too.

31. #31
    On February 17th, 2010 at 7:34 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Lesbian Muslim Terrorists?

    It appears Al Qaeda has a strong diversity program in Texas.

    Does Osama know about this? Is this “Imam Approved?”

    My head is spinning…

32. #32
    On February 17th, 2010 at 8:05 pm, TanyaB said:

    Wasn’t it the Japanese that said not to atttack the United States, because there would be a gun behind every blade of grass? Keep that in mind, and stop anyone from trying to take away that freedom, or we stand more of a chance of becoming the U.K., as they can’t have guns there, and the Muslims are taking over. The unarmed become victims!!

33. #33
    On February 17th, 2010 at 8:13 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Although there is no evidence of an exchange of classified information, this meeting was the beginning of an Obama administration program aimed at devising a new information-sharing framework with the Muslim organizations — some of them regarded as extremist because of their ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. The group is to meet regularly with DHS senior aides and with Napolitano.

    Where they will engage in many happy hours of “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours” and “Let’s all sit naked in a circle and play Truth or Dare!”

34. #34
    On February 17th, 2010 at 8:18 pm, 24Klady said:

    And, I’ll be on the range Saturday morning seeing how my skills carried over the winter. Every blade of grass is correct.

35. #35
    On February 17th, 2010 at 8:51 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Slacker, I’m there every Sunday morning, at the church of John Moses Browning.

    The French seem to be waking up to the danger of losing their country, maybe too late….

36. #36
    On February 17th, 2010 at 9:04 pm, Republicanvet said:

    So the military suspends a Muslim from giving lectures to members of the military because of his ties to the Muslim Brotherhood among other things, yet Janack Obamitano is briefing them on Homeland Security issues.

    Is the system working Janet?

37. #37
    On February 17th, 2010 at 9:05 pm, Lindsay said:

    WarEagle, I hope you caught her photo on the newest link from last weekend in Dallas…a real charmer.

    Here is another link of the dynamic duo:
    http://sweetness-light.com/archive/muslim-women-suspected-of-surveying-love-field

    Al- Homsi has claimed a friendship with Wadih el Hage, a former Arlington resident and former personal secretary of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. He received a life sentence for his part in the 1998 US Embassy bombings. Perhaps she is a jihadi wannabe, but why was she caught and then set free?

    Nothin’ to see here. Carry on.

38. #38
    On February 17th, 2010 at 9:15 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On February 17th, 2010 at 7:02 pm, 24Klady said:

    It’s becoming harder by the day to pass off any of these gigantic failures to incompetence. I can no longer say it’s because they are a new and untried group that is simply just trying to get along and make the world a better place. No, this is deliberate and well thought out. Our economy is in the toilet, our standing in the western world is at all time lows, we owe our very souls to the company store – China. Tax, tax, put more on the welfare and unemployment rolls while patting ourselves on the back.

    Remember how the economy tanked after 911?

    Imagine what it will be like when we get whacked again because of these incompetent nitwits.

39. #39
    On February 17th, 2010 at 10:19 pm, jangar said:

    It appears to me that the Obama administration plans on outdoing decades of previous piss-pour democrat policies in the span of less than one term.

    Clinton looked the other way for his 8 years, and we got 9/11.

    Bush spent 8 years cleaning up the mess, and establishing policies and procedures to protect the American citizens and interests.

    Obama is hell-bent on not only rolling back the clock, but making sure that many more Muslims are in their right places in society so that we can really get the $h!t knocked out of us on the next attack.

    We can harp on J-No all we want, but it boils down to the desires of her boss.

    Must be a brotherhood thing, and we don’t understand it.

40. #40
    On February 17th, 2010 at 10:23 pm, tbear44 said:

    The program requires bringing in Muslim groups as “partners” in a two-way information sharing program.

    Wonderful.

41. #41
    On February 17th, 2010 at 10:29 pm, jangar said:

    When do we say “enough” ?

    We already know “when”…the question should be “how”.

42. #42
    On February 17th, 2010 at 10:31 pm, jangar said:

    The program requires bringing in Muslim groups as “partners” in a two-way information sharing program.

