<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s anti-fraud gimmick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dutchcedar</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902608</link>
		<dc:creator>dutchcedar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902608</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The federal government estimates that it made $98 billion in improper payments last year. The audits are on pace to find $1 billion over the next three years, and the White House said more aggressive use of them could double that to $2 billion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Did I read this correctly?  We&#039;re to be impressed that they know about $98 billion lost in a year and can find $2 billion in three years?  2/3 of a percent of the money?

Hey, if you or I misspent a hundred bucks a year, it wouldn&#039;t take us three years to find two of those bucks.

This stuff makes my head spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The federal government estimates that it made $98 billion in improper payments last year. The audits are on pace to find $1 billion over the next three years, and the White House said more aggressive use of them could double that to $2 billion.</p></blockquote>
<p>Did I read this correctly?  We&#8217;re to be impressed that they know about $98 billion lost in a year and can find $2 billion in three years?  2/3 of a percent of the money?</p>
<p>Hey, if you or I misspent a hundred bucks a year, it wouldn&#8217;t take us three years to find two of those bucks.</p>
<p>This stuff makes my head spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Links To Visit &#8211; 03/10/10 NoisyRoom.net: There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword, the other is by debt. John Adams</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902434</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Links To Visit &#8211; 03/10/10 NoisyRoom.net: There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword, the other is by debt. John Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902434</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin &#8211; Obama’s anti-fraud gimmick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin &#8211; Obama’s anti-fraud gimmick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FirstSkirt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902330</link>
		<dc:creator>FirstSkirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902330</guid>
		<description>Like many have already said here, this is all a scam to make Obeyme look like he gives a damn about fraud, waste and abuse.  We need to place the blame exactly where it belongs: on every single congressional rep and the bureaucrats who love them. They all have to go in the next election or we will never be able to start the clean up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many have already said here, this is all a scam to make Obeyme look like he gives a damn about fraud, waste and abuse.  We need to place the blame exactly where it belongs: on every single congressional rep and the bureaucrats who love them. They all have to go in the next election or we will never be able to start the clean up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prendad</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902326</link>
		<dc:creator>prendad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902326</guid>
		<description>The Obama-Borg is out of control.  Resistance is futile.  He is trying to assimilate everything.
1. Banks
2. Unions
3. Car companies
4. Healthcare
5. Your children
and finally. . .
6. YOU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama-Borg is out of control.  Resistance is futile.  He is trying to assimilate everything.<br />
1. Banks<br />
2. Unions<br />
3. Car companies<br />
4. Healthcare<br />
5. Your children<br />
and finally. . .<br />
6. YOU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beenthere</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902315</link>
		<dc:creator>beenthere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902315</guid>
		<description>So who will be the &quot;Detect fraudulent payments to health-care and other federal contractors&quot; czar?  We know it will be someone carefully trained to look the other way should something surface that would embarrass a FOO (Friend Of Obama).  Surely there must be many who are qualified.

