Cool post, I really enjoyed reading it. I will check out your site for some more content on this subject….

Imagine a day when WALMART is shuttered because there is no food to sell because banks didn’t loan money to farmers to grow it, and $6 gas would make trucking it in cost prohibitive anyway…..

SOoooooooooo….enter a father trying to feed his starving kids, but….OOOOOPS! Law dawg says NO FISHING!

HUNGRY CITIZENS WILL BE FORCED INTO BREAD LINES with the First Lady handing out soy burgers and “mushroom risotto” at the Washington DC homeless shelter….

HUNGER + FEAR = SUBJECTS, not citizens

This throw away regulation has much, MUCH DEEPER implications.

On March 10th, 2010 at 4:47 pm, swmntman said:

Just making sure… in as tactful a way as possible :blushes:

On March 10th, 2010 at 9:26 am, happy2behere said: #84

Ooooh “bears are not fish…” Thanks zzygy, we didn’ know!

(Hint zzygy: sometimes a thread is started because it’s fun to speculate and the posters know its speculation but its fun to play along.)

Maybe you knew, but the author of the exceprt is suggesting the agenda used to deal with bears is the same agenda used to deal with fish. Not to mention, the bears in the excerpt are in Canada, and the fish are in the US.

“Fun to play along.”

I suppose, but when does the truth become important? People are saying things (making conclusions) based on speculation (guesses).

When do facts matter? Why spin yourself into a tizzy based on misinformation (not reading the actual report or seeing the referenced agendas)?

Moreover, individual States have greater oversight with regard to fishing and hunting. States and municipalities have more rules and regulations concerning time (when), weight, licensing and size of what you hunt or fish.

Lastly, you would do well to speak for yourself and not to the motives of other posters and why they do what they do. They are an independant lot and can speak for themselves.

Me, not so big on having ‘climate change’ mentioned, but knowledge is power, and speculating to reach conclusions is lunacy.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/09_17_09_Interim_Report_of_Task_Force_FINAL2.pdf

OH, and the bottomline line is that President Obama is not having a ‘war on fishing’. Though you might want to check your home State’s laws which do far more to circumvent your fishing activities.

All the fishermen staying in bed and conjoogaling with the little woman.

Lots on new future taxpayers!

On March 10th, 2010 at 11:48 am, swmntman said:

On March 9th, 2010 at 6:16 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
Great! Now I wont have to get up early on Saturdays!I can stay in bed and conjoogal with the little woman!

Ok, I’ll admit it — I looked up the word conjoogal. Cheddar, can you please supply a definition (I wanna make sure it is legal in Colorado before I stop fishing).

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/conjugal

On March 9th, 2010 at 7:01 pm, Lucifer Jones said:

OMG! How much more anti-American can you get?! Pretty soon apple pie will be outlawed!
Aaaargh!!!

Well, he’s already got Chevrolet locked up, Madame Obama is going after hot dogs, so yes I suspect baseball and apple pie will be next.

On March 9th, 2010 at 6:16 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
Great! Now I wont have to get up early on Saturdays!I can stay in bed and conjoogal with the little woman!

Ok, I’ll admit it — I looked up the word conjoogal. Cheddar, can you please supply a definition (I wanna make sure it is legal in Colorado before I stop fishing).

On March 10th, 2010 at 11:32 am, Ty85719 said:

The farmland he wants to take over in Utah (by the way the feds already have taken 57% of land in Utah)is rich in crude oil so all of the lease owned by Exxon and others are null and void. This guy is on a one way destruction tour of the US!

However, moves like these are nothing short of political power plays – it is all about CONTROL.

On this note, Obama’s administration is also drafting a bill to take over millions of acres of farmland – I hope someone can investigate this further, as well