    “We tell you our secrets, and you promise not hurt us very badly.”

43. #43
    On February 17th, 2010 at 10:33 pm, sbw999 said:

    Although Matthew Chandler, deputy press secretary and spokesman for Secretary Napolitano, refused to comment on the meetings or identify the groups that attended the two-day session,

    Does anyone else not find this statement ominous??? Dangerous?

44. #44
    On February 17th, 2010 at 10:53 pm, jangar said:

    sbw999 -

    Probably CAIR, Hamas and a few radical Imams.

45. #45
    On February 17th, 2010 at 10:57 pm, sbw999 said:

    On February 17th, 2010 at 10:53 pm, jangar said:

    sbw999 -

    Probably CAIR, Hamas and a few radical Imams.

    Part of the Obama constituency no doubt. This administration is INSANE. Our Country has gone INSANE.

46. #46
    On February 17th, 2010 at 10:58 pm, jangar said:

    regularguy said:

    Just more evidence this administration hasn’t a clue about the sophisticated, dedicated nature of our enemies.

    I bet to differ. They (Obama) know all too well the Islamic enemy, and share a lot of commonality.

    You can take that to the bank.

47. #47
    On February 17th, 2010 at 11:00 pm, jangar said:

    Our Country has gone INSANE.

    Voters got dupped in 2008. And this administration is an infiltration of the enemy we’ve been fighting for many moons…on many issues, and many fronts.

48. #48
    On February 17th, 2010 at 11:07 pm, tbear44 said:

    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:09 pm, TooMuchTime said:
    When is Napolitano going to meet with American citizens and tell us the truth of how she’s going to protect us?

    She has no problem meeting with Muslims but the rest of us are just S.O.L.

49. #49
    On February 17th, 2010 at 11:12 pm, regularguy said:

    I bet to differ. They (Obama) know all too well the Islamic enemy, and share a lot of commonality.

    You can take that to the bank.

    I see your point and agree that the left and radical left often work hand-in-hand against us, whether or not they actually collude, but I think the left vastly underestimate radical islamists and their dedication to our common demise.

50. #50
    On February 17th, 2010 at 11:13 pm, jangar said:

    IF only a few more people start to pay attention to what this current administration and congressional Democrats have been doing for the last 3 years, then the following 2 election cycles might prove to be what moves mountains.

    If not… we’re VERY screwed.

51. #51
    On February 17th, 2010 at 11:16 pm, tbear44 said:

    Pretty hard to call Obowma on anything when he never holds a press conference.

52. #52
    On February 18th, 2010 at 9:56 am, misterbee241 said:

    Nothing like bringing the enemy in on your strategy sessions. Can you see Field Marshall Rommel sitting down in a session with Patton and Montgomery. this is the same thing.

53. #53
    On February 18th, 2010 at 10:32 am, Insomniac said:

    On February 17th, 2010 at 7:34 pm, WarEagle82 said:
    Lesbian Muslim Terrorists?

    Only in America would this not be the title of an exploitation flick.

54. #54
    On February 18th, 2010 at 12:29 pm, Laree said:

    It looks like the ACLU is the one in charge of screening at Airports.

    This is unreal they think it’s up to them to decide protocol for who get’s screened. If someone test positive for explosives they expect them to be treated “RESPECTFULLY”

55. #55
    On February 18th, 2010 at 6:07 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On February 17th, 2010 at 4:08 pm, thejim said:

    Scary, isn’t it!? America’s enemy occupies the White House.

    Not just in the White House. As Commander-in-Chief, Obama has access to every every miltitary and national security secret of this country.

    Instead of being in jail where he belongs, Bill Ayers has his protégé usurping the most powerful position in our government.

    Ayers used to attack our government from the outside. Now he is doing so from the inside.

56. #56
    On February 19th, 2010 at 1:59 pm, Lockstein13 said:

    This is another nice “encapsulation”
    of the Dhimmitude of the Administration:

    http://bigjournalism.com/mwalsh/2010/02/19/flashback-to-the-1930s-has-the-enemy-within-returned/