I know there have been a lot of jokes on this but we are the one&#039;s in the shower who have dropped the soap.  The FOOs are the one&#039;s ready and eager to have their way.  This is looking really, really bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who will be the &#8220;Detect fraudulent payments to health-care and other federal contractors&#8221; czar?  We know it will be someone carefully trained to look the other way should something surface that would embarrass a FOO (Friend Of Obama).  Surely there must be many who are qualified.</p>
<p>I know there have been a lot of jokes on this but we are the one&#8217;s in the shower who have dropped the soap.  The FOOs are the one&#8217;s ready and eager to have their way.  This is looking really, really bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Passage of ObamaCare now far from assured; Pelosi determination? reduced to &#8216;hopeful&#8217; &#171; VotingFemale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902313</link>
		<dc:creator>Passage of ObamaCare now far from assured; Pelosi determination? reduced to &#8216;hopeful&#8217; &#171; VotingFemale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902313</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin: Adam Kokesh: An anti-war smear merchant in “Republican” clothing  and  Obama’s anti-fraud gimmick and The House Ethics Committee is a corruption-enabling cesspool and  Obamacare Road Show, Pt. II: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin: Adam Kokesh: An anti-war smear merchant in “Republican” clothing  and  Obama’s anti-fraud gimmick and The House Ethics Committee is a corruption-enabling cesspool and  Obamacare Road Show, Pt. II: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter Alarius</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902306</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter Alarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902306</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The federal government estimates that it made $98 billion in improper payments last year. The audits are on pace to find $1 billion over the next three years...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Wow, recover a whole 1/3 of 1 percent per year!  Yay.  Maybe they&#039;re hiring the wrong auditors.  What&#039;s the cost of the program vs. what is recovered?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The federal government estimates that it made $98 billion in improper payments last year. The audits are on pace to find $1 billion over the next three years&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, recover a whole 1/3 of 1 percent per year!  Yay.  Maybe they&#8217;re hiring the wrong auditors.  What&#8217;s the cost of the program vs. what is recovered?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogue Cheddar</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902273</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue Cheddar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902273</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The federal government estimates that it made $98 billion in improper payments last year. The audits are on pace to find $1 billion over the next three years, and the White House said more aggressive use of them could double that to $2 billion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Okay, where&#039;d the rest of 96 billion go? These poinyoins could screw up a free lunch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The federal government estimates that it made $98 billion in improper payments last year. The audits are on pace to find $1 billion over the next three years, and the White House said more aggressive use of them could double that to $2 billion.</p></blockquote>
<p>Okay, where&#8217;d the rest of 96 billion go? These poinyoins could screw up a free lunch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeakEasy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902239</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeakEasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902239</guid>
		<description>Speaking of fraud, Mr. President, how about an audit on this Geithner guy, his friends and the Federal reserve...........?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of fraud, Mr. President, how about an audit on this Geithner guy, his friends and the Federal reserve&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbarry</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902238</link>
		<dc:creator>nbarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902238</guid>
		<description>State attorney-general&#039;s offices want only cases that make them look good? I&#039;m shocked, shocked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State attorney-general&#8217;s offices want only cases that make them look good? I&#8217;m shocked, shocked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GladzKravtz</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902237</link>
		<dc:creator>GladzKravtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902237</guid>
		<description>And during their efforts, if fraud and waste &lt;strong&gt;continue to rise&lt;/strong&gt;, they can create another measurement: 
&lt;em&gt;The amount of money saved had there been fraud&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And during their efforts, if fraud and waste <strong>continue to rise</strong>, they can create another measurement:<br />
<em>The amount of money saved had there been fraud</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mostly Annoyed</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902235</link>
		<dc:creator>Mostly Annoyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902235</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 10th, 2010 at 11:29 am, Popeye3 said: 
UNBELIEVABLE!!! The government has been fighting Waste, Fraud, and Abuse for over 30 years, atleast. How many times can we visit that well, and why haven’t we made this fight more efficient. 98 billion in immproper payments last year is both frightening and discouraging.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not unbelievable, it&#039;s the government.  If it&#039;s being done right, it&#039;s not being done by the government!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 10th, 2010 at 11:29 am, Popeye3 said:<br />
UNBELIEVABLE!!! The government has been fighting Waste, Fraud, and Abuse for over 30 years, atleast. How many times can we visit that well, and why haven’t we made this fight more efficient. 98 billion in immproper payments last year is both frightening and discouraging.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not unbelievable, it&#8217;s the government.  If it&#8217;s being done right, it&#8217;s not being done by the government!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesertLover</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902228</link>
		<dc:creator>DesertLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902228</guid>
		<description>ThatSamIAm ... Thanks ...

See my comment (#11) ...

I think you just validated the story I passed on from one of my employees and his experience with trying to report what was considered &quot;too small&quot; an incident of fraud and abuse for the government to do anything about ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ThatSamIAm &#8230; Thanks &#8230;</p>
<p>See my comment (#11) &#8230;</p>
<p>I think you just validated the story I passed on from one of my employees and his experience with trying to report what was considered &#8220;too small&#8221; an incident of fraud and abuse for the government to do anything about &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: battleaxe</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902227</link>
		<dc:creator>battleaxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902227</guid>
		<description>Can he extend it to malpractice lawyer fees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can he extend it to malpractice lawyer fees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatSamIAm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/10/obamas-anti-fraud-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-902226</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatSamIAm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44907#comment-902226</guid>
		<description>I worked as a Medicare Fraud Investigator.  Here&#039;s what people don&#039;t know.  

1. The government contracts those evil insurance companies to do Medicare. 
2. The evil insurance companies had to bid to be eligible to get the work and as you probably guessed, lowest bidders win.  If one company will process the millions and millions of claims for 5 cents and another for 4 cents a claim you know who wins.
3. Once an evil insurance company gets the work they must agree to follow and endless river of government regulations on timeliness and quality with countless audits and most importantly it all must be done at or under the agreed budget.  Failure to meet these constantly changing requirements means you can lose your contract.
4. As for fraud investigaiton these companies are given, by the government, X amount of money to have a fraud and abuse department. Do you think it&#039;s given a lot of money? Nope.  But these companies still manage to save or get back $10 - $15 dollars for every dollar budgeted to this department by the government.  But the government doesn&#039;t take it seriously enough to really build and invest in these departments.  
5.  The fraud and abuse departments gather the facts, identify the fraud or abuse and once they have the information they don&#039;t just get to go take it back.  If it is significant they MUST work with the state DOJ to see if they want to pursue it.  You think they want every case?  Nope.  They only want the big bucks and the news worthy cases that make them look good.  And do you think those big buck cases all get completed?  Not every time.  If the DOJ doesn&#039;t have the resources or time they dump it.  If they think it&#039;s too tough to prove it gets dropped.  They leave it to the small little fraud and abuse department of the evil insurance company to get back whatever money they can.  No criminal charges.  No felony convictions.  Just get back as much money as you can.  

To the point.  The government has looked the other way at healthcare fraud and abuse for a long long time and now that it is politically convenient for their agenda they want to talk tough.  Bull crap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked as a Medicare Fraud Investigator.  Here&#8217;s what people don&#8217;t know.  </p>
<p>1. The government contracts those evil insurance companies to do Medicare.<br />
2. The evil insurance companies had to bid to be eligible to get the work and as you probably guessed, lowest bidders win.  If one company will process the millions and millions of claims for 5 cents and another for 4 cents a claim you know who wins.<br />
3. Once an evil insurance company gets the work they must agree to follow and endless river of government regulations on timeliness and quality with countless audits and most importantly it all must be done at or under the agreed budget.  Failure to meet these constantly changing requirements means you can lose your contract.<br />
4. As for fraud investigaiton these companies are given, by the government, X amount of money to have a fraud and abuse department. Do you think it&#8217;s given a lot of money? Nope.  But these companies still manage to save or get back $10 &#8211; $15 dollars for every dollar budgeted to this department by the government.  But the government doesn&#8217;t take it seriously enough to really build and invest in these departments.<br />
5.  The fraud and abuse departments gather the facts, identify the fraud or abuse and once they have the information they don&#8217;t just get to go take it back.  If it is significant they MUST work with the state DOJ to see if they want to pursue it.  You think they want every case?  Nope.  They only want the big bucks and the news worthy cases that make them look good.  And do you think those big buck cases all get completed?  Not every time.  If the DOJ doesn&#8217;t have the resources or time they dump it.  If they think it&#8217;s too tough to prove it gets dropped.  They leave it to the small little fraud and abuse department of the evil insurance company to get back whatever money they can.  No criminal charges.  No felony convictions.  Just get back as much money as you can.  </p>
<p>To the point.  The government has looked the other way at healthcare fraud and abuse for a long long time and now that it is politically convenient for their agenda they want to talk tough.  Bull crap